AI Skill Hub 推荐使用:AI-Rig 是一款优质的Claude技能。AI 综合评分 7.5 分,在同类工具中表现稳健。如果你正在寻找可靠的Claude技能解决方案,这是一个值得深入了解的选择。
AI-Rig是一组个人AI编码助手配置,专家代理,提供CLAUDESkill的开源集合,帮助开发者提高编码效率和智能化。
AI-Rig 是一款基于 Python 开发的开源工具,专注于 claude_skill、ai-agents、claude-agents 等核心功能。作为 GitHub 开源项目,它拥有活跃的社区支持和持续的版本迭代,代码完全透明可审计,支持本地部署以保护数据隐私。无论是个人使用还是集成到企业工作流,都能提供稳定可靠的解决方案。
AI-Rig是一组个人AI编码助手配置,专家代理,提供CLAUDESkill的开源集合,帮助开发者提高编码效率和智能化。
AI-Rig 是一款基于 Python 开发的开源工具,专注于 claude_skill、ai-agents、claude-agents 等核心功能。作为 GitHub 开源项目,它拥有活跃的社区支持和持续的版本迭代,代码完全透明可审计,支持本地部署以保护数据隐私。无论是个人使用还是集成到企业工作流,都能提供稳定可靠的解决方案。
# 方式一:pip 安装(推荐)
pip install ai-rig
# 方式二:虚拟环境安装(推荐生产环境)
python -m venv .venv
source .venv/bin/activate # Windows: .venv\Scripts\activate
pip install ai-rig
# 方式三:从源码安装(获取最新功能)
git clone https://github.com/Borda/AI-Rig
cd AI-Rig
pip install -e .
# 验证安装
python -c "import ai_rig; print('安装成功')"
# 命令行使用
ai-rig --help
# 基本用法
ai-rig input_file -o output_file
# Python 代码中调用
import ai_rig
# 示例
result = ai_rig.process("input")
print(result)
# ai-rig 配置文件示例(config.yml) app: name: "ai-rig" debug: false log_level: "INFO" # 运行时指定配置文件 ai-rig --config config.yml # 或通过环境变量配置 export AI_RIG_API_KEY="your-key" export AI_RIG_OUTPUT_DIR="./output"
Specialist-agent infrastructure for Python/ML OSS — the scaffolding that lets you maintain at scale without becoming a full-time reviewer.
14 specialist agents · 20+ slash-command workflows · 5 domain plugins — opinionated Claude Code + Codex CLI configuration for Python/ML OSS maintainers, version-controlled and self-calibrating.
<details> <summary><strong>Contents</strong></summary>
</details>
<details> <summary><strong>Repository layout</strong></summary>
AI-Rig/
├── plugins/
│ ├── foundry/ # Base plugin: agents, hooks, audit/manage/calibrate/brainstorm/…
│ │ ├── .claude-plugin/
│ │ │ └── plugin.json # plugin manifest
│ │ ├── agents/ # 10 foundry agents (canonical source)
│ │ ├── skills/ # foundry skills (canonical source)
│ │ ├── rules/ # rule files (canonical source; symlinked from .claude/rules/)
│ │ ├── CLAUDE.md # workflow rules (symlinked from .claude/CLAUDE.md)
│ │ ├── TEAM_PROTOCOL.md # AgentSpeak v2 protocol (symlinked from .claude/TEAM_PROTOCOL.md)
│ │ ├── permissions-guide.md # allow-entry reference (symlinked from .claude/permissions-guide.md)
│ │ └── hooks/
│ │ └── hooks.json # task tracking, quality gates, preprocessing
│ ├── oss/ # OSS plugin: shepherd, cicd-steward + analyse/review/resolve/release (+ internal: gh-scraper, repo-warden)
│ ├── develop/ # Develop plugin: feature/fix/refactor/plan/debug
│ ├── research/ # Research plugin: scientist, data-steward + topic/plan/judge/run/sweep
│ └── codemap/ # codemap plugin: structural index, blast-radius scores, import graph
├── .claude/ # Claude Code source of truth
│ ├── README.md # full reference: restore, skills, rules, hooks, architecture (real file)
│ ├── CLAUDE.md # workflow rules and core principles (symlink → plugins/foundry/)
│ ├── TEAM_PROTOCOL.md # AgentSpeak v2 inter-agent protocol (symlink → plugins/foundry/)
│ ├── permissions-guide.md # allow-entry reference (symlink → plugins/foundry/)
│ ├── settings.json # deny list + project preferences (real file)
│ ├── agents/ # symlinks → plugins/foundry/agents/
│ ├── skills/ # symlinks → plugins/foundry/skills/
│ ├── rules/ # per-topic coding and config standards (symlinks → plugins/foundry/rules/)
│ └── hooks/ # symlinks → plugins/foundry/hooks/
├── .mcp.json # MCP server definitions
