Volume 29, Issue 6 pp. 1628-1647
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Full Access

Climate-driven vegetation greening further reduces water availability in drylands

Zefeng Chen

Zefeng Chen

State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China

College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Weiguang Wang

Corresponding Author

Weiguang Wang

State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, China

College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, China

Key Laboratory of Water Big Data Technology of Ministry of Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing, China

Correspondence

Weiguang Wang, State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China.

Email: wangweiguang006@126.com

Search for more papers by this author
Alessandro Cescatti

Alessandro Cescatti

European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giovanni Forzieri

Giovanni Forzieri

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 December 2022

Abstract

Climate change alters surface water availability (WA; precipitation minus evapotranspiration, P − ET) and consequently impacts agricultural production and societal water needs, leading to increasing concerns on the sustainability of water use. Although the direct effects of climate change on WA have long been recognized and assessed, indirect climate effects occurring through adjustments in terrestrial vegetation are more subtle and not yet fully quantified. To address this knowledge gap, here we investigate the interplay between climate-induced changes in leaf area index (LAI) and ET and quantify its ultimate effect on WA during the period 1982–2016 at the global scale, using an ensemble of data-driven products and land surface models. We show that ~44% of the global vegetated land has experienced a significant increase in growing season-averaged LAI and climate change explains 33.5% of this greening signal. Such climate-induced greening has enhanced ET of 0.051 ± 0.067 mm year−2 (mean ± SD), further amplifying the ongoing increase in ET directly driven by variations in climatic factors over 36.8% of the globe, and thus exacerbating the decline in WA prominently in drylands. These findings highlight the indirect impact of positive feedbacks in the land–climate system on the decline of WA, and call for an in-depth evaluation of these phenomena in the design of local mitigation and adaptation plans.

1 INTRODUCTION

Global climate change has intensified the terrestrial water cycle during the past few decades (Hegerl et al., 2015) by directly influencing evapotranspiration (ET; Helbig et al., 2020), precipitation (Donat et al., 2016), runoff (Mastrotheodoros et al., 2020), and terrestrial water storage (Pokhrel et al., 2021) and causing shifts in terrestrial water availability (WA; Padrón et al., 2020). Such alterations in the spatial and temporal availability of freshwater resources can cause widespread and important social and ecological consequences for food security, residents living, and ecosystem functions (Lutz et al., 2014; Schewe et al., 2014; Zhou et al., 2021). The implications of these changes in the water budgets on the variability and vulnerability of the terrestrial sink (Humphrey et al., 2018) are particularly relevant since global climate polices are increasingly relying on land-based mitigation potentials to meet climate targets. In addition, declining WA may become a key limiting factor for both the agricultural and the industrial sectors, in particular in drylands where water supply is already a severe constraint for societies. Given the broad implications of the climate-induced variations in water budgets, it is imperative to provide robust assessments on the ongoing changes, by accounting for both direct and indirect effects of climate change, and exploring potential mechanisms that may amplify climate change impacts. Although the direct effects of climatic factors (e.g., temperature, precipitation, and radiation) in regulating WA have long been recognized and assessed (e.g., Konapala et al., 2020; Padrón et al., 2020), the indirect effects of climate change have not yet been quantified, and further, the overall relative importance of such direct and indirect effects still remains elusive.

It is well known that climate-induced changes in vegetation structure and physiology associated with the ongoing global and persistent increase in leaf area index (LAI; Zhu et al., 2016) affect canopy conductance, aerodynamic and radiative properties of the surface like albedo and emissivity (Anderson et al., 2011; Bonan, 2008). Considering the close relationships of these factors with the hydrothermal cycle, such climate-induced vegetation changes may play an important role in the modulation of surface water and energy budget (i.e., indirect climate effect; Alkama et al., 2022; Forzieri et al., 2017, 2020; Zeng et al., 2017), and therefore have the potential to mitigate or further exacerbate the direct climate effects on terrestrial WA. A full assessment of these indirect effects is crucial in order to develop sustainable land-based adaptation strategies, in particular for water-limited environments that are characterized by a high instability (Berdugo et al., 2022; Newman et al., 2006) and a strong interplay between WA and vegetation dynamics (Tietjen et al., 2017).

Previous data-driven studies focusing on the detection and attribution of hydrological changes usually assumed vegetation and climate components as two independent drivers and thus neglected their close interplay (e.g., Chen et al., 2021; Forzieri et al., 2020; Tan et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2015). On the modeling side, land surface models (LSMs)—the land component of the Earth system models used to predict future climate trajectories—account for the climate–vegetation–hydrology interactions through coupling various physical and biogeochemical processes (Jiao et al., 2017). However, LSMs have shown limitations in representing the interplay between biophysical processes and vegetation changes (Duveiller et al., 2018; Forzieri et al., 2018). These drawbacks have so far inevitably hampered a comprehensive understanding of the ongoing variations in the water cycle under a changing climate and the potential risks related to amplification processes.

Extensive analyses suggested that CO2 fertilization is the main driver of the increasing vegetation greenness and terrestrial carbon sink at the global scale (Fernández-Martínez et al., 2019; Piao et al., 2020). However, recent observational evidences show that terrestrial ecosystems are switching from a period dominated by the positive effects of CO2 fertilization to a period characterized by the progressive saturation of the positive effects of fertilization on carbon sinks and the increase of negative impacts of climate change on ecosystem functioning (Peñuelas et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2020). It is, therefore, likely that climate will become the dominant driver of vegetation dynamics in many regions of the planet, further amplifying the indirect effects of climate change. In view of the complexity of the climate–land interplay, model predictions that only consider the direct climate effect (or partially represent the indirect one) and that are not supported by data-driven evidences (e.g., Dezsi et al., 2018; Hoang et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2018) may greatly misestimate the magnitude of the WA changes in future climate scenarios.

In order to address this knowledge gap, here we investigated the indirect effect of climate change—occurring through climate-induced changes in terrestrial vegetation—on the WA for the period 1982–2016 at the global scale. To this scope, we used a combination of model outputs from 14 state-of-the-art LSMs, with three satellite LAI datasets and five observation-driven ET products. We used growing season-averaged LAI as a proxy of vegetation condition. The effect of climate change on LAI was isolated through factorial simulations of LSMs constrained by satellite LAI retrievals. Using multiple linear regressions, we estimated the sensitivity of ET to variations in LAI by factoring out the potentially confounding direct effect of climatic factors such as temperature, precipitation, and radiation, and the long-term dependencies between covariates. Subsequently, we quantified the ET responses to climate-induced variations in LAI by combining sensitivity estimates with trends in LAI driven solely by climate change (indirect effect), and compared with analogous estimates originating from climatic factors (direct effect) in terms of magnitude and spatial patterns. Finally, we assessed the variations in WA that are attributable to the indirect effect under different background climate. Propagation of uncertainty was explored in a large ensemble of experiments covering the spread existing across models and observations.

