---
name: emotional-regulation-skills
description: |
  Teaches specific named emotional regulation techniques (the STOP technique, urge surfing, cognitive reframing, emotional labeling, opposite action, and physiological soothing) with step-by-step sequences. Gathers the user's emotional challenges and triggers, then produces a personalized regulation toolkit with technique instructions and a situation-response plan.
  Use when the user asks about managing emotions, controlling anger, handling frustration, emotional regulation strategies, or building emotional resilience.
  Do NOT use for clinical emotional dysregulation treatment, personality disorder management, or replacing professional mental health support.
license: Apache-2.0
metadata:
  author: foundry-skills
  version: "1.0.0"
  tags: "mental-wellness self-care stress-management emotional-health"
  category: "health-wellness"
  subcategory: "mental-health"
  depends: ""
  disclaimer: "not-medical-advice"
  difficulty: "intermediate"
---
# Emotional Regulation Skills

> **Disclaimer:** This skill provides general wellness and health information for educational purposes only. It does NOT constitute medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment recommendations. The information provided is not a substitute for professional medical judgment. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making decisions about your health. If you are experiencing a mental health emergency, contact emergency services or a crisis line immediately.

---

## When to Use

**Use this skill when:**
- The user asks how to manage a specific strong emotion -- anger, frustration, jealousy, shame, anxiety, overwhelm, or resentment -- in daily situations
- The user describes a recurring trigger situation where their emotional reaction causes regret, conflict, or physical stress (clenched jaw, heart pounding, stomach dropping)
- The user wants to stop reacting impulsively and create space between trigger and response
- The user wants to build a personalized system of emotional tools they can apply in real time, not just read about
- The user asks about emotional resilience, emotional intelligence, or "not letting things get to me"
- The user describes a specific pattern: yelling and regretting it, going silent and ruminating for hours, sending messages they wish they had not sent, or cycling through the same emotional loop repeatedly
- The user wants a daily practice to develop emotional awareness before a crisis forces it

**Do NOT use when:**
- The user describes self-harm urges, thoughts of suicide, or harm to others -- stop immediately and direct to a crisis line or emergency services; do not attempt regulation coaching
- The user's emotional difficulties are persistent, severe, and significantly impair work, relationships, or basic self-care most days (possible clinical territory -- recommend a licensed mental health professional without delay)
- The user asks specifically about managing bipolar mood episodes, borderline personality patterns, PTSD flashbacks, or dissociative states -- these require clinical assessment and treatment, not self-help toolkits
- The user is seeking conflict resolution scripts or advice on what another person should do or say (use a communication or conflict resolution skill instead)
- The user is asking about grief following a major loss such as death, divorce, or job loss -- complex grief has its own distinct needs and warrants a dedicated skill or professional support
- The user is a parent asking how to teach regulation skills to a child -- child development has fundamentally different mechanisms and requires a parenting-specific skill
- The user needs clinical anger management court-ordered or as part of a treatment plan -- this skill is for self-directed wellness, not clinical compliance

---

## Process

### Step 1: Gather the User's Emotional Landscape Before Recommending Anything

Do not immediately offer techniques. First understand the person in front of you. Ask specifically for:

- **The emotions that are hardest to manage.** Get granular. "Bad feelings" is too vague. Prompt for distinctions: frustration vs. rage, disappointment vs. shame, worry vs. dread, irritability vs. contempt. Granularity in naming predicts better regulation outcomes.
- **The primary recurring trigger situations.** Where does it happen? Who is present? What was said or done? What time of day? What is the physical environment? (Open office? Car? Dinner table?) Context shapes technique selection.
- **Current response patterns.** Specifically: do they tend toward external expression (snapping, yelling, sarcasm, confrontational behavior) or internal suppression (going quiet, withdrawing, ruminating for hours, replaying events)? These two patterns require different primary techniques.
- **Physical early-warning signals.** Before the emotion peaks, the body always signals first. Ask the user to identify theirs: clenched jaw, heat rising in the face or neck, tight chest, rapid heartbeat, stomach drop, shallow breathing, suddenly feeling cold, hands going tense, a buzzing sensation in the head. These signals are the only reliable cue to deploy a technique before the emotional peak is unreachable.
- **The time window available.** Can they step away from the situation for 3 minutes, or do they need invisible in-the-moment tools? Technique selection is useless if deployment is impossible.
- **The 10-point intensity threshold.** Ask the user to estimate where on a 1-10 scale their emotion peaks in the worst cases, and what score is the tipping point before they say or do something they regret. This threshold number becomes a critical design constraint for their plan.

### Step 2: Assess the Pattern Type and Select the Primary Intervention Layer

Emotional regulation techniques are not interchangeable. Each works at a different layer: physical arousal, impulse interruption, cognitive interpretation, or behavioral habit. Match the user's dominant pattern to the correct entry point.

