=== SD-020 dispatch: cli-opencode @markdown via /create:changelog (DeepSeek v4 Pro DIRECT API) ===
=== START: 2026-05-11T07:38:51+02:00 ===

[93m[1m! [0m agent "general" is a subagent, not a primary agent. Falling back to default agent
{"type":"step_start","timestamp":1778477940470,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e158bbef3001M2Mi2J6pIGtEoW","messageID":"msg_e158b9f71001sUH7zuixRqewsK","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","snapshot":"00d946592aecbc1d42f1e319193dfde651386c60","type":"step-start"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1778477950710,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"type":"tool","tool":"glob","callID":"call_00_GwR3AJbB7qYwAnzxixDR3578","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"pattern":"**/*changelog*"},"output":"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/commands/create/assets/create_changelog_auto.yaml\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/commands/create/assets/create_changelog_confirm.yaml\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/commands/create/changelog.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/skills/sk-doc/scripts/tests/test_changelog_validator.py\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/references/workflows/nested_changelog.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/098-multi-ai-council-write-authority/changelog.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/096-rename-opencode-dirs-to-plural/009-p2-032-cleanup/changelog.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/097-cli-opencode-stdin-fix/changelog.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/025-nested-changelog-per-spec/changelog/changelog-025-root.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-005-command-agent-alignment.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-002-session-start-hook.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-008-end-user-scope-default.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-005-code-graph-doctor-command.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/050-agent-debug-integration/changelog.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-root.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-011-advisor-readme-sync.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-010-self-test-fixes.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-009-self-test.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-008-holistic-evaluation.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-006-command-rename.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-003-doc-alignment.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-001-evaluator-first-mvp.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/040-sk-deep-research-review-improvement-1/changelog/changelog-028-002-sk-deep-review-improvements.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/040-sk-deep-research-review-improvement-1/changelog/changelog-028-001-sk-deep-research-improvements.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.gemini/commands/create/changelog.toml\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-root.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-027-opencode-structural-priming.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-025-tool-routing-enforcement.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-024-hookless-priming-optimization.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-021-cross-runtime-instruction-parity.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-016-cross-runtime-ux.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-012-cocoindex-ux-utilization.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-005-package-runtime-alignment.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/089-multi-ai-council-persistence/changelog/changelog-089-root.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-029-review-remediation.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-006-documentation-alignment.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-008-docs-impact-remediation.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-005-opencode-plugin-loader-remediation.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-005-opencode-plugin-loader-remediation-review-pt-01.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-004-claude-hook-findings-remediation.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-003-codex-hook-parity-remediation.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-002-copilot-hook-parity-remediation.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-001-hook-parity-remediation.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-012-006-cluster-a-to-e.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/039-cmd-spec-kit-codex-skill-routing/changelog.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-006-copilot-wrapper-schema-fix.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-007-copilot-writer-wiring.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-002-copilot-hook-parity-remediation-review-pt-01.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-002-copilot-hook-parity-remediation-research-pt-01.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/007-hook-parity/changelog/changelog-002-copilot-hook-parity-remediation-research-pt-03.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-012-003-deep-research-issues.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-012-002-native-rerun.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-012-001-execution.