├── .codex/ # OpenAI Codex CLI source of truth
│ ├── README.md # full reference: agents, profiles, Claude integration
│ ├── AGENTS.md # global instructions and subagent spawn rules
│ ├── config.toml # multi-agent config (gpt-5.5 baseline)
│ ├── agents/ # per-agent model and instruction overrides
│ ├── calibration/ # self-calibration harness + fixed task set
│ └── skills/ # codex-native workflow skills
├── .pre-commit-config.yaml
├── .gitignore
└── README.md
</details>
Things not possible with vanilla Claude Code:
/oss:review fans six specialist agents — architecture, tests, perf, docs, lint, security — plus an independent Codex pre-pass, all running simultaneously. The consolidator flags every finding that two or more reviewers independently raised. You see both per-dimension analysis and the overlap, in one report./develop:feature requires a failing demo test to exist and pass review before a single line of production code is written. The gate is structural — the workflow does not proceed to implementation without it./research:run proposes a change, applies it, measures the target metric, and automatically reverts if the metric regresses — then tries the next hypothesis. The loop runs unattended; you set the goal and the guard, and review the committed result./foundry:calibrate generates synthetic problems, scores each agent's responses against ground truth, and computes the gap between stated confidence and actual recall. Agents that are systematically overconfident get concrete fix proposals — applied automatically with --apply.npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code
claude plugin install foundry@borda-ai-rig # base agents + audit, manage, calibrate, brainstorm, … claude plugin install oss@borda-ai-rig # OSS workflow: analyse, review, resolve, release claude plugin install develop@borda-ai-rig # development: feature, fix, refactor, plan, debug claude plugin install research@borda-ai-rig # ML research: topic, plan, judge, run, sweep claude plugin install codemap@borda-ai-rig # structural index: import graph, blast-radius scores
> [!NOTE]
>
> **Safe to install alongside any existing Claude Code setup.** Plugins live in a private cache (`~/.claude/plugins/cache/<plugin>/`) under their own namespace. Your existing `~/.claude/agents/`, `~/.claude/skills/`, and `settings.json` are never modified or overwritten — custom agents and skills you have created remain fully independent. See the [Claude Code plugin reference](https://code.claude.com/docs/en/plugins-reference) for details.
**3. One-time settings merge** — run inside Claude Code:
text /foundry:setup
OSS, develop, and research skills always use their plugin prefix (`/oss:review`, `/develop:fix`, `/research:run`). Safe to re-run.
> [!IMPORTANT]
>
> **Codex CLI** — optional companion; requires a local clone (`.codex/` config is not a plugin):
>
> bash > git clone https://github.com/Borda/AI-Rig Borda-AI-Rig > npm install -g @openai/codex > cp -r Borda-AI-Rig/.codex/ ~/.codex/ # Codex agents and profiles > ```
→ See Token Savings (RTK) for RTK install details.
npm install -g @openai/codex # install Codex CLI
cp -r Borda-AI-Rig/.codex/ ~/.codex/ # activate globally from the project source of truth
This repo's .codex/ directory is the source of truth; ~/.codex/ is a downstream copy. After pulling updates, re-apply: cp -r Borda-AI-Rig/.codex/ ~/.codex/ — or rsync -av to preserve local customizations.