- **High physical arousal + external expression (yelling, physical tension, impulsive messages):** Entry point must be physiological soothing. Starting with cognitive techniques while the nervous system is flooded is ineffective -- thinking is impaired when heart rate exceeds approximately 100-120 beats per minute (the cognitive interference threshold). Body first, then mind.
- **Impulse-driven reactions (sarcasm, reactive messages, cutting remarks):** Entry point is urge surfing combined with a behavioral delay rule. The urge must peak and subside before any communication occurs.
- **Internal suppression + rumination (goes quiet, replays events, stews for hours):** Entry point is emotional labeling (breaks the rumination loop by naming what is happening) followed by cognitive reframing (challenges the interpretation fueling the loop) and opposite action (interrupts the behavioral withdrawal pattern).
- **Chronic low-grade irritability or emotional numbness:** Entry point is the emotional labeling check-in as a daily awareness practice, because the signal detection system is impaired and must be rebuilt before other techniques can be cued.
- **Anxiety-adjacent emotional states (dread, worry, anticipatory frustration):** Physiological soothing and STOP technique work well at the moment of onset; cognitive reframing works well in calmer windows.

Select 3-4 techniques total for the toolkit. More than 4 creates decision fatigue during high-emotion moments and is counterproductive.

### Step 3: Teach Each Selected Technique With Exact Step-by-Step Instructions

For every technique selected, provide:
- The precise trigger condition for deploying it
- The exact sequence of steps with specific durations and sensory details
- The realistic outcome (what will and will not change as a result)
- One common mistake people make when using it for the first time

**Emotional Labeling:**
- The neuroscience basis: naming an emotion activates the prefrontal cortex and reduces amygdala activation -- the "putting feelings into words" effect. This is not metaphor; it is a measurable shift in brain activity.
- Step 1: Notice a physical signal (jaw tight, face hot, chest compressed).
- Step 2: Name the emotion with specificity. Not "stressed" but "I feel humiliated because my suggestion was laughed at without explanation."
- Step 3: Add the cause clause ("because..."). The cause clause is not optional -- it is what converts a flooded emotional state into an observation, creating the critical pause.
- Step 4: Do nothing else with the emotion yet. Labeling is complete. The urge to immediately solve, argue, or justify will be strong. Resist it for 30 seconds.
- Duration: 30 seconds. Invisible. Can be done in any setting.
- Common mistake: Using vague labels like "upset" or "emotional." Vague labels provide no regulation benefit. Specificity is the mechanism.

**STOP Technique:**
- A structured 4-step interruption sequence: Stop the action. Take three breaths (4-second inhale, 6-second exhale -- the extended exhale activates the parasympathetic nervous system via vagal stimulation). Observe what is present in the body and mind without judgment. Proceed with one deliberately chosen next action.
- The "Proceed" step requires choosing one option explicitly -- not just "calming down" and reacting again. Explicit choice is what makes STOP a regulation tool rather than a brief delay.
- Duration: 1-2 minutes. Can be made invisible with a sip of water, a moment of looking at notes, or a pause to write something down.
- Best for: Any situation where impulsive response is the problem. Works at any intensity level below the cognitive flooding threshold.
- Common mistake: Skipping the Proceed step and letting the pause be followed by the original reactive impulse.

**Urge Surfing:**
- Derived from the observation that urges are physiological events with a natural arc: they rise, peak (typically at 45-90 seconds), and subside if not acted upon. Acting on the urge -- even partially -- resets the arc back to the beginning.
- Step 1: Notice the specific urge ("I want to send a sharp reply," "I want to slam the door," "I want to say something cutting").
- Step 2: Locate where the urge lives in the body (usually chest, throat, jaw, or hands). Give it a shape and intensity number (1-10).
- Step 3: Watch it. Do not fight it, justify it, or feed it with mental replays of the trigger. Just observe.
- Step 4: Every 30 seconds, re-rate intensity. Announce (silently) each rating: "7... 6... 5." The decrease is the proof the technique is working.
- Step 5: When the number drops below 4, proceed with a deliberate choice.
- Duration: 2-4 minutes (3-4 rating cycles).
- Critical rule: Do not act during the observation period. Delay rule: no communication about the triggering topic for a minimum of 20-30 minutes after the urge peaks. This is non-negotiable in the plan.
- Common mistake: Re-feeding the urge by mentally replaying what the other person said. This extends the arc indefinitely.

**Cognitive Reframing:**
- Targets the interpretation layer. Emotions are driven by what an event means to us, not only by the event itself. Two people can be interrupted in the same meeting and one feels mildly inconvenienced while the other feels deeply disrespected -- the difference is interpretation.
- Step 1: Write the automatic interpretation: "They did that because they do not respect me."
- Step 2: Write 2-3 pieces of evidence that support this interpretation.
- Step 3: Write 2-3 pieces of evidence that contradict or complicate this interpretation.
- Step 4: Write an alternative interpretation that accounts for all the evidence: not "everything is fine" (toxic positivity) but "the most accurate, balanced read of what happened."
- Step 5: Identify one action that follows from the balanced interpretation.
- This is NOT a "think positive" exercise. The goal is accuracy, not optimism. A reframe that ignores real evidence is unconvincing and ineffective.
- Duration: 5-10 minutes. Requires a relatively calm moment -- cannot be done at emotional peak.
- Best for: Post-event rumination, resentment loops, recurring patterns tied to the same interpretation ("no one takes me seriously," "I always get left out").
- Common mistake: Writing the reframe without first genuinely engaging with the evidence on both sides. Skipping to the answer generates intellectual reframing without emotional change.