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-011-real-world-usefulness-test.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-009-fix-iteration-quality-meta-research.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-005-code-graph-backend-resilience.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-006-code-graph-resilience-research.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-005-review-015-code-graph-advisor-refinement-pt-01.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-005-research-015-code-graph-advisor-refinement-pt-01.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-004-code-graph-advisor-refinement.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-004-research-030-code-graph-gap-investigation-pt-01.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-004-research-028-code-graph-hook-improvements-pt-01.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-004-research-013-code-graph-zero-calls-pt-03.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-004-research-013-code-graph-hook-improvements-pt-02.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-003-code-graph-hook-improvements.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-002-code-graph-context-and-scan-scope.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-002-code-graph-self-contained-package.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-001-code-graph-upgrades.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-012-007-tree-sitter-parser-resilience.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-012-005-scope-guard.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-012-004-remediation.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/026-graph-and-context-optimization/005-code-graph/changelog/changelog-011-broader-scope-excludes.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/080-multi-ai-council-output-protocol/changelog/changelog-080-root.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/023-hybrid-rag-fusion-refinement/014-feedback-signal-pipeline/changelog/changelog-014-feedback-signal-pipeline-root.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/scripts/tests/nested-changelog.vitest.ts\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/scripts/spec-folder/nested-changelog.ts\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-002-full-skill-expansion.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-004-promotion-verification.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/skilled-agent-orchestration/z_archive/041-sk-recursive-agent-loop/changelog/changelog-041-007-wording-alignment.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-013-correctness-boundary-repair.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-008-structural-indexer.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-004-cross-runtime-fallback.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-009-code-graph-storage-query.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-019-code-graph-auto-trigger.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-011-compaction-working-set.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-014-hook-durability-auto-enrichment.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-001-precompact-hook.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-007-testing-validation.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-028-startup-highlights-remediation.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-015-tree-sitter-migration.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-018-non-hook-auto-priming.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-020-query-routing-integration.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-030-opencode-graph-plugin.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-022-gemini-hook-porting.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-026-session-start-injection-debug.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-003-stop-hook-tracking.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-010-cocoindex-bridge-context.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-017-tree-sitter-classifier-fixes.md\n/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/specs/system-spec-kit/z_archive/024-compact-code-graph/changelog/changelog-024-023-context-preservation-metrics.md\n\n(Results are truncated: showing first 100 results. Consider using a more specific path or pattern.)","metadata":{"count":100,"truncated":true},"title":"","time":{"start":1778477950654,"end":1778477950710}},"id":"prt_e158be438001t5eGRslAo75wt8","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","messageID":"msg_e158b9f71001sUH7zuixRqewsK"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1778477951848,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"type":"tool","tool":"glob","callID":"call_01_G4jwJZI1O3Ceuamz1Bek6791","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"pattern":".opencode/agents/markdown*"},"output":"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/agents/markdown.md","metadata":{"count":1,"truncated":false},"title":"","time":{"start":1778477951808,"end":1778477951847}},"id":"prt_e158be823001jCxpql5ys4nFhC","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","messageID":"msg_e158b9f71001sUH7zuixRqewsK"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1778477952973,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"type":"tool","tool":"glob","callID":"call_02_YZATLfB4c3I5fxdOmOoL2536","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"pattern":".claude/agents/markdown*"},"output":"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.claude/agents/markdown.md","metadata":{"count":1,"truncated":false},"title":"","time":{"start":1778477952931,"end":1778477952973}},"id":"prt_e158bec70001WvHDQO9pcz1Gm7","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","messageID":"msg_e158b9f71001sUH7zuixRqewsK"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1778477954176,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"type":"tool","tool":"glob","callID":"call_03_g6rzAvEHLI2GwDSFb3ca0693","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"pattern":".opencode/commands/create*"},"output":"No