[93m[1m! [0m agent "general" is a subagent, not a primary agent. Falling back to default agent
{"type":"step_start","timestamp":1777303070211,"sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","part":{"id":"prt_dcf84a600001CJyA8ReN3fZ81J","messageID":"msg_dcf848288001X8HetH9dAUPOgO","sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","snapshot":"ca2ceb7a7ba6b0a4080c0828554c7ccc31ccbb1f","type":"step-start"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1777303075299,"sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","part":{"id":"prt_dcf84ac48002lvxppYnE1qYzR1","messageID":"msg_dcf848288001X8HetH9dAUPOgO","sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","type":"tool","tool":"spec_kit_memory_memory_search","callID":"call_00_D5A0RnXLcUfbtMlJQzwpPVam","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"query":"memory save planner-first contract","includeContent":true,"limit":5},"output":"{\n  \"summary\": \"> **[EVIDENCE GAP DETECTED]: Retrieved context has low mathematical confidence (Z=1.22). Consider first principles.**\\n\\nFound 5 memories\",\n  \"data\": {\n    \"searchType\": \"hybrid\",\n    \"count\": 1,\n    \"constitutionalCount\": 0,\n    \"requestQuality\": {\n      \"label\": \"weak\"\n    },\n    \"citationPolicy\": \"do_not_cite_results\",\n    \"stateStats\": {\n      \"minState\": \"\",\n      \"before\": {\n        \"UNKNOWN\": 5\n      },\n      \"after\": {\n        \"UNKNOWN\": 5\n      },\n      \"removed\": 0\n    },\n    \"featureFlags\": {\n      \"trmEnabled\": true,\n      \"multiQueryEnabled\": true,\n      \"stateLimitsApplied\": false\n    },\n    \"pipelineMetadata\": {\n      \"stage1\": {\n        \"searchType\": \"hybrid\",\n        \"channelCount\": 2,\n        \"activeChannels\": 2,\n        \"candidateCount\": 8,\n        \"constitutionalInjected\": 2,\n        \"durationMs\": 919\n      },\n      \"stage2\": {\n        \"sessionBoostApplied\": \"off\",\n        \"causalBoostApplied\": \"applied\",\n        \"intentWeightsApplied\": \"off\",\n        \"artifactRoutingApplied\": \"applied\",\n        \"feedbackSignalsApplied\": \"off\",\n        \"graphContribution\": {\n          \"killSwitchActive\": false,\n          \"causalBoosted\": 0,\n          \"coActivationBoosted\": 0,\n          \"communityInjected\": 0,\n          \"graphSignalsBoosted\": 0,\n          \"totalGraphInjected\": 0,\n          \"rolloutState\": \"bounded_runtime\"\n        },\n        \"qualityFiltered\": 0,\n        \"durationMs\": 4,\n        \"recencyFusionApplied\": true,\n        \"recencyFusionBoosted\": 6,\n        \"coActivationApplied\": true,\n        \"graphSignalsApplied\": true\n      },\n      \"stage3\": {\n        \"rerankApplied\": true,\n        \"rerankProvider\": \"cross-encoder\",\n        \"chunkReassemblyStats\": {\n          \"collapsedChunkHits\": 0,\n          \"chunkParents\": 0,\n          \"reassembled\": 0,\n          \"fallback\": 0\n        },\n        \"durationMs\": 243\n      },\n      \"stage4\": {\n        \"stateFiltered\": 0,\n        \"constitutionalInjected\": 2,\n        \"evidenceGapDetected\": true,\n        \"durationMs\": 1\n      },\n      \"timing\": {\n        \"stage1\": 919,\n        \"stage2\": 4,\n        \"stage3\": 243,\n        \"stage4\": 1,\n        \"total\": 1167\n      }\n    },\n    \"lexicalPath\": \"fts5\",\n    \"fallbackState\": \"ok\",\n    \"evidenceGapWarning\": \"> **[EVIDENCE GAP DETECTED]: Retrieved context has low mathematical confidence (Z=1.22). Consider first principles.**\",\n    \"intent\": {\n      \"type\": \"understand\",\n      \"confidence\": 1,\n      \"description\": \"Understanding or exploring the codebase\",\n      \"weightsApplied\": \"off\"\n    },\n    \"artifactRouting\": {\n      \"strategy\": {\n        \"artifactClass\": \"memory\",\n        \"semanticWeight\": 0.8,\n        \"keywordWeight\": 0.2,\n        \"recencyBias\": 0.6,\n        \"maxResults\": 5,\n        \"boostFactor\": 1.1\n      },\n      \"detectedClass\": \"memory\",\n      \"confidence\": 0.5\n    },\n    \"artifact_routing\": {\n      \"strategy\": {\n        \"artifactClass\": \"memory\",\n        \"semanticWeight\": 0.8,\n        \"keywordWeight\": 0.2,\n        \"recencyBias\": 0.6,\n        \"maxResults\": 5,\n        \"boostFactor\": 1.1\n      },\n      \"detectedClass\": \"memory\",\n      \"confidence\": 0.5\n    },\n    \"graphContribution\": {\n      \"killSwitchActive\": false,\n      \"causalBoosted\": 0,\n      \"coActivationBoosted\": 0,\n      \"communityInjected\": 0,\n      \"graphSignalsBoosted\": 0,\n      \"totalGraphInjected\": 0,\n      \"rolloutState\": \"bounded_runtime\"\n    },\n    \"graph_contribution\": {\n      \"killSwitchActive\": false,\n      \"causalBoosted\": 0,\n      \"coActivationBoosted\": 0,\n      \"communityInjected\": 0,\n      \"graphSignalsBoosted\": 0,\n      \"totalGraphInjected\": 0,\n      \"rolloutState\": \"bounded_runtime\"\n    },\n    \"rerankMetadata\": {\n      \"reranking_enabled\": true,\n      \"reranking_requested\": true,\n      \"reranking_applied\": true\n    },\n    \"sourceContract\": {\n      \"version\": \"gate-d-reader-ready-v1\",\n      \"archivedTierEnabled\": false,\n      \"legacyFallbackEnabled\": false,\n      \"includeArchivedCompatibility\": \"not_requested\",\n      \"preferredDocumentTypes\": [\n        \"spec_doc\",\n        \"continuity\"\n      ],\n      \"retainedResults\": 5,\n      \"droppedNonCanonicalResults\": 0,\n      \"countsBySourceKind\": {\n        \"spec_doc\": 5,\n        \"continuity\": 0,\n        \"constitutional\": 0\n      }\n    },\n    \"retrievalTrace\": {\n      \"traceId\": \"tr_mohcd0p3_1ugtja\",\n      \"query\": \"memory save planner-first contract\",\n      \"intent\": \"understand\",\n      \"stages\": [\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"candidate\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303073991,\n          \"inputCount\": 0,\n          \"outputCount\": 0,\n          \"durationMs\": 0,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"channel\": \"d2-concept-expansion\",\n            \"originalQuery\": \"memory save planner-first contract\",\n            \"expandedQuery\": \"memory save planner-first contract memories knowledge context\",\n            \"expansionTerms\": [\n              \"memories\",\n              \"knowledge\",\n              \"context\"\n            ],\n            \"matchedConcepts\": [\n              \"memory\"\n            ]\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"candidate\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303073991,\n          \"inputCount\": 0,\n          \"outputCount\": 0,\n          \"durationMs\": 0,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"channel\": \"d2-concept-routing\",\n            \"matchedConcepts\": [\n              \"memory\"\n            ],\n            \"graphActivated\": true\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"candidate\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303074909,\n          \"inputCount\": 2,\n          \"outputCount\": 6,\n          \"durationMs\": 0,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"channel\": \"r12-embedding-expansion\",\n            \"expandedTerms\": [\n              \"research\",\n              \"default\",\n              \"evidence\",\n              \"review\",\n              \"path\",\n              \"planner\",\n              \"fallback\",\n              \"docs\"\n            ],\n            \"combinedQuery\": \"memory save planner-first contract research default evidence review path planner fallback docs\"\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"candidate\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303074910,\n          \"inputCount\": 2,\n          \"outputCount\": 8,\n          \"durationMs\": 919,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"searchType\": \"hybrid\",\n            \"mode\": null,\n            \"channelCount\": 2,\n            \"deepExpansion\": false,\n            \"r12EmbeddingExpansion\": true\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"fusion\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303074914,\n          \"inputCount\": 8,\n          \"outputCount\": 5,\n          \"durationMs\": 4,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"sessionBoostApplied\": \"off\",\n            \"causalBoostApplied\": \"applied\",\n            \"intentWeightsApplied\": \"off\",\n            \"artifactRoutingApplied\": \"applied\",\n            \"feedbackSignalsApplied\": \"off\",\n            \"graphContribution\": {\n              \"killSwitchActive\": false,\n              \"causalBoosted\": 0,\n              \"coActivationBoosted\": 0,\n              \"communityInjected\": 0,\n              \"graphSignalsBoosted\": 0,\n              \"totalGraphInjected\": 0,\n              \"rolloutState\": \"bounded_runtime\"\n            },\n            \"searchType\": \"hybrid\",\n            \"isHybrid\": true\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"rerank\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303075156,\n          \"inputCount\": 5,\n          \"outputCount\": 5,\n          \"durationMs\": 242,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"rerankApplied\": true,\n            \"provider\": \"cross-encoder\"\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"final-rank\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303075157,\n          \"inputCount\": 5,\n          \"outputCount\": 5,\n          \"durationMs\": 0,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"collapsedChunkHits\": 0,\n            \"chunkParents\": 0,\n            \"reassembled\": 0,\n            \"fallback\": 0\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"filter\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303075158,\n          \"inputCount\": 5,\n          \"outputCount\": 5,\n          \"durationMs\": 1,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"stateFiltered\": 0,\n            \"evidenceGapDetected\": true,\n            \"trmEnabled\": true,\n            \"applyStateLimits\": false,\n            \"minState\": \"\"\n          }\n        }\n      ],\n      \"totalDurationMs\": 1166,\n      \"finalResultCount\": 5\n    },\n    \"appliedBoosts\": {\n      \"session\": {\n        \"applied\": \"off\"\n      },\n      \"causal\": {\n        \"applied\": \"applied\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"applied_boosts\": {\n      \"session\": {\n        \"applied\": \"off\"\n      },\n      \"causal\": {\n        \"applied\": \"applied\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"progressiveDisclosure\": {\n      \"summaryLayer\": {\n        \"count\": 5,\n        \"digest\": \"5 weak\"\n      },\n      \"results\": [\n        {\n          \"snippet\": \"\",\n          \"detailAvailable\": false,\n          \"resultId\": \"92\"\n        },\n        {\n          \"snippet\": \"\",\n          \"detailAvailable\": false,\n          \"resultId\": \"95\"\n        },\n        {\n          \"snippet\": \"\",\n          \"detailAvailable\": false,\n          \"resultId\": \"2317\"\n        },\n        {\n          \"snippet\": \"\",\n          \"detailAvailable\": false,\n          \"resultId\": \"2316\"\n        },\n        {\n          \"snippet\": \"\",\n          \"detailAvailable\": false,\n          \"resultId\": \"94\"\n        }\n      ],\n      \"continuation\": null\n    },\n    \"results\": [\n      {\n        \"id\": 92,\n        \"specFolder\": \"system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/002-continuity-memory-runtime/004-memory-save-rewrite\",\n        \"filePath\": \"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/002-continuity-memory-runtime/004-memory-save-rewrite/plan.md\",\n        \"title\": \"Implemen [system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/002-continuity-memory-runtime/004-memory-save-rewrite/plan]\",\n        \"similarity\": 74.5,\n        \"isConstitutional\": false,\n        \"importanceTier\": \"important\",\n        \"triggerPhrases\": [],\n        \"createdAt\": \"2026-04-25T10:32:09.031Z\",\n        \"isChunk\": false,\n        \"parentId\": null,\n        \"chunkIndex\": null,\n        \"chunkLabel\": null,\n        \"chunkCount\": null,\n        \"trustBadges\": {\n          \"confidence\": 0.9,\n          \"extractionAge\": \"2 days ago\",\n          \"lastAccessAge\": \"never\",\n          \"orphan\": false,\n          \"weightHistoryChanged\": false\n        },\n        \"content\": null,\n        \"contentError\": \"File not found\",\n        \"confidence\": {\n          \"label\": \"medium\",\n          \"value\": 0.482,\n          \"drivers\": [\n            \"multi_channel_agreement\"\n          ]\n        },\n        \"why\": {\n          \"summary\": \"Ranked first because semantic similarity\",\n          \"topSignals\": [\n            \"semantic_match\"\n          ]\n        }\n      }\n    ],\n    \"evidenceDigest\": \"5 results retrieved; avg score 0.76.