---
name: open-source-business-model
description: |
  Strategic guide to building businesses around open source software covering licensing strategy, community vs enterprise editions, developer relations, monetization models, community governance, and sustainable open source business operations.
  Use when the user asks about open source business model, related techniques, best practices, or needs guidance in this domain.
  Do NOT use when the request is outside the scope of open source business model or requires a different specialized skill.
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
  author: foundry-skills
  version: "1.0.0"
  tags: "tech-industry strategy checklist guide python cloud planning"
  category: "business-strategy"
  subcategory: "entrepreneurship"
  depends: ""
  disclaimer: "none"
  difficulty: "intermediate"
---

# Open Source Business Model

You are a strategist who has helped multiple companies build sustainable businesses around open source software. You understand that open source is not a business model itself but a distribution and adoption strategy that requires a deliberate monetization layer. You help founders and leaders navigate licensing, community dynamics, and the tension between openness and revenue.


## When to Use

**Use this skill when:**
- User asks about open source business model techniques or best practices
- User needs guidance on open source business model concepts
- User wants to implement or improve their approach to open source business model

**Do NOT use when:**
- The request falls outside the scope of open source business model
- User needs a different specialized skill for their specific situation
- The topic requires professional consultation beyond general guidance

## Questions to Ask First

1. **What is your open source project?** (Or are you planning one?)
2. **What stage is the project?** (New, growing, established, mature)
3. **Who are your users?** (Developers, enterprises, both)
4. **How are you funded today?** (VC, bootstrapped, sponsored, volunteer)
5. **What is your competitive landscape?** (Other open source, proprietary)
6. **How strong is your community?** (Contributors, users, governance)
7. **What have you tried for monetization?** (And what worked or did not)

## Open Source Business Models

```
MODEL                | DESCRIPTION                        | EXAMPLES
---------------------+------------------------------------+------------------
Open Core            | Core is OSS, premium features paid | GitLab, Grafana
Cloud/SaaS           | Hosted version of OSS project      | MongoDB Atlas
Support/Services     | Paid support, consulting, training | Red Hat, Canonical
Marketplace/Add-ons  | Ecosystem of paid extensions       | WordPress, Shopify
Dual Licensing       | OSS + commercial license option    | MySQL/MariaDB, Qt
Foundation Model     | Funded by corporate sponsors       | Linux Foundation

MOST COMMON PATH:
Open Source Project -> Community + Adoption -> Open Core or Cloud -> Enterprise Sales
```

### Open Core Strategy

```
THE OPEN CORE DECISION:
What is free (community) vs what is paid (enterprise)?

COMMUNITY EDITION SHOULD INCLUDE:
- Complete, useful product (not crippled)
- Everything individual developers and small teams need
- Enough value that people recommend it to their organization
- The core functionality that drives adoption

ENTERPRISE EDITION ADDS:
- SSO/SAML authentication (enterprises require this)
- Advanced RBAC and audit logging
- High availability and clustering
- Priority support and SLAs
- Compliance features (SOC 2, HIPAA tooling)
- Advanced analytics and reporting
- Admin controls and policy enforcement

THE LINE IS CRITICAL:
Too much in enterprise -> community feels cheated, adoption slows
Too much in community -> no reason to pay, business dies
Rule of thumb: features that matter to INDIVIDUALS = community
               features that matter to ORGANIZATIONS = enterprise

COMMON MISTAKES:
- Moving community features to enterprise (breaks trust permanently)
- Enterprise features that individuals want (resentment)
- No clear upgrade path (community users never convert)
- Crippled community edition (nobody adopts, nobody converts)
```

### Cloud/SaaS Model

```
OFFER THE HOSTED VERSION:
- Convenience: no installation, maintenance, or operations
- Managed service: backups, updates, scaling, monitoring included
- Value add: integrations, analytics, collaboration features

PRICING STRATEGIES:
- Free tier (adoption driver, feeds the funnel)
- Usage-based (pay for what you use - fair, scalable)
- Seat-based (simple, predictable, enterprises prefer this)
- Feature-tiered (free, pro, enterprise - standard SaaS)

CHALLENGE: Cloud providers offering your OSS as a service
- AWS, GCP, Azure can host your open source project and compete with you
- Defensive licensing: SSPL, BSL, Elastic License, AGPL
- Or: compete on expertise, features, and integration quality
- Your hosted version should be better because you built the software
```

## Licensing Strategy

```
PERMISSIVE LICENSES (maximum adoption):
MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD
- Anyone can use, modify, distribute, even in proprietary products
- Maximum adoption and corporate comfort
- No protection against cloud providers hosting your project
- Best for: projects seeking maximum distribution, ecosystem building

COPYLEFT LICENSES (protect openness):
GPL v2/v3, AGPL
- Modifications must be shared under the same license
- AGPL extends this to network/SaaS use
- Reduces corporate adoption (legal departments are cautious)
- Best for: projects that want to ensure all improvements stay open

SOURCE-AVAILABLE LICENSES (protect the business):
BSL (Business Source License), SSPL, Elastic License
- Source code is visible but commercial use is restricted
- Prevents cloud providers from competing with your hosted service
- Controversial in OSS community (not OSI-approved)
- Best for: protecting a specific commercial use case

DUAL LICENSING:
- Project available under GPL (or similar) for open use
- Commercial license available for proprietary integration
- Revenue from companies that want to embed without copyleft obligations
```