git clone https://github.com/Borda/AI-Rig Borda-AI-Rig
claude --plugin-dir ./Borda-AI-Rig/plugins/foundry
claude plugin uninstall foundry
claude plugin uninstall oss
claude plugin uninstall develop
claude plugin uninstall research
claude plugin uninstall codemap
Settings added by /foundry:setup remain in ~/.claude/settings.json; remove manually if desired. If /foundry:setup was run, symlinks in ~/.claude/agents/ and ~/.claude/skills/ also persist and will be broken after uninstall — remove with rm ~/.claude/agents/<name>.md and rm -rf ~/.claude/skills/<name> for each.
______________________________________________________________________
```bash
Mirrored skills are prompt-based — not slash commands:
codex # interactive — auto-selects agents
codex "use the qa-specialist to review src/api/auth.py" # address agent by name
codex --profile deep-review "full security audit of src/api/" # activate a profile
run investigate on this branch and find root cause of failing CI
run investigate before fixing this failing pytest; do not suggest a workaround unless it is explicitly temporary
run resolve for the current working tree and fix high-severity findings
→ Deep reference — agents, profiles, adversarial review, mirrored skills, RTK integration: .codex/README.md
openai/codex-plugin-cc connects the Codex CLI to Claude Code as a local plugin — enabling the cross-validation, mechanical delegation, and diff pre-pass described in Claude + Codex Integration.
→ Install: /plugin marketplace add openai/codex-plugin-cc → /plugin install codex@openai-codex → /reload-plugins
[!NOTE] RTK only compresses Bash tool output — shell commands likegit,cargo,pytest, etc. It does not affect Claude Code's native tools (Read, Grep, Glob, Edit, Write), which run inside Claude's own engine and are already token-efficient by design.
A typical maintainer morning — 15 new issues, 3 PRs waiting, a release due:
```text
Skills chain naturally — the output of one becomes the input for the next.
<details> <summary><strong>Bug report → fix → validate</strong></summary>
/oss:analyse 42 # understand the issue, extract root cause hypotheses
/develop:fix 42 # reproduce with test, apply targeted fix
/oss:review # validate the fix meets quality standards
</details>
<details> <summary><strong>Code review → fix blocking issues</strong></summary>
/oss:review 55 # 7 agent dimensions + Codex co-review
/develop:fix "race condition in cache invalidation" # fix blocking issue from review
/oss:review 55 # re-review after fix
</details>
<details> <summary><strong>Fuzzy idea → spec → breakdown → implement</strong></summary>
```text /foundry:brainstorm "add caching layer to the data pipeline"
Claude and Codex complement each other — Claude handles long-horizon reasoning, orchestration, and judgment calls; Codex handles focused, mechanical in-repo coding tasks with direct shell access.
Every skill that reviews or validates code uses a three-tier pipeline:
git diff --stat gate)Cheaper tiers gate the expensive ones — this keeps full agent spawns reserved for diffs that actually need them. → Full architecture with skill-tier matrix: .claude/README.md → Tiered review pipeline
Why unbiased review matters / Real example: Claude makes targeted changes with intentionality — it has a mental model of which files are "in scope". Codex has no such context: it reads the diff and the codebase independently. During one session, Claude applied a docstring-style mandate across 6 files and scored its own confidence at 0.88. The Codex pre-pass then found skills/develop/modes/feature.md still referencing the old style — a direct miss. The union of both passes is more complete than either alone.
Claude identifies what needs to change and delegates execution to the plugin agent. Claude keeps its context clean and validates the output via git diff HEAD.
Dispatched automatically by /oss:review, /oss:resolve, /calibrate, and /research:run via codex-delegation.md. The plugin agent has full working-tree access.