**Opposite Action:**
- Based on the principle that emotions create behavioral action urges, and deliberately acting opposite to the urge -- when the urge is not justified or is disproportionate to the situation -- interrupts the emotional loop.
- Action urge map:
  - Anger urges: attack, argue, confront -- Opposite action: speak gently or do something kind for the person (or for yourself if the anger is self-directed)
  - Shame urges: hide, disappear, avoid -- Opposite action: share with one trusted person at low disclosure level
  - Sadness urges: withdraw, stop engaging, stay in bed -- Opposite action: one small engagement (10-minute walk, texting a friend one sentence, making coffee)
  - Anxiety urges: avoid, escape, seek reassurance -- Opposite action: approach the avoided situation at the smallest possible increment
  - Jealousy urges: monitor, compare, withdraw love -- Opposite action: express one genuine appreciation
- Critical caveat: Opposite action is only appropriate when the emotion is not warranted by the facts or is disproportionate. If someone is being mistreated and anger is warranted, opposite action is not the right tool -- that situation calls for assertive communication, not suppression.
- Duration: Variable. The opposite action is the replacement behavior itself.
- Common mistake: Treating opposite action as suppression ("don't be sad"). The technique acknowledges the emotion fully, then chooses a different behavior.

**Physiological Soothing:**
- The only technique that works directly on the nervous system to reduce physiological arousal before the brain can engage higher cognitive functions.
- Three primary methods:
  - Cold water face immersion or cold water on the wrists and back of the neck: activates the mammalian dive reflex, triggering parasympathetic response and measurably reducing heart rate within 30-60 seconds. Fill a bowl of cold water and submerge the face for 15-30 seconds, or run cold water on pulse points for 45 seconds.
  - Ice cube hold: grip ice cubes in both hands for 30-45 seconds. Intense physical sensation redirects attentional resources away from the emotional stimulus. Releases after 30 seconds.
  - Box breathing (4-4-4-4): Inhale for 4 seconds, hold for 4 seconds, exhale for 4 seconds, hold for 4 seconds. Four complete cycles takes approximately 64 seconds. Slows heart rate, reduces cortisol response, restores prefrontal access.
  - Progressive muscle release (fast version): Tense all major muscle groups simultaneously for 5 seconds, then release completely. Two cycles. The contrast between tension and release activates the relaxation response.
- When to use physiological soothing: When intensity is 7/10 or higher, when physical symptoms are dominant (racing heart, shaking hands, hot face), or when thinking clearly feels impossible.
- This technique must come BEFORE any cognitive technique at high intensity. Cognitive techniques applied to a flooded nervous system are ineffective.

### Step 4: Build a Trigger-Specific Situation-Response Plan

Map the user's specific triggers to specific technique sequences. Every plan entry must have:
- The specific trigger (not "work stress" but "when my manager gives feedback in front of the team")
- The likely emotion and its typical intensity (1-10)
- The first-response technique with duration
- The escalation technique if the first response does not reduce intensity below 5 within the specified time
- A communication delay rule for any trigger where the user's impulse is to confront, text, or email

The plan should be a table that the user can reference before entering high-risk situations.

### Step 5: Create an Emotion Tracking Log for Pattern Detection

The tracking log serves one purpose: pattern identification over 10-14 days. Do not frame it as measurement of success or failure. Patterns to look for:
- Time-of-day clusters (afternoon crashes, morning irritability before coffee)
- Cumulative load effect (small triggers hitting harder after a difficult week)
- Which technique reliably reduces intensity by 2+ points vs. which does not seem to help
- Whether intensity-after scores are trending down over the 2 weeks, which indicates skill development

Provide a table with: Date, Trigger, Emotion, Intensity Before (1-10), Technique Used, Intensity After (1-10), Notes.

### Step 6: Design a Daily Practice Anchored to an Existing Habit

Regulation skills that are only practiced during emotional crises never become automatic. The skill must be practiced when calm so it fires reliably when it is needed. Key design principles:

- Anchor the daily practice to an existing daily behavior (morning coffee, before the first meeting, brushing teeth at night) to maximize consistency. This is called habit stacking.
- The emotional labeling check-in is the best daily practice for most users: 1 minute, 3 times per day, naming current emotional state with a cause clause. This rebuilds signal detection -- the ability to notice the emotion early enough that regulation is possible.
- Include one physical practice -- box breathing or progressive muscle release -- done daily for 5 minutes regardless of emotional state. This lowers baseline physiological arousal over time so peaks are less extreme.
- Frame the daily practice as maintenance, not treatment. It is the equivalent of stretching before exercise -- it reduces the severity and frequency of emotional injuries.

