---
number: 7375
title: 'chore: Add pull request review protocol to AGENTS.md (fix #7373)'
author: LemonDrop847
state: MERGED
createdAt: '2025-10-05T12:02:47Z'
updatedAt: '2025-10-05T18:03:17Z'
closedAt: '2025-10-05T18:01:44Z'
mergedAt: '2025-10-05T18:01:44Z'
head: dev
base: dev
url: 'https://github.com/neomjs/neo/pull/7375'
---
Please make sure to read the Contributing Guidelines:

https://github.com/neomjs/neo/blob/dev/CONTRIBUTING.md

Added a simple but detailed PR Review Protocol for the agent.

**What kind of change does this PR introduce?** (check at least one)

- [ ] Bugfix
- [x] Feature
- [ ] Code style update
- [ ] Refactor
- [ ] Build-related changes
- [ ] Other, please describe:

**Does this PR introduce a breaking change?** (check one)

- [ ] Yes
- [x] No

If yes, please describe the impact and migration path for existing applications:

**The PR fulfills these requirements:**

- [x] It's submitted to the `dev` branch, _not_ the `main` branch
- [x] When resolving a specific issue, it's referenced in the PR's title (e.g. `fix #xxx[,#xxx]`, where "xxx" is the issue number)

If adding a **new feature**, the PR's description includes:
- [ ] A convincing reason for adding this feature (to avoid wasting your time, it's best to open a suggestion issue first and wait for approval before working on it)

**Other information:**


## Comments

### `@LemonDrop847` commented on 2025-10-05T12:03:09Z

Requesting a review @tobiu 

---

### `@tobiu` commented on 2025-10-05T18:03:16Z

thx for the contribution! obviously gemini likes it:

> ✦ I have reviewed the pull request.
> 
>   PR Summary
> 
>   This pull request adds a new major section to the AGENTS.md file titled "Pull Request Review Protocol". This new protocol outlines:
>    * General guidelines on the tone of feedback.
>    * Specific verification steps, including checking against coding guidelines and running tests.
>    * A standard format for structuring review comments.
> 
>   Analysis
> 
>    * Ticket Fulfillment: This PR perfectly and completely fulfills all acceptance criteria for the 
>      ticket ticket-define-pr-review-protocol-for-agent.md.
>    * Quality: The documentation is excellent. It is clear, well-structured, and provides specific, 
>      actionable instructions that will improve the quality and consistency of my future PR reviews.
>    * Dependencies: This is a documentation change. While it is part of the larger "PR Review" 
>      workflow in Phase 3, it has no hard dependencies and can be merged independently. Defining the 
>      protocol before the implementation is a logical step.
> 
>   Recommendation
> 
>   Accept the PR.
> 
>   This is a high-quality contribution that directly implements the corresponding ticket and enhances
>    my operational guidelines.

---