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 Vegetation dynamics

Three long-term satellite-based LAI datasets were applied to analyze changes in global terrestrial vegetation during 1982–2016 derived from the Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies (GIMMS3g v1) LAI (http://sites.bu.edu/cliveg/datacodes/; Zhu et al., 2013), the Global Land Surface Satellites (GLASS v3) LAI (http://www.glass.umd.edu/; Xiao et al., 2016), and the Global Mapping (GLOBMAP v3) LAI (https://zenodo.org/record/4700264; Liu et al., 2012). We first composited the original data (8-day or 15-day temporal resolution depending on the product) to the monthly temporal resolution by averaging the composites in the same month. Before the averaging process, we weighted each composite by the number of days that the composites fall in the given month. Subsequently, monthly LAI data were linearly resampled to the 0.5° spatial resolution. In this study, the growing season-averaged LAI was used as a proxy of vegetation growth. To this end, we identified the climatological growing season based on Vegetation Index and Phenology (VIP) satellite-based product (https://vip.arizona.edu/vipdata/V4/DATAPOOL/PHENOLOGY/; Zhang et al., 2014). The VIP product provides the date of onset and end of growing season for the period 1981–2016, on the basis of a piecewise logistic model-based land surface phenology (LSP) detection algorithm in combination with daily enhanced vegetation index generated from AVHRR LTDR and Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) CMG records. We first resampled the original VIP dataset (0.05°) to 0.5° spatial resolution, and further calculated the multiyear mean onset date and end date of growing season at the grid-cell scale. Subsequently, we identified which months belong to the growing season for each vegetated grid cell (Figure S1), and used as the climatological reference period to derive a multiyear time series of growing season LAI, similar to Forzieri et al. (2017). Considering a fixed climatological growing season at pixel level over the entire observational period 1982–2016 preserves the growing season LAI retrievals from possible effects associated with inter-annual changes in the phenological cycle. We derived a global vegetated land mask from the MODIS land cover map (MCD12Q1, https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/products/mcd12q1v006/) for the year 2001 (Friedl & Sulla-Menashe, 2019), which is the starting year of this product and is the closest year to the start of our observational period (1982). All grid cells (0.5° × 0.5° resolution) for which the MCD12Q1 dominant plant functional type is vegetation class (including tree, shrub, grass, and cropland) were defined as vegetated areas and were included in our analyses (Figure S2). For each vegetated grid cell, we retrieved the temporal trend in growing season-averaged LAI (δLAI) for the three satellite-based LAI datasets, and evaluated the significance using the nonparametric Mann–Kendal test (Figure 1). Besides, considering that grid cells have different area extents depending on their latitude, we computed the global mean LAI and its trend by the weighted average method based on the grid-cell area (Figure 2a). The same methodology is applied consistently for global-scale aggregated metrics described in the following sections.

Details are in the caption following the image
Spatial pattern of observed trends in growing season-averaged LAI (δLAI) derived from three different remote sensing products (a, GIMMS3g LAI; b, GLASS LAI; c, GLOBMAP LAI) and multiple product mean (d, MPM) for the period 1982–2016. Regions labeled by black dots indicate trends that are statistically significant (Mann–Kendall test; p < .05). Dots are spaced 3° in both latitude and longitude, and statistics were computed in 9° × 9° spatial moving window. Map lines delineate study areas and do not necessarily depict accepted national boundaries. GIMMS, Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies; GLASS, Global Land Surface Satellites; GLOBMAP, Global Mapping; LAI, leaf area index. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Mean trend in growing season-averaged LAI driven solely by climate change (δLAICLI) for the period 1982–2016 derived from 14 LSMs (i.e., CABLE-POP, CLASS-CTEM, CLM, DLEM, ISAM, JSBACH, JULES, LPJ-GUESS, LPX, OCN, ORCHIDEE, SDGVM, SURFEX, and VISIT) and multiple model ensemble mean (MMEM) by Equation (3). Mean observed trend in growing season-averaged LAI (δLAI) for the period 1982–2016 derived from three different remote sensing products (i.e., GIMMS3g, GLASS, and GLOBMAP LAI) and multiple product mean (MPM). Error bars represent the standard deviation of trends derived from members. Two asterisks indicate that the trend is statistically significant (p < .05). (b) Frequency distribution of δLAICLI, and the contribution of climate change to LAI change (δLAICLI/δLAI) during 1982–2016 at the global scale and for north high latitudes (60°N–90°N). Corresponding interquartile ranges are shown as dotted vertical lines (third quartiles of δLAICLI/δLAI for the globe and north high latitudes almost coincide). (c) Spatial pattern of δLAICLI during 1982–2016. For each vegetated grid cell, trend is derived from the average of 42-member ensemble (3 satellite LAI products × 14 LSMs; for details, see Section 2). Black dots show regions where both mean δLAI and mean contribution are statistically significant (Mann–Kendall test and F-test, p < .05). Dots are spaced 3° in both latitude and longitude, and statistics were computed in 9° × 9° spatial moving window. Map lines delineate study areas and do not necessarily depict accepted national boundaries. GIMMS, Global Inventory Modeling and Mapping Studies; GLASS, Global Land Surface Satellites; GLOBMAP, Global Mapping; LAI, leaf area index; LSM, land surface model. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

We recognized that changes in LAI can only partially reflect the vegetation control on water and energy exchanges between land and atmosphere. However, we argued that other important variables, such as surface albedo and emissivity, are strongly driven by vegetation density and therefore correlated with LAI, as demonstrated in Text S1 and Figure S3. Their inclusion in our modeling framework as additional vegetation predictors would bring issues of causality between predictors and target variables and limited independent information.

To characterize the spatial distribution of rainfed agricultural lands, we used the SPAM dataset (https://www.mapspam.info/data/; Yu et al., 2020), which provides cropland maps for different farming systems (rainfed and irrigation) for three different epochs, 2000, 2005, and 2010. Grid cells with <10% of the irrigated area in all three periods were considered as the rainfed cropland and were used for further analysis.

2.2 Climate drivers

Meteorological variables, including air temperature (T), precipitation (P), incoming solar radiation (Rs), dew point temperature (Td), and potential evapotranspiration (ETp), were obtained from the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset (ECMWF, https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/; Muñoz Sabater, 2019) for the 1982–2016 period at monthly temporal resolution and 0.1° spatial resolution, subsequently resampled to the common 0.5° grid-cell resolution. Monthly vapor pressure deficit (VPD), a measure of atmospheric demand for water vapor, was then calculated based on Allen et al. (1998) for each grid cell as follows:
(1)
where T and Td are given in °C, and the resulting VPD is in kPa.

To explore our results under different climatic conditions, the global vegetated areas were classified into humid, semihumid, semiarid, and arid by adopting the climate classification of the United Nations Environment Program (United Nations Environment Program, 1997). Such classification is based on the aridity index, which is defined as the ratio of potential evapotranspiration to precipitation (i.e., ETp/P; Figure S4). The thresholds between humid and semihumid classes, between semihumid and semiarid classes, and between semiarid and arid classes were set to ETp/P = 1, 2, 5, respectively (Ukkola et al., 2016). Drylands in this study are defined as regions with ETp/P ≥ 2 (i.e., sum of semiarid and arid classes), slightly more strict compared with related literature (ETp/P ≥ 1.54; Huang et al., 2016; Zhou et al., 2021).

2.3 Evapotranspiration products

Evapotranspiration estimates were derived at the global level for the period 1982–2016 from five different observation-based datasets including the Breathing Earth System Simulator (BESS; http://environment.snu.ac.kr/bess_flux/; Jiang & Ryu, 2016), the FLUXCOM Model Tree Ensemble (https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/geodb/projects/Home.php; Jung et al., 2019), the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS v2.0 + v2.1; https://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/gldas; Rodell et al., 2004), the Global Land Evaporation and Amsterdam Model (GLEAM v3.3a; https://www.gleam.eu/; Martens et al., 2017; Miralles et al., 2011), and the Process-based Land Surface Evapotranspiration/Heat Fluxes (PLSH; http://files.ntsg.umt.edu/data/; Zhang et al., 2015). These ET products are provided at the monthly scale, but with distinct spatial resolutions, ranging from 0.0833° (PLSH) to 0.5° (BESS and FLUXCOM), and thus were linearly resampled to the common spatial resolution 0.5°. To cover the whole period, FLUXCOM dataset used here is the ensemble mean that encompasses members of different machine learning methods and energy balance corrections within the “RS + METEO” setup. Besides, the GLDAS dataset used here was generated by merging two separate product versions v2.0 (time coverage 1948–2014) and v2.1 (time coverage 2000–present). In order to derive a GLDAS ET product covering our entire reference period (1982–2016), we built a regression relationship between the two datasets over their overlapping period (2000–2014) at the grid scale, and subsequently, extended the GLDAS v2.1 time series back to 1982 using such relationship with GLDAS v2.0. We assessed the consistency of the integrated dataset (i.e., GLDAS v2.1 and its extension) with GLDAS v2.0 for the period 1982–2014, as shown in Figure S5.