### Step 7: Deliver the Complete Toolkit and Address Questions

After delivering the toolkit:
- Ask if any technique feels unworkable for their specific context (office environment, physical limitations, cultural context)
- Offer to adjust the situation-response plan if any trigger mapping does not feel accurate
- Remind the user that the first several uses of any technique during a real emotional episode will feel effortful and partially effective -- this is normal skill acquisition, not technique failure
- Explicitly name the threshold for seeking professional support: if daily practice for 3-4 weeks does not produce any reduction in intensity scores or any improvement in the ability to pause before reacting, a licensed mental health professional can provide assessment and structured support that goes beyond self-directed tools

---

## Output Format

```
## Emotional Regulation Toolkit

**Primary Emotions to Manage:** [emotion 1 -- specific], [emotion 2 -- specific]
**Key Triggers:** [trigger 1 -- specific situation], [trigger 2], [trigger 3]
**Dominant Pattern:** [external expression (reactive) / internal suppression (ruminative) / mixed]
**Physical Early-Warning Signals:** [user's specific signals]
**Regulation Tipping Point:** [intensity score at which regulation becomes very difficult, e.g., 7/10]

---

### Situation-Response Plan

| Trigger | Likely Emotion | Typical Intensity | First Response (Duration) | If Intensity Stays Above 5 |
|---------|---------------|-------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|
| [specific trigger] | [specific emotion] | [X/10] | [Technique name, X min] | [Backup technique, X min] |
| [specific trigger] | [specific emotion] | [X/10] | [Technique name, X min] | [Backup technique, X min] |
| [specific trigger] | [specific emotion] | [X/10] | [Technique name, X min] | [Backup technique, X min] |

**Communication Delay Rule:** For triggers involving [specific person/situation], no messages, emails, or calls 
about the triggering topic for [20 / 30] minutes after the emotion peaks.

---

### Technique 1: [Name] -- [Entry Point: Physical / Impulse / Cognitive / Behavioral]

**When to deploy:** [The specific physical signal or situation that cues this technique]
**Where it works:** [In-the-moment / Post-event / Daily practice]
**Duration:** [X] minutes

**Step-by-Step:**
1. [Specific action with sensory detail]
2. [Specific action with sensory detail]
3. [Specific action with sensory detail]
4. [Specific action with sensory detail]
5. [Specific action with sensory detail -- if applicable]

**What will change:** [Realistic, specific outcome]
**What will not change:** [Realistic limitation -- the technique does not eliminate the emotion]
**Common first-use mistake:** [The specific error to avoid]

---

### Technique 2: [Name] -- [Entry Point]

[Same structure as Technique 1]

---

### Technique 3: [Name] -- [Entry Point]

[Same structure as Technique 1]

---

### Technique 4: [Name] -- [Entry Point] (if applicable)

[Same structure as Technique 1]

---

### Emotion Tracking Log (10-14 Days)

Use this log for pattern identification, not self-assessment. Fill in one row per notable emotional event.

| Date | Trigger | Emotion | Intensity Before (1-10) | Technique Used | Intensity After (1-10) | Notes |
|------|---------|---------|------------------------|----------------|------------------------|-------|
|      |         |         |                        |                |                        |       |
|      |         |         |                        |                |                        |       |
|      |         |         |                        |                |                        |       |
|      |         |         |                        |                |                        |       |
|      |         |         |                        |                |                        |       |

**After 10-14 days, look for:**
- Which triggers appear most frequently?
- What time of day do intensity scores peak?
- Which technique produces the largest intensity reduction?
- Are intensity-after scores trending lower over the two weeks?

---

### Daily Practice

**Technique:** [Name]
**Anchor habit:** [Specific existing habit it attaches to]
**Time of day:** [Specific time or habit event]
**Duration:** [X] minutes
**Frequency:** [X times per day]

**Step-by-step:**
1. [Specific action]
2. [Specific action]
3. [Specific action]

**Why this technique daily:** [Specific rationale connecting the technique to the user's dominant pattern]

---

### When to Seek Professional Support

If after 3-4 weeks of consistent daily practice you notice no reduction in intensity scores and 
no improvement in the ability to pause before reacting, this is a signal that self-directed tools 
have reached their limit for your situation. A licensed mental health professional -- particularly 
one experienced with emotion-focused approaches -- can provide structured assessment and support 
that goes beyond what a self-directed toolkit can offer. This is not a failure of the toolkit 
or of you; some emotional patterns are deeply rooted and benefit from professional guidance.
```

---

## Rules

1. **Never diagnose or use clinical terminology.** Do not describe a user's pattern as "emotional dysregulation," "anger management disorder," "mood instability," or any other clinical label. These are clinical terms that require clinical assessment. Describe what you observe in behavioral, descriptive language: "you describe snapping and regretting it" not "you show signs of dysregulation."

2. **Never start with cognitive techniques when physical arousal is described as dominant or high.** If the user describes shaking, racing heart, face flushing, or intensity of 7/10 or higher, lead with physiological soothing. Cognitive techniques applied to a flooded nervous system are not merely ineffective -- they increase frustration when they do not work, which worsens the episode.

3. **Always include Emotional Labeling as an element of the toolkit.** It is the signal-detection foundation that makes all other techniques deployable. A person cannot deploy a coping technique for an emotion they have not yet recognized. Labeling is the prerequisite skill.

4. **Specificity in labeling is not optional -- it is the mechanism.** "Upset" or "stressed" are not acceptable emotional labels in this skill. Always prompt the user to find the specific emotion word (frustrated, humiliated, dismissed, resentful, panicked, dejected) and always include the "because" cause clause. The specificity is what produces the prefrontal activation that reduces emotional intensity.