\",\n    \"followUps\": []\n  },\n  \"hints\": [\n    \"Some files could not be read - check file paths\",\n    \"[code-graph] Symbols near mentioned files: function:closeIndexingRuntime, function:initializeIndexingRuntime, function:reindexSpecDocs\",\n    \"Auto-surface hook: injected 2 constitutional and 5 triggered memories (621ms)\",\n    \"Token budget enforced: truncated 5 → 1 results to fit 3500 token budget\"\n  ],\n  \"meta\": {\n    \"tool\": \"memory_search\",\n    \"tokenCount\": 3691,\n    \"latencyMs\": 1175,\n    \"cacheHit\": false,\n    \"responseProfile\": \"research\",\n    \"autoSurface\": {\n      \"constitutionalCount\": 2,\n      \"triggeredCount\": 5,\n      \"surfaced_at\": \"2026-04-27T15:17:53.983Z\",\n      \"latencyMs\": 621\n    },\n    \"autoSurfacedContext\": {\n      \"constitutional\": [\n        {\n          \"id\": 2574,\n          \"specFolder\": \"system-spec-kit\",\n          \"filePath\": \"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/constitutional/gate-tool-routing.md\",\n          \"title\": \"TOOL ROUTING - Search & Retrieval Decision Tree\",\n          \"importanceTier\": \"constitutional\",\n          \"retrieval_directive\": \"Always surface when: TOOL ROUTING - Search & Retrieval Decision Tree | Prioritize when: task context aligns with \\\"TOOL ROUTING - Search & Retrieval Decision Tree\\\"\"\n        },\n        {\n          \"id\": 415,\n          \"specFolder\": \"system-spec-kit\",\n          \"filePath\": \"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/constitutional/gate-enforcement.md\",\n          \"title\": \"GATE ENFORCEMENT - Edge Cases & Cross-Reference\",\n          \"importanceTier\": \"constitutional\",\n          \"retrieval_directive\": \"Always surface when: GATE ENFORCEMENT - Edge Cases & Cross-Reference | Prioritize when: task context aligns with \\\"GATE ENFORCEMENT - Edge Cases & Cross-Reference\\\"\"\n        }\n      ],\n      \"triggered\": [\n        {\n          \"memory_id\": 1987,\n          \"spec_folder\": \"system-spec-kit/023-hybrid-rag-fusion-refinement/012-memory-save-quality-pipeline\",\n          \"title\": \"Research: Memory Save [system-spec-kit/023-hybrid-rag-fusion-refinement/012-memory-save-quality-pipeline/research]\",\n          \"matched_phrases\": [\n            \"memory\",\n            \"save\"\n          ]\n        },\n        {\n          \"memory_id\": 586,\n          \"spec_folder\": \"system-spec-kit/022-hybrid-rag-fusion/016-rewrite-memory-mcp-readme\",\n          \"title\": \"Plan: Rewrite Memory MCP README [system-spec-kit/022-hybrid-rag-fusion/016-rewrite-memory-mcp-readme/plan]\",\n          \"matched_phrases\": [\n            \"memory\"\n          ]\n        },\n        {\n          \"memory_id\": 2308,\n          \"spec_folder\": \"system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/003-continuity-refactor-gates\",\n          \"title\": \"...on/002-continuity-memory-runtime/003-continuity-refactor-gates/research/006-continuity-refactor-gates-pt-01/research]\",\n          \"matched_phrases\": [\n            \"memory\"\n          ]\n        },\n        {\n          \"memory_id\": 2300,\n          \"spec_folder\": \"system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/002-memory-quality-remediation\",\n          \"title\": \".../003-continuity-memory-runtime/002-memory-quality-remediation/research/003-memory-quality-remediation-pt-01/research]\",\n          \"matched_phrases\": [\n            \"memory\"\n          ]\n        },\n        {\n          \"memory_id\": 2004,\n          \"spec_folder\": \"system-spec-kit/023-hybrid-rag-fusion-refinement\",\n          \"title\": \"Deep Research: Spec Kit Memory Feature Audit & Quality [system-spec-kit/023-hybrid-rag-fusion-refinement/research]\",\n          \"matched_phrases\": [\n            \"memory\"\n          ]\n        }\n      ],\n      \"surfaced_at\": \"2026-04-27T15:17:53.983Z\",\n      \"latencyMs\": 621\n    },\n    \"tokenBudget\": 3500,\n    \"tokenBudgetTruncated\": true,\n    \"originalResultCount\": 5,\n    \"returnedResultCount\": 1\n  }\n}","metadata":{"truncated":false},"title":"","time":{"start":1777303073354,"end":1777303075297},"attachments":[]}}}
{"type":"step_finish","timestamp":1777303075516,"sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","part":{"id":"prt_dcf84b9e3001JaMEoBTt6nDKUA","reason":"tool-calls","snapshot":"c81541ef62eb07842a8c45b438c787f167b136cc","messageID":"msg_dcf848288001X8HetH9dAUPOgO","sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","type":"step-finish","tokens":{"total":39857,"input":27452,"output":87,"reasoning":30,"cache":{"write":0,"read":12288}},"cost":0.048351816}}
{"type":"step_start","timestamp":1777303077328,"sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","part":{"id":"prt_dcf84c1cd001l58deU1p7p1x4z","messageID":"msg_dcf84bb7e001dIH62ea7lgNQDS","sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","snapshot":"4bb955bcac68d2b899620323f4713a0399788ab1","type":"step-start"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1777303083564,"sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","part":{"id":"prt_dcf84cff3001P8pGADyJKb6in5","messageID":"msg_dcf84bb7e001dIH62ea7lgNQDS","sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","type":"tool","tool":"spec_kit_memory_memory_search","callID":"call_00_9YaASCMRFyoLZUTTNByOePbp","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"query":"planner-first contract memory save","includeContent":true,"limit":5},"output":"{\n  \"summary\": \"> **[EVIDENCE GAP DETECTED]: Retrieved context has low mathematical confidence (Z=1.27). Consider first principles.**\\n\\nFound 5 memories\",\n  \"data\": {\n    \"searchType\": \"hybrid\",\n    \"count\": 1,\n    \"constitutionalCount\": 0,\n    \"requestQuality\": {\n      \"label\": \"weak\"\n    },\n    \"recovery\": {\n      \"status\": \"low_confidence\",\n      \"reason\": \"knowledge_gap\",\n      \"suggestedQueries\": [\n        \"planner-first contract\",\n        \"planner-first contract memory\"\n      ],\n      \"recommendedAction\": \"ask_user\"\n    },\n    \"citationPolicy\": \"do_not_cite_results\",\n    \"responsePolicy\": {\n      \"requiredAction\": \"broaden_or_ask\",\n      \"noCanonicalPathClaims\": true,\n      \"citationRequiredForPaths\": true,\n      \"safeResponse\": \"Retrieval quality is weak. Broaden the query or ask the user for disambiguation before citing any path.\"\n    },\n    \"stateStats\": {\n      \"minState\": \"\",\n      \"before\": {\n        \"UNKNOWN\": 5\n      },\n      \"after\": {\n        \"UNKNOWN\": 5\n      },\n      \"removed\": 0\n    },\n    \"featureFlags\": {\n      \"trmEnabled\": true,\n      \"multiQueryEnabled\": true,\n      \"stateLimitsApplied\": false\n    },\n    \"pipelineMetadata\": {\n      \"stage1\": {\n        \"searchType\": \"hybrid\",\n        \"channelCount\": 2,\n        \"activeChannels\": 2,\n        \"candidateCount\": 8,\n        \"constitutionalInjected\": 2,\n        \"durationMs\": 629\n      },\n      \"stage2\": {\n        \"sessionBoostApplied\": \"off\",\n        \"causalBoostApplied\": \"applied\",\n        \"intentWeightsApplied\": \"off\",\n        \"artifactRoutingApplied\": \"applied\",\n        \"feedbackSignalsApplied\": \"off\",\n        \"graphContribution\": {\n          \"killSwitchActive\": false,\n          \"causalBoosted\": 0,\n          \"coActivationBoosted\": 0,\n          \"communityInjected\": 0,\n          \"graphSignalsBoosted\": 0,\n          \"totalGraphInjected\": 0,\n          \"rolloutState\": \"bounded_runtime\"\n        },\n        \"qualityFiltered\": 0,\n        \"durationMs\": 2,\n        \"recencyFusionApplied\": true,\n        \"recencyFusionBoosted\": 6,\n        \"coActivationApplied\": true,\n        \"graphSignalsApplied\": true\n      },\n      \"stage3\": {\n        \"rerankApplied\": true,\n        \"rerankProvider\": \"cross-encoder\",\n        \"chunkReassemblyStats\": {\n          \"collapsedChunkHits\": 0,\n          \"chunkParents\": 0,\n          \"reassembled\": 0,\n          \"fallback\": 0\n        },\n        \"durationMs\": 256\n      },\n      \"stage4\": {\n        \"stateFiltered\": 0,\n        \"constitutionalInjected\": 2,\n        \"evidenceGapDetected\": true,\n        \"durationMs\": 0\n      },\n      \"timing\": {\n        \"stage1\": 629,\n        \"stage2\": 2,\n        \"stage3\": 256,\n        \"stage4\": 0,\n        \"total\": 887\n      }\n    },\n    \"lexicalPath\": \"fts5\",\n    \"fallbackState\": \"ok\",\n    \"evidenceGapWarning\": \"> **[EVIDENCE GAP DETECTED]: Retrieved context has low mathematical confidence (Z=1.27). Consider first principles.**\",\n    \"intent\": {\n      \"type\": \"understand\",\n      \"confidence\": 1,\n      \"description\": \"Understanding or exploring the codebase\",\n      \"weightsApplied\": \"off\"\n    },\n    \"artifactRouting\": {\n      \"strategy\": {\n        \"artifactClass\": \"memory\",\n        \"semanticWeight\": 0.8,\n        \"keywordWeight\": 0.2,\n        \"recencyBias\": 0.6,\n        \"maxResults\": 5,\n        \"boostFactor\": 1.1\n      },\n      \"detectedClass\": \"memory\",\n      \"confidence\": 0.5\n    },\n    \"artifact_routing\": {\n      \"strategy\": {\n        \"artifactClass\": \"memory\",\n        \"semanticWeight\": 0.8,\n        \"keywordWeight\": 0.2,\n        \"recencyBias\": 0.6,\n        \"maxResults\": 5,\n        \"boostFactor\": 1.1\n      },\n      \"detectedClass\": \"memory\",\n      \"confidence\": 0.5\n    },\n    \"graphContribution\": {\n      \"killSwitchActive\": false,\n      \"causalBoosted\": 0,\n      \"coActivationBoosted\": 0,\n      \"communityInjected\": 0,\n      \"graphSignalsBoosted\": 0,\n      \"totalGraphInjected\": 0,\n      \"rolloutState\": \"bounded_runtime\"\n    },\n    \"graph_contribution\": {\n      \"killSwitchActive\": false,\n      \"causalBoosted\": 0,\n      \"coActivationBoosted\": 0,\n      \"communityInjected\": 0,\n      \"graphSignalsBoosted\": 0,\n      \"totalGraphInjected\": 0,\n      \"rolloutState\": \"bounded_runtime\"\n    },\n    \"rerankMetadata\": {\n      \"reranking_enabled\": true,\n      \"reranking_requested\": true,\n      \"reranking_applied\": true\n    },\n    \"sourceContract\": {\n      \"version\": \"gate-d-reader-ready-v1\",\n      \"archivedTierEnabled\": false,\n      \"legacyFallbackEnabled\": false,\n      \"includeArchivedCompatibility\": \"not_requested\",\n      \"preferredDocumentTypes\": [\n        \"spec_doc\",\n        \"continuity\"\n      ],\n      \"retainedResults\": 5,\n      \"droppedNonCanonicalResults\": 0,\n      \"countsBySourceKind\": {\n        \"spec_doc\": 5,\n        \"continuity\": 0,\n        \"constitutional\": 0\n      }\n    },\n    \"retrievalTrace\": {\n      \"traceId\": \"tr_mohcd7bi_vr5ct9\",\n      \"query\": \"planner-first contract memory save\",\n      \"intent\": \"understand\",\n      \"stages\": [\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"candidate\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303082574,\n          \"inputCount\": 0,\n          \"outputCount\": 0,\n          \"durationMs\": 0,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"channel\": \"d2-concept-expansion\",\n            \"originalQuery\": \"planner-first contract memory save\",\n            \"expandedQuery\": \"planner-first contract memory save memories knowledge context\",\n            \"expansionTerms\": [\n              \"memories\",\n              \"knowledge\",\n              \"context\"\n            ],\n            \"matchedConcepts\": [\n              \"memory\"\n            ]\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"candidate\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303082574,\n          \"inputCount\": 0,\n          \"outputCount\": 0,\n          \"durationMs\": 0,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"channel\": \"d2-concept-routing\",\n            \"matchedConcepts\": [\n              \"memory\"\n            ],\n            \"graphActivated\": true\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"candidate\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303083203,\n          \"inputCount\": 2,\n          \"outputCount\": 6,\n          \"durationMs\": 0,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"channel\": \"r12-embedding-expansion\",\n            \"expandedTerms\": [\n              \"research\",\n              \"default\",\n              \"evidence\",\n              \"review\",\n              \"path\",\n              \"planner\",\n              \"fallback\",\n              \"docs\"\n            ],\n            \"combinedQuery\": \"planner-first contract memory save research default evidence review path planner fallback docs\"\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"candidate\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303083203,\n          \"inputCount\": 2,\n          \"outputCount\": 8,\n          \"durationMs\": 629,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"searchType\": \"hybrid\",\n            \"mode\": null,\n            \"channelCount\": 2,\n            \"deepExpansion\": false,\n            \"r12EmbeddingExpansion\": true\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"fusion\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303083205,\n          \"inputCount\": 8,\n          \"outputCount\": 5,\n          \"durationMs\": 2,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"sessionBoostApplied\": \"off\",\n            \"causalBoostApplied\": \"applied\",\n            \"intentWeightsApplied\": \"off\",\n            \"artifactRoutingApplied\": \"applied\",\n            \"feedbackSignalsApplied\": \"off\",\n            \"graphContribution\": {\n              \"killSwitchActive\": false,\n              \"causalBoosted\": 0,\n              \"coActivationBoosted\": 0,\n              \"communityInjected\": 0,\n              \"graphSignalsBoosted\": 0,\n              \"totalGraphInjected\": 0,\n              \"rolloutState\": \"bounded_runtime\"\n            },\n            \"searchType\": \"hybrid\",\n            \"isHybrid\": true\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"rerank\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303083460,\n          \"inputCount\": 5,\n          \"outputCount\": 5,\n          \"durationMs\": 255,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"rerankApplied\": true,\n            \"provider\": \"cross-encoder\"\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"final-rank\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303083461,\n          \"inputCount\": 5,\n          \"outputCount\": 5,\n          \"durationMs\": 0,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"collapsedChunkHits\": 0,\n            \"chunkParents\": 0,\n            \"reassembled\": 0,\n            \"fallback\": 0\n          }\n        },\n        {\n          \"stage\": \"filter\",\n          \"timestamp\": 1777303083461,\n          \"inputCount\": 5,\n          \"outputCount\": 5,\n          \"durationMs\": 0,\n          \"metadata\": {\n            \"stateFiltered\": 0,\n            \"evidenceGapDetected\": true,\n            \"trmEnabled\": true,\n            \"applyStateLimits\": false,\n            \"minState\": \"\"\n          }\n        }\n      ],\n      \"totalDurationMs\": 886,\n      \"finalResultCount\": 5\n    },\n    \"appliedBoosts\": {\n      \"session\": {\n        \"applied\": \"off\"\n      },\n      \"causal\": {\n        \"applied\": \"applied\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"applied_boosts\": {\n      \"session\": {\n        \"applied\": \"off\"\n      },\n      \"causal\": {\n        \"applied\": \"applied\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"progressiveDisclosure\": {\n      \"summaryLayer\": {\n        \"count\": 5,\n        \"digest\": \"5 weak\"\n      },\n      \"results\": [\n        {\n          \"snippet\": \"\",\n          \"detailAvailable\": false,\n          \"resultId\": \"2316\"\n        },\n        {\n          \"snippet\": \"\",\n          \"detailAvailable\": false,\n          \"resultId\": \"95\"\n        },\n        {\n          \"snippet\": \"\",\n          \"detailAvailable\": false,\n          \"resultId\": \"94\"\n        },\n        {\n          \"snippet\": \"\",\n          \"detailAvailable\": false,\n          \"resultId\": \"92\"\n        },\n        {\n          \"snippet\": \"\",\n          \"detailAvailable\": false,\n          \"resultId\": \"2317\"\n        }\n      ],\n      \"continuation\": null\n    },\n    \"results\": [\n      {\n        \"id\": 2316,\n        \"specFolder\": \"system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/004-memory-save-rewrite\",\n        \"filePath\": \"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/004-memory-save-rewrite/plan.md\",\n        \"title\": \"Implemen [system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/004-memory-save-rewrite/plan]\",\n        \"similarity\": 76.46,\n        \"isConstitutional\": false,\n        \"importanceTier\": \"important\",\n        \"triggerPhrases\": [],\n        \"createdAt\": \"2026-04-26T14:30:22.365Z\",\n        \"isChunk\": false,\n        \"parentId\": null,\n        \"chunkIndex\": null,\n        \"chunkLabel\": null,\n        \"chunkCount\": null,\n        \"contentSource\": \"file_read_fallback\",\n        \"trustBadges\": {\n          \"confidence\": 0.9,\n          \"extractionAge\": \"yesterday\",\n          \"lastAccessAge\": \"never\",\n          \"orphan\": false,\n          \"weightHistoryChanged\": false\n        },\n        \"content\": \"---\\ntitle: \\\"Implemen [system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/004-memory-save-rewrite/plan]\\\"\\ndescription: \\\"Milestoned delivery (M1-M10) for the planner-first /memory:save contract: audit + retirement of the legacy [spec]/memory/*.md write path, 20-iteration relevance research, planner contract + fallback implementation, routing/quality/reconsolidation/enrichment trim, follow-up API extraction, verification, release alignment, and deep-review remediation.\\\"\\ntrigger_phrases:\\n  - \\\"implementation plan\\\"\\n  - \\\"memory save planner first\\\"\\n  - \\\"planner-first memory save plan\\\"\\n  - \\\"save flow trim plan\\\"\\n  - \\\"retirement audit to planner-first\\\"\\nimportance_tier: \\\"important\\\"\\ncontextType: \\\"planning\\\"\\n_memory:\\n  continuity:\\n    packet_pointer: \\\"system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/004-memory-save-rewrite\\\"\\n    last_updated_at: \\\"2026-04-15T10:00:01Z\\\"\\n    last_updated_by: \\\"cli-copilot\\\"\\n    recent_action: \\\"Folder renamed; plan rewritten as M1-M10 planner-first delivery\\\"\\n    next_safe_action: \\\"Packet complete\\\"\\n    blockers: []\\n    key_files:\\n      - \\\"plan.md\\\"\\n      - \\\"spec.md\\\"\\n      - \\\"tasks.md\\\"\\n      - \\\"checklist.md\\\"\\n      - \\\"decision-record.md\\\"\\n      - \\\"implementation-summary.md\\\"\\n    session_dedup:\\n      fingerprint: \\\"sha256:014-planner-first-plan-2026-04-15\\\"\\n      session_id: \\\"014-planner-first-plan-2026-04-15\\\"\\n      parent_session_id: \\\"014-planner-first-seed\\\"\\n    completion_pct: 100\\n    open_questions: []\\n    answered_questions:\\n      - \\\"The planner-first default + explicit fallback architecture preserves the canonical writer while eliminating the default-path overreach.\\\"\\n      - \\\"Delivery spanned M1-M10 across audit, research, implementation, verification, release alignment, and deep-review remediation.\\\"\\ntemplate_source_hint: \\\"<!-- SPECKIT_TEMPLATE_SOURCE: plan-core | v2.2 -->\\\"\\n---\\n# Implementation Plan: /memory:save Planner-First Default\\n\\n<!-- SPECKIT_LEVEL: 3+ -->\\n<!-- SPECKIT_TEMPLATE_SOURCE: plan-core | v2.2 -->\\n\\n---\\n\\n<!-- ANCHOR:summary -->\\n## 1. SUMMARY\\n\\n### Technical Context\\n\\n| Aspect | Value |\\n|--------|-------|\\n| **Language or Stack** | TypeScript save-flow handlers, CLI wrapper, routing, validation, indexing, and follow-up APIs; markdown packet docs + release notes |\\n| **Framework** | system-spec-kit MCP server + spec-folder workflow |\\n| **Storage** | Canonical spec docs, vector DB, routed record identity, graph metadata, optional follow-up indexing |\\n| **Testing** | `validate_document.py`, `validate.sh --strict`, vitest suites, transcript prototypes, env-flag orthogonality tests |\\n| **Runtime Surface** | TypeScript save-flow handlers, CLI wrapper, routing, validation, indexing, and follow-up APIs described in `spec.md §3` |\\n\\n### Overview\\n\\nThe plan delivers a planner-first default for `/memory:save` while preserving the canonical atomic writer as an explicit fallback. It retires the legacy `[spec]/memory/*.md` write path end-to-end, gates four previously default-on save-path behaviors behind explicit env flags, and extracts freshness into three explicit follow-up APIs. Delivery runs through 10 sequential milestones: audit surface + classification, retirement cutover, relevance research, planner contract build-out, routing + quality trim, verification + transcript prototypes, release alignment, and deep-review remediation.\\n\\n### Full Delivery Summary\\n\\n| Milestone | Theme | Main Output | Why It Matters |\\n|-----------|-------|-------------|----------------|\\n| M1 | Audit kickoff | Classification rules + iteration plan | Establishes the audit frame |\\n| M2 | Audit convergence | 25-finding audit report + half-migrated diagnosis | Proves the default contract is broken |\\n| M3 | Retirement cutover | v3.4.1.0 removes legacy memory-file write path + aligns docs | Bridges audit to planner work |\\n| M4 | Research kickoff | Q1-Q10 relevance questions | Sets the classification scope |\\n| M5 | Research convergence | 15-subsystem classification + trim-targeted verdict | Decides what survives the default path |\\n| M6 | Planner contract | Planner-first default + flag plumbing + type surface + shared types | Ships the new operator contract |\\n| M7 | Routing and quality trim | Tier 3 + quality-loop + reconsolidation + enrichment leave the default path | Aligns runtime to verdict |\\n| M8 | Verification + transcripts | Targeted tests, transcript prototypes, packet validation | Grounds planner behavior in real operator flows |\\n| M9 | Release alignment | v3.4.1.0 release note + env reference + template updates | Runtime contract documented honestly |\\n| M10 | Deep-review remediation | 9-finding closure (3 P0, 5 P1, 1 P2) | Closes the last correctness + honesty gaps |\\n\\n---\\n\\n<!-- /ANCHOR:summary -->\\n<!-- ANCHOR:quality-gates -->\\n## 2. QUALITY GATES\\n\\n### Definition of Ready\\n\\n- [x] Audit classification rules and dimension plan defined before iteration started.\\n- [x] Q1-Q10 relevance questions agreed before M4 kickoff.\\n- [x] Load-bearing core and candidate trim targets defined before M6 kickoff.\\n- [x] Packet scope limited to the planner contract, retirement of legacy write path, subsystem gating, follow-up APIs, and docs alignment.\\n\\n### Definition of Done\\n\\n- [x] Packet canonical docs exist and agree on the planner-first contract.\\n- [x] Audit, research, deep-review, and transcript snapshots copied into the packet.\\n- [x] Every copied Markdown file begins with the required snapshot note.\\n- [x] `description.json`, `graph-metadata.json`, and packet-local nested changelog exist.\\n- [x] All primary docs pass `validate_document.py`.\\n- [x] Packet passes `validate.sh --strict` with no blocking errors.\\n- [x] Planner-default runtime tests prove the default path is non-mutating.\\n- [x] Full-auto fallback tests prove atomic mutation + rollback + `POST_SAVE_FINGERPRINT` parity.\\n- [x] Follow-up APIs (`refreshGraphMetadata`, `reindexSpecDocs`, `runEnrichmentBackfill`) have execution-level coverage.\\n- [x] Deep-review findings F001-F009 closed.\\n\\n---\\n\\n<!-- /ANCHOR:quality-gates -->\\n<!-- ANCHOR:architecture -->\\n## 3. ARCHITECTURE\\n\\n### Pattern\\n\\nPlanner-first wrapper around the preserved canonical atomic writer. The default path computes route + legality + advisory data and returns structured planner output without mutating files. An explicit fallback path activates the canonical writer with full atomic semantics intact. Freshness work lives in callable follow-up APIs.\\n\\n### Key Components\\n\\n- **Planner-first handler (`memory-save.ts`)**: Default execution path returning planner output (routes, blockers, advisories, follow-up actions). No mutation on default.\\n- **Canonical atomic writer (preserved: `create-record.ts`, `atomic-index-memory.ts`, `thin-continuity-record.ts`, `post-insert.ts`)**: Fallback path when `SPECKIT_SAVE_PLANNER_MODE=full-auto`. Rollback, promotion, same-path identity, `POST_SAVE_FINGERPRINT` parity intact.\\n- **Content router (`content-router.ts`)**: Eight-category contract preserved. Scoped exception: Tier 3 default-disable + manual-review guard.\\n- **Quality gate (`quality-loop.ts`, `save-quality-gate.ts`)**: Hard blockers preserved. Auto-fix retries gated behind `SPECKIT_QUALITY_AUTO_FIX=true`.\\n- **Reconsolidation (`reconsolidation-bridge.ts`)**: Gated behind `SPECKIT_RECONSOLIDATION_ENABLED=true` or explicit fallback.\\n- **Post-insert enrichment (`post-insert.ts`)**: Gated behind `SPECKIT_POST_INSERT_ENRICHMENT_ENABLED=true` or follow-up API.\\n- **Follow-up indexing APIs (`api/indexing.ts`, `graph-metadata-parser.ts`)**: `refreshGraphMetadata`, `reindexSpecDocs`, `runEnrichmentBackfill`.\\n- **Env reference + command docs + release notes**: Aligned to describe default/opt-in/reserved/fallback consistently.\\n\\n### Data Flow\\n\\n```text\\nCaller invokes /memory:save\\n    |\\n    v\\nResolve SPECKIT_SAVE_PLANNER_MODE\\n    |\\n    |-- default or plan-only or hybrid(reserved) -->\\n    |       Compute route + legality + advisories\\n    |       Respect env flags for deferred helpers\\n    |       Return structured planner output (no mutation)\\n    |\\n    +-- full-auto -->\\n            Canonical atomic writer\\n            Promotion + rollback + same-path identity\\n            POST_SAVE_FINGERPRINT parity\\n            Gated subsystems run only when their env flag is true\\n```\\n\\n### File-Level Change Map\\n\\nSee `spec.md §3 Files to Change` for the consolidated table covering legacy write-path retirement, planner contract core, canonical writer preservation, content router scoped exception, quality gate updates, reconsolidation gating, enrichment deferral, freshness APIs, command + reference + env docs, release notes, test surfaces, and packet metadata.