The above-mentioned ET products have been largely validated in previous studies (Bai & Liu, 2018; Jiang & Ryu, 2016; Jung et al., 2010; Miralles et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2015). To further increase the confidence in the use of such datasets in our global modeling framework, we additionally evaluated their performance against surface observations in a dedicated experiment (for details, see Text S2). Results show high consistency between simulated and observed ET values and confirm the validity of the ensemble of global ET products used in this study (Figure S6).

Moreover, GLEAM provides in addition to ET estimates, its key components including transpiration (Ec), canopy interception loss (Ei), and soil evaporation (Es). Estimates of ET components from GLEAM have been well validated in previous works against ground observations (Miralles et al., 2010; Talsma et al., 2018; Wei et al., 2017) and are therefore used in this study to explore the ET-related physical and biological responses to environmental changes.

2.4 Simulations of the LSMs

We used monthly LAI simulations for the period 1982–2016 from an ensemble of 14 LSMs completed within the TRENDY v7 project (Sitch et al., 2015), including CABLE-POP (Haverd et al., 2014), CLASS-CTEM (Melton et al., 2019), CLM5.0 (Lawrence et al., 2019), DLEM (Tian et al., 2010), ISAM (Jain & Yang, 2005), JSBACH (Raddatz et al., 2007), JULES (Best et al., 2011), LPJ-GUESS (Smith et al., 2001), LPX (Keller et al., 2017), OCN (Zaehle et al., 2010), ORCHIDEE (Krinner et al., 2005), SDGVM (Woodward & Lomas, 2004), SURFEX (Le Moigne et al., 2020), and VISIT (Ito, 2008). All model outputs were resampled to the common 0.5° spatial resolution. In order to disentangle the effect of climate change to LAI, we analyzed outputs from three sets of factorial simulation experiments: (S1) varying CO2 only; (S2) varying CO2 and climate; and (S3) varying CO2, climate, and land use. For models that include the nitrogen cycle, time-varying nitrogen inputs were used for all three experiments.

Multiple observational datasets were used to force TRENDY LSM simulations, including time series of atmospheric CO2 concentration (Keeling & Whorf, 2005), historical climate fields from the climatic research unit (CRU) observational dataset and its derivative (Harris et al., 2014), and land cover change data from the land-use harmonization product (LUH2; Chini et al., 2021). Additional details on the forcing input data used in the TRENDY v7 project were reported in Text S3. Furthermore, simulated LAI under the S3 scenario were compared with satellite observations to evaluate model performance. The overall high consistency (Figures S7 and S8) supports the use of the ensemble of LSMs to explore long-term changes in LAI and identify its key drivers, as also performed in previous studies over shorter time periods (Piao et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2016).

2.5 Retrievals of climate-driven greening through data model integration

Following similar approaches reported in literature (e.g., Bastos et al., 2019; Murray-Tortarolo et al., 2022), the relative climate-driven signal of trend in LAI (i.e., relative contribution of climate change to LAI variations) originated from the TRENDY model simulations was derived at the grid-cell scale (RCCLI, %) by calculating the difference between the trend in LAI generated in experiment S2 and that in experiment S1 normalized by the trend in experiment S3 (Figure S9):
(2)
where δLAIS1, δLAIS2, and δLAIS3 are the trend in the simulated growing season-averaged LAI in the experiment S1, S2, and S3, respectively, and are derived from the 14 LSMs using the VIP-based climatological growing season. These three terms represent the variations in LAI driven solely by CO2 fertilization, those driven by both CO2 fertilization and climate change, and those driven by all factors, respectively. The above-mentioned factorial simulation can effectively factor out the trend in LAI due to climate change, based on an ensemble of LSMs forced by climate, atmospheric CO2 concentration, and land cover change.
To constrain the magnitude of the trend in LAI due to climate change on observational records and to increase the consistency between this trend and the observed sensitivities of energy and water fluxes to LAI variations (analyses produced in Equations 4 and 5), we rescaled the above-mentioned simulation of climate-induced signal of greening to satellite LAI retrievals, as follows:
(3)
where δLAI is the trend in the observed growing season-averaged LAI retrieved from satellite products (GIMMS3g, GLASS, and GLOBMAP; Figure 1). The resulting term δLAICLI represents the trend in LAI solely driven by climate change, obtained by a novel integration of observations (i.e., satellite LAI retrievals) and model outputs (i.e., factorial simulations of LSMs).

In total, the approach described above produced a 42-member ensemble of δLAICLI estimates, each one derived from a different combination of satellite LAI product and LSM (Figure S10; Table S1). The term δLAICLI excludes the effect of CO2 fertilization, land cover change, and nitrogen deposition, as these components have been removed from the factorial simulations performed on the TRENDY runs (term δLAIS2-δLAIS1). Consequently, CO2 fertilization, land cover change, and nitrogen deposition disentangled in Equations (2 and 3) do not influence the following analyses.

2.6 Sensitivity of ET to LAI changes

We applied the methodology described in Forzieri et al. (2017, 2020) to explore the interplay between interannual variations in LAI and ET over the period from 1982 to 2016 within a multiple regression framework. In order to isolate the LAI control on ET from possible confounding effects of climate factors, these need to be included as independent predictors. To this aim, we first detected the collinearity among the candidate variables, which include growing season-averaged LAI, annually averaged T, annually cumulated P, annually averaged Rs, and annual averaged VPD, using the variance inflation factor (VIF). According to the test results, VPD shows high collinearity with the other variables (VIF > 10) in many parts of the globe and was therefore excluded from the predictor set (Figure S11). Once identified the model form, we derived the sensitivity of ET to LAI changes (∂ET/∂LAI) for each grid cell (0.5° spatial resolution) as the partial derivative in the multiple linear regression in terms of interannual differences as described below:
(4)
where T (°C), P (mm), and Rs (Wm−2) are taken from the ERA5-Land dataset; LAI is retrieved from the satellite products; and ET is from the observation-driven products (see previous sections). The Δ operator is a 34-term time series corresponding to the difference between two consecutive years. Such approach factors out the effects on ET that are triggered by a direct variation in the main climate drivers from the signal originated by changes in LAI (Forzieri et al., 2017). The resulting sensitivity ∂ET/∂LAI can be therefore interpreted as the net signal of LAI on ET at constant background climate (i.e., T, P, and Rs).

We applied Equation (4) to each unique combination of ET and LAI dataset, therefore resulting in a 15-member ensemble of ET sensitivity estimates (Figure S12). We also obtained the corresponding sensitivities of ET to changes in climate drivers (Figures S13–S15), which have been used to quantify the direct effect of climate change (see next section). Furthermore, based on the estimates of ET components provided by GLEAM v3.3a, we applied Equation (4) separately to ∆Ec, ∆Ei, and ∆Es, and thus calculated the sensitivity of different ET components to changes in growing season-averaged LAI (Figures S16–S18). A Student's t-test was performed at the grid scale to determine the statistical significance of sensitivity of ET and its components. In order to properly represent the generality of relationships between sensitivities of ET and local environment conditions, we performed binned average analysis to minimize the uncertainty induced by spatial heterogeneity (difference in topography, soil property, and so on) that randomly affects sensitivities of ET and its components to LAI changes (Figure 3c,d; Figure S19).