5. **The situation-response plan must list specific triggers, not categories.** "Work stress" is not a trigger entry. "When my manager gives feedback publicly during team standup" is a trigger entry. Vague triggers cannot be acted upon; specific triggers can be anticipated and met with a pre-selected technique.

6. **Limit the toolkit to 3-4 active techniques.** During an emotional episode, decision-making capacity is reduced. A toolkit of 6-7 techniques becomes cognitively overwhelming at the exact moment it needs to be accessible. Four techniques maximum, each mapped to a specific condition.

7. **Every technique entry must include what will NOT change.** Framing techniques as techniques that "make you feel better" creates false expectations and causes users to abandon the technique after the first use because the emotion did not disappear. The realistic outcome is "intensity reduces enough that you can make a deliberate choice" -- not "you feel fine."

8. **Include a communication delay rule whenever the user's pattern involves reactive communication.** Sending a message, email, or making a call within the first 20-30 minutes of an emotional peak is one of the most common sources of regret in interpersonal conflicts. This rule is not a technique -- it is a structural safeguard that sits alongside the toolkit.

9. **The daily practice must be anchored to a specific existing habit, not an aspirational one.** "Practice daily when you feel calm" does not produce consistent practice. "Practice box breathing while the coffee brews each morning" uses habit stacking to ensure the skill is exercised regardless of emotional state that day.

10. **Always include the professional support threshold.** Every toolkit must close with a clear, non-stigmatizing statement of when self-directed regulation tools have reached their appropriate limit and professional support is warranted. Framing: "some emotional patterns are deeply rooted and benefit from professional guidance" -- not "if this does not work you have a serious problem."

11. **Opposite action is not suppression -- the distinction must be preserved.** When teaching opposite action, explicitly acknowledge that the emotion is real and valid before introducing the behavioral choice. "Your anger is real and makes sense given what happened. AND you can choose a different behavior than the one the anger is pulling you toward." Skipping this acknowledgment turns opposite action into "pretend you do not feel it," which is harmful.

12. **The tracking log is for pattern identification only.** Explicitly frame the log as a pattern-detection tool, not a success metric. Users who see high intensity scores on the log and interpret them as failure will abandon both the log and the techniques. The log's value is in identifying trends over 10-14 days, not in any single day's data.

---

## Edge Cases

**The user describes intense anger with physical aggression or near-aggression (throwing objects, slamming doors, punching walls, physical intimidation):**
This sits at the boundary of this skill's scope. Acknowledge the honesty it takes to share this. Prioritize physiological soothing as the immediate first-line response -- specifically the cold water face immersion and progressive muscle release, because both provide an acceptable physical outlet (submerging face, tensing and releasing muscles) that partially redirects the physical energy. Add a mandatory physical space exit plan: the user must identify a specific physical location to move to when intensity hits their tipping point (a specific room, outside, a car). The exit plan must be decided in advance when calm, because deciding where to go during an intensity-9 moment is impossible. Note clearly that if this pattern is frequent or has led to harming people, objects, or relationships, this is beyond the scope of this skill and a licensed professional is warranted.

**The user wants to manage emotions in a setting where no visible techniques are possible (court, high-stakes meeting, medical appointment, job interview):**
This is a real constraint that must shape the entire toolkit. Every technique selected must be invisible and internal:
- Emotional Labeling: always internal and silent, no adaptation needed
- STOP Technique: the "stop" becomes a sip of water or a moment of looking at notes; the breathing is slow and through the nose (4-second inhale, 6-second exhale), invisible in any setting
- Urge Surfing: entirely internal; rating the urge silently requires no physical action
- Physiological Soothing must be adapted: cold water is not available mid-meeting, but pressing fingertips firmly together under the table for 10 seconds achieves a mild physical grounding effect; slow nasal breathing achieves a partial physiological reset
- Cognitive Reframing is post-event only in this context -- during the high-stakes event, internal labeling and STOP are the only feasible tools
Make the constraints explicit in the toolkit so the user does not attempt physiological soothing during a meeting and feel exposed.

**The user describes persistent sadness, low energy, feeling empty, or inability to feel positive emotions for more than a few weeks:**
Apply the techniques to the current situation while explicitly and gently noting that persistent low mood lasting more than two weeks affecting daily energy, motivation, or enjoyment of activities warrants a conversation with a primary care physician or licensed mental health professional -- not because this is a "serious problem" but because there are effective supports available that go beyond self-directed regulation. Do not treat this with opposite action alone. Emotional labeling and low-stimulation opposite action (a 10-minute walk, one social text, making a meal) are appropriate and gentle starting points. Do NOT suggest that the person should feel better through effort or positive thinking. Acknowledge that some low mood is weather, not character.