\\n\\n### Runtime Surface Summary\\n\\n| Area | Files | Role |\\n|------|-------|------|\\n| Legacy write path retirement | `directory-setup.ts`, `workflow.ts`, `file-writer.ts`, `memory-indexer.ts`, `memory-metadata.ts` | Removed from runtime |\\n| Load-bearing core preserved | `memory-save.ts`, `create-record.ts`, `atomic-index-memory.ts`, `thin-continuity-record.ts`, `content-router.ts`, `post-insert.ts`, `reconsolidation-bridge.ts`, `workflow.ts` | Writer core + continuity + routing |\\n| Planner contract | `types.ts`, `response-builder.ts`, `validation-responses.ts`, `generate-context.ts`, `/memory:save` docs | Default non-mutating output |\\n| Follow-up APIs | `api/indexing.ts`, `graph-metadata-parser.ts` | Deferred freshness + enrichment |\\n| Remediation surfaces | `content-router.ts`, `memory-save.ts`, `post-insert.ts`, `../../../../skill/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/ENV_REFERENCE.md`, `../../../../changelog/01--system-spec-kit/v3.4.1.0.md` | Deep-review closure + honesty fixes |\\n\\n---\\n\\n<!-- /ANCHOR:architecture -->\\n<!-- ANCHOR:phases -->\\n## 4. IMPLEMENTATION PHASES\\n\\n### Milestone Flow\\n\\n```text\\nM1 Audit kickoff\\n  -> M2 Audit convergence\\n  -> M3 Retirement closure (v3.4.1.0 legacy write-path removal)\\n  -> M4 Research kickoff\\n  -> M5 Research convergence (15-subsystem classification + trim-targeted verdict)\\n  -> M6 Planner contract\\n  -> M7 Routing + quality + reconsolidation + enrichment trim\\n  -> M8 Verification and transcripts\\n  -> M9 Release alignment\\n  -> M10 Deep-review remediation\\n```\\n\\n### M1 — Audit kickoff\\n\\nOpen the audit with a narrow question: does any active file still write, read, or assume `[spec]/memory/*.md` in contradiction to the retirement claim? Define classification rules and the iteration plan. Evidence: `research/013-audit-snapshot/primary-docs/spec.md`, `research/013-audit-snapshot/deep-review-strategy.md`.\\n\\n### M2 — Audit convergence\\n\\nRun the audit to convergence across 7 iterations. Document the half-migrated state in concrete families: runtime write path, runtime read path, doc contradiction, phantom dedup contract, test drift, and template drift. 25 active findings across 9 P0, 9 P1, and 7 P2 produce three closure paths (A retire, B rescind, C dedup redesign). Evidence: `research/013-audit-snapshot/iterations/`, `research/013-audit-snapshot/review-report.md`.\\n\\n### M3 — Retirement closure\\n\\nRemove the live memory-file write path, clean up templates and docs, and align the runtime with the intended canonical-doc model. v3.4.1.0 records the cutover. Evidence: `../../../../changelog/01--system-spec-kit/v3.4.1.0.md`.\\n\\n### M4 — Research kickoff\\n\\nAfter the retirement cutover, open relevance research with Q1-Q10 covering load-bearing core, planner-first feasibility, quality-check classification, reindex vs freshness, graph-metadata refresh, entity extraction, reconsolidation cost, router classifier overfitting, trigger harmonization, and continuity ownership. Evidence: `research/014-research-snapshot/primary-docs/spec.md`, `research/014-research-snapshot/deep-research-strategy.md`.\\n\\n### M5 — Research convergence\\n\\nRun 20 iterations of relevance research. Classify 15 subsystems into load-bearing (canonical atomic writer, routed record identity, content-router core, thin continuity validation), candidate trim targets (Tier 3 routing, reconsolidation-on-save, heavy quality-loop auto-fix, post-insert enrichment), and other categories. Reach the `trim-targeted` verdict: keep the writer, trim the oversized default-path stack. Evidence: `research/014-research-snapshot/research.md`, `research/014-research-snapshot/findings-registry.json`.\\n\\n### M6 — Planner contract\\n\\nBuild the planner-first default, CLI defaults, docs, and type surfaces:\\n\\n- [x] T001-T005 Add planner-default and fallback flag definitions; planner response interfaces; response serialization helpers; planner blocker and advisory response helpers.\\n- [x] T006-T008 Make `generate-context.ts` request planner-first behavior by default; update `/memory:save` docs; make `memory-save.ts` return planner output by default with explicit fallback.\\n- [x] T009-T012 Update aggregate and handler tests for planner-default behavior; focused planner-first regression coverage.\\n\\n### M7 — Routing and quality trim\\n\\nTrim Tier 3 routing, quality-loop auto-fix, reconsolidation-on-save, and post-insert enrichment from the default hot path while preserving the category contract and hard blockers:\\n\\n- [x] T013-T017 Trim default Tier 3 participation while preserving category contract; reduce Tier 2 prototype library; update content-router tests for Tier 1/Tier 2 deterministic default; update runtime routing + intent-routing tests.\\n- [x] T018-T022 Retire default-path auto-fix retries; preserve hard structural blockers; update quality-loop + save-quality-gate + pipeline-enforcement tests.\\n- [x] T023-T026 Gate reconsolidation behind explicit flag/fallback; move default-path enrichment to explicit follow-up behavior; preserve same-path lineage; keep chunking as size-driven fallback.\\n- [x] T027-T034 Move unconditional graph refresh + spec-doc reindex out of planner-default saves; expose explicit follow-up indexing entry points; keep graph refresh callable as explicit follow-up; update reconsolidation-bridge, reconsolidation, assistive-reconsolidation, chunking, graph-refresh tests.\\n\\n### M8 — Verification and transcripts\\n\\nProve the planner-first model holds up against real session evidence:\\n\\n- [x] T035-T037 Memory-save integration tests for planner-default plus fallback end-to-end; planner UX regression tests for readable output; thin-continuity tests for normalization + upsert parity.\\n- [x] T038 Prototype planner-first behavior against three real session transcripts. Evidence: `scratch/transcripts-snapshot/`.\\n- [x] T039-T040 Run per-file doc validation + strict packet validation; capture follow-on defects.\\n- [x] T041-T043 Review structural parity between `/memory:save` + `AGENTS.md` + system-spec-kit skill doc; review fallback safety against `atomic-index-memory.ts` + `create-record.ts`; review transcript mismatches and convert unresolved issues into follow-on tasks.\\n\\n### M9 — Release alignment\\n\\nDocument the shipped contract in `v3.4.1.0` release notes and closeout docs, including the explicit follow-up APIs, the scoped router exception, and the reserved state of `hybrid`. Evidence: `review/015-deep-review-snapshot/primary-docs/implementation-summary.md`, `../../../../changelog/01--system-spec-kit/v3.4.1.0.md`.\\n\\n### M10 — Deep-review remediation\\n\\nClose the 9 findings from the deep-review pass (3 P0, 5 P1, 1 P2):\\n\\n- **F001 [P0]**: router-preservation contradiction → resolved by documenting the scoped `content-router.ts` exception (ADR-007).\\n- **F002 [P0]**: fallback safety parity → resolved by reinstating `POST_SAVE_FINGERPRINT`.\\n- **F003 [P0]**: template-contract failures hidden as advisories → resolved by promoting them to planner blockers.\\n- **F004 [P1]**: deferred enrichment returning success-shaped status → resolved by returning explicit `deferred` status.\\n- **F005 [P2]**: `hybrid` assumed live → resolved by marking reserved and documenting `plan-only`-equivalent behavior.\\n- **F006 [P1]**: follow-up API coverage → resolved by adding execution-level coverage for `refreshGraphMetadata`, `reindexSpecDocs`, `runEnrichmentBackfill`.\\n- **F007 [P1]**: follow-up tool names in packet docs → resolved by aligning docs to shipped names.\\n- **F008 [P1]**: env reference drift → resolved by documenting `hybrid` honestly in `ENV_REFERENCE.md`.\\n- **F009 [P1]**: release-note honesty → resolved by describing router scope and `hybrid` state accurately in `v3.4.1.0.md`.\\n\\n---\\n\\n<!-- /ANCHOR:phases -->\\n<!-- ANCHOR:testing -->\\n## 5. TESTING STRATEGY\\n\\n| Test Type | Scope | Tools | Source |\\n|-----------|-------|-------|--------|\\n| Audit validation | Verify runtime + doc contradictions | Deep-review iterations + synthesis report | `research/013-audit-snapshot/**` |\\n| Research convergence | Verify Q1-Q10 answers + 15-subsystem verdicts | Deep-research iterations + findings registry | `research/014-research-snapshot/**` |\\n| Runtime contract tests | Planner-default + fallback parity + router + quality + follow-up APIs | Vitest suites + targeted sweeps | `review/015-deep-review-snapshot/primary-docs/tasks.md`, `review/015-deep-review-snapshot/primary-docs/checklist.md`, `review/015-deep-review-snapshot/primary-docs/implementation-summary.md` |\\n| Transcript validation | Planner-first behavior against real sessions | Transcript markdown + planner-output JSON + transcript reviews | `scratch/transcripts-snapshot/` |\\n| Review convergence | Deep-review isolation of real defect set | Review report + findings registry + iteration ledger | `review/015-deep-review-snapshot/**` |\\n| Remediation confirmation | All 9 review findings resolved | Remediated docs + tests + changelog + implementation summary | `review/015-deep-review-snapshot/primary-docs/implementation-summary.md`, `../../../../changelog/01--system-spec-kit/v3.4.1.0.md` |\\n| Packet validation | Packet structural soundness | `validate_document.py`, `validate.sh --strict` | This packet |\\n\\n### Audit Approach (M1-M3)\\n\\n- Focused deep-review loop over runtime, docs, tests, and templates.\\n- Classification rule applied each iteration.\\n- Convergence threshold tracked and documented.\\n- Retirement cutover delivered as part of v3.4.1.0; docs aligned to the canonical-doc model.\\n\\n### Research Approach (M4-M5)\\n\\n- 20 iterations with explicit subsystem questions.\\n- Research document and findings registry used as the canonical synthesis.\\n- Minimal replacement design evaluated against live code surfaces.\\n- Final report explicitly ruled out a full writer redesign.\\n\\n### Implementation Approach (M6-M8)\\n\\n- Planner-first contract built before trim work.\\n- Routing, quality, reconsolidation, enrichment, and follow-up APIs covered by targeted tests.\\n- Transcript prototypes used to validate real operator narratives.\\n- Packet-local doc validation and strict packet validation used as release gates.\\n\\n### Remediation Approach (M10)\\n\\n- Deep review split concerns into runtime correctness, follow-up API integrity, coverage, and documentation honesty.\\n- Remediation closed all 9 findings and aligned packet docs and release notes.\\n- Packet docs reflect the remediated state as the final truth.\\n\\n---\\n\\n<!-- /ANCHOR:testing -->\\n<!-- ANCHOR:dependencies -->\\n## 6. DEPENDENCIES\\n\\n| Dependency | Type | Status | Impact if Blocked |\\n|------------|------|--------|-------------------|\\n| Audit evidence | Documentation source | Ready | Audit truth cannot be grounded |\\n| Research synthesis | Documentation source | Ready | Verdicts and Q1-Q10 would be underspecified |\\n| Canonical atomic writer | Runtime core | Preserved | Fallback path depends on it |\\n| Eight-category router contract | Runtime core | Preserved | Target authority depends on it |\\n| Vitest suites | Verification tooling | Ready | Runtime contract evidence |\\n| Transcript fixtures | Verification input | Ready | Real-operator-flow evidence |\\n| v3.4.1.0 changelog | Release artifact | Ready | Release-state truth |\\n| `validate_document.py` | Tooling | Pass recorded | Docs could ship with structural defects |\\n| `validate.sh --strict` | Tooling | Pass recorded | Packet could ship with blocking issues |\\n| `generate-description.js` | Tooling | Run | Packet metadata complete |\\n| Nested changelog generator | Tooling | Run | Packet-local change trace complete |\\n\\n---\\n\\n<!-- /ANCHOR:dependencies -->\\n<!-- ANCHOR:rollback -->\\n## 7. ROLLBACK PLAN\\n\\n- **Trigger**: Planner-default mutates under some branch, fallback loses atomic safety parity, router preservation claim contradicts code, or remediation reopens a closed finding.\\n- **Procedure**: Revert runtime changes + docs + env reference + release note as one batch. Re-run vitest suites + strict validation + transcript prototypes.\\n- **Data reversal**: No data migrations. Vector DB schema unchanged; saves still use the canonical atomic writer when fallback is active.\\n\\n### Per-Milestone Rollback\\n\\n| Milestone | Trigger | Rollback Action | Data Reversal |\\n|-----------|---------|-----------------|---------------|\\n| M3 retirement cutover | Legacy memory-file surface regression | Revert the retirement commit; re-run audit fixtures | None |\\n| M6 planner contract | Planner output schema drift or default mutation | Revert planner commits; re-enable prior handler default | None |\\n| M7 trim milestones | Opt-in flag cascade activates unintended subsystems | Revert trim commits for affected subsystem | None |\\n| M8 verification | Transcript prototype breaks unexpectedly | Patch surface; re-run validator | None |\\n| M9 release alignment | Release notes drift from runtime | Patch release notes + env reference | None |\\n| M10 remediation | Reopened finding | Apply targeted patch; re-run closure tests | None |\\n\\n### Consolidated Rollback Note\\n\\nBecause the canonical atomic writer is preserved, rollback means reverting the planner-first wrapper + env-flag gates + follow-up API exports. Fallback behavior continues to work with full atomic semantics intact.\\n\\n---\\n\\n<!