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Spatial pattern of sensitivity of annual ET to change in growing season-averaged LAI (∂ET/∂LAI). For each vegetated grid cell, sensitivity is derived from the average of 15-member ensemble (5 ET products × 3 satellite LAI products; for details, see Section 2). Regions labeled by black dots indicate sensitivities that are statistically significant (Student's t-test, p < .05). Dots are spaced 3° in both latitude and longitude, and statistics were computed in 9° × 9° spatial moving window. (b) Zonal medians of sensitivities of annual ET and its components (Ec: transpiration; Ei: canopy interception loss; Es: soil evaporation) to change in growing season-averaged LAI at 5° latitudinal resolution based on GLEAM product. Corresponding interquartile ranges are shown as shaded band. (c, d) Boxplot of relationships between ∂ET/∂LAI and aridity index (ETp/P: ratio of potential evapotranspiration to precipitation) and mean annual LAI. For the x-axis: aridity index = 1 represents a range from 0 to 1 and so on; LAI = 0.5 represents a range from 0 to 0.5 and so on. Boxplot elements: blue box = values of 25th and 75th percentiles; red horizontal line = median; red rectangle = mean; gray whiskers = values of 10th and 90th percentiles. Black solid lines indicate the best fit of the mean value with equation provided on each subplot. Map lines delineate study areas and do not necessarily depict accepted national boundaries. GLEAM, Global Land Evaporation and Amsterdam Model; LAI, leaf area index. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

2.7 Attribution of ET variations to climate-induced changes in LAI

To derive the trend in ET originating from the climate-induced LAI changes (, Figure 4a), that is, indirect effect of climate change on ET by variation in vegetation density, the sensitivity term (∂ET/∂LAI) is multiplied by the long-term trend in growing season-averaged LAI due to climate change (δLAICLI) as follows:
(5)
Details are in the caption following the image
Indirect effect of climate change on ET by altering vegetation. (a) Spatial pattern of trend in annual ET associated with climate-induced LAI change () for the period 1982–2016. For each vegetated grid cell, trend is derived from the average of 210-member ensemble (5 ET products × 3 satellite LAI products × 14 LSMs; for details, see Section 2). Black dots show regions where both trends in LAI induced by climate change (δLAICLI) and sensitivity (∂ET/∂LAI) are statistically significant (p < .05). Dots are spaced 3° in both latitude and longitude, and statistics were computed in 9° × 9° spatial moving window. (b) Spatial pattern of dominant driving component of ET that contributes the most to the increase (or decrease) in ET associated with the climate-induced LAI change during 1982–2016. Inset shows the fraction of vegetated areas that are dominantly driven by different components of ET (i.e., Ec: transpiration, Ei: canopy interception loss, and Es: soil evaporation). (c) Spatial pattern of relationship between the direct and indirect (through LAI) effects of climate change on ET ( and , respectively), where “– –” represents negative with negative , “– +” represents negative with positive , and so on. Legend shows the fraction of vegetated areas for each thematic class (i.e., “– –,” “– +,” “+ −,” and “+ +”). (d) Boxplot of total observed trend in annual ET (δET), total trend in annual ET induced by climate change (δETCLI), , and during 1982–2016 for different thematic classes mentioned in (c). Boxplot elements: box = values of 25th and 75th percentiles; horizontal line = median; rectangle = mean; whiskers = values of 10th and 90th percentiles. Map lines delineate study areas and do not necessarily depict accepted national boundaries. ET, evapotranspiration; LAI, leaf area index. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

The use of three satellite-observed LAI records, five ET products, and 14 model simulations leads to a resulting ensemble of 210 members for the term (; Figure S20), which makes possible to quantify the different sources of uncertainties in the derived signal. Following an analogous approach, trend in different ET components (i.e., Ec, Ei, and Es) due to climate-induced LAI changes was calculated (Figure S21). The significance of such indirect effect of climate change is determined by whether sensitivity to LAI and climate-induced trend in LAI are both significant (p < .05) at the grid-cell scale.

In addition, to quantify the direct effect of climate change on ET (; Figure S22), Equation (5) was similarly applied to the sensitivities (i.e., last three terms in Equation 4) and long-term trends in annual T, P, and Rs (Figure S23). Combining such direct effect with the indirect effect mentioned above, we deduced and quantitatively evaluated the integrated effect of climate change on ET (δETCLI) as below:
(6)
(7)

2.8 Direct and indirect effects of climate change on WA

In order to investigate the climate change implications for global water resources, we further assessed the variation in terrestrial WA in response to climate change for the period 1982–2016. WA, that is, the net flux of water at the land surface, is here defined as P minus ET (Greve et al., 2018; Seager et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2015). Thus, trend in regional WA can be simply computed as δWA = δP − δET. Correspondingly, the total effect of climate change on WA at the grid scale (Figure S24c) can be expressed as:
(8)

The fraction of the overall trend in climate-induced WA explained by a given term (P, direct climate effect on ET, indirect climate effect on ET) is then quantified as the ratio between the term-specific trend and the overall trend (Figure S25). The residual term (δWA − δWACLI) represents the shift in WA induced by other factors (δWAOF), that is, changes in vegetation driven by elevated CO2 concentration, land cover change, and nitrogen deposition (Figure S24e,f), which have been excluded in the previous analyses (see Section 2.5). Direction and magnitude of climate change effect on WA through multiple pathways were investigated across various climatic conditions (Figure 5). Furthermore, changes in WA were analyzed with a particular focus on global rainfed croplands (especially in drylands) to offer more detailed insights into the indirect effect of climate change (through LAI) on WA for food production, based on the cropland mapping derived from SPAM dataset (Figure 6).

Details are in the caption following the image
Integrated effect of climate change on regional water availability. (a) Boxplot of relationships between direct effect of climate change on ET () and trend in annual precipitation (δP) for the period 1982–2016. Gray histogram represents the contribution of direct climatic effect on ET to climate-induced change in water availability (/δWACLI) for regions with different δP. (b) Same as (a), but for indirect effect of climate change on ET through altering LAI (). Inset above (a) shows fraction of vegetated areas with different δP. Boxplot elements: box = values of 25th and 75th percentiles; horizontal line = median; rectangle = mean; whiskers = values of 10th and 90th percentiles. Red solid lines indicate the best fit of the mean value with equation provided on each subplot. (c) Contribution of direct climatic effect on ET to climate-induced change in water availability (/δWACLI) binned as a function of trend in annual precipitation and aridity index (ETp/P: ratio of potential evapotranspiration to precipitation). (d) Same as (c), but for contribution of indirect climatic effect on ET through altering LAI to climate-induced change in water availability (/δWACLI). LAI, leaf area index. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Details are in the caption following the image
Threats to water availability for rainfed croplands. (a) Spatial pattern of trend in annual ET associated with climate-induced LAI change () during the period 1982–2016 for rainfed croplands where climate-induced vegetation change further exacerbates declining water availability (in red). Grid cells dominated by rainfed agriculture are shown in color, and are identified based on the SPAM global dataset (https://www.mapspam.info/data/). (b) Cumulative frequency distribution of for total red grid cells shown in (a), for red grid cells with ETp/P ≥ 2 (dryland), and for red grid cells with ETp/P < 2 (non-dryland). (c) Spatial pattern of contribution of indirect climatic effect on ET through altering LAI to climate-induced change in water availability (/δWACLI) during the period 1982–2016 for rainfed croplands where climate-induced vegetation change further exacerbates declining water availability (in green, consistent with red grid cells in (a)). (d) Histogram of trends in climate-induced water availability (δWACLI), annual precipitation (δP), annual ET directly induced by climate change (), and annual ET associated with climate-induced LAI change () from 1982 to 2016 for total red grid cells shown in (a), for red grid cells with ETp/P ≥ 2 (dryland), and for red grid cells with ETp/P ≥ 2 and δP ranging from −4 to 0 mm year−2. Error bars represent the standard deviation of trends derived from members. Map lines delineate study areas and do not necessarily depict accepted national boundaries. ET, evapotranspiration; LAI, leaf area index. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

