# F10.2 Curator Review — 杂项 Batch (0 cards)

## Scope
34 memos scanned: 金句(12), English(8), 小说(5), Suri爱学习(4), 知识总结(4), 其他(1).
0 cards written.

## Findings

### 🔵 Skip decisions are correct
- **金句 (12)**: One-line quotes without context or analysis. Zettelkasten needs atomic *insights*, not aphorisms.
- **English (8)**: Vocabulary lists — personal study material, zero transferable insight.
- **小说/清明上河图密码 (5)**: Fiction plot notes. Not knowledge cards.
- **Suri爱学习 (4)**: Child education planning — personal, not generalizable.
- **知识总结 (4)**: Factual summaries (OpenAI plugins, vector DB basics, Android MADA, financial terms). These are reference material, not insights in the Zettelkasten sense — they describe *what* without *why* or *so what*.

### 🔵 No forced cards
Writing 0 cards is the honest outcome. The quality bar has been consistent across all batches: skip garbage, skip personal notes, skip factual-only summaries, only write when there's a non-obvious insight worth preserving.

### 🔵 Consistent with prior batches
Earlier batches (F1-F9) had skip rates of 80-96%. This batch hitting 100% is expected — it's the residual category after all substantive memos were processed.

## Verdict: PASS

0 cards is correct. No missed gems detected.