-- /ANCHOR:rollback -->\\n## L2: PHASE DEPENDENCIES\\n\\n```text\\nM1 Audit kickoff\\n  -> M2 Audit convergence\\n  -> M3 Retirement closure\\n  -> M4 Research kickoff\\n  -> M5 Research convergence\\n  -> M6 Planner contract\\n  -> M7 Routing and quality trim\\n  -> M8 Verification and transcripts\\n  -> M9 Release alignment\\n  -> M10 Remediation\\n```\\n\\n| Phase | Depends On | Blocks |\\n|-------|------------|--------|\\n| M1 | None | M2-M10 |\\n| M2 | M1 | M3-M10 |\\n| M3 | M2 | M4-M10 |\\n| M4 | M3 | M5-M10 |\\n| M5 | M4 | M6-M10 |\\n| M6 | M5 | M7-M10 |\\n| M7 | M6 | M8-M10 |\\n| M8 | M7 | M9-M10 |\\n| M9 | M8 | M10 |\\n| M10 | M9 | Packet closeout |\\n\\n---\\n\\n## L2: EFFORT ESTIMATION\\n\\n| Phase | Complexity | Estimated Effort |\\n|-------|------------|------------------|\\n| Audit + retirement | High | 1-2 days |\\n| Research convergence | High | 1 day |\\n| Planner contract | High | 0.5-1 day |\\n| Routing + quality + reconsolidation + enrichment trim | High | 1-1.5 days |\\n| Verification + transcripts | Medium | 0.5 day |\\n| Release alignment | Medium | 0.5 day |\\n| Deep-review remediation (9 findings) | High | 0.5-1 day |\\n| **Total** | **High** | **~5-7 implementation days** |\\n\\n### Historical Effort Context\\n\\n| Area | Effort Shape | Why It Matters |\\n|------|--------------|----------------|\\n| Audit loop | Multi-iteration review + release alignment | Explains depth of the original contradiction |\\n| Research loop | 20-iteration classification | Explains trim-targeted verdict trustworthiness |\\n| Implementation | 43 tasks across planner + trim + verification | Explains why the contract cannot be summarized as a small one-line change |\\n\\n---\\n\\n## L2: ENHANCED ROLLBACK\\n\\n### Pre-release Checks\\n\\n- [x] Snapshot tree complete (audit + research + review + transcripts)\\n- [x] Planner-default runtime tests pass\\n- [x] Full-auto fallback tests pass with `POST_SAVE_FINGERPRINT` parity\\n- [x] Follow-up API coverage in place\\n- [x] Release notes + env reference aligned to runtime\\n\\n### Rollback Procedure\\n\\n1. Revert planner commits atomically; fallback behavior continues via canonical writer.\\n2. Revert env-flag gates for any subsystem that regressed.\\n3. Re-run vitest suites + strict validation + transcript prototypes.\\n4. If v3.4.1.0 release note needs adjustment, patch the release note and env reference.\\n\\n### Data Reversal\\n\\n- **Has data migration?** No\\n- **Reversal procedure**: Runtime-level revert only\\n\\n---\\n\\n## L3: DEPENDENCY GRAPH\\n\\n```text\\n┌──────────────┐\\n│ Audit (M1-M2)│\\n└──────┬───────┘\\n       v\\n┌──────────────┐\\n│ Retirement   │\\n│ cutover (M3) │\\n└──────┬───────┘\\n       v\\n┌──────────────┐\\n│ Research     │\\n│ (M4-M5)      │\\n└──────┬───────┘\\n       v\\n┌──────────────┐\\n│ Planner +    │\\n│ trim (M6-M7) │\\n└──────┬───────┘\\n       v\\n┌──────────────┐\\n│ Verification │\\n│ (M8)         │\\n└──────┬───────┘\\n       v\\n┌──────────────┐\\n│ Release      │\\n│ alignment M9 │\\n└──────┬───────┘\\n       v\\n┌──────────────┐\\n│ Remediation  │\\n│ (M10)        │\\n└──────────────┘\\n```\\n\\n### Dependency Matrix\\n\\n| Component | Depends On | Produces | Blocks |\\n|-----------|------------|----------|--------|\\n| Audit | None | Half-migrated evidence | Retirement cutover |\\n| Retirement cutover | Audit | Canonical-doc-aligned runtime | Research |\\n| Research | Retirement cutover | Trim-targeted verdict | Planner contract |\\n| Planner contract | Research | Non-mutating default + fallback | Trim milestones |\\n| Trim milestones | Planner contract | Gated subsystems + follow-up APIs | Verification |\\n| Verification | Trim milestones | Targeted tests + transcript evidence | Release |\\n| Release alignment | Verification | v3.4.1.0 + env reference + templates | Remediation |\\n| Remediation | Release alignment | 9-finding closure + honest router scope | Closeout |\\n\\n---\\n\\n## L3: CRITICAL PATH\\n\\n1. **Audit the half-migrated state** — critical because every later claim depends on grounded evidence.\\n2. **Retire the legacy write path** — critical so research and implementation do not inherit the contradiction.\\n3. **Classify the 15 subsystems** — critical so the trim targets are objective.\\n4. **Ship the planner-first default + full-auto fallback** — critical because it is the operator-facing contract.\\n5. **Gate Tier 3 + quality + reconsolidation + enrichment** — critical so the default path actually trims.\\n6. **Expose follow-up APIs** — critical so deferred work remains callable.\\n7. **Align docs + release notes + env reference** — critical so the shipped contract is documented honestly.\\n8. **Close all 9 deep-review findings** — critical because the first review verdict was remediation-required.\\n\\n**Total Critical Path**: Audit → Retirement → Research → Planner + Trim → Verification → Release → Remediation\\n\\n---\\n\\n## L3: MILESTONES\\n\\n| Milestone | Description | Success Criteria | Target |\\n|-----------|-------------|------------------|--------|\\n| M1 | Audit kickoff | Classification rules + iteration plan published | Audit spec + strategy |\\n| M2 | Audit convergence | 25-finding audit report + half-migrated diagnosis | Audit synthesis |\\n| M3 | Retirement cutover | Legacy memory-file write path removed | v3.4.1.0 release |\\n| M4 | Research kickoff | Q1-Q10 published | Research spec + strategy |\\n| M5 | Research convergence | 15-subsystem classification + trim-targeted verdict | Research synthesis |\\n| M6 | Planner contract | Planner-first default + fallback + shared types | Runtime handler |\\n| M7 | Routing + quality trim | Four subsystems behind env flags | Runtime handlers |\\n| M8 | Verification + transcripts | Targeted tests + transcript prototypes + packet validation | Vitest + transcripts |\\n| M9 | Release alignment | v3.4.1.0 + `/memory:save` docs + env reference + templates | Release artifacts |\\n| M10 | Remediation | 9 findings closed | Review report + ADR-007 |\\n\\n---\\n\\n### Architecture Decision Record Summary\\n\\n| ADR | Summary |\\n|-----|---------|\\n| ADR-001 | Trim-targeted verdict: keep the core writer, trim the oversized default-path stack |\\n| ADR-002 | Planner-first output becomes the default `/memory:save` contract |\\n| ADR-003 | Reconsolidation-on-save becomes explicit opt-in |\\n| ADR-004 | Post-insert enrichment becomes deferred or standalone |\\n| ADR-005 | Router categories stay while Tier 2 or Tier 3 scope narrows |\\n| ADR-006 | Hard checks remain while quality-loop auto-fix leaves the default path |\\n| ADR-007 | Router preservation claim becomes \\\"core preserved with one scoped exception\\\" |\\n\\n---\\n\\n## L3+: AI EXECUTION FRAMEWORK\\n\\n### Pre-Task Checklist\\n\\n- [x] Confirm the canonical atomic writer stays intact\\n- [x] Confirm env flags stay orthogonal\\n- [x] Confirm planner default stays non-mutating\\n\\n### Task Execution Rules\\n\\n| Rule | Description |\\n|------|-------------|\\n| EXEC-SEQ | Ship planner contract before trim work |\\n| EXEC-EVIDENCE | Every trim target maps to an audit/research finding |\\n| EXEC-SCOPE | Do not touch canonical atomic writer internals |\\n\\n### Status Reporting Format\\n\\nReport task state as `P###-ID [x] - description` using the packet-prefixed IDs in `tasks.md`.\\n\\n### Blocked Task Protocol\\n\\nIf a runtime change regresses fallback safety, revert and patch the specific subsystem before re-running the verification sweep.\\n\\n### Tier 1: Runtime Core\\n\\n**Files**\\n- `memory-save.ts`, `types.ts`, `response-builder.ts`, `validation-responses.ts`, `generate-context.ts`\\n- `content-router.ts`, `quality-loop.ts`, `save-quality-gate.ts`\\n- `reconsolidation-bridge.ts`, `post-insert.ts`\\n- `api/indexing.ts`, `graph-metadata-parser.ts`\\n\\n**Goal**\\n- Preserve the canonical atomic writer + routing + continuity; move default-path overreach behind env flags; expose follow-up APIs.\\n\\n### Tier 2: Docs + Release\\n\\n| Workstream | Output | Notes |\\n|------------|--------|-------|\\n| Runtime contract docs | `/memory:save` docs + `ENV_REFERENCE.md` + templates | Align to shipped contract |\\n| Release notes | `v3.4.1.0.md` | Scoped exception + reserved `hybrid` honestly |\\n| Packet docs | `spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, `checklist.md`, `decision-record.md`, `implementation-summary.md` | Tell the end-to-end story |\\n\\n### Tier 3: Validation\\n\\n**Goal**\\n- Packet behaves like a normal spec packet: validators pass, metadata generated, packet-local changelog emitted.\\n\\n**Actions**\\n- Run `validate_document.py`\\n- Run `validate.sh --strict`\\n- Generate `description.json`\\n- Author or verify `graph-metadata.json`\\n- Generate nested changelog\\n\\n---\\n\\n## L3+: WORKSTREAM COORDINATION\\n\\n| ID | Name | Scope | Output |\\n|----|------|-------|--------|\\n| W-A | Audit + retirement | Half-migrated evidence + legacy write-path removal | `research/013-audit-snapshot/**` + v3.4.1.0 retirement |\\n| W-B | Research | 15-subsystem classification + trim-targeted verdict | `research/014-research-snapshot/**` |\\n| W-C | Planner contract + trim | Runtime handlers + env flags + follow-up APIs | Runtime TypeScript |\\n| W-D | Verification + transcripts | Targeted tests + three transcript prototypes | Vitest + `scratch/transcripts-snapshot/` |\\n| W-E | Docs + release alignment | `/memory:save` docs + env reference + release notes + packet docs | Docs surface |\\n| W-F | Remediation | 9-finding closure + ADR-007 | `review/015-deep-review-snapshot/**` |\\n\\n### Sync Points\\n\\n| Sync ID | Trigger | Participants | Output |\\n|---------|---------|--------------|--------|\\n| SYNC-001 | Audit complete | W-A + W-B | Research grounded in audit reality |\\n| SYNC-002 | Research complete | W-B + W-C | Trim targets objective |\\n| SYNC-003 | Runtime complete | W-C + W-D | Tests cover default + fallback + gated subsystems |\\n| SYNC-004 | Verification complete | W-D + W-E | Docs + release + env reference aligned to runtime |\\n| SYNC-005 | Release aligned | W-E + W-F | Remediation targets documented findings |\\n\\n---\\n\\n## L3+: COMMUNICATION PLAN\\n\\n### Checkpoints\\n\\n- **Checkpoint 1**: Audit truth grounded.\\n- **Checkpoint 2**: Retirement cutover shipped.\\n- **Checkpoint 3**: Research verdict published.\\n- **Checkpoint 4**: Planner + trim + follow-up APIs merged.\\n- **Checkpoint 5**: Verification + transcripts validated.\\n- **Checkpoint 6**: v3.4.1.0 released with aligned docs.\\n- **Checkpoint 7**: All 9 deep-review findings closed.\\n\\n### Escalation Path\\n\\n1. If audit findings conflict with research, prefer audit evidence over summary.\\n2. If release-note wording conflicts with the remediated state, preserve the remediated state and adjust the release note.\\n3. If validation rules conflict with the shipped structure, preserve validation compliance and document the exact warning.\\n\\n### Governance Notes\\n\\n- The packet is a runtime change with documented operator-facing contract; changelog honesty matters.\\n- The canonical atomic writer is the single mutation mechanism; fallback preserves atomic semantics.\\n- The deep-review pass is part of the delivery record; remediation closure is load-bearing.\\n\\n---\\n\\n### Governance and Compliance Notes\\n\\n### Governance Sign-Off Targets\\n\\n| Sign-Off | Status | Basis |\\n|----------|--------|-------|\\n| Runtime correctness | Complete | Planner default non-mutating + fallback atomic parity |\\n| Documentation alignment | Complete | `/memory:save` docs + env reference + release notes agree |\\n| Spec-packet compliance | Complete | `validate.sh --strict` pass |\\n| Metadata completeness | Complete | `description.json`, `graph-metadata.json`, nested changelog |\\n\\n### Compliance Notes\\n\\n- No secrets, credentials, or third-party systems involved.\\n- Packet stores only copied internal project artifacts plus new documentation and runtime changes.\\n- Canonical atomic writer unchanged outside the scoped router Tier 3 guard.\\n\",\n        \"confidence\": {\n          \"label\": \"low\",\n          \"value\": 0.363,\n          \"drivers\": [\n            \"multi_channel_agreement\"\n          ]\n        },\n        \"why\": {\n          \"summary\": \"Ranked first because semantic similarity\",\n          \"topSignals\": [\n            \"semantic_match\"\n          ]\n        }\n      }\n    ],\n    \"evidenceDigest\": \"5 results retrieved; avg score 0.78.