---
number: 7422
title: Polish the new Getting Started Guide
author: Mariam-Saeed
state: MERGED
createdAt: '2025-10-08T22:32:34Z'
updatedAt: '2025-10-09T11:10:43Z'
closedAt: '2025-10-09T11:06:12Z'
mergedAt: '2025-10-09T11:06:12Z'
head: Polish-the-new-Getting-Started-Guide
base: dev
url: 'https://github.com/neomjs/neo/pull/7422'
---
Please make sure to read the Contributing Guidelines:

https://github.com/neomjs/neo/blob/dev/CONTRIBUTING.md

<!-- PULL REQUEST TEMPLATE -->
<!-- (Update "[ ]" to "[x]" to check a box) -->

**What kind of change does this PR introduce?** (check at least one)

- [ ] Bugfix
- [ ] Feature
- [ ] Code style update
- [ ] Refactor
- [ ] Build-related changes
- [x] Other, please describe: Documentation

**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?** (check one)

- [ ] Yes
- [x] No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

**The PR fulfills these requirements:**
Resolves #7417

- [x] It's submitted to the `dev` branch, _not_ the `main` branch
- [x] When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (e.g. `fix #xxx[,#xxx]`, where "xxx" is the issue number)

If adding a **new feature**, the PR's description includes:
- [ ] A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

**Other information:**
Resolves #7417


## Comments

### `@tobiu` commented on 2025-10-09T11:10:43Z

Thx for your contribution!  Fun fact: Gemini had some hiccups with reading the diff (we really need to get the GH CLI epic done soon).

> ✦ Thank you. I have reviewed the final, correct version of the file. My initial assessment based on the corrupted diff was
>   completely wrong.
> 
>   Here is the review I should have posted for the pull request:
> 
>   ---
> 
>   Excellent work, and thank you for your contribution!
> 
>   I've reviewed the changes, and this looks great.
> 
>    - [x] The manual Table of Contents has been correctly removed.
>    - [x] All shell and JavaScript code blocks have been updated with the required readonly flag for the documentation
>      portal.
>    - [x] The entry in learn/tree.json is present.
> 
>   Everything aligns perfectly with the requirements in ticket #7417. This is ready to be merged. Great job

---

