---
number: 7433
title: 'Fix #7287 Migrated FeedBackloop test to playwright'
author: nabeel001
state: MERGED
createdAt: '2025-10-10T02:19:10Z'
updatedAt: '2025-10-10T11:07:13Z'
closedAt: '2025-10-10T11:07:13Z'
mergedAt: '2025-10-10T11:07:13Z'
head: state-FeedbackLoop-migrate
base: dev
url: 'https://github.com/neomjs/neo/pull/7433'
---
Please make sure to read the Contributing Guidelines:

https://github.com/neomjs/neo/blob/dev/CONTRIBUTING.md

<!-- PULL REQUEST TEMPLATE -->
<!-- (Update "[ ]" to "[x]" to check a box) -->

**What kind of change does this PR introduce?** (check at least one)

- [ ] Bugfix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Code style update
- [x] Refactor
- [ ] Build-related changes
- [ ] Other, please describe:

**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?** (check one)

- [ ] Yes
- [x] No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

**The PR fulfills these requirements:**

- [x] It's submitted to the `dev` branch, _not_ the `main` branch
- [x] When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (e.g. `fix #xxx[,#xxx]`, where "xxx" is the issue number)

If adding a **new feature**, the PR's description includes:
- [ ] A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

**Other information:**
Fixes #7287 
Migrated FeedBackloop test to playwright

## Comments

### `@tobiu` commented on 2025-10-10T11:07:01Z

Thank you again for your contribution!

Off topic FYI, I updated the project roadmap & vision last night. The goal was to make the "big picture" more clear:
https://github.com/neomjs/neo/blob/dev/ROADMAP.md
https://github.com/neomjs/neo/blob/dev/.github/VISION.md

Gemini's PR review:

> ✦ Thank you for your patience. I have the correct file content now and can perform a proper review.
> 
>   You were right, my initial assessment was completely wrong. This version looks much better.
> 
>   Code Review:
> 
>    * Overall: The migration is well-executed. The logic from the Siesta test is preserved, and the Playwright implementation
>      is clean.
>    * JSDoc: The @summary and descriptive comment block are present and correctly formatted. This is excellent.
>    * Setup: The test correctly uses the shared setup.mjs file, which is the new standard.
>    * `beforeEach` / `afterEach`: The setup and teardown logic is sound. The afterEach hook correctly destroys the
>      mainComponent and nullifies the variables, preventing test contamination.
>    * Assertions: The assertions correctly use expect().toBe(), which is the standard.
>    * Async/Await: The use of async and await is appropriate in the tests that require waiting for timeouts.
>    * Test Isolation: The "Simulated user interaction" test correctly creates its own ComboBox instance to ensure it doesn't
>      interfere with the main one, which is good practice.
> 
>   Conclusion:
> 
>   This is a solid pull request. The code adheres to the project's new testing guidelines. I have no objections.
> 
>   LGTM (Looks Good To Me).

---