**The user describes emotional numbness -- feeling nothing, going flat, or being "past the point of caring" after a significant stressor:**
Emotional numbness is not the absence of emotion -- it is often the nervous system's protective response to sustained high-load emotional experience. It requires a different entry point than acute emotional intensity. Build the toolkit around signal detection rather than regulation:
- Daily emotional labeling check-ins 3 times per day, naming physical sensations even when no emotion is identifiable ("I notice tension in my shoulders and a slight heaviness in my chest")
- Physical sensations are the accessible layer when emotional awareness is dampened
- Opposite action for the behavioral pattern of numbness (withdrawal, reduced engagement, decreased activity) -- small incremental re-engagement rather than large behavioral change
- Do not push the user to "feel more." The goal is rebuilding awareness, not generating feeling by force
- If numbness is persistent (more than 2-3 weeks) and accompanied by disconnection from daily life, recommend professional support

**The user's emotional triggers are almost entirely tied to one specific person (a partner, parent, or colleague):**
The regulation toolkit is valid and useful for managing the user's own emotional responses. Provide it fully. AND be explicit about what the toolkit does not address: it does not resolve the underlying relationship dynamic, it does not tell the other person anything, and it does not prevent future triggering. Name this directly: "This toolkit will help you respond differently in those moments. It does not change the other person or the pattern between you. If the relationship dynamic itself is a source of ongoing distress, that is worth exploring with a therapist or counselor who specializes in relationships." Do not provide scripts for confrontation, relationship advice, or speculation about the other person's motivations or mental state.

**The user has tried regulation techniques before and says they "do not work":**
This is common and important to address before providing more techniques. Ask specifically: What technique did you try? What happened when you tried it? At what point in the emotional episode did you try it? The most common failure mode is attempting a cognitive technique (reframing, telling oneself to calm down) at peak emotional intensity, which genuinely does not work and teaches the person the technique is ineffective when the actual problem was the timing. Another common failure mode is trying a technique once during an intense episode without prior practice. Normalize this: "Most techniques feel unnatural and partially effective the first 3-5 times you use them -- especially if the first use is during a real emotional episode rather than practice. That is not technique failure; that is skill acquisition." Then design the toolkit with extra emphasis on the daily calm-state practice to build the skill before the next crisis.

**The user works in a high-stress emergency or helping profession (nursing, social work, firefighting, teaching) and reports emotional exhaustion alongside acute emotion:**
Acute regulation skills address the moment-to-moment spike. But this user likely also has cumulative emotional load -- sometimes called compassion fatigue or burnout -- which is a different problem with different needs. Provide the regulation toolkit for acute moments. AND name explicitly that when the emotional system is depleted by chronic exposure to others' distress or high-stakes environments, individual regulation skills have reduced effectiveness because the nervous system is operating from a chronic deficit. Recovery practices -- sleep, physical movement, social connection outside the professional role, genuine rest -- are not optional extras. Recommend speaking with an occupational health resource or mental health professional familiar with their specific professional context if chronic depletion is present.

---

## Example

**Input:**
"I have a really hard time with my older sister. She has a way of criticizing my choices -- my job, where I live, how I parent my kids -- that makes me furious. When she does it, I either explode at her or I go totally quiet and then spend the next 24 hours replaying everything she said and thinking of comebacks. Either way I feel terrible afterward and the relationship suffers. This usually happens at family gatherings. I want to stop letting her get to me so badly."

**Output:**

## Emotional Regulation Toolkit

**Primary Emotions to Manage:** Fury (acute spike), resentment (sustained), shame or defensiveness (triggered by criticism of parenting choices)
**Key Triggers:** Unsolicited criticism of job, living situation, or parenting choices from sister; family gathering settings where disengagement is difficult
**Dominant Pattern:** Mixed -- explosive external reaction in the moment OR immediate shutdown followed by 24-hour rumination loop ("replaying and rewriting")
**Physical Early-Warning Signals:** To identify -- likely jaw tightening, heat rising in face or neck, chest constriction, or a sudden cold feeling. Note these for yourself before the next family event.
**Regulation Tipping Point:** To be determined by you -- on a scale of 1-10, what intensity score is the point where you either explode or go silent? Once you identify this number, this plan is designed to intervene before you hit it.

---

### Situation-Response Plan

| Trigger | Likely Emotion | Typical Intensity | First Response (Duration) | If Intensity Stays Above 5 |
|---------|---------------|-------------------|--------------------------|---------------------------|
| Sister comments on parenting | Fury, defensiveness | 7-9/10 | Emotional Labeling + STOP Technique, 2 min | Urge Surfing for the explosion urge, 3 min |
| Sister comments on job or home | Resentment, dismissal | 6-8/10 | Emotional Labeling, 30 sec | STOP Technique, 1-2 min |
| During the drive home -- replay begins | Resentment, injustice | 5-7/10 | Cognitive Reframing (written), 8 min | Opposite Action: text a friend something unrelated |
| Pre-event anticipatory dread (before family gathering) | Anxiety, dread | 4-6/10 | Box Breathing 4 cycles, 3 min | Cognitive Reframing on what you can and cannot control |

**Communication Delay Rule:** No texts, calls, or messages to your sister about anything said at a family gathering for a minimum of 24 hours after the event. This rule applies regardless of how justified the message feels. The 24-hour window is the buffer between the emotional peak and any communication you will not regret.