\",\n    \"followUps\": []\n  },\n  \"hints\": [\n    \"Some files could not be read - check file paths\",\n    \"[code-graph] Symbols near mentioned files: function:closeIndexingRuntime, function:initializeIndexingRuntime, function:reindexSpecDocs\",\n    \"Auto-surface hook: injected 2 constitutional and 5 triggered memories (74ms)\",\n    \"Token budget enforced: truncated 5 → 1 results to fit 3500 token budget\"\n  ],\n  \"meta\": {\n    \"tool\": \"memory_search\",\n    \"tokenCount\": 12274,\n    \"latencyMs\": 891,\n    \"cacheHit\": false,\n    \"responseProfile\": \"research\",\n    \"autoSurface\": {\n      \"constitutionalCount\": 2,\n      \"triggeredCount\": 5,\n      \"surfaced_at\": \"2026-04-27T15:18:02.573Z\",\n      \"latencyMs\": 74\n    },\n    \"autoSurfacedContext\": {\n      \"constitutional\": [\n        {\n          \"id\": 2574,\n          \"specFolder\": \"system-spec-kit\",\n          \"filePath\": \"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/constitutional/gate-tool-routing.md\",\n          \"title\": \"TOOL ROUTING - Search & Retrieval Decision Tree\",\n          \"importanceTier\": \"constitutional\",\n          \"retrieval_directive\": \"Always surface when: TOOL ROUTING - Search & Retrieval Decision Tree | Prioritize when: task context aligns with \\\"TOOL ROUTING - Search & Retrieval Decision Tree\\\"\"\n        },\n        {\n          \"id\": 415,\n          \"specFolder\": \"system-spec-kit\",\n          \"filePath\": \"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/constitutional/gate-enforcement.md\",\n          \"title\": \"GATE ENFORCEMENT - Edge Cases & Cross-Reference\",\n          \"importanceTier\": \"constitutional\",\n          \"retrieval_directive\": \"Always surface when: GATE ENFORCEMENT - Edge Cases & Cross-Reference | Prioritize when: task context aligns with \\\"GATE ENFORCEMENT - Edge Cases & Cross-Reference\\\"\"\n        }\n      ],\n      \"triggered\": [\n        {\n          \"memory_id\": 1987,\n          \"spec_folder\": \"system-spec-kit/023-hybrid-rag-fusion-refinement/012-memory-save-quality-pipeline\",\n          \"title\": \"Research: Memory Save [system-spec-kit/023-hybrid-rag-fusion-refinement/012-memory-save-quality-pipeline/research]\",\n          \"matched_phrases\": [\n            \"memory\",\n            \"save\"\n          ]\n        },\n        {\n          \"memory_id\": 586,\n          \"spec_folder\": \"system-spec-kit/022-hybrid-rag-fusion/016-rewrite-memory-mcp-readme\",\n          \"title\": \"Plan: Rewrite Memory MCP README [system-spec-kit/022-hybrid-rag-fusion/016-rewrite-memory-mcp-readme/plan]\",\n          \"matched_phrases\": [\n            \"memory\"\n          ]\n        },\n        {\n          \"memory_id\": 2308,\n          \"spec_folder\": \"system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/003-continuity-refactor-gates\",\n          \"title\": \"...on/002-continuity-memory-runtime/003-continuity-refactor-gates/research/006-continuity-refactor-gates-pt-01/research]\",\n          \"matched_phrases\": [\n            \"memory\"\n          ]\n        },\n        {\n          \"memory_id\": 2300,\n          \"spec_folder\": \"system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/002-memory-quality-remediation\",\n          \"title\": \".../003-continuity-memory-runtime/002-memory-quality-remediation/research/003-memory-quality-remediation-pt-01/research]\",\n          \"matched_phrases\": [\n            \"memory\"\n          ]\n        },\n        {\n          \"memory_id\": 2004,\n          \"spec_folder\": \"system-spec-kit/023-hybrid-rag-fusion-refinement\",\n          \"title\": \"Deep Research: Spec Kit Memory Feature Audit & Quality [system-spec-kit/023-hybrid-rag-fusion-refinement/research]\",\n          \"matched_phrases\": [\n            \"memory\"\n          ]\n        }\n      ],\n      \"surfaced_at\": \"2026-04-27T15:18:02.573Z\",\n      \"latencyMs\": 74\n    },\n    \"tokenBudget\": 3500,\n    \"tokenBudgetTruncated\": true,\n    \"originalResultCount\": 5,\n    \"returnedResultCount\": 1\n  }\n}","metadata":{"truncated":false},"title":"","time":{"start":1777303082495,"end":1777303083563},"attachments":[]}}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1777303085070,"sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","part":{"id":"prt_dcf84d749001AaNHbu9hHaVMgv","messageID":"msg_dcf84bb7e001dIH62ea7lgNQDS","sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","type":"tool","tool":"grep","callID":"call_01_LCw6VLhVRDGfpaSNbYXxLfel","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"pattern":"planner-first","include":"*.md","path":"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs"},"output":"Found 201 matches (showing first 100)\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/010-stress-test-close-loop-measurement-rerun/runs/S1/cli-opencode-pure-1/prompt.md:\n  Line 1: Find the spec for the /memory:save planner-first contract. Return the exact spec folder path and cite at least one anchor or filename from the canonical spec.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/010-stress-test-close-loop-measurement-rerun/findings.md:\n  Line 39: | **S1** Find /memory:save planner-first spec | 7→7 (0) NEUTRAL-CEILING | 7→7 (0) NEUTRAL-CEILING | 7→**8 (+1)** **WIN** | _pending_ | S1/opencode WIN driven by correct memory_search MCP invocation + no-hallucinate-on-gap behavior (packet 009 model-boundary signal). |\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/010-stress-test-close-loop-measurement-rerun/runs/S1/cli-opencode-1/prompt.md:\n  Line 1: Find the spec for the /memory:save planner-first contract. Return the exact spec folder path and cite at least one anchor or filename from the canonical spec.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/010-stress-test-close-loop-measurement-rerun/runs/S1/cli-copilot-1/prompt.md:\n  Line 1: Find the spec for the /memory:save planner-first contract. Return the exact spec folder path and cite at least one anchor or filename from the canonical spec.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/010-stress-test-close-loop-measurement-rerun/runs/S1/cli-codex-1/prompt.md:\n  Line 1: Find the spec for the /memory:save planner-first contract. Return the exact spec folder path and cite at least one anchor or filename from the canonical spec.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/010-stress-test-close-loop-measurement-rerun/scripts/prompts/S1.md:\n  Line 1: Find the spec for the /memory:save planner-first contract. Return the exact spec folder path and cite at least one anchor or filename from the canonical spec.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/001-search-intelligence-stress-playbook/002-search-scenario-execution/findings.md:\n  Line 23: | **S1** Find /memory:save planner-first spec | 7/10 | 7/10 | 7/10 | 6/10 | All correct. opencode used `memory_match_triggers` (intended path); pure ablation costs ~10% efficiency, no correctness loss |\n  Line 29: | **I1** \"Save the context for this conversation\" | 6/10 | **1/10** | **7/10** | n/a | opencode wins (planner-first per 004 contract); **copilot CATASTROPHIC** (9.6 min, 2.1M tokens, mutated wrong spec folder); codex correctly described the contract without execution |\n  Line 46: 3. **S1 — 7/10**: Cited spec.md L154 ANCHOR:requirements + REQ-001 (planner-first non-mutating) — also recited the full REQ list when only the path was asked (over-thorough but not wrong).\n  Line 55: 2. **I1 — 7/10**: Recognized /memory:save planner-first contract and correctly did NOT mutate (per 004 default). Used zero MCP tool calls — the planner-first pattern in action.\n  Line 138: **Recommended use**: The MCP advantage is real but bounded — model alone solves S1 (specific search) just fine; MCP earns its keep on S2 (vague), S3 (ADR ledger), I1 (planner-first contract awareness), and I3 (subcommand routing).\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/001-search-intelligence-stress-playbook/002-search-scenario-execution/runs/S1/cli-opencode-pure-1/prompt.md:\n  Line 1: Find the spec for the /memory:save planner-first contract. Return the exact spec folder path and cite at least one anchor or filename from the canonical spec.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/001-search-intelligence-stress-playbook/002-search-scenario-execution/runs/S1/cli-codex-1/prompt.md:\n  Line 1: Find the spec for the /memory:save planner-first contract. Return the exact spec folder path and cite at least one anchor or filename from the canonical spec.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/001-search-intelligence-stress-playbook/002-search-scenario-execution/runs/S1/cli-codex-1/score.md:\n  Line 9: | Hallucination | 2 | Verified: 004-memory-save-rewrite exists, spec.md L154 has ANCHOR:requirements, REQ-001 says planner-first non-mutating |\n  Line 23: | Hallucination | 2 | Verified: 004-memory-save-rewrite exists, spec.md L154 has ANCHOR:requirements, REQ-001 says planner-first non-mutating |\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/001-search-intelligence-stress-playbook/002-search-scenario-execution/runs/S1/cli-copilot-1/prompt.md:\n  Line 1: Find the spec for the /memory:save planner-first contract. Return the exact spec folder path and cite at least one anchor or filename from the canonical spec.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/001-search-intelligence-stress-playbook/002-search-scenario-execution/runs/S1/cli-opencode-1/prompt.md:\n  Line 1: Find the spec for the /memory:save planner-first contract. Return the exact spec folder path and cite at least one anchor or filename from the canonical spec.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/001-search-intelligence-stress-playbook/002-search-scenario-execution/runs/S1/cli-opencode-1/score.md:\n  Line 5: | Correctness | 2 | Found 004-memory-save-rewrite + cited planner-first contract via memory_search/memory_context |\n  Line 12: **Notable**: MCP routing worked as designed; memory_search trigger 'planner-first' hit the target packet directly per S1 expectation.\n  Line 20: | Correctness | 2 | Found 004-memory-save-rewrite + cited planner-first contract via memory_search/memory_context |\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/001-search-intelligence-stress-playbook/002-search-scenario-execution/runs/I1/cli-opencode-1/score.md:\n  Line 5: | Correctness | 2 | Recognized /memory:save intent; correctly identified as planner-first contract; did not mutate per 004 contract |\n  Line 6: | Tool Selection | 2 | MCP-aware: knows /memory:save exists and is planner-first by default |\n  Line 9: | Hallucination | 2 | Stated planner-first default accurately |\n  Line 12: **Notable**: Best of three. The MCP advantage is real for command-aware intent routing. Note: did NOT actually call /memory:save (no spec folder context); behaved correctly per planner-first contract.\n  Line 20: | Correctness | 2 | Recognized /memory:save intent; correctly identified as planner-first contract; did not mutate per 004 contract |\n  Line 21: | Tool Selection | 2 | MCP-aware: knows /memory:save exists and is planner-first by default |\n  Line 23: | Hallucination | 2 | Stated planner-first default accurately |\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/001-search-intelligence-stress-playbook/001-search-scenario-design/scripts/prompts/S1.md:\n  Line 1: Find the spec for the /memory:save planner-first contract. Return the exact spec folder path and cite at least one anchor or filename from the canonical spec.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/001-search-intelligence-stress-playbook/001-search-scenario-design/spec.md:\n  Line 136: - **Prompt**: `Find the spec for the /memory:save planner-first contract.`\n  Line 138: - **Target tools**: `memory_search`, `memory_match_triggers` (trigger phrase \"planner-first\" should hit)\n  Line 179: - **Expected outcome**: Routes to `/memory:save` with planner-first default; returns structured planner output (no file mutation per 004)\n  Line 181: - **Success indicators**: Recognizes save intent; uses planner-first contract; no surprise mutations\n  Line 182: - **Cross-ref**: 003/004 (planner-first contract)\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-runtime-stress-remediation/001-search-intelligence-stress-playbook/001-search-scenario-design/implementation-summary.md:\n  Line 63: | I1 | Intelligence | Simple | 003/004 (planner-first) |\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/spec.md:\n  Line 127: | `implemented` | Shipped substrate exists and should not be treated as missing prerequisite work. | Shared trust axes and readiness primitives, planner-first memory-save substrate, Codex hook injection, search-routing measurement scaffolding |\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/005-memory-search-runtime-bugs/tasks.md:\n  Line 165:   - `../004-memory-save-rewrite/` — planner-first save contract\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/005-memory-search-runtime-bugs/plan.md:\n  Line 153: | Sibling packet `004-memory-save-rewrite` (planner-first contract) | Internal | Green (complete) | None — already landed |\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/research.md:\n  Line 182: - The deferred planner-first save path DOES have a typed `runEnrichmentBackfill` recovery action. Other runtime-degradation branches are structurally inferior to this one case; the deferred path is the design model.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-049.md:\n  Line 13: - **Evidence:** The Gate 3 trigger list is the literal prose set `rename, move, delete, create, add, remove, update, change, modify, edit, fix, refactor, implement, build, write, generate, configure, analyze, decompose, phase` (`AGENTS.md:182-186`). The same file separately documents `/memory:save` as a context-writing workflow (`AGENTS.md:142-144`) and then adds a second trigger surface - `Trigger: \"save context\", \"save memory\", /memory:save, continuity update` - under `MEMORY SAVE RULE` (`AGENTS.md:201-204`). Nearby automated coverage exercises memory-save handler behavior and planner/export payloads (`.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/handler-memory-save.vitest.ts:1-84`; `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214`; `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/transcript-planner-export.vitest.ts:146-217`), but none of those suites reconcile Gate 3 classification with the later memory-save trigger surface.