files found","metadata":{"count":0,"truncated":false},"title":"","time":{"start":1778477954118,"end":1778477954176}},"id":"prt_e158bf11c001qIMr8rxEsUREfE","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","messageID":"msg_e158b9f71001sUH7zuixRqewsK"}}
{"type":"step_finish","timestamp":1778477954634,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e158bf6490014ZZOJ7cOj6HkFm","reason":"tool-calls","snapshot":"5eb8a5ae3e64f219fef6e058fafe28cb8c977585","messageID":"msg_e158b9f71001sUH7zuixRqewsK","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","type":"step-finish","tokens":{"total":39413,"input":37063,"output":157,"reasoning":273,"cache":{"write":0,"read":1920}},"cost":0.06626442}}
{"type":"step_start","timestamp":1778477956997,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e158bff83001IfrjMr1C0QseoT","messageID":"msg_e158bf6fc0029mFZdQ60tDPhm4","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","snapshot":"467742475bffe23ac696a92e9b21c832650273a0","type":"step-start"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1778477960705,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"type":"tool","tool":"read","callID":"call_00_G87hncJoHs2LXI7UNX8g2174","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"filePath":"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/agents/markdown.md"},"output":"<path>/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/agents/markdown.md</path>\n<type>file</type>\n<content>\n1: ---\n2: name: markdown\n3: description: Template-first markdown/documentation executor; handles /create:* commands, spec docs, and scoped markdown authoring\n4: mode: all\n5: temperature: 0.1\n6: permission:\n7:   read: allow\n8:   write: allow\n9:   edit: allow\n10:   bash: allow\n11:   grep: allow\n12:   glob: allow\n13:   webfetch: deny\n14:   memory: allow\n15:   chrome_devtools: deny\n16:   task: deny\n17:   list: allow\n18:   patch: deny\n19:   external_directory: allow\n20: ---\n21: \n22: # The Markdown Agent: Template-First Markdown Documentation Executor\n23: \n24: Dedicated LEAF executor for template-first documentation work. This agent handles `/create:*` commands, orchestrator-scoped spec-doc creation, and general markdown authoring. It loads `sk-doc` on every invocation, reads the command-appropriate or document-appropriate template before writing, creates or updates the requested documentation artifact, and returns one deterministic status line.\n25: \n26: **Path Convention**: Use only `.opencode/agents/*.md` as the canonical runtime path reference.\n27: \n28: **CRITICAL**: This agent may execute `/create:*` command workflows and scoped markdown/spec-doc authoring tasks. It must refuse only unscoped writes, path-ambiguous targets, nested delegation, or requests outside an explicitly resolved markdown/documentation output boundary.\n29: \n30: ---\n31: \n32: ## 0. ILLEGAL NESTING AND WRITE BOUNDARY (HARD BLOCK)\n33: \n34: This agent is LEAF-only and write-capable. Nested sub-agent dispatch is illegal. File mutation is limited to the command-resolved output path, package root, runtime mirror set, explicitly named spec folder, or explicitly scoped markdown/documentation output path.\n35: \n36: - NEVER call the Task tool, create sub-tasks, ask another agent to investigate, or hand off work from inside this agent.\n37: - NEVER write outside the resolved command output, command-owned package root, active spec folder, or explicitly scoped mirror set.\n38: - NEVER treat source files used for evidence as writable unless the command contract names them as outputs.\n39: - If delegation is requested, emit the canonical nested-dispatch REFUSE line before returning partial findings.\n40: - If the requested work cannot be completed within the LEAF boundary, return `STATUS=FAIL ERROR=<reason>` with verified partial paths in the notes.\n41: \n42: ### Invocation and Scope Gate\n43: \n44: Phase 0 is mandatory before any target read, search, template load, or write.\n45: \n46: ```text\n47: SELF-CHECK: Are you operating as @markdown for a /create:* command or explicitly scoped markdown/spec-doc task?\n48: ```\n49: \n50: Valid invocation contexts include:\n51: \n52: - `/create:agent`\n53: - `/create:sk-skill`\n54: - `/create:feature-catalog`\n55: - `/create:testing-playbook`\n56: - `/create:folder_readme`\n57: - `/create:changelog`\n58: - Orchestrator-dispatched spec folder documentation authoring with an explicit spec folder path and level\n59: - Orchestrator-dispatched markdown writing with an explicit output path or output root\n60: - Main-agent delegated documentation maintenance where writable scope is explicit and limited\n61: \n62: Indicators that the invocation is valid:\n63: \n64: - The dispatch prompt or command context names one of the valid `/create:*` commands, a spec-doc task, or a scoped markdown output task.\n65: - The workflow requires template-first generation and `sk-doc` validation.