---

### Technique 1: Emotional Labeling -- Signal Detection and Pause Creation

**When to deploy:** The instant you notice a physical signal that criticism is incoming or has just landed -- jaw tightening, heat in your face, chest contracting, a sudden feeling of coldness, hands tensing
**Where it works:** In-the-moment, silent, invisible at any family gathering
**Duration:** 30 seconds

**Step-by-Step:**
1. Notice the physical signal. Do not wait for the emotion to be fully formed -- the body signals first.
2. Silently name the emotion with full specificity: not "I'm angry" but "I feel furious and humiliated because my parenting was criticized in front of other family members and I feel like I have to defend myself."
3. Add the cause clause: "...because this happens repeatedly and I interpret it as my sister believing I am not competent as a parent."
4. Sit with that label for 10-15 seconds. Do not speak yet. Do not begin formulating a response yet.
5. Notice whether the physical signal (jaw, chest, face heat) shifts slightly. It will not disappear -- but the specificity of the label creates a small but real pause between the trigger and your reaction.

**What will change:** The fury will not disappear. What changes is that you move from being inside the emotion (flooded) to being an observer of the emotion (aware). That shift creates the 15-30 second window where a choice is possible instead of a reaction.
**What will not change:** The label does not make the criticism acceptable or stop the emotion from being real and significant. You are not minimizing what happened.
**Common first-use mistake:** Using vague labels like "angry" or "hurt." These provide no regulation benefit. The specificity -- including the cause and the interpretation -- is what activates the pause mechanism.

---

### Technique 2: STOP Technique -- Interrupting the Explosion Before It Happens

**When to deploy:** Immediately after labeling, when the urge to snap back or deliver a sharp retort is strong and the intensity is between 5-8/10
**Where it works:** In-the-moment, invisible in a family setting
**Duration:** 1-2 minutes

**Step-by-Step:**
1. **Stop:** Do not speak. If your mouth was about to open, take a deliberate sip of a drink, look down at your plate or phone, or simply pause. You are buying 3-5 seconds.
2. **Take:** Three slow breaths through your nose only. Inhale for 4 seconds. Exhale for 6 seconds. The extended exhale is not optional -- it is what activates the calming response. No one at the table will notice.
3. **Observe:** Silently run through: "My chest is tight. My face is hot. I want to say something cutting. If I say it, I will feel powerful for 4 seconds and terrible for the next 3 days. My kids may be watching."
4. **Proceed:** Choose one of these four options -- only one, explicitly chosen:
   - Option A: Respond calmly with one short sentence and redirect the topic ("I'm happy with how things are going. How is your work project coming along?")
   - Option B: Say nothing and let the moment pass (not seething silence -- deliberate disengagement)
   - Option C: Excuse yourself physically: "I'm going to get more water" -- step away for 3 minutes
   - Option D: Acknowledge and defer: "That's an interesting perspective. I'll think about it." (Non-committal, non-escalating)

**What will change:** You will not say the thing you regret. The anger will still be present, but the 4-second window created by the sip + breath is often enough to shift from reactive to chosen.
**What will not change:** The underlying frustration will remain and will need to be addressed with Cognitive Reframing after the event. STOP is an in-the-moment interruption, not a resolution.
**Common first-use mistake:** Skipping the Proceed step and returning to the conversation in the same emotionally loaded state after the three breaths. Without an explicitly chosen next action, the pause leads right back to the reactive impulse.

---

### Technique 3: Urge Surfing -- For the Explosion Urge When STOP Is Not Enough

**When to deploy:** When the urge to explode, say the cutting remark, or walk out dramatically is at 7/10 or higher and feels physically urgent -- chest pressure, jaw locked, words forming before you can stop them
**Where it works:** In-the-moment (can be done while appearing to look at your phone or out the window), or immediately post-trigger in a bathroom or outside
**Duration:** 3-4 minutes

**Step-by-Step:**
1. Identify the specific urge: "I want to tell her she has no right to comment on my parenting. I want to say it loudly."
2. Locate the urge in your body. (Likely: chest, throat, jaw, or hands.) Give it an intensity rating: "8 out of 10."
3. Observe it. Do not fight it, suppress it, or justify it with mental replays of what she said. Just watch it. The urge is a wave. It has already started moving toward its peak.
4. Wait 30 seconds. Re-rate. Say the number silently: "7."
5. Wait another 30 seconds. Re-rate: "6."
6. Continue one more cycle: "5."
7. When the number reaches 4 or below, return to STOP technique and choose a deliberate proceed action.

**What will change:** The physiological peak of the urge passes. The 45-90 seconds you observe it without acting is usually sufficient to bring intensity below the impulsive-action threshold.
**What will not change:** The resentment and the underlying dynamic with your sister remain. Urge surfing is not a relationship fix -- it is a window of clarity.
**Common first-use mistake:** Re-feeding the urge by mentally replaying what she said, imagining the perfect comeback, or adding more evidence for why you are right to be furious. Each mental replay extends the arc. Observe the urge as a physical sensation, not a story.