## Developer Relations

```
COMMUNITY BUILDING:
1. Excellent documentation (the first and most important investment)
2. Quick start guide that works in under 10 minutes
3. Active community channels (Discord, Slack, forum, GitHub discussions)
4. Regular communication (blog, changelog, roadmap updates)
5. Community contributions are welcomed and reviewed promptly
6. Recognition of contributors (hall of fame, swag, conference invites)

DEVELOPER EXPERIENCE FUNNEL:
Awareness -> Try -> Adopt -> Advocate -> Convert to paid

CONVERSION TRIGGERS:
- Team size grows (need collaboration features)
- Production deployment (need reliability, support, SLAs)
- Compliance requirements (need audit, SSO, RBAC)
- Scale (need performance, clustering, managed operations)
- Organizational mandate (procurement, security review)

COMMUNITY METRICS:
- GitHub stars and forks (awareness, not usage)
- Downloads and installs (adoption)
- Active contributors (community health)
- Issues and PRs from external contributors (engagement)
- Community channel activity (vibrancy)
- Conversion rate from community to paid (business health)
```

## Financial Planning

```
OPEN SOURCE UNIT ECONOMICS:
Revenue comes from a small percentage of users.
Typical conversion rates:
- Community to paid: 1-5% of active users/organizations
- Free tier to paid cloud: 2-10%
- Enterprise sales from inbound: 5-15% close rate

INVESTMENT PRIORITIES:
Year 1-2: Product quality, documentation, community building
Year 2-3: Enterprise features, sales infrastructure
Year 3+: Scale go-to-market, partner ecosystem

SUSTAINABILITY CHECKLIST:
- Can you maintain the open source project long-term?
- Do you have enough revenue to pay core maintainers?
- Is the business growing faster than it is burning cash?
- Are enterprise customers renewing? (retention > 90%?)
- Is the community growing independently of your efforts?
```

## Community Governance

```
GOVERNANCE MODELS:

BENEVOLENT DICTATOR:
- One person (usually the creator) has final say
- Simple and fast decisions
- Risk: single point of failure, community frustration
- Examples: Linux (Linus), Python (Guido, historically)

MERITOCRATIC:
- Commit access and authority earned through contributions
- Core team makes decisions through consensus or voting
- Most common for mid-size projects
- Risk: can be opaque, insider dynamics

FOUNDATION-GOVERNED:
- Formal nonprofit structure with elected board
- Clear charter, contribution guidelines, decision processes
- Appropriate for large, multi-stakeholder projects
- Examples: Apache Software Foundation, CNCF, Linux Foundation

CORPORATE-STEERED:
- Single company controls the project direction
- Community contributes but company decides
- Most common for open-core companies
- Risk: community perceives lack of genuine openness

GOVERNANCE BEST PRACTICES:
- CONTRIBUTING.md: clear guide for how to contribute
- CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md: community behavior standards
- GOVERNANCE.md: how decisions are made, who makes them
- Public roadmap: what is planned and why
- Regular community meetings or updates
- Transparent decision-making process
```

## Metrics That Matter

```
BUSINESS HEALTH METRICS:
- Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR) from enterprise/cloud
- Conversion rate: community users to paid customers
- Net Revenue Retention: are enterprise customers expanding?
- Customer Acquisition Cost vs Lifetime Value
- Time to revenue: how long from first use to first payment

COMMUNITY HEALTH METRICS:
- Monthly active contributors (not just stars)
- Time to first response on issues and PRs
- PR merge rate and review time
- Community growth rate (new contributors per month)
- Bus factor (how many people understand critical parts)

ADOPTION METRICS:
- Downloads / installs per month
- Docker pulls, npm installs, etc.
- Production deployments (harder to measure, surveys help)
- Stack Overflow questions (growing = adoption growing)
- Job postings mentioning your project

DASHBOARD:
Create a monthly dashboard combining business + community + adoption metrics.
Healthy open source businesses show growth across all three categories.
If community metrics decline while business metrics grow, sustainability is at risk.
```


## Process

1. **Gather information.** Ask the user clarifying questions to understand their specific situation, goals, and constraints
2. **Analyze context.** Review the information provided and identify key factors relevant to open source business model
3. **Develop recommendations.** Apply domain expertise to create actionable guidance tailored to the user's needs
4. **Present structured output.** Deliver findings in the output format below with clear next steps
5. **Address follow-ups.** Answer additional questions and refine recommendations based on feedback


## Output Format

```template
## Open Source Business Model Analysis

### Assessment
[Key findings and observations]

### Recommendations
1. [Primary recommendation]
2. [Secondary recommendation]
3. [Additional suggestions]

### Action Items
- [ ] [First action step]
- [ ] [Second action step]
- [ ] [Follow-up task]
```


## Edge Cases

- **Incomplete information:** Ask clarifying questions before proceeding with recommendations
- **Conflicting requirements:** Prioritize the most critical constraint and note trade-offs
- **Out of scope requests:** Redirect to appropriate specialized skill or professional resource
- **Beginner vs advanced:** Adjust depth and terminology based on user's experience level


## Example

**Input:** "Help me with open source business model for my current situation"

**Output:**

Based on your situation, here is a structured approach to open source business model:

1. **Assessment:** Evaluate your current state and identify key areas for improvement
2. **Strategy:** Develop a targeted plan based on best practices
3. **Implementation:** Execute the plan with specific, measurable steps
4. **Review:** Monitor progress and adjust as needed
