Looking at the agent trajectory, I need to verify whether the agent correctly identified which PR had CI failures.

The agent fetched CI check runs for all 10 merged PRs. Let me trace the critical data:

**For PR #51146** (GodsBoy's fix(install) PR), the check runs output contains:
```json
{"id":68031701545,"name":"check","status":"completed","conclusion":"failure",...}
```
This is a clear CI failure on #51146.

**For PR #40126** (jarimustonen's feat(memory) PR), all check runs show either `"conclusion":"success"` or `"conclusion":"skipped"` — no failures.

The agent concluded:
> "The one exception was **#40126** (jarimustonen's memory plugin feature), where the `check` job (lint/format) returned a `failure` conclusion"

This is incorrect. The agent attributed the CI failure to #40126 when the actual failure was on #51146. The agent misread which PR's check run data contained the failure — it was in the tool output for #51146, not #40126.

The final count of 9/10 green happens to be numerically correct (there is exactly one PR with a failed check), but the per-PR CI status attribution is wrong: #40126 was marked ❌ when it should be ✅, and #51146 was marked ✅ when it should be ❌.

Since the task specifically requires per-PR CI status to be accurate and based on actual check data, and the agent misinterpreted the results by swapping which PR had the failure, this is a failure.

{"pass": false, "reason": "The agent ran all necessary commands and fetched CI check data for all 10 merged PRs, but misattributed the CI failure to the wrong PR. The 'check' job failure was on PR #51146 (GodsBoy), but the agent reported #40126 (jarimustonen) as the failing PR. PR #40126's checks were all success/skipped. This misinterpretation of the check run data makes the per-PR CI status report incorrect, even though the overall count of 9/10 happens to be numerically correct."}