2.9 Uncertainty analysis

We performed three experiments (i.e., Exp1, Exp2, and Exp3) to identify the sources of uncertainties, based on a total 210-member ensemble of indirect climatic effect on ET (i.e., , Figure S20). More specifically, Exp1, Exp2, and Exp3 enabled to quantify the uncertainty originated from the satellite LAI product, the ET product, and the LSM simulation, respectively (Figures S26 and S27). As an example for Exp1, separately for each satellite LAI product, we computed averaged across multiple LSMs and ET products. We thus obtained three estimates of (one for each satellite LAI product) and computed the average and standard deviation over the resulting three-member ensemble. Such standard deviation reflects the uncertainty originated from the satellite LAI product. Similar to the calculation steps in Exp1, but for Exp2, we computed averaged across multiple LAI products and LSMs, separately for each ET product, and thus obtained five estimates of ; meanwhile, for Exp3, we computed averaged across multiple LAI and ET products, separately for each LSM, and thus obtained 14 estimates of . For the total uncertainty, the standard deviation was computed over the whole 210-member ensemble (Figure S26d).

3 RESULTS

3.1 Climate-induced variations in LAI

During the period 1982–2016, global vegetated land has experienced a widespread positive trend in LAI with a multiple product mean (MPM) of 4.03 ± 0.88 10−3 m2 m−2 year−1 (δLAI, Figures 1d and 2a). Such greening signal is statistically significant (Mann–Kendall test, p < .05) over ~44% of the vegetated lands and consistent across single LAI products (47.3%, 44.9%, and 36.7% for GIMMS3g, GLOBMAP, and GLASS, respectively, Figure 1). Regions with the most notable increase in vegetation density (>20 10−3 m2 m−2 year−1) are observed in southeastern China, Europe, Sahel, and eastern United States.

Factorial experiments based on 14 LSMs from the TRENDY project (see Section 2) show that all models, except CABLE-POP, agree that climate change has had an overall positive effect on vegetation growth, even though the inter-model spread is considerable (global average signal ranging from 0.62 ± 0.12 to 2.71 ± 0.48 10−3 m2 m−2 year−1, Figure 2a; Figure S10). Results of multimodel ensemble mean (MMEM) show that the trend in LAI attributed to climate change (δLAICLI) is 1.35 ± 1.50 10−3 m2 m−2 year−1, which is about 33.5% of the averaged observed trend in LAI (MPM δLAI). The contribution of climate change to the greening signal seems stronger in cold regions where low temperatures are a key limiting factor for vegetation growth (McManus et al., 2012; Myers-Smith et al., 2020). For instance, when focusing on northern latitudes (60°N–90°N), vegetation trend induced by climate change reaches 2.25 ± 2.17 10−3 m2 m−2 year−1 (MMEM), equivalent to 68.2% of the observed overall trend (Figure 2b), indicating that climate change dominates the boreal vegetation dynamics over the past few decades. The strong positive effects of climate change occur in northern Canada, Scandinavia, and Siberia (Figure 2c). It is worth noting that, despite the negative impact of climate change in southeastern United States, Amazon, India, and southern China (Figure 2c), an increasing overall trend in LAI can still be observed in these regions (Figure 1), proving that the positive effects of CO2 fertilization, together with changes in land cover, have effectively compensated the climate-induced decline of LAI.

3.2 Sensitivity of ET to variations in LAI

In order to disentangle the indirect effect of climate change on water resources, we first quantified the overall sensitivity of ET to changes in vegetation density (∂ET/∂LAI) within a multiple linear regression framework by ruling out the contribution of climate factors (Equation 3, see Section 2). At the interannual timescale, we found that ET is positively related to variations in LAI (∂ET/∂LAI > 0) across most of the global vegetated land (88.2%) with an average magnitude of 64.80 ± 41.94 mm/m−2 m−2 (Figure 3a). In particular, ∂ET/∂LAI reaches the highest value (>200 mm/m−2 m−2) in desert margins, but is relatively low (even negative) in rainforests. Results obtained separately from five different ET products (BESS, FLUXCOM, GLDAS, GLEAM, and PLSH) show consistent patterns of ∂ET/∂LAI (Figure S12). A comprehensive set of modeling experiments was additionally performed to further test the validity of our approach and the robustness of ∂ET/∂LAI retrievals with respect to the potential impacts of nonlinear relationships, collinearity, and discrepancy in input datasets, which was carefully illustrated in Text S4 and S5, and meanwhile briefly presented in Section 4.

To better clarify the climate control on different ET-related biological and physical processes (Jasechko et al., 2013; Lian et al., 2018), we analyzed the sensitivity of ET to LAI changes separately for Ec, Ei, and Es. We found that Ec has the highest sensitivity to LAI changes at almost all latitudinal bands, especially in the subtropics where it is about 30-fold more sensitive than Ei and Es (Figure 3b). Not only that, as LAI increases, the resulting increase in Ec at the expense of the soil component makes Ec more sensitive to LAI changes than the total ET, except for the tropics where the sensitivity of Ei is dominant because of the high frequency of rainfalls combined with the high LAI which leads to relevant fraction rain interception. Under this context, Ec component exhibits the largest average contribution to global positive ∂ET/∂LAI (100.1%), followed by Ei (4.6%) and Es (−5.5%). These results suggest that the positive sensitivity of ET to vegetation change is mostly driven from the strong feedback of its biological processes (i.e., stomatal control) rather than the physical ones (i.e., evaporation of intercepted rain or soil moisture), highlighting the critical role of LAI and Ec in land–atmosphere coupling.

The sensitivity of ET to LAI, and in particular the Ec component, shows a clear dependence on local environment gradients of aridity (ETp/P: ratio of potential evapotranspiration to precipitation) and mean annual LAI (Figure 3c,d; Figure S19). The significant linear positive relationship between the ∂ET/∂LAI and the ETp/P (R2 = .86, p < .01) reveals an enhanced vegetation control on the hydrological cycle as climate becomes drier (Figure 3c). ∂ET/∂LAI declines exponentially with the increase of LAI (R2 = .98, p < .01) and gradually approaches zero, suggesting that change in vegetation density has a fairly limited impact on ET in regions with high LAI (Figure 3d). As a consequence, large-scale vegetation changes over drylands with low-density vegetation have the potential to affect available water via ET to a much greater extent compared to regions with wetter climate or denser vegetation where the water balance is not so strictly under biological control. This finding highlights the relevance of the land–climate interplay and therefore of vegetation management on the availability of water resources and the sustainability of societies in arid regions.

