---
number: 7383
title: 'feat: added workflow for agent to comment on PRs (Fix #7372)'
author: LemonDrop847
state: MERGED
createdAt: '2025-10-05T18:20:09Z'
updatedAt: '2025-10-05T18:43:31Z'
closedAt: '2025-10-05T18:41:47Z'
mergedAt: '2025-10-05T18:41:47Z'
head: dev
base: dev
url: 'https://github.com/neomjs/neo/pull/7383'
---
Please make sure to read the Contributing Guidelines:

https://github.com/neomjs/neo/blob/dev/CONTRIBUTING.md

Added workflow for agent to use github cli to add comments (Attempted fix for #7372)

**What kind of change does this PR introduce?** (check at least one)

- [ ] Bugfix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Code style update
- [ ] Refactor
- [ ] Build-related changes
- [ ] Other, please describe:

**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?** (check one)

- [ ] Yes
- [x] No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

**The PR fulfills these requirements:**

- [x] It's submitted to the `dev` branch, _not_ the `main` branch
- [x] When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (e.g. `fix #xxx[,#xxx]`, where "xxx" is the issue number)

If adding a **new feature**, the PR's description includes:
- [x] A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)


## Comments

### `@LemonDrop847` commented on 2025-10-05T18:20:36Z

up for review @tobiu 

---

### `@tobiu` commented on 2025-10-05T18:43:31Z

thx again! i am out of tokens for today, so i had a fallback switch to the gemini flash model. also manually looked into it (well done!)

gemini flash feedback:

> ✦ I have reviewed the pull request.
> 
>   PR Summary
> 
>   This pull request modifies AGENTS.md by adding a new section, "6.4. Adding Comments via GitHub 
>   CLI," which details how to use gh pr review for inline comments and gh issue comment for general 
>   feedback on pull requests. It also includes a minor wording correction in the "API Errors" 
>   description.
> 
>   Analysis
> 
>    * Ticket Fulfillment: The new section directly and completely fulfills all acceptance criteria for
>       ticket-agent-can-comment-on-pr.md. It clearly outlines the commands, provides examples, and 
>      includes best practices for commenting.
>    * Documentation Quality: The added content is clear, well-structured, and highly actionable. It 
>      effectively teaches me how to use the GitHub CLI for commenting, which is a crucial part of the 
>      PR review workflow.
>    * Dependencies: This is a documentation task. While the execution of these commands depends on the
>       gh CLI being installed and authenticated (Phase 1), and the logical sequence of reviewing a PR 
>      implies checking out and diffing first (other Phase 3 tickets), the documentation itself has no 
>      blockers and can be merged.
>    * Minor Change: The correction in the "API Errors" description is a small but positive cleanup.
> 
>   Recommendation
> 
>   Accept the PR.
> 
>   This is a high-quality contribution that fully implements the corresponding ticket and 
>   significantly enhances my operational guidelines for PR reviews.
> 
>   Regarding your question about Gemini Flash: This review task was well within my capabilities. I 
>   was able to analyze the text, understand the code snippets, and compare them against the 
>   acceptance criteria without any issues.

---

