# Loom Weaver Agent Audit Packet

ID: packet:20260514T230124Z-loom-weaver-agent-audit
Type: Packet
Status: running
Created: 2026-05-14 23:01 UTC
Updated: 2026-05-14 23:01 UTC
Target: ticket:20260514-loom-weaver-agent
Packet Kind: Ralph
Mode: review
Context Style: live-reference
Worker: subagent - OpenCode general task agent
Branch: main
Worktree: /Users/alexanderbutler/code_projects/personal/agent-loom
Iteration: 1
Risk: high - model-visible prompt and cross-harness adapter surfaces
Review Lens: audit, code review, evidence sufficiency, harness support honesty, product-surface leakage
Change Class: new optional Core agent persona and docs

## Mission

Perform an adversarial audit of the Loom Weaver implementation for `ticket:20260514-loom-weaver-agent`.

Challenge whether the implementation, docs, package metadata, plugin manifests,
and evidence satisfy the ticket acceptance criteria without overclaiming harness
support, leaking contributor-only behavior into model-visible surfaces, or
loosening the `.loom/` write boundary.

Do not modify files. Return review output only.

## Context Bundle

Records:

- `ticket:20260514-loom-weaver-agent` - target ticket, scope, acceptance, current state, and closure gate.
- `spec:loom-weaver-agent` - intended Loom Weaver behavior contract.
- `research:20260514-direct-interactive-agent-surfaces` - harness capability research and Codex plugin-surface amendment.
- `evidence:20260514-loom-weaver-implementation-validation` - implementation validation observations and limits.
- `packet:20260514T223622Z-loom-weaver-agent-implementation` - implementation packet and worker output.

Source paths and docs to inspect:

- `loom-core/agents/loom-weaver.md`
- `loom-core/skills/loom-weaver/SKILL.md`
- `loom-core/loom-core.mjs`
- `loom-core/package.json`
- `loom-core/.claude-plugin/plugin.json`
- `loom-core/.codex-plugin/plugin.json`
- `loom-core/.cursor-plugin/plugin.json`
- `loom-core/gemini-extension.json`
- `loom-core/gemini-bootstrap.md`
- `AGENTS.md`
- `INSTALL.md`
- `README.md`
- `loom-core/README.md`
- Current git diff for the working tree.

## Read Scope

- `.loom/tickets/20260514-loom-weaver-agent.md`
- `.loom/specs/loom-weaver-agent.md`
- `.loom/research/20260514-direct-interactive-agent-surfaces.md`
- `.loom/evidence/20260514-loom-weaver-implementation-validation.md`
- `.loom/packets/ralph/20260514T223622Z-loom-weaver-agent-implementation.md`
- `loom-core/**`
- `AGENTS.md`
- `INSTALL.md`
- `README.md`
- Current git diff and status.

## Write Scope

- None. This is a read-only audit packet. Do not edit files or records.

The parent session will record the audit result under `.loom/audit/` and update

## Task

Review the implementation against these questions:

- Does `loom-core/agents/loom-weaver.md` and `loom-core/skills/loom-weaver/SKILL.md` satisfy `spec:loom-weaver-agent` without duplicating full `using-loom` doctrine or leaking contributor-only process?
- Is the `.loom/` write boundary explicit and not weakened by docs, prompts, or adapter configuration?
- Does OpenCode registration look correct and safe for primary/subagent use, and does smoke evidence support the claim being made?
- Does Claude plugin exposure use a schema-valid manifest shape and avoid unsupported default activation claims?
- Does Codex support now match current docs: bundled skill and natural-language plugin use, no manual profile copying, no plugin-shipped profile/custom-agent overclaim, no `@<agent>` claim?
- Does Cursor documentation avoid `@<agent>` overclaim and stay honest about proxy-mediated subagent behavior?
- Does Gemini documentation and package structure avoid treating a subagent as a true main-agent prompt switch?
- Do package metadata and validation evidence support the shipped artifact claims?
- Did the implementation stay inside ticket scope and avoid unrelated cleanup?
- Are acceptance criteria `ACC-001` through `ACC-008` supported enough for closure consideration, leaving `ACC-009` to this audit?

## Stop Conditions

- Stop and return `inconclusive` if required context is missing.
- Stop and return findings if evidence overclaims live runtime support that was not observed.
- Stop and return findings if product-visible prompt/skill content leaks package smoke, adapter mechanics, dogfood state, repository workflow, or self-justification.
- Stop and return findings if Codex or Cursor docs claim unsupported `@<agent>` or plugin profile/custom-agent semantics.

## Output Contract

Return:

- outcome: `clear`, `concerns`, `changes-needed`, or `inconclusive`
- files and records inspected
- findings with stable IDs `FIND-001`, `FIND-002`, etc. for material issues, including severity, confidence, path/line or record ref, challenged claim, impact, and required follow-up
- explicit `None - no material findings within audited scope` if no material findings exist
- verdict explaining whether the ticket can proceed to closure after the parent records the audit
- what was not inspected or remains risky

Do not claim ticket acceptance or closure; the ticket owns disposition.