\n  Line 21: - **Evidence:** Earlier control gates use `when:` as an expression DSL - `folder_state != populated`, `folder_state == populated`, `intake_only == TRUE`, and `intake_only == FALSE` (`spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml:354,372,380,391`). The same key later carries the prose sentence `Immediately after the canonical spec document is refreshed on disk` (`spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml:555`). Existing nearby tests validate memory-save planner/export behavior instead of command-asset interpretation (`.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214`; `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/transcript-planner-export.vitest.ts:146-217`), so there is no automated contract pinning what `when:` means in this asset.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-048.md:\n  Line 17: - **File:** `.opencode/commands/spec_kit/assets/spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml`; `.opencode/commands/spec_kit/assets/spec_kit_plan_confirm.yaml`; `.opencode/commands/spec_kit/assets/spec_kit_complete_auto.yaml`; `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/transcript-planner-export.vitest.ts`; `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts`\n  Line 18: - **Lines:** `spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml:354-391,548-555`; `spec_kit_plan_confirm.yaml:372-416,606-612`; `spec_kit_complete_auto.yaml:465-483,1008-1012`; `transcript-planner-export.vitest.ts:146-217`; `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:1-40`\n  Line 21: - **Evidence:** In `spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml`, `when:` is used for executable conditions like `folder_state != populated`, `folder_state == populated`, `intake_only == TRUE`, and `intake_only == FALSE` (`spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml:354-391`), but the same asset later uses `when: \"Immediately after the canonical spec document is refreshed on disk\"` as a scheduling note under `post_save_indexing` (`spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml:548-555`). The same overload appears in `spec_kit_plan_confirm.yaml` and `spec_kit_complete_auto.yaml`, where predicate-style `when:` clauses coexist with prose-only timing strings like `Immediately after the generated continuity artifact is written to disk` and `Immediately after the canonical spec document is refreshed on disk` (`spec_kit_plan_confirm.yaml:372-416,606-612`; `spec_kit_complete_auto.yaml:465-483,1008-1012`). The nearby automated coverage exercises save/planner behavior and response shaping, not the YAML asset grammar: `transcript-planner-export.vitest.ts` drives `atomicSaveMemory()` end-to-end, and `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts` tests response-builder serialization (`transcript-planner-export.vitest.ts:146-217`; `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:1-40`). A repo search on 2026-04-16 found no direct test references to `spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml`, `spec_kit_plan_confirm.yaml`, `spec_kit_complete_auto.yaml`, or `intake_triggered` / `intake_completed` payload evaluation under `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests`.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-045.md:\n  Line 9: - **File:** `AGENTS.md`; `.claude/skills/sk-deep-review/manual_testing_playbook/01--entry-points-and-modes/002-confirm-mode-checkpointed-review.md`; `.opencode/commands/spec_kit/plan.md`; `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts`\n  Line 10: - **Lines:** `AGENTS.md:182-186`; `002-confirm-mode-checkpointed-review.md:26-32`; `plan.md:86-89`; `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214`\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-043.md:\n  Line 17: - **File:** `.opencode/commands/spec_kit/assets/spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml`; `.opencode/commands/spec_kit/plan.md`; `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/transcript-planner-export.vitest.ts`; `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts`\n  Line 18: - **Lines:** `spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml:343-372,375-392`; `plan.md:93-99`; `transcript-planner-export.vitest.ts:146-217`; `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214`\n  Line 21: - **Evidence:** The asset's intake gate and intake-only stop gate are raw string predicates: `when: \"folder_state != populated\"`, `when: \"folder_state == populated\"`, `when: \"intake_only == TRUE\"`, and `when: \"intake_only == FALSE\"` (`spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml:353-372,375-392`). The operator-facing `/spec_kit:plan` contract mirrors the same branch logic in prose (`plan.md:93-99`), so the workflow behavior still depends on all runtimes interpreting those string expressions the same way. The adjacent planner export suite exercises memory-save transcript routing and asserts only summary/status outputs (`transcript-planner-export.vitest.ts:146-217`), while the planner-first response suite is a response-builder contract test for follow-up actions and hints (`memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214`). Neither suite evaluates the YAML branch predicates, the `TRUE`/`FALSE` literal handling, or the Step 0 `folder_state` comparisons.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-041.md:\n  Line 17: - **File:** `AGENTS.md`; `.opencode/commands/spec_kit/plan.md`; `.opencode/commands/spec_kit/complete.md`; `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts`\n  Line 18: - **Lines:** `AGENTS.md:182-186`; `plan.md:86-89`; `complete.md:74-77`; `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214`\n  Line 21: - **Evidence:** `AGENTS.md` says Gate 3 fires on the literal trigger list `rename, move, delete, create, add, remove, update, change, modify, edit, fix, refactor, implement, build, write, generate, configure, analyze, decompose, phase` (`AGENTS.md:182-186`). Both planning and completion docs then state `Gate 1 trigger matching handled at agent level (AGENTS.md)` instead of defining a local or shared classifier (`plan.md:86-89`; `complete.md:74-77`). The nearby planner-first response suite covers response shaping only; it does not verify Gate 3 trigger classification at all (`memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214`).\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-025.md:\n  Line 12: - **Description:** The deferred-enrichment branch is no longer just a source-local boolean collapse; the repo now treats that success-shaped state as the expected contract. When planner-first mode skips enrichment, `post-insert.ts` returns all five `enrichmentStatus` booleans as `true`, even though no enrichment work ran. `response-builder.ts` only emits a warning when any boolean is `false`, so the deferred path becomes observationally identical to a fully successful run unless a caller separately inspects `executionStatus`.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-024.md:\n  Line 12: - **Description:** `memory_save` decides whether to advertise `runEnrichmentBackfill` before post-insert enrichment runs. That means the only save path with a typed recovery action is the already-known planner-first defer case. If `post-insert.ts:96-208` later collapses a partial runtime miss into `executionStatus.status = 'ran'` plus warning-only side channels, the final save response has no structured retry/backfill action even though the backfill API exists.\n  Line 25: - The remaining Domain 2 risk is now mostly **control-plane asymmetry**. Deferred planner-first saves get a typed recovery action, but comparable runtime degradation branches only get warning strings; cached resume scope is trusted enough to choose a packet, but not trusted enough to propagate the same packet into transport metadata.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-014.md:\n  Line 29: - **Evidence:** `runPostInsertEnrichment()` sets `enrichmentStatus.causalLinks = true` immediately after any non-throwing `processCausalLinks(...)` call (`post-insert.ts:97-100`), and only emits a log for unresolved references (`post-insert.ts:103-105`). The processor itself explicitly returns partial-failure state through `unresolved` and `errors` arrays (`handlers/causal-links-processor.ts:345-420`). The response layer only warns when a status flag is `false` (`handlers/save/response-builder.ts:315-321`). The helper tests prove unresolved and mixed-result paths exist (`tests/handler-helpers.vitest.ts:680-710`), while the dedicated post-insert test only exercises planner-first deferral (`tests/post-insert-deferred.vitest.ts:11-48`).\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-011.md:\n  Line 45: - **Evidence:** `generateAndStoreSummary(...)` is called and `enrichmentStatus.summaries = true` is set unconditionally after the await, without checking `summaryResult.stored` (`post-insert.ts:136-147`). Likewise, `onIndex(...)` can return `skipped: true`, but `post-insert.ts` still sets `enrichmentStatus.graphLifecycle = true` after the call (`post-insert.ts:187-200`). `response-builder.ts:315-321` only warns when an enrichment flag is `false`. The helper test suites prove the ignored no-op states exist: `tests/memory-summaries.vitest.ts:371-382` expects `stored=false` for empty content, and `tests/graph-lifecycle.vitest.ts:658-668` expects `skipped=true` when graph refresh does not actually run. The post-insert coverage does not exercise those branches; `tests/post-insert-deferred.vitest.ts:11-48` only locks in planner-first deferral.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-007.md:\n  Line 4: I traced the planner-first save follow-up path for deferred enrichment: `memory-save.ts` -> `api/indexing.ts` -> `memory-index.ts` -> `post-insert.ts`, then cross-checked the entity-extraction and entity-linking substeps to see whether the runtime truthfully replays deferred work and surfaces soft failures.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-008.md:\n  Line 4: I shifted from the hook/code-graph startup seam into the save-time enrichment controller in `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/save/post-insert.ts`, then traced how its status object is consumed by `memory-save` result building and what the direct post-insert tests currently lock in. The focus was whether planner-first and degraded enrichment states stay truthful once they leave the pipeline.\n  Line 12: - **Description:** `EnrichmentStatus` is documented as tracking which enrichment steps succeeded, but the implementation uses `true` for four different outcomes: actual success, feature-disabled skip, \"nothing to do\" skip, and full planner-first deferral. Because the save response only warns when some status flag is `false`, a save where no enrichment ran is serialized as fully healthy.\n  Line 13: - **Evidence:** `post-insert.ts:86-92` initializes every step flag to `false`, but the non-run branches flip them to `true` at `110-113`, `130-133`, `152-155`, `178-181`, and `205-208`. The deferred wrapper returns all-`true` enrichment status again at `223-238` even though `executionStatus.status` is `'deferred'`. Downstream, `response-builder.ts:315-322` only emits a partial-enrichment warning when a flag remains `false`, and the direct regression test codifies the misleading contract by expecting all five booleans to be `true` in planner-first defer mode (`tests/post-insert-deferred.vitest.ts:11-47`).\n  Line 14: - **Downstream Impact:** `handlers/memory-save.ts:2362-2383` forwards this status into the indexed save result, so planner-first saves and feature-disabled saves can look fully enriched even though causal links, summaries, entity linking, and graph lifecycle never ran. That suppresses the runtime's only generic warning surface for skipped freshness work and makes deferred saves observationally similar to completed saves.\n  Line 21: - **Evidence:** `post-insert.ts:116-129` wraps extraction and auto-entity refresh in a try/catch and leaves the pipeline alive after failure. The later entity-linking branch at `159-177` checks only `isEntityLinkingEnabled() && isAutoEntitiesEnabled()`, not whether extraction actually succeeded. The refresh helper is the step that deletes and replaces existing auto-entities for the memory (`lib/extraction/entity-extractor.ts:198-224`), while `runEntityLinkingForMemory()` immediately queries persisted entities for that memory and builds links from those matches (`lib/search/entity-linker.ts:1096-1133`). There is no direct regression test for the failure path; the dedicated post-insert suite only covers planner-first deferral (`tests/post-insert-deferred.vitest.ts:11-47`).\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-006.md:\n  Line 4: I audited the save-time reconsolidation bridge, with emphasis on the assistive lane that sits beside the canonical `memory_save` write path. The goal was to verify whether the public \"assistive reconsolidation\" contract is actually reachable and behaviorally consistent in planner-first runtime mode.