# F11.2 Devil's Advocate — Final Verification

## Challenge: Did we leave value on the table?

### 1. Skip rate too aggressive?
575 memos → 31 cards = 94.6% skip rate. Is this too aggressive?

**Counter:** The flomo export contains:
- ~200 one-liners, quotes, vocabulary lists (zero insight value)
- ~100 fiction/personal/child-education notes (not transferable knowledge)
- ~150 factual snapshots (OpenAI plugins 2023, financial terms) now outdated
- ~125 substantive memos → 31 cards

31/125 = 24.8% conversion from substantive memos. That's reasonable — many "substantive" memos overlap or are too thin for atomic cards.

**Verdict: skip rate is honest, not aggressive.**

### 2. Cross-linking adequate?
40+ wikilinks across 31 cards. Average ~1.3 links per card. Many link into existing non-flomo cards (figma-product-distribution-fit, ai-value-chain-smile-curve, etc.) which is good — the flomo cards mesh into the existing knowledge graph rather than forming an isolated island.

**Finding: 🔵 Linking is adequate. Cards connect to both flomo siblings and existing retro cards.**

### 3. Section naming in index?
New sections: "Business & Strategy (from flomo)", "Thinking & Decision Making (from flomo)", etc. The "(from flomo)" suffix is clear provenance but might get awkward if future non-flomo cards fit the same category.

**Finding: 🔵 Acceptable for now. Can be refactored in a future organize pass if categories grow.**

### 4. Any category misplacement?
- `startup-monetization-timing-paradox` is under Business & Strategy — correct, it's a monetization timing insight
- `creative-friction-vs-ai-efficiency` is under AI Industry — borderline, could be Thinking. But it's about AI's effect on creativity, so AI Industry fits better.

**Finding: 🔵 No misplacements detected.**

## Verdict: PASS

The 575→31 digest is complete, honest, and well-integrated.