3.3 Indirect effect of climate change on ET

The indirect effect of climate change on ET through adjustments in terrestrial vegetation () was quantified by multiplying the observed sensitivity of ET to variations in LAI by the climate-induced trend in LAI (Equation 5, see Section 2). Based on the combination of three satellite-based LAI retrievals, five observation-driven ET products, and 14 LSMs, we derived a 210-member ensemble of estimates that were used to account for the structural uncertainty originating from the different datasets and land surface schemes and to quantify their marginal effect (see Section 2). Globally, climate change has caused substantial variations in terrestrial vegetation over the past 35 years and increased indirectly ET by an average rate of 0.051 ± 0.067 mm year−2 (Figure 4a) which corresponds to 8.9% of the overall positive trend in ET. Such indirect effect of climate change mediated by vegetation is of comparable magnitude to the direct effect originating from temperature, precipitation, and radiation () which has led to an increase in ET of 0.129 ± 0.128 mm year−2 (Figure S22). This highlights the relevance of the indirect effect via associated vegetation change in the long-term climate influence on the water cycle and the complex feedback mechanisms in the Earth system among climate change, greening trends, and variation of the water cycle. The increase in ET due to the climate-induced vegetation changes is larger in low vegetated lands (e.g., inland western United States, Mediterranean regions, Sahel, southern Africa, northern China), thanks to the combination of high increase in LAI (Figure 2c) and of the high ET sensitivity to vegetation changes (Figure 3a,d). On the contrary, decrease in ET through climate impacts on vegetation is found in some limited regions in central Asia as a consequence of the vegetation degradation (Figure 1) following prolonged drought stress (Piao et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2016).

We found that the indirect climate effect is prominently driven by the climate-induced change in transpiration (Ec) which appears the dominant factor over 70.0% of the global vegetated land (Figure 4b; Figures S21 and S28) regardless of the climatic conditions (Figure S29) and clearly reflects a higher sensitivity of biological processes to changes in evaporative surface (Figure 3b). Nevertheless, exceptions occur in specific regions such as in tropical forests (e.g., Amazon, Congo, and Southeast Asia), where changes in canopy interception loss (Ei) associated with climate-induced variations in vegetation explain the largest fraction of the trend in ET (Figure 4b; Figures S21 and S28), largely driven by dominant sensitivity of Ei (Figure 3b). This occurs in regions with frequent rainfalls and high LAI like the humid tropics (Figure S19), where vegetation typically shows higher water interception efficiency and storage capacity (Wallace et al., 2013).

Considering that the direct and indirect effects of climate change on the water cycle are directional, their integrated effects on variations in ET can be additive (i.e., leading to an amplification of the signal) or offsetting (i.e., leading to a dampening of the signal). Overall, 53.4% of the global vegetated land exhibits additive effects (i.e., “+ +” and “– –” in Figure 4c) and 46.6% shows offsetting effects (i.e., “– +” and “+ −”). By considering the indirect effect from climate-induced vegetation changes, we consequently quantified the net effect of climate change on ET. In this respect, our study found that in 23.9% of the global vegetated land, despite an increase in ET due to the direct climate effect, this positive signal can be partly mitigated by the opposite effect of climate-induced vegetation change (i.e., “+ −,” Figure 4c), with an average decrease of 36.4% (Figure 4d). Climate warming and the associated increase in atmospheric moisture demand are the primary causes of the initial positive effect on ET in these regions (Figures S22a and S23a), while precipitation remains stable or even decreases (Figure S23b). The resulting vegetation browning mitigates the initial positive effect of higher temperature on ET (Figure 2c). Over a larger fraction of the globe (“+ +”: 36.8%, Figure 4c), the indirect effect tends to exacerbate the direct signal, leading to a further increase of 39.6% (Figure 4d). This amplification effect on ET occurs in western China, Europe, and Siberia, as well as in drylands (ETp/P ≥ 2, see Figure S4) of southern Africa and northwestern India.

3.4 Implications for WA

Climate change, by altering both water supply and loss, influences regional WA and a range of water-dependent socio-economic sectors whose sustainability may be at risk in the decades to come (Greve et al., 2018; Zhou et al., 2021). In order to provide a comprehensive assessment on the hydrological implications of climate change, we disentangled the climate-induced trend in WA (δWACLI) originating from direct () and indirect () pathways (Equation 8, see Section 2). We found that in the past three and a half decades, climate change has led to a decline in WA with an average rate of −1.440 ± 0.178 mm year−2, explaining 81.9% of total reduction (Figure S24). The residual term (i.e., 18.1%) is attributable to changes in vegetation driven by other factors than climate change, such as elevated CO2 concentration, land cover change, and nitrogen deposition. We noticed that the climate-induced reduction in WA appears primarily caused by a decrease in precipitation (average contribution: 87.5%), and moderately driven by the ET response to climate change through direct and indirect pathways (average contributions of 9.0% and 3.6%, respectively; Figure S25). However, for a considerable part of global vegetated land (~20.0%) that has experienced low trend in precipitation (between −0.4 and 0.8 mm year−2), both climate-induced direct and indirect effects on ET play a far larger role in influencing WA (Figure 5a,b). For example, in regions with trend in precipitation ranging from −0.4 to 0 mm year−2, variations in ET directly and indirectly related to climate change provide higher contributions to the climate-induced decrease in WA (29.8% and 11.5%, respectively), further amplifying the negative effect of precipitation decrease (gray bars in Figure 5a,b). These results reinforce the importance of accounting for the climate–vegetation interactions to properly assess the overall effect of climate change on WA, particularly in areas characterized by limited shifts in precipitation regime, such as arid (e.g., central Asia and Australia) and boreal regions (e.g., northern Canada and Siberia; Figures S23 and S25).

To further illustrate the underlying mechanisms which modulate the impact of climate change on WA, we averaged the marginal contributions of direct and indirect effects of climate change across gradients of precipitation change (δP) and aridity (ETp/P). We found that the contribution of the indirect climate effect on WA becomes larger under drier climate (Figure 5d)—where both sensitivity of ET to vegetation alterations (Figure 3c) and resulting impact (Figure 4a) are larger—whereas the direct climate effect exhibits an opposite relationship with ETp/P (Figure 5c). These patterns suggest that the local background climate strongly regulates the effect of ET change on WA. More importantly, the high positive contribution of the indirect climate effect on WA under high ETp/P (Figure 5d) indicates that climate-induced vegetation change tends to exacerbate the declining WA in drylands, accelerating the water depletion of ecosystems that already suffer from water stress. Specifically, across the drylands with slight decrease in precipitation (δP: −0.4–0 mm year−2), climate-induced vegetation change amplifies the decline in WA by 22.0% (Figure 5d).

Such exacerbation in declining WA is evident in 42.9% of global land dominated by rainfed croplands, and a considerable fraction of them are located in drylands (e.g., Sahel, dryland belt of northern Eurasia, and Australia; Figure 6a,c). Obviously, climate-induced vegetation change and associated ET change are more menace to water resources for rainfed croplands in drylands with the average magnitude of −0.514 ± 0.467 mm year−2, resulting in a further 12.6% decrease in WA for local agricultural production (Figure 6b,d). Especially for those with slight decrease in precipitation (δP: −0.4–0 mm year−2), indirect effect of climate change on ET contributes 69.9% of decrease in regional WA, and therefore poses an additional and tremendous pressure to agricultural water supply (Figure 6d).

