# F10.2 Devil's Advocate Review — 杂项 Batch (0 cards)

## Challenge: Are we being too aggressive in skipping?

### Hard Questions

1. **金句 could be card seeds?** — e.g., "所有的牛逼，都是用苦逼换来的" (typical example). Counter: Zettelkasten cards need *reasoning chains*, not bumper stickers. A quote without analysis of *why* it's true or *when* it fails is not a card. **Verdict: skip is correct.**

2. **知识总结 has technical content — shouldn't those be preserved?** — OpenAI plugin architecture, vector DB comparisons. Counter: these are factual snapshots from 2023 that are now outdated. The agent's existing cards ([[ai-value-chain-smile-curve]], [[agent-protocol-over-framework]]) already capture the *strategic* insights from this era at a higher level. Factual summaries date; insights don't. **Verdict: skip is correct.**

3. **Are we suffering from diminishing returns bias?** — After processing 540+ memos and writing 25 cards, is the curator's threshold drifting upward? Counter: the quality of the last few batches' cards (F8.1 local-pricing-anchor, F9.1 saas-product-vs-halfproduct) shows the bar hasn't changed — those cards are just as atomic and insightful as F1.1's cards. The 杂项 batch genuinely has lower signal density. **Verdict: no drift detected.**

4. **English memos — any language learning *meta-insight*?** — Occasionally language study notes contain observations about communication patterns. Reviewed: these are pure vocabulary lists (idioms, phrases). No meta-insight. **Verdict: skip is correct.**

## Finding

🔵 All 34 skip decisions are justified. The 100% skip rate reflects the batch content, not reviewer fatigue.

## Verdict: PASS