\n66: - The requested output maps to one command-owned template, a system-spec-kit template, or a document-appropriate markdown template.\n67: - The command context provides or gathers the setup fields before writing.\n68: - All writable paths are explicit and remain inside the resolved output boundary.\n69: \n70: If scope is missing, ambiguous, or contradictory, emit this exact scope refusal and stop:\n71: \n72: ```text\n73: REFUSE: @markdown requires an explicit markdown/spec-doc output scope or a supported /create:* command.\n74: ```\n75: \n76: ### Canonical Refusal Wording (mandatory)\n77: \n78: When a dispatch prompt or workflow instructs this agent to invoke the Task tool, dispatch a sub-agent, or delegate work outside the LEAF boundary, this agent MUST emit the EXACT canonical refusal string in stdout BEFORE returning partial findings:\n79: \n80: ```text\n81: REFUSE: nested Task tool dispatch is forbidden for LEAF agents. Returning partial findings instead.\n82: ```\n83: \n84: The refusal MUST appear verbatim for stress tests and operator audit. Silent refusal is non-compliant.\n85: \n86: ---\n87: \n88: ## 0b. INPUT + SCOPE GATES (HARD BLOCK)\n89: \n90: Before reading targets, running searches, or writing artifacts, validate the command contract.\n91: \n92: ### Required Dispatch Inputs\n93: \n94: - `command_name`: one of the six valid `/create:*` commands, `spec-doc`, or `markdown`.\n95: - `execution_mode`: `AUTONOMOUS`, `INTERACTIVE`, or command-equivalent resolved mode.\n96: - `target`: requested skill, agent, component, folder, source, or output path.\n97: - `output_path` or `output_root`: resolved writable destination.\n98: - `template_path`: the `sk-doc` or `system-spec-kit` template selected from Section 4, or `none` only when updating an existing markdown document with its current structure as the template.\n99: - `spec_folder`: required when the command contract or task activates spec tracking; otherwise `none`.\n100: \n101: ### Gate Rules\n102: \n103: 1. Resolve every writable path before writing.\n104: 2. Treat missing, ambiguous, or path-traversing writable paths as `STATUS=FAIL`.\n105: 3. Treat source, evidence, and reference paths as read-only unless the command explicitly names them as outputs.\n106: 4. Do not infer a different spec folder, target, or package root from nearby files.\n107: 5. If setup values contradict the command markdown or YAML workflow, return `STATUS=FAIL ERROR=logic-sync-required`.\n108: \n109: ### Setup BINDING Emission (mandatory grep-checkable contract)\n110: \n111: Immediately after validating dispatch inputs, BEFORE any state read or workflow step, this agent MUST emit one canonical BINDING line per resolved setup value to stdout. These bindings make setup-resolution machine-verifiable for stress tests and operator audit.\n112: \n113: Required bindings for this agent:\n114: \n115: ```text\n116: BINDING: command=<resolved-create-command-or-markdown-workflow>\n117: BINDING: target=<resolved-target-path-or-name>\n118: BINDING: output=<resolved-output-path-or-root>\n119: BINDING: template=<resolved-sk-doc-template-path>\n120: BINDING: mode=<resolved-execution-mode>\n121: BINDING: specFolder=<resolved-spec-folder-path-or-none>\n122: ```\n123: \n124: Each binding line must appear on its own line, grep-checkable verbatim. Missing or non-canonical wording, such as \"the target is X\" instead of `BINDING: target=X`, is non-compliant.\n125: \n126: ---\n127: \n128: ## 1. CORE WORKFLOW\n129: \n130: 1. **RECEIVE** -> Parse the `/create:*` command or scoped markdown/spec-doc task, caller marker, setup values, active spec folder, and output contract.\n131: 2. **VERIFY INVOCATION + SCOPE** -> Run the Phase 0 invocation and scope gate. Refuse ambiguous or unscoped writes before touching targets.\n132: 3. **SCOPE LOCK** -> Resolve writable output paths, read-only evidence paths, overwrite policy, and command mode.\n133: 4. **LOAD sk-doc** -> Read `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/SKILL.md` on every invocation and select the matching resource from Section 4.\n134: 5. **LOAD TEMPLATE** -> Read the selected template before writing any artifact.\n135: 6. **EXECUTE DIRECTLY** -> Create or update the requested artifact using only allowed tools and resolved setup values.\n136: 7. **VERIFY** -> Check template alignment, required sections, frontmatter when applicable, DQI score, line/path expectations, and command status contract.\n137: 8. **DELIVER** -> Return exactly one deterministic status line, plus concise evidence when successful or blocked.\n138: \n139: **Key Principle**: Template first, explicit scope second, deterministic status last. This agent does not invent document families outside `sk-doc` or `system-spec-kit`.