\n  Line 12: - **Description:** The file documents assistive reconsolidation as a separate, default-on advisory feature, but the runtime gates it behind the same planner/full-auto switch used for save-time reconsolidation. In the default planner-first runtime, assistive review never executes unless the caller explicitly enables full-auto mode or the opt-in save-time reconsolidation flag.\n  Line 25: This seam is weaker than the public surface suggests in two different ways. First, the assistive lane is not actually independent of TM-06/planner mode; the planner-first default disables it before similarity search even runs. Second, even when the lane does run, its highest-severity tier is advisory-only, so the system advertises an \"auto-merge\" outcome that never materializes in live write behavior.\n  Line 28: Stay on the save pipeline and inspect `handlers/save/post-insert.ts` plus its consumers to determine whether deferred enrichment/backfill reporting is similarly success-shaped by default, especially where planner-first flows promise follow-up work without a guaranteed executor.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/interim-synthesis-44-iterations.md:\n  Line 198: - `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214` — covers response shaping only; no Gate 3 trigger-classification verification (R41-002).\n  Line 550: R43-002 | spec_kit_plan_auto.yaml:343-372,375-392; plan.md:93-99; transcript-planner-export.vitest.ts:146-217; memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214 | P2 | /spec_kit:plan Step 0 folder_state and intake_only branches are untyped string predicates with no automated coverage of the predicate evaluation itself\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/interim-synthesis-47-iterations.md:\n  Line 199: - `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214` — covers response shaping only; no Gate 3 trigger-classification verification (R41-002).\n  Line 392: | R45-001 | P2 | `AGENTS.md`, `002-confirm-mode-checkpointed-review.md`, `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts` | Gate 3 overbroad trigger list misclassifies read-only deep-review prompts as file-modifying; `analyze`/`phase` overlap with research vocabulary | B4 |\n  Line 557:           memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214 | P2\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/interim-synthesis-41-iterations.md:\n  Line 220: - `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214` covers response shaping only; no Gate 3 trigger-classification verification (R41-002).\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/interim-synthesis-38-iterations.md:\n  Line 146: 3. **Control-plane asymmetry.** Deferred planner-first saves get a typed `runEnrichmentBackfill` recovery action, but comparable runtime degradation branches get only warning strings (R24-001). Cached resume scope is trusted to choose a packet but not propagated into `opencodeTransport.specFolder` (R24-002).\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/interim-synthesis-32-iterations.md:\n  Line 138: 3. **Control-plane asymmetry.** Deferred planner-first saves get a typed `runEnrichmentBackfill` recovery action, but comparable runtime degradation branches get only warning strings (R24-001). Cached resume scope is trusted to choose a packet but not propagated into `opencodeTransport.specFolder` (R24-002).\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/004-runtime-executor-hardening/001-foundational-runtime/research/FINAL-synthesis-and-review.md:\n  Line 246: | R45-001 | `AGENTS.md:182-186`; `002-confirm-mode-checkpointed-review.md:26-32`; `plan.md:86-89`; `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts:12-214` | P2 | Gate 3 trigger list includes `analyze`, `decompose`, `phase`; read-only deep-review/deep-research prompts reuse these tokens | False positives: read-only review can trigger unnecessary spec-folder setup |\n  Line 649: - The deferred planner-first save path DOES have a typed `runEnrichmentBackfill` recovery action. The other runtime-degradation branches are structurally inferior to this one case; the deferred path is the design model.\n  Line 1183: - **M13:** `post-insert-deferred.vitest.ts`, `handler-memory-save.vitest.ts`, `memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts`, `response-builder.vitest.ts`.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/research/prompts/iteration-004.md:\n  Line 18: - P1 FIND-iter003-planner-default-gated-by-hints — planner-first is not the live default\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/research/prompts/iteration-003.md:\n  Line 1: # Deep-Research Iteration 3 — /memory:save planner-first routing drift (Q2)\n  Line 10: - Next focus: Q2 — /memory:save planner-first routing table drift.\n  Line 24: > **Q2 — /memory:save planner-first rewrite: does the routing table in code match the documented behavior for every intent (decision, narrative_progress, narrative_delivery, handover_state, research_finding, task_update, metadata_only, drop)? Where is the specified-but-unimplemented gap or implemented-but-undocumented behavior?**\n  Line 32:    - `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/references/` directory listing, then open any routing-contract or planner-first doc (grep for \"planner-first\", \"routeAs\", \"narrative_progress|narrative_delivery|handover_state|research_finding|task_update|metadata_only|drop\")\n  Line 54: 7. **(If budget remains)** Check `SaveRoute` / `SaveMode` enum vs documented enum in the planner-first spec. Any enum drift (values added/renamed/deleted in code but not propagated to docs)?\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/research/prompts/iteration-001.md:\n  Line 17: - `004-memory-save-rewrite/` — `/memory:save` planner-first default (`SPECKIT_MEMORY_SAVE_EXECUTE` opt-in)\n  Line 27: - Q2 /memory:save planner-first routing table (code vs docs drift)\n  Line 54:    - `rg -n \"planner-first|SPECKIT_MEMORY_SAVE_EXECUTE\" --type md --type ts --type js --type json` — 004 surface\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-001.md:\n  Line 30: | `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/memory-save.ts` | 004 | mcp-tool | H | Primary `/memory:save` handler; planner-first default, blockers, routing, and fallback all converge here. |\n  Line 34: | `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/save/atomic-index-memory.ts` | 004 | shared-module | H | Canonical mutation path preserved under planner-first fallback. |\n  Line 41: | `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/memory-save-planner-first.vitest.ts` | 004 | script | H | Direct verification that default `/memory:save` is planner-only and non-mutating. |\n  Line 67: | `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/tests/memory-save-dedup-order.vitest.ts` | 004 | script | M | Verifies dedup/ordering invariants under planner-first flow. |\n  Line 72: | `.opencode/commands/memory/save.md` | 004 | CLI | M | Operator-facing `/memory:save` command surface for planner-first behavior. |\n  Line 87: 2. **Q2 `/memory:save` planner-first routing table (code vs docs drift)** - candidate files: `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/memory-save.ts`, `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/save/response-builder.ts`, `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/ENV_REFERENCE.md`\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-002.md:\n  Line 57: 1. **Q2 `/memory:save` planner-first routing table drift** - compare live handler routing, response-builder output, and operator docs for mismatches in default behavior and fallback wording.\n  Line 66: Audit **Q2** next by tracing planner-first routing and fallback behavior through `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/memory-save.ts`, `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/save/response-builder.ts`, and `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/ENV_REFERENCE.md`.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/research/iterations/iteration-003.md:\n  Line 3: Audit Q2: `/memory:save` planner-first routing drift, with emphasis on the 8-category route table, planner-vs-apply gating, fallback behavior, and route/merge semantics that are documented differently from the live handler.\n  Line 7: 1. Read the operator contract in `.opencode/commands/memory/save.md` and the routing reference in `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/references/memory/save_workflow.md`; extracted the documented 8-category table plus the planner-first/full-auto wording.\n  Line 35:   The docs say canonical save requests are planner-first by default and only mutate after explicit `plannerMode: \"full-auto\"` opt-in, but the handler only enters planner mode when at least one routing hint is already present. `save.md` documents planner-first default and full-auto opt-in (`.opencode/commands/memory/save.md:78-79`), while the live gate is `const shouldPlanCanonicalSave = !dryRun && plannerMode !== 'full-auto' && Boolean(routeAs || mergeModeHint || targetAnchorId);` (`.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/memory-save.ts:2637-2638`). If that condition is false, the request falls through to `indexMemoryFile(...)` and mutates immediately (`.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/memory-save.ts:2969-2978`). This is specified-but-unimplemented default planner behavior.\n  Line 38:   The command docs still frame `generate-context.js` as the primary save mechanism around the planner-first rewrite, but the live planner path never invokes it and its follow-up actions only point back to the in-handler atomic writer and local maintenance steps. The docs say `generate-context.js` remains the primary save mechanism and describe planner-first/full-auto around that flow (`.opencode/commands/memory/save.md:77-79`), but the planner follow-ups are `apply`, `refresh-graph`, `reindex`, `reconsolidate`, and `enrich` (`.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/memory-save.ts:1684-1739`), and the planner branch returns `buildPlannerResponse(...)` directly from `atomicSaveMemory(...)` (`.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/memory-save.ts:2937-2967`). The response builder is a pure envelope serializer, not a workflow bridge (`.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/mcp_server/handlers/save/response-builder.ts:446-485`). That makes the advertised fallback-to-`generate-context.js` behavior doc-only in this runtime slice.\n\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/research/deep-research-strategy.md:\n  Line 33: - [ ] Q2 — /memory:save planner-first rewrite: does the routing table in code match the documented behavior for every intent (decision, narrative_progress, narrative_delivery, handover_state, research_finding, task_update, metadata_only, drop)? Where is the specified-but-unimplemented gap or implemented-but-undocumented behavior?\n  Line 124: - **004-memory-save-rewrite**: `/memory:save` is planner-first by default; returns structured planner response with routes/blockers/advisories and mutates nothing unless the operator opts in (`SPECKIT_MEMORY_SAVE_EXECUTE`).\n\n(Results truncated: showing 100 of 201 matches (101 hidden). Consider using a more specific path or pattern.)","metadata":{"matches":201,"truncated":true},"title":"planner-first","time":{"start":1777303084929,"end":1777303085069}}}}
{"type":"step_finish","timestamp":1777303085433,"sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","part":{"id":"prt_dcf84e0af001qbqHcfUf9MaxM3","reason":"tool-calls","snapshot":"ab2b9dde6df0e33b90369107cc1c41b0c85d58f5","messageID":"msg_dcf84bb7e001dIH62ea7lgNQDS","sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","type":"step-finish","tokens":{"total":44144,"input":4066,"output":176,"reasoning":94,"cache":{"write":0,"read":39808}},"cost":0.008591656}}
{"type":"step_start","timestamp":1777303088689,"sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","part":{"id":"prt_dcf84ee2e0019UQxA47WnHXed7","messageID":"msg_dcf84e24f001QBu4Xkj1c8K7IE","sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","snapshot":"3d265f28021674f9132d63bed78a6c6a25d13614","type":"step-start"}}
{"type":"text","timestamp":1777303099208,"sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","part":{"id":"prt_dcf8509d4001NwPU24dEl6hpNg","messageID":"msg_dcf84e24f001QBu4Xkj1c8K7IE","sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","type":"text","text":"**Spec folder path:**\n```\n.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/003-continuity-memory-runtime/004-memory-save-rewrite/\n```\n\n**Canonical file:** `plan.md` — titled *\"Implementation Plan: /memory:save Planner-First Default\"*, containing the planner-first contract spec with milestones M1-M10, ADRs (e.g., ADR-002: \"Planner-first output becomes the default `/memory:save` contract\"), and quality gates.","time":{"start":1777303099206,"end":1777303099206}}}
{"type":"step_finish","timestamp":1777303099431,"sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","part":{"id":"prt_dcf851748001mWd5CiWxyaIyAa","reason":"stop","snapshot":"d0ae522ba3adcb39b7b860ffb3d4df34be929eb4","messageID":"msg_dcf84e24f001QBu4Xkj1c8K7IE","sessionID":"ses_2307b8034ffeLrn5ppEkGLeXav","type":"step-finish","tokens":{"total":68101,"input":23715,"output":118,"reasoning":236,"cache":{"write":0,"read":44032}},"cost":0.043134484}}
