# Documentation Review Report

**Branch**: feat/177-agent-adapter-migration -> main
**Date**: 2026-05-19

## Issues in Your Changes (BLOCKING)

### CRITICAL

(none)

### HIGH

**README.md not updated -- 5 stale Gemini references** - `README.md:61,66,226,240,249`
**Confidence**: 95%
- Problem: README.md still references Gemini as a supported agent in 5 places: line 61 ("Autobeat works with Claude Code, Codex, Gemini"), line 66 (prerequisites listing `gemini`), line 226 ("Four agent runtimes" including Gemini), line 240 (`beat agents config set gemini`), and line 249 (Gemini API key table row). This is the primary user-facing document and will actively mislead new users into trying to configure a removed agent.
- Fix: Remove all Gemini references from README.md -- update agent counts from "four" to "two" (plus Ollama), remove the `gemini` CLI examples, remove the `gemini` row from the API key table, update the prerequisites list.

**Skills files not updated -- 10 stale Gemini references across 4 files** - `skills/autobeat/SKILL.md:15,164,185`, `skills/autobeat/references/capability-matrix.md:20,22,344,400,533`, `skills/autobeat/references/loops.md:238`, `skills/autobeat/references/orchestration.md:48`
**Confidence**: 95%
- Problem: The skills/ directory provides structured context injected into AI agents. These files still list Gemini as a supported agent, reference `GEMINI_SYSTEM_MD`, document the removed `beat agents refresh-base-prompt` command (capability-matrix.md:533), and show `gemini` in agent selection enums. An AI agent reading these skill files will attempt to use Gemini, generating invalid commands.
- Fix: Update all 4 skill files to remove Gemini references, update agent lists to `claude, codex`, remove the `refresh-base-prompt` command documentation, and remove the Gemini system prompt row.

### MEDIUM

**CHANGELOG.md not updated for breaking change** - `CHANGELOG.md`
**Confidence**: 90%
- Problem: CHANGELOG.md has no entry for this branch's changes. Removing Gemini support is a breaking change (AgentProvider narrowed, CLI command removed, tasks with agent='gemini' fail). The CHANGELOG still references Gemini in 5 historical entries (lines 58, 100, 139, 157, 340), which is acceptable for history, but the absence of a new `[Unreleased]` entry documenting the removal is a gap. Users upgrading will not know Gemini support was dropped without reading release notes.
- Fix: Add an `[Unreleased]` entry in CHANGELOG.md documenting: Gemini adapter removed, AgentProvider narrowed to 'claude' | 'codex', `beat agents refresh-base-prompt` command removed, migration v28 updates CHECK constraint.

**FEATURES.md "Last Updated" header is stale** - `docs/FEATURES.md:5`
**Confidence**: 85%
- Problem: The "Last Updated" line reads "May 2026 (2026-05-08)" but this branch modifies the file with Gemini removal changes. When merged, the document content will reflect post-Gemini removal but the header will claim the last update was May 8.
- Fix: Update to current date: `Last Updated: May 2026 (2026-05-19)` (or the merge date).

## Issues in Code You Touched (Should Fix)

### MEDIUM

**CHANGELOG.md historical entries still reference Gemini as current** - `CHANGELOG.md:58,139`
**Confidence**: 65% (see Suggestions)
- Deferred to Suggestions -- historical entries are debatable.

## Pre-existing Issues (Not Blocking)

### MEDIUM

**docs/SETUP_GUIDE.md has duplicate lines** - `docs/SETUP_GUIDE.md:102,107`
**Confidence**: 90%
- Problem: Lines 102 and 107 are duplicated: "To use with an actual agent CLI (not mock):" appears twice, and "3. Test with real tasks" appears twice. This appears to be a pre-existing copy-paste error, not introduced by this branch (the branch only changed line 105).
- Fix: Remove the duplicate lines.

**Release notes files contain historical Gemini references** - `docs/releases/RELEASE_NOTES_v0.5.0.md`, `docs/releases/RELEASE_NOTES_v1.0.0.md`, `docs/releases/RELEASE_NOTES_v1.1.0.md`, `docs/releases/RELEASE_NOTES_v1.2.0.md`, `docs/releases/RELEASE_NOTES_v1.3.0.md`, `docs/releases/RELEASE_NOTES_v1.4.0.md`, `docs/releases/RELEASE_NOTES_v1.5.0.md`
**Confidence**: 80%
- Problem: Seven release notes files reference Gemini. These are historical documents describing what shipped in those versions, so they are factually accurate for their point in time. However, the v1.5.0 release notes (lines 60, 63) show `beat agents config set gemini runtime ollama` and `beat agents config set gemini runtime none` as examples, which will fail after this PR merges.
- Fix: Historical release notes for v0.5.0 through v1.4.0 should remain unchanged (they document what existed at that time). The v1.5.0 release notes could add a note that Gemini was subsequently removed, or this can be handled in the next release's notes.

## Suggestions (Lower Confidence)

- **CHANGELOG.md historical Gemini wording** - `CHANGELOG.md:58,139` (Confidence: 65%) -- Lines like "wired through Claude, Codex, and Gemini adapters" and "`.gemini/`" in historical entries are factually accurate for those versions. Updating them is a judgment call; leaving them preserves history but could confuse readers scanning the CHANGELOG top-to-bottom.

- **CLAUDE.md File Locations table still references gemini-adapter.ts path** (Confidence: 70%) -- The File Locations table in CLAUDE.md does not list `gemini-adapter.ts`, so no stale entry exists. However, the table lacks a "Gemini adapter" row being explicitly removed -- this is a non-issue since the file was never listed there.

## Summary
| Category | CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW |
|----------|----------|------|--------|-----|
| Blocking | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Should Fix | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pre-existing | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |

**Documentation Score**: 5/10
**Recommendation**: CHANGES_REQUESTED

The core documentation files directly changed (CLAUDE.md, FEATURES.md, ROADMAP.md, SETUP_GUIDE.md, mcp-instructions.ts, help.ts) are well-updated and consistent. However, the README.md (primary user-facing document) and all skills/ files (AI agent context) were not updated, leaving 15+ stale Gemini references that will actively mislead users and agents. The CHANGELOG.md also lacks an entry for this breaking change. These are significant gaps for a feature removal PR. Avoids PF-002 -- this is a clean removal with no backward-compatibility scaffolding for a feature being fully dropped, which is the correct approach.