---

### Technique 4: Cognitive Reframing -- Breaking the 24-Hour Rumination Loop

**When to deploy:** After the event, when you are alone and the replay loop has started ("I should have said... / She always does this... / She thinks I'm a failure...")
**Where it works:** Post-event, requires a relatively calm moment and preferably a pen or keyboard
**Duration:** 8-10 minutes

**Step-by-Step:**
1. Write the automatic interpretation that is driving the loop. Be honest: "My sister criticized my parenting because she thinks I am doing a bad job and she does not respect me as a parent."
2. Write evidence that supports this interpretation: "She has criticized my parenting choices at least four times this year. She never acknowledges when things go well. She gives advice I did not ask for."
3. Write evidence that contradicts or complicates this interpretation: "She also criticizes her own choices obsessively -- this may be how she relates to anyone she is close to. Last Christmas she defended me to my aunt. She has asked for my advice on her own kids twice this year. She is under significant stress at work right now and tends to be more critical when stressed."
4. Write a balanced reframe. Not "she means well and everything is fine" -- that dismisses your real experience. Instead: "My sister's criticism is real, it lands as dismissal, and it is also consistent with a broader pattern she applies to herself and others -- it may not be primarily about her assessment of me as a parent. That does not make it acceptable, but it may make it less about my fundamental competence than it feels in the moment."
5. Identify one action that follows logically from the balanced reframe: "I will decide whether I want to address this pattern with her directly at a neutral moment -- not tonight. For now, I will let this specific incident close."

**What will change:** The intensity of the resentment loop drops. The replaying typically continues because an unresolved interpretation demands resolution. Providing a balanced, evidence-based interpretation gives the mind something to close on.
**What will not change:** The underlying relationship dynamic. Reframing does not fix the pattern -- it reduces the emotional cost of carrying it while you decide what, if anything, you want to do about it.
**Common first-use mistake:** Writing the reframe without genuinely engaging with the evidence against the automatic interpretation. Jumping straight to "she probably means well" without examining the evidence is spiritual bypassing, not reframing -- it will not reduce intensity.

---

### Emotion Tracking Log (10-14 Days)

Use this log for pattern identification, not self-assessment. One row per notable emotional event.

| Date | Trigger | Emotion | Intensity Before (1-10) | Technique Used | Intensity After (1-10) | Notes |
|------|---------|---------|------------------------|----------------|------------------------|-------|
|      |         |         |                        |                |                        |       |
|      |         |         |                        |                |                        |       |
|      |         |         |                        |                |                        |       |
|      |         |         |                        |                |                        |       |
|      |         |         |                        |                |                        |       |
|      |         |         |                        |                |                        |       |

**After 10-14 days, look for:**
- Are sister-related triggers the dominant entry, or are other triggers also appearing at high intensity?
- Which technique produces the largest drop in intensity score for you specifically?
- Are there days or times when the same trigger hits harder? (End of week, after poor sleep, around other family stress?)
- Is the intensity-after score on any technique trending lower over the two weeks, suggesting skill development?

This data belongs to you for your own awareness. It is not diagnostic. A single high-intensity day means nothing on its own.

---

### Daily Practice

**Technique:** Emotional Labeling Check-In + Box Breathing
**Anchor habit:** Morning coffee/tea preparation
**Time of day:** Morning (coffee), midday (before lunch), evening (before or after dinner)
**Duration:** 1 minute for labeling + 3 minutes for box breathing (4 minutes total, morning only for breathing)
**Frequency:** 3 labeling check-ins per day; 1 box breathing session per day

**Morning Check-In (with coffee, 4 minutes total):**
1. Before looking at your phone, pause and notice your current physical state. Where is tension? Where is ease?
2. Name the emotion present with specificity and cause: "I feel mildly anxious because I have a full day and I am not sure I have enough time." OR "I feel relatively calm because nothing pressing is scheduled this morning."
3. If no strong emotion is present, note that: "I feel neutral because the morning has been uneventful." This is valid data.
4. Follow immediately with 4 cycles of box breathing: inhale 4 seconds, hold 4, exhale 4, hold 4. Approximately 64 seconds total. This is not because you are stressed -- this is daily nervous system maintenance.

**Midday and Evening Check-Ins (1 minute each, labeling only):**
1. Pause for 30 seconds and notice physical state.
2. Name the emotion and cause.
3. Note whether it is different from the morning. No action required -- only awareness.

**Why this practice:** Your pattern involves going from 0 to explosion or shutdown very quickly, which suggests that by the time you notice the emotion, it is already at 7/10 or higher. The daily labeling practice rebuilds the signal detection system -- the ability to notice emotion at a 3 or 4, when all four techniques are easy to use. You are not practicing this to feel better every morning; you are practicing it so the technique is automatic when you need it in a family gathering with your sister.

---

### When to Seek Professional Support

This toolkit addresses your in-the-moment emotional responses and the post-event rumination loop. It does not address the underlying dynamic with your sister or the history that makes her criticism land with such force. If after 3-4 weeks of consistent daily practice you are not noticing any reduction in intensity or any improvement in your ability to create a pause before reacting, this is a signal that the tools available here have reached their natural limit for your situation. A licensed therapist or counselor -- particularly one experienced with family-of-origin dynamics or interpersonal patterns -- can offer assessment and structured support that goes considerably deeper. This is not a failure of effort; some patterns are woven from long histories and benefit significantly from professional guidance. Seeking that support is the most skilled thing a person in your situation can do.