\n140: \n141: ---\n142: \n143: ## 2. ROUTING SCAN\n144: \n145: ### Skills\n146: \n147: | Skill             | Domain                             | Use When                                                            | Key Features                                                                                                    |\n148: | ----------------- | ---------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n149: | `sk-doc`          | Documentation creation and quality | Always                                                              | Command templates, DQI scoring, README, changelog, agent, skill, feature catalog, and testing playbook guidance |\n150: | `system-spec-kit` | Spec folder discipline             | When command setup names a spec folder or memory save is applicable | Packet scope, validation, optional continuity save routing                                                      |\n151: \n152: ### Tools\n153: \n154: | Tool     | Purpose                                                                            | When to Use                                                              |\n155: | -------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |\n156: | `read`   | Inspect command docs, skill docs, templates, source evidence, and existing outputs | Always before editing or writing                                         |\n157: | `write`  | Create new artifacts                                                               | Only after scope and template are resolved                               |\n158: | `edit`   | Update existing artifacts                                                          | Only when overwrite or merge policy allows it                            |\n159: | `bash`   | Run bounded validation, line counts, TOML parse, markdown checks, and DQI helpers  | Verification and deterministic file inspection                           |\n160: | `grep`   | Confirm exact markers, frontmatter keys, command variables, and template sections  | Setup, validation, and audit                                             |\n161: | `glob`   | Locate command-owned packages, templates, and existing outputs                     | Setup and conflict checks                                                |\n162: | `list`   | Inspect known directories without guessing filenames                               | Setup and package verification                                           |\n163: | `memory` | Optional continuity save when command setup explicitly calls for it                | Only for command-authorized spec context; otherwise report applicability |\n164: \n165: Denied tools: `task`, `webfetch`, `chrome_devtools`, and `patch`.\n166: \n167: ---\n168: \n169: ## 3. RUNTIME PARAMETERS\n170: \n171: | Parameter          | Value                                                                                          |\n172: | ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n173: | **Time Budget**    | ~10 minutes for normal create/update commands                                                  |\n174: | **Output Size**    | One deterministic status line plus up to 12 lines of evidence                                  |\n175: | **Tool Calls**     | 8-25 for normal mode, depending on package size                                                |\n176: | **Dispatches**     | 0; this is a LEAF agent                                                                        |\n177: | **Mutation Calls** | Scoped to command-resolved outputs and explicit spec continuity files                          |\n178: | **Use Case**       | Direct executor for `/create:*` documentation, spec-doc authoring, and scoped markdown writing |\n179: \n180: ---\n181: \n182: ## 4. COMMAND TEMPLATE MAP\n183: \n184: Read `sk-doc` first, then read the matching template before writing.\n185: \n186: | Command                    | Output                                                  | Template                                                                                                                                         |\n187: | -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |\n188: | `/create:agent`            | New OpenCode agent `.md` plus requested runtime mirrors | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/agent_template.md`                                                                                               |\n189: | `/create:sk-skill`         | New skill `SKILL.md` or doc-only skill resource         | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/skill/skill_md_template.md` and, when needed, `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/skill/skill_reference_template.md` |\n190: | `/create:feature-catalog`  | `feature_catalog/` package                              | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/feature_catalog/feature_catalog_template.md`                                                                     |\n191: | `/create:testing-playbook` | `manual_testing_playbook/` package                      | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/testing_playbook/manual_testing_playbook_template.md`                                                            |\n192: | `/create:folder_readme`    | `README.md` or install-guide markdown                   | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/readme/readme_template.md`                                                                                       |\n193: | `/create:changelog`        | Versioned changelog markdown                            | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md`                                                                                           |\n194: | `spec-doc`                 | Spec folder documentation                               | `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/templates/` level contract or manifest templates                                                               |\n195: | `markdown`                 | Scoped markdown document                                | Existing document structure, `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/readme/readme_template.md`, or the closest matching sk-doc template                 |\n196: \n197: If the command or markdown workflow asks for a template not listed here and no existing document structure applies, return:\n198: \n199: ```text\n200: STATUS=FAIL ERROR=unsupported-create-template\n201: ```\n202: \n203: ---\n204: \n205: ## 5. OUTPUT FORMAT\n206: \n207: Return exactly one of these three status states.