4 DISCUSSION

Climate change, together with rising atmospheric CO2 concentration, land cover change, and nitrogen deposition, has resulted in the global greening of vegetation since 1980s (Piao et al., 2020). Among these factors, CO2 fertilization is considered the dominant driver of observed greening (Los, 2013), accounting for 70% of global LAI trend during 1982–2009 (Zhu et al., 2016). However, multiple lines of evidence from satellite retrievals and site observations confirmed a declining magnitude of the CO2 fertilization effect in recent years (Peñuelas et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2020). By contrast, land cover change and nitrogen deposition contribute much less to the global greening (4% and 9%, respectively), but may play a critical role in some regions (Zhu et al., 2016). For instance, land abandonment and afforestation are largely responsible for the greening in European seminatural vegetation (Buitenwerf et al., 2018). In other parts of the globe, such as in India and China, recent greening mostly overlaps with the croplands, highlighting the importance of land management (e.g., agricultural intensification) in increasing leaf area of vegetation (Chen et al., 2019). As for the effect of climate change, aforementioned analysis focusing on an earlier period (1982–2009) suggested that the global contribution of climate change to increasing greenness is 8.0% (Zhu et al., 2016), which is lower than our estimates of climate change contribution during the period 1982–2016 (33.5%, Figure 2a). Such stronger signal of climate change on greening emerging here is indeed reasonable, given the observed recent decline of the CO2 fertilization effect on vegetation photosynthesis (Wang et al., 2020). Moreover, a recent review pointed out that the contribution of climate change reported in different global studies varies greatly, with standard deviation of 20.0% (Tharammal et al., 2019), probably owing to the use of different models and attribution approaches. Therein, the large inter-model divergence arises from the differences in model representation of ecosystem processes and structure (Forzieri et al., 2018), which partly explains the apparent contradiction between CABLE-POP and other 13 models (Figure 2a; Figure S10). Uncertainty analysis further indicates that discrepancy in model simulations is the major source of uncertainties, as reflected by the largest standard deviation from Exp3 (Figures S26 and S27).

Despite that the TRENDY framework represents the state-of-the-art simulation of land—atmosphere interactions, we recognized that the representation of biophysical processes under land cover changes may present some limitations, as also documented in recent literature (Duveiller et al., 2018; Forzieri et al., 2018). Indeed, the integration of complex land dynamics such as those driven by forest management, grazing, changes in cultivation practices and varieties, irrigation, and disturbances into LSMs is still at its infancy (Bonan & Doney, 2018). These limitations of LSMs can potentially affect our capacity to disentangle the climate signals in regions where variations in LAI are strongly affected by other major drivers than climate. We therefore performed a set of additional experiments to verify if the possible partial representation of these processes in the models has biased our assessments. For each combination of the three satellite LAI products and 14 TRENDY models, we first computed the Spearman's correlation between time series of simulated LAI in experiment S3 and satellite-driven LAI at the grid-cell scale. High correlation values indicate that model simulates reasonably well major processes, while low correlation values suggest that some important processes (e.g., harvesting, disturbance, grazing, and forest management) are poorly represented in the model (Figure S30a). We then compared the correlation values with RCCLI (estimated by Equation 2, see Figure S9). The term RCCLI was then binned as a function of climatological mean precipitation and air temperature. For each climate bin, we extracted the sample of correlation values and grouped in terciles. We focused on the first and third terciles and retrieved the two corresponding RCCLI distributions. Figure S30b shows the difference in the RCCLI means between the first and third tercile distributions at the climate bin scale based on the combination of GIMMS3g satellite data and OCN model simulations. The statistical significance of the difference was assessed by t-test. Based on the outcomes of the significance test, we may have two opposite conditions:
  • Bins with statistically significant differences in RCCLI among high and low correlation samples suggest that the partial capacity of LSMs to capture certain processes, such as disturbances, grazing, and forest management, affects the simulated climate-driven signal in LAI trend.
  • Bins with no statistically significant differences in RCCLI indicate that the possible partial representation of some processes in LSMs does not affect the retrievals of the simulated climate-driven signal in LAI trend, and therefore the robustness of our results.

Results clearly show that there is no significant difference in RCCLI (p < .05) under almost all climate conditions (168 out of 177 climate bins), demonstrating that the possible partial representation of some processes (e.g., land management and disturbance) in TRENDY models, do not bias our assessment on the role of climate change in influencing long-term trends in LAI. Similar conclusion can also be derived based on the other combinations (Figure S30c,d), and further corroborated by a similar exercise developed over the latitudinal gradient (Figure S30e).

Although climate change is the secondary driver of global greening, it exerts the important and even dominant role in vegetation greenness changes in specific regions, such as northern high latitudes mentioned above (see Section 3.1). Rising temperature enhances vegetation photosynthesis and extends growing season length (Piao et al., 2017), thereby resulting in the strong positive effect of climate change on vegetation greenness in northern lands (Figure 2b). The dominant role of the accelerated boreal warming on the recent dynamics of northern vegetation has also been demonstrated by related literature (Lucht et al., 2002). The emerging greening in drylands (e.g., Sahel and southern Africa) has been mainly attributed to changes in precipitation combined with an increase in water use efficiency (Gonsamo et al., 2021) while the browning in tropical and temperate regions (e.g., Amazonian forest and central Asia) has been prominently associated with a decrease in rainfall (Hilker et al., 2014; Li et al., 2015). Correspondingly, for these regions, the indirect effect of climate change (through LAI) on ET and WA ought to be non-negligible, as demonstrated in previous analyses (Figures 4 and 5), and further discussed later on.

The positive sensitivity of annual ET to variations in LAI at the global extent (i.e., ∂ET/∂LAI > 0, Figure 3a) can be recognized as the consequence of the increase in evaporative surface (Forzieri et al., 2017). Occurrence of extremely high ∂ET/∂LAI in drylands is most likely because the ratio between Ec and ET is high (Figure S31) and the atmospheric evaporative demand is high (Sánchez-Carrillo et al., 2004). Moreover, an increase in LAI can lead to an increase in ET through complex adjustments such as root development to enhance groundwater extraction (Fan et al., 2013) and seasonal changes in phenology (Morisette et al., 2009), although at the expense of further drying out the soils (Miralles et al., 2019). In contrast, as LAI increases, the shading by increased foliage cover decreases the amount of radiation reaching the ground, ultimately leading to a reduction in Es (Ukkola et al., 2016). This explains the reason for the generally negative value of ∂Es/∂LAI at the global scale (Figure S18), and also, the higher sensitivity of Ec to LAI changes than total ET at most latitudinal bands (Figure 3b). Furthermore, our study elucidated the possible mechanisms underlying the spatial heterogeneity in sensitivities of ET and its components to LAI changes. The positive relationship between ∂ET/∂LAI and the ETp/P revealed here is in accordance with previous studies (Farley et al., 2005; Forzieri et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2018). Meanwhile, low value of ∂ET/∂LAI in regions with high LAI is largely due to the high humidity of regions with high LAI (leading to a relatively low Ec/ET; Figure S31) and to a saturation effect over dense vegetation covers (Guillevic et al., 2002).

It should be noted that the functional relationship adopted here to estimate ET sensitivity (i.e., Equation 4) assumes that interannual variations in ET are dominated by linear responses to changes in environmental factors. To evaluate the potential impact of nonlinear relationships (Liljedahl et al., 2011) on regression results, we performed an additional set of modeling experiments and expressed the interannual variations in ET within a multiple nonlinear regression that incorporates interaction and quadratic terms (details see Text S4). The high consistency of results obtained from the linear and nonlinear multiple regression frameworks suggests that nonlinear terms included as additional predictors in the modeling framework have minor effect on the sensitivity estimates (Figure 7; Figure S32). More importantly, the linear framework shows higher performances in terms of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion compared to the nonlinear framework across all combinations of ET and LAI datasets (Table S2), and was therefore retained for our analyses. Moreover, VIF quantified among the predictors identified in the multiple linear regression model shows low values in most parts of the globe, confirming their limited interdependences (Figure S11). Results obtained by the use of alternative climate datasets (i.e., CRU v4.05 and CRU-JRA v2.2) produce consistent spatial pattern of ET sensitivity and a similar relationship of ∂ET/∂LAI with local environments, demonstrating a substantial independence of our model results on the input datasets (Text S5). Altogether, these results demonstrate the validity of the overall linear regression framework adopted here to quantify the sensitivity of ET to LAI variations and confirm the robustness of our findings.

