● skill(system-spec-kit)

I’m locating the active spec target first so the save lands in the right packet, then I’ll write the conversation context through the canonical save flow.

● List directory specs
  └ 1 file found

● Search (glob)
  │ "**/graph-metadata.json" in specs
  └ No matches found

● memory_match_triggers (MCP: spec_kit_memory) · prompt: "Save the context for this conversation.",…
  └ {"summary":"Matched 5 memories via trigger phrases","data":{"matchType":...

The repo-level `specs/` folder isn’t the active packet tree here, so I’m checking the Spec Kit continuity surfaces under `.opencode/specs` to recover the best target before writing the save.

● List directory .opencode/specs
  └ 7 files found

● Search (glob)
  │ "**/handover.md" in .opencode/specs
  └ 20 files found

● Search (glob)
  │ "**/implementation-summary.md" in .opencode/specs
  └ 7 files found

● session_resume (MCP: spec_kit_memory) · minimal: true
  └ {"status":"ok","data":{"mode":"minimal","codeGraph":{"status":"stale","l...

I’ve got the packet tree; now I’m ranking recent continuity files so the save goes to the most recently active spec instead of a stale archive.

● Search (grep)
  │ "last_active_child_id|"status"\s*:|packet_pointer:|next_safe_action:" in
  │ **/{graph-metadata.json,implementation-summary.md,handover.md}
  │ (.opencode/specs)
  └ 7 lines found

● List recent spec continuity files (shell)
  │ python3 - <<'PY'
  │ from pathlib import Path
  │ root = Path('/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Pu
  │ blic/.opencode/specs')
  │ files = []…
  └ 33 lines...

● Read graph-metadata.json
  │ .opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/010-phase
  │ -parent-documentation/graph-metadata.json
  └ 110 lines read

● Read implementation-summary.md
  │ .opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/010-phase
  │ -parent-documentation/004-legacy-phase-parent-migration/implementation-
  │ summary.md
  └ L1:120 (120 lines read)

● Read implementation-summary.md
  │ .opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/011-mcp-r
  │ untime-stress-remediation/010-stress-test-close-loop-measurement-rerun/implementation-summar
  │ y.md
  └ L1:120 (107 lines read)

I found a strong continuity target: `system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/010-phase-parent-documentation/004-legacy-phase-parent-migration`. Its own continuity block explicitly says the next safe action is to run `/memory:save` against `004`, so I’m persisting there and re-indexing that packet afterward.

● memory_index_scan (MCP: spec_kit_memory) · specFolder: "system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-opt…
  └ {"summary":"Scan complete: 6 indexed, 0 updated, 0 unchanged, 0 deleted,...

● Save session context to active spec packet (shell)
  │ set -euo pipefail && cd
  │ /Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public &&
  │ tmp_json=$(mktemp) && python3 - <<'PY' "$tmp_json"
  │ import json, sys
  │ path = sys.argv[1]…
  └ 133 lines...

The save completed, but the first index scan overlapped the write window. I’m checking the actual continuity update and then doing one clean post-save re-index for the target packet.

● Read implementation-summary.md
  │ .opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/010-phase
  │ -parent-documentation/004-legacy-phase-parent-migration/implementation-
  │ summary.md
  └ L1:40 (40 lines read)

● Read graph-metadata.json
  │ .opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/010-phase
  │ -parent-documentation/004-legacy-phase-parent-migration/graph-metadata.
  │ json
  └ L1:140 (140 lines read)

● Show saved continuity diff (shell)
  │ cd /Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public &&
  │ git --no-pager diff -- .opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-conte
  │ xt-optimization/010-phase-parent-documentation/004-retroactive-phase-paren
  │ t-migration/implementation-summary.md .opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-
  │ graph-and-context-optimization/010-phase-parent-documentation/004-retroact…
  └ 2 lines...

The canonical save path succeeded; I’m confirming the save markers and then I’ll do one final post-save index pass now that the write window is closed.

● Search (grep)
  │ "last_save_at|last_active_at|status|save_lineage" (.opencode/specs/system-sp
  │ ec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/010-phase-parent-documentation/004
  │ -retroactive-phase-parent-migration/graph-metadata.json)
  └ 3 lines found

✗ memory_index_scan (MCP: spec_kit_memory) · specFolder: "system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-opt…
  └ MCP server 'spec_kit_memory': {"summary":"Error: Rate
    limited","data":{"error":"Rate limited","code":"E429","details":{"waitSecond
    s":20,"reason":"cooldown"}},"hints":["Please wait 20 seconds before scanning
    again","Wait for cooldown period","Consider using incremental=true for
    faster subsequent scans"],"meta":{"tool":"memory_index_scan","tokenCount":12
    9,"cacheHit":false,"isError":true,"severity":"warning","tokenBudget":1000}}

The save timestamp is in place at `2026-04-27T15:01:11.544Z`. The indexer is just in its cooldown window, so I’m waiting that out and then re-running the packet scan once.

● Wait for memory scan cooldown (shell)
  │ sleep 21
  └ 1 line...

● memory_index_scan (MCP: spec_kit_memory) · specFolder: "system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-opt…
  └ {"summary":"Scan complete: 0 indexed, 1 updated, 5 unchanged, 0 deleted,...

● memory_search (MCP: spec_kit_memory) · retroactive phase parent migration continuity refresh save…
  └ {"summary":"> **[EVIDENCE GAP DETECTED]: Retrieved context has low mathe...

**Saved.** I persisted this conversation to `system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/010-phase-parent-documentation/004-legacy-phase-parent-migration` via the canonical Spec Kit memory save flow.

The packet now has a fresh continuity save marker in `graph-metadata.json` (`derived.last_save_at: 2026-04-27T15:01:11.544Z`), and the packet was re-indexed so it’s available through memory retrieval.


Changes   +0 -0
Requests  1 Premium (3m 52s)
Tokens    ↑ 817.9k • ↓ 6.4k • 749.3k (cached) • 3.5k (reasoning)