After Claude stages changes, codex:review --wait serves as a second pass — examining the diff, applying review comments, or resolving PR conflicts. The /oss:resolve skill automates this: it resolves conflicts semantically (Claude) then applies review comments (plugin agent).
/oss:resolve 42 # Claude resolves conflicts → plugin agent applies review comments
/oss:resolve "rename the `fit` method to `train` throughout the module"
<details> <summary><strong>Setup requirement</strong></summary>
Install the Codex plugin in Claude Code:
/plugin marketplace add openai/codex-plugin-cc
/plugin install codex@openai-codex
/reload-plugins
Without the plugin: pre-pass review is skipped gracefully (skills check with claude plugin list | grep 'codex@openai-codex'); /oss:resolve's review-comment step is skipped (conflict resolution works with Claude alone).
</details>
| Capability | Vanilla Claude Code | Borda's AI-Rig |
|---|---|---|
| Code review | Generalist single pass | 6 specialists in parallel + Codex pre-pass; convergence callouts |
| Context flooding | Context fills up across long sessions | File-based handoff — agents write full output to disk, return compact envelopes |
| Confidence calibration | No mechanism | /foundry:calibrate benchmarks recall vs stated confidence; auto-apply fixes |
| Demo-test gate | Skippable | Structural gate — /develop:feature cannot proceed without passing demo test |
| ML experiment safety | Manual rollback | /research:run auto-reverts regressions; goal + guard are explicit inputs |
| Release discipline | Manual | SemVer-aware /oss:release with deprecation tracking, migration guide, readiness audit |
| Token efficiency | Default verbosity | RTK hook compresses Bash output 60–99%; caveman plugin cuts response tokens ~75% |
/foundry:brainstorm breakdown .plans/blueprint/2026-04-01-caching-layer.md
Borda 的 AI-Rig 是一个专家代理基础设施,用于 Python/ML 开源软件的维护。它提供了一个可以让您在大规模下维护软件而不必成为全职审查员的骨架。
AI-Rig 的功能包括:实现缓存层、并行多专家 PR 审查等。它还支持多个插件,包括 foundry、OSS、开发和研究等。
环境依赖与系统要求:
安装步骤:首先安装 Claude Code,接着安装所需的插件,例如 foundry、OSS、开发和研究等。
使用教程:使用 Codex CLI 可以交互地与 AI-Rig 进行通信,例如使用 QA 专家来审查代码等。
Codex CLI 插件:连接 Codex CLI 到 Claude Code,支持跨验证、机械委托和差异预检查等功能。
工作流 / 模块:AI-Rig 支持多种工作流和模块,例如 bug 报告、修复和验证等。
常见问题:包括关于 AI-Rig 的使用、插件安装和配置等问题的解答。
AI-Rig提供了一组CLAUDESkill的开源集合,帮助开发者提高编码效率和智能化,但需要注意的是,AI-Rig的质量和安全性需要进一步评估。
该工具未明确声明开源协议,商业使用前请联系原作者确认授权范围,避免侵权风险。
AI Skill Hub 为第三方内容聚合平台,本页面信息基于公开数据整理,不对工具功能和质量作任何法律背书。
建议在沙箱或测试环境中充分验证后,再部署至生产环境,并做好必要的安全评估。
总体来看,AI-Rig 是一款质量良好的Claude技能,在同类工具中具备一定竞争力。AI Skill Hub 将持续追踪其更新动态,建议收藏备用,结合自身场景选择合适时机引入使用。
| 原始名称 | AI-Rig |
| 原始描述 | 开源Claude技能:A collection of personal AI coding assistant configurations, specialist agents, 。⭐19 · Python |
| Topics | claude_skillai-agentsclaude-agentsclaude-codeclaude-skillscodexpython |
| GitHub | https://github.com/Borda/AI-Rig |
| 语言 | Python |
收录时间:2026-06-13 · 更新时间:2026-06-16 · License:未公布 · AI Skill Hub 不对第三方内容的准确性作法律背书。
选择 Agent 类型,复制安装指令后粘贴到对应客户端