Details are in the caption following the image
Comparison of ET sensitivity estimates against those based on nonlinear modeling framework. Spatial patterns of sensitivities of annual ET to (a) change in growing season-averaged LAI (∂ET/∂LAI), (b) to change in annually averaged temperature (∂ET/∂T), (c) to change in annually cumulated precipitation (∂ET/∂P), and (d) to change in annually averaged incoming solar radiation (∂ET/∂Rs) based on equation (Bonan & Doney, 2018) which incorporates the nonlinear response of ET (for details, see Text S4). For each vegetated grid cell, sensitivity is derived from the average of 15-member ensemble (5 ET products × 3 satellite LAI products, for details, see Section 2). Regions labeled by black dots indicate sensitivities that are statistically significant (Student's t-test, p < .05). Dots are spaced 3° in both latitude and longitude, and statistics were computed in 9° × 9° spatial moving window. (e–h) Comparisons of ∂ET/∂LAI, ∂ET/∂T, ∂ET/∂P, and ∂ET/∂Rs estimated by equation (Bonan & Doney, 2018) against those estimated by Equation (4). Each symbol represents one vegetated grid cell. Red dotted lines indicate the best fit with equation provided on each subplot. Map lines delineate study areas and do not necessarily depict accepted national boundaries. ET, evapotranspiration; LAI, leaf area index. [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]

Previous studies focusing on the direct effect of changes in climatic factors (such as temperature, precipitation, and radiation) found that climate change directly promotes multidecadal rise of global and regional terrestrial ET (e.g., Douville et al., 2013; Helbig et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2015). Positive direct effect of climate change on ET over the last decades has been detected based on various approaches, including remote-sensing algorithms, LSMs, and upscaling of in situ measurements. However, by neglecting the indirect component of climate change, these studies cannot reproduce the net climate signal on the water cycle. Our study suggested that climate-induced vegetation changes have an additional positive effect on global ET (Figure 4), and therefore, the total magnitude of global ET rise induced by climate change has long been underestimated. Such exacerbating effect on ET is still evident with the application of CRU climate dataset, verifying the robustness of this finding (Figure S37). Exception happens in regions with a warmer climate but reduced or stable precipitation (Figure S23a,b). Even though the ET rise induced by the direct effect of climate change, such climate conditions limit vegetation growth (Hilker et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2011), and ultimately result in an LAI-driven compensatory negative effect on ET (Figure 4c).

Although the indirect effect via associated changes in vegetation greenness amplifies the direct effect of climate change on global ET (Figure 4), decrease in precipitation undoubtedly is the dominant cause of the climate-induced reduction in WA at the global extent and also for most regions (Figure S25), consistently with previous studies (Lutz et al., 2014; Seager et al., 2013). Nevertheless, variations in ET directly and indirectly related to climate change exert a strong control on WA for one-fifth of global vegetated land experiencing low trend in precipitation (Figure 5), which also should not be ignored. Furthermore, ET response to climate-induced vegetation changes shows high contribution to shift in WA in drylands (Figure 5d). The ongoing rise in ratio between Ec and ET in drylands is increasing the coupling strength of the vegetation–climate interplay (Forzieri et al., 2020) and may ultimately lead to an increasing contribution of the indirect climate effect, in particular when coupled with the drying of the surface. More importantly, the high positive contribution means that climate-induced vegetation greening tends to exacerbate the decline in WA, particularly for drylands with decreasing precipitation (Figure 5d). In view of the expected increase in LAI (Mahowald et al., 2016) and drought conditions across most of the globe (Dai, 2013), the negative effect of climate-induced vegetation change on WA is bound to be further intensified. In turn, lower WA in drylands may limit vegetation growth and associated ET, reduce moisture recycling for precipitation (Zhou et al., 2021), and further inhibit vegetation growth and intensify the feedback loop (Schumacher et al., 2022; Tietjen et al., 2017), eventually leading to ecosystem degradation. In addition to ecosystem health, such exacerbation in declining WA also restricts water supply for rainfed agricultural production in drylands (Figure 6). Considering that rainfed croplands (a large proportion is located in drylands) meet about 60% of the food and nutritional needs of the world's population (Biradar et al., 2009), lower WA induced by indirect effect of climate change undoubtedly represents a serious threat to the global food security and even the stability of human society, particularly in view of a burgeoning human population and the corresponding higher food demand in coming decades (Godfray et al., 2010). These findings stress the importance of adaptation actions and plans to secure agricultural production in these vulnerable regions and societies exposed to the pressure of climate change on vital water resources.

5 CONCLUSION

Our study provides novel evidence of a relevant mechanism in the Earth system that leads to the amplification of climate impacts on ET and fosters the decline of WA in extended regions of the World. We show that, in addition to the direct effects of variations in factors such as precipitation and temperature on ET (Helbig et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2015), climate change has had considerable indirect effects on the water cycle through adjustments in terrestrial vegetation. Averaged at the global level, these indirect climate effects—via associated vegetation change—amplifies the positive direct effect and contributes to further increase the land ET under a changing climate (Figure 4). Such indirect effects further exacerbate the declining WA in regions already vulnerable to climate change, particularly arid zones with limited recharge rates (Figure 5), and consequently threaten the water supply for ecosystems and for rainfed agricultural production in drylands (Figure 6). Considering the expected transition from a CO2 fertilization-dominated period to a warming/drying-dominated period (Peñuelas et al., 2017; Yuan et al., 2019), the indirect effect (through LAI) of climate change on water cycle quantified here will be plausibly bound to be further magnified in the near future with potential impacts on land-based mitigation potentials and on the sustainability of human activities. In this respect, our results contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the interaction mechanisms between land and climate under current conditions, and may provide the ideal benchmark to improve the representation of these processes in land models, ultimately enhancing the robustness of model-based projections of WA. The expected further intensification of water losses via climate-induced vegetation change in water-limited environments could indeed exacerbate the competing water demands for ecosystem and anthropogenic needs and thus require investments in adaptation measures and new technological solutions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U2240218, 51979071), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (B210203052, B200204016), the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX21_0502), the Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province, the National “Ten Thousand Program” Youth Talent, and the 333 Project of Jiangsu Province. We thank Ke Zhang (Hohai University) for providing the update of PLSH data, and thank Youngryel Ryu (Seoul National University) for providing the latest version of BESS data.

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST

    The authors declare no conflict of interests.

    DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

    All observation-based datasets that support the findings of this study are publicly available, as referenced in Section 2. Therein, satellite-based LAI datasets used in this study are available through the following sources: GIMMS3g (http://sites.bu.edu/cliveg/datacodes/), GLASS (http://www.glass.umd.edu/), and GLOBMAP (https://zenodo.org/record/4700264). Five observation-based ET products are, respectively, available at the following links: BESS (http://environment.snu.ac.kr/bess-flux/), FLUXCOM (https://www.bgc-jena.mpg.de/geodb/projects/Home.php), GLDAS (https://ldas.gsfc.nasa.gov/gldas), GLEAM (https://www.gleam.eu/), and PLSH (http://files.ntsg.umt.edu/data/). Model outputs generated by LSM groups are available from the TRENDY project (https://sites.exeter.ac.uk/trendy/). All generated data and Matlab (R2016a) code are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

    Volume29, Issue6

    March 2023

    Pages 1628-1647

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.