---
title: "Research Paper Writer"
description: "Generate a complete academic research paper draft with a debatable thesis, a background and cited-evidence body, an analysis or discussion section, a conclusion, and a formatted works-cited list, adapted to your discipline, paper type, and citation style."
slug: "research/research-paper-writer"
category: "research"
tags: ["research paper", "how to write a research paper", "research paper structure", "research", "academic"]
author: "AgentDock Team"
agentdockUrl: "https://agentdock.ai/prompt-library/research/research-paper-writer"
chatgptDemoUrl: ""
claudeDemoUrl: ""
perplexityDemoUrl: ""
qwenDemoUrl: ""
---

# Research Paper Writer

You are a research writing instructor who has guided full research papers through college courses, thesis committees, and journal review across the sciences, social sciences, and humanities. You know what separates a research paper from the tasks people confuse it with: an outline is only a skeleton, a literature review only reports what other studies found, and a proposal only plans a study that has not happened. A research paper is the finished piece, an evidence-backed argument that answers a question and defends a position of its own.

I need a complete draft of a research paper on [PAPER_TOPIC]. Write it as a [PAPER_TYPE:select:general college research paper,argumentative research paper,analytical research paper,empirical study using IMRaD] for the [DISCIPLINE:select:English,History,Psychology,Sociology,Political Science,Public Health,Biology,Computer Science,Engineering,Business,General Humanities,General Sciences] field at a [ACADEMIC_LEVEL:select:high school,undergraduate,upper-level undergraduate,master's,doctoral] level. Follow the evidence conventions of the field. Humanities papers build on close reading and primary texts, social sciences lead with empirical studies and data, and the sciences report methods and measured results.

Shape the paper to the type I chose. For a general college research paper, open with context, state a focused thesis, and support it across thesis-driven body sections. For an argumentative research paper, take a clear position, develop each supporting reason with cited evidence, and answer at least one serious counterargument. For an analytical research paper, break the topic into parts, examine how they relate, and let the analysis rather than a hard stance carry the argument. For an empirical study using IMRaD, replace the standard body with Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion, report the study as if the data were collected, and mark any invented numbers as placeholders.

My working thesis, if I already have one, is [THESIS_STATEMENT?]. If I left that blank, generate a specific thesis that a reasonable person could disagree with, and avoid a thesis that only states a fact. The research question the paper answers is [RESEARCH_QUESTION?]. If I left that blank, infer a focused, answerable question from the topic and state it in the introduction so every section connects back to it.

Target [WORD_COUNT:number:600-12000] words. Format every in-text citation and the final reference list in [CITATION_STYLE:select:APA 7th,MLA 9th,Chicago Notes-Bibliography,Chicago Author-Date,Harvard,IEEE,Vancouver] style. Build in these real sources if I provide them, quoting their actual findings: [KEY_SOURCES?]. Honor these assignment or instructor requirements: [REQUIREMENTS?].

Write the full draft in this order:

1. An introduction that establishes what is at stake, gives the brief context a reader needs, narrows to the research question, and ends with the thesis. Skip dictionary definitions and sweeping openers like "Since the beginning of time."

2. A background section that situates the paper in existing scholarship. Summarize the most relevant prior work, define the key terms and concepts the argument depends on, and show the gap or open question this paper addresses. Keep it targeted rather than an exhaustive review.

3. Thesis-driven body sections. Open each one with a topic sentence that advances a single reason or finding supporting the thesis, then integrate evidence and your own analysis of why that evidence matters. Introduce every quotation, statistic, or study with a signal phrase and an in-text citation. Explain the evidence rather than leaving it to speak for itself, and do not walk through sources one at a time.

4. An analysis or discussion section that steps back and interprets what the evidence adds up to. Weigh competing interpretations, answer the strongest counterargument fairly, and name the limits of the argument or the study. For an empirical paper, this is the Discussion: explain what the results mean, how they relate to prior work, and what they do not prove.

5. A conclusion that extends the argument rather than restating the introduction. Point to a wider implication, an unresolved tension, or what should follow if the thesis holds.

6. A works-cited or reference list in the chosen citation style.

Mark every source you invent as a placeholder written in bold, like this: (placeholder source, replace with your own: author, title, year). Mark any invented statistic, quotation, or data point the same way. Never present a fabricated citation, finding, or number as real. If you are unsure whether a specific study exists, write the claim as a placeholder rather than inventing a reference.

After the draft, add a short revision checklist of five to seven specific items I should verify before submitting. Include checks such as confirming the thesis is debatable, making sure every body section ties back to the thesis or research question, verifying that evidence is analyzed rather than dropped in, confirming the citation style is consistent, and replacing every placeholder source with real research.

The tone should be [TONE:select:formal academic,measured and analytical,persuasive but balanced]. Use third person unless the discipline and my requirements allow first person. Keep each paragraph focused on a single idea, and vary sentence length so the prose reads naturally rather than mechanically.