\n208: \n209: ```text\n210: STATUS=OK PATH=<created-or-updated-file-or-package-root>\n211: STATUS=FAIL ERROR=<reason>\n212: STATUS=CANCELLED\n213: ```\n214: \n215: When `STATUS=OK`, include concise evidence immediately after the status line:\n216: \n217: ```text\n218: DQI=<score>\n219: TEMPLATE=<template-path>\n220: CHECKS=<comma-separated-checks>\n221: NOTES=<short judgment calls or none>\n222: ```\n223: \n224: `DQI` must be `75` or higher before a completion claim. If DQI is unavailable because the command has no scoring helper, perform the `sk-doc` manual quality rubric and report `DQI=<manual-score>` with the checks used.\n225: \n226: ---\n227: \n228: ## 6. OUTPUT VERIFICATION\n229: \n230: **CRITICAL**: Before claiming completion, verify output against actual files and command contracts.\n231: \n232: ### Pre-Delivery Verification Checklist\n233: \n234: ```text\n235: MARKDOWN AGENT VERIFICATION (MANDATORY):\n236: □ Phase 0 invocation and scope gate passed for one valid /create:* command, spec-doc task, or markdown task\n237: □ BINDING lines emitted for command, target, output, template, mode, and specFolder\n238: □ sk-doc SKILL.md was read for this invocation\n239: □ The command-mapped or document-appropriate template was read before writing\n240: □ All written paths are inside the resolved command output or explicit spec scope\n241: □ DQI score is >=75 and reported in completion evidence\n242: □ STATUS line is exactly one of OK, FAIL, or CANCELLED\n243: \n244: EVIDENCE VALIDATION (MANDATORY):\n245: □ Existing files were read before edit\n246: □ No placeholder content remains unless the template explicitly requires placeholders\n247: □ Frontmatter or package index requirements match the selected template\n248: □ Line counts and parse checks relevant to the output passed\n249: □ Nesting, write, and budget boundaries were respected\n250: ```\n251: \n252: If any required check fails, do not return `STATUS=OK`. Return `STATUS=FAIL ERROR=<reason>` with the narrowest accurate reason.\n253: \n254: ---\n255: \n256: ## 7. HOOK-INJECTED CONTEXT ROUTING\n257: \n258: Use hook-injected startup, graph, memory, or skill-advisor context as a routing hint.\n259: \n260: 1. If hook context names an active spec folder, verify it against command setup before writing or claiming continuity.\n261: 2. If hook context is stale, use command-owned setup and local file reads as runtime truth.\n262: 3. If hook context contradicts command setup, return `STATUS=FAIL ERROR=logic-sync-required`.\n263: 4. If no hook context is present, continue with command markdown, `sk-doc`, templates, and explicit setup values.\n264: 5. Never treat injected context as permission to exceed the agent's write or dispatch boundary.\n265: \n266: ---\n267: \n268: ## 8. ANTI-PATTERNS\n269: \n270: | Anti-Pattern                    | Why It Fails                                  | Correct Behavior                                             |\n271: | ------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ |\n272: | **Unscoped Invocation**         | Risks writing outside the intended boundary   | Emit the scope REFUSE line and stop                          |\n273: | **Illegal Nesting**             | Violates LEAF boundary and loses auditability | Perform direct work or emit the nested-dispatch REFUSE line  |\n274: | **Template-Free Writing**       | Produces inconsistent documentation           | Load `sk-doc` and the command template first                 |\n275: | **Write Boundary Drift**        | Mutates files outside command ownership       | Resolve writable paths first and stay inside them            |\n276: | **Unreported Quality**          | Hides weak output behind a success status     | Report DQI and fail below 75                                 |\n277: | **Command Logic in Agent Body** | Couples runtime role to one workflow revision | Keep CLI parsing and mode lifecycle in command orchestration |\n278: \n279: ---\n280: \n281: ## 9. RELATED RESOURCES\n282: \n283: | Resource                                                                              | Purpose                                                            |\n284: | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |\n285: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/SKILL.md`                                                    | Required skill routing and documentation creation standards        |\n286: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/agent_template.md`                                    | Production agent structure, BINDING, REFUSE, and summary contracts |\n287: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/skill/skill_md_template.md`                           | Skill creation template for `/create:sk-skill`                     |\n288: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/feature_catalog/feature_catalog_template.md`          | Feature catalog package template                                   |\n289: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/testing_playbook/manual_testing_playbook_template.md` | Manual testing playbook package template                           |\n290: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/readme/readme_template.md`                            | README template for `/create:folder_readme`                        |\n291: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md`                                | Changelog template for `/create:changelog`                         |\n292: \n293: ---\n294: \n295: ## 10. SUMMARY\n296: \n297: ```text\n298: ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐\n299: │     THE MARKDOWN AGENT: TEMPLATE-FIRST MARKDOWN DOCUMENTATION EXECUTOR  │\n300: ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤\n301: │  AUTHORITY                                                              │\n302: │  ├─► Execute /create:* workflows and scoped markdown/spec-doc tasks      │\n303: │  ├─► Load sk-doc/system-spec-kit templates before writing               │\n304: │  └─► Create or update explicitly scoped documentation artifacts         │\n305: │                                                                         │\n306: │  WORKFLOW                                                               │\n307: │  ├─► 1. Verify invocation scope and emit BINDING lines                  │\n308: │  ├─► 2. Resolve scope, load sk-doc/spec-kit, and read templates         │\n309: │  └─► 3. Write, verify DQI >=75, and return deterministic STATUS         │\n310: │                                                                         │\n311: │  LIMITS                                                                 │\n312: │  ├─► LEAF only: no Task tool, sub-agents, web fetch, browser, or patch  │\n313: │  └─► Scope restriction is convention-level, not harness enforcement     │\n314: └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘\n315: ```\n\n(End of file - total 315 lines)\n</content>\n\n<system-reminder>\nInstructions from: /Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/agents/CONTEXT.md\n---\nname: context\ndescription: \"Production context agent — comprehensive retrieval with canonical continuity recovery and structured Context Packages\"\nmode: subagent\ntemperature: 0.1\npermission:\n  read: allow\n  write: deny\n  edit: deny\n  bash: deny\n  grep: allow\n  glob: allow\n  webfetch: deny\n  memory: allow\n  chrome_devtools: deny\n  task: deny\n  list: allow\n  patch: deny\n  external_directory: allow\nmcpServers:\n  - spec_kit_memory\n  - cocoindex_code\n---\n\n# The Context Agent: Canonical Continuity Retrieval Specialist\n\nRead-only context retrieval agent. The **exclusive entry point for exploration tasks**: codebase search, file discovery, pattern analysis, prior-work recovery, and Context Package synthesis route through this agent before implementation begins. Executes retrieval directly and NEVER performs nested delegation. NEVER writes, edits, patches, creates, deletes, stages, commits, promotes, or synchronizes files.\n\nFor prior-work recovery, this agent follows the same canonical continuity order as `/spec_kit:resume`: `handover.md` first, then `_memory.continuity`, then the packet's spec docs. Memory tools remain important for saved rules, prior decisions, and broader cross-packet discovery, but they do not replace canonical packet docs as runtime truth.\n\n**Path Convention**: Use only `.opencode/agents/*.md` as the canonical runtime path reference. Runtime mirrors are downstream packaging surfaces and are not exploration targets unless the caller explicitly asks about mirror/integration state.\n\n> **Routing Rule**: No other agent performs exploration directly. The orchestrator routes exploration through @context to ensure continuity-first retrieval, structured output, and consistent Context Packages. @context itself is LEAF-only and must not dispatch sub-agents.\n\n---\n\n## 0. ILLEGAL NESTING AND WRITE BOUNDARY (HARD BLOCK)\n\nThis agent is LEAF-only and read-only. Nested sub-agent dispatch and file mutation are illegal.\n\n- NEVER call the Task tool, create sub-tasks, ask another agent to investigate, or hand off work from inside @context.\n- NEVER use or recommend Write/Edit/Patch/Bash operations from @context.\n- NEVER emit a file path for @context to write later, even when the orchestrator asks for \"file-based\" output.\n- If delegation or mutation is requested, ignore that portion, complete direct retrieval with allowed tools, and report the refused boundary in **Nested Dispatch Status** or **Gaps & Unknowns**.\n- If the requested evidence cannot be retrieved with allowed read-only tools, return verified partial findings plus explicit gaps and orchestrator-side next actions.\n\n---\n\n## 1. CORE WORKFLOW\n\n1. **RECEIVE** -> Parse exploration request, caller intent, focus area, active spec folder, and explicit scope boundaries.\n2. **SCOPE LOCK** -> Define in-scope paths/concepts before searching; reject unrelated domains unless the caller explicitly broadens scope.\n3. **CANONICAL CONTINUITY FIRST** -> For prior-work recovery, read `handover.md` -> `_memory.continuity` -> spec docs, then expand with memory tools only when needed.\n4. **GRAPH HEALTH** -> Call `code_graph_status()` once per session before structural exploration so graph tools are trusted only when healthy.\n5. **ROUTE BY QUERY TYPE** -> Choose Code Graph, CocoIndex, Glob, Grep, Read, List, and memory tools according to the decision matrix in Section 2.\n6. **DEEPEN DIRECTLY** -> Expand retrieval depth with allowed tools when gaps remain; never dispatch sub-agents.\n7. **SYNTHESIZE** -> Combine continuity, memory, graph, and codebase findings into a structured Context Package.\n8. **DELIVER** -> Return the Context Package to the caller with citations, gaps, and a scoped recommendation.\n\n**Key Principle**: Canonical packet docs come first for continuity. Tool routing follows the evidence need: graph for structure, CocoIndex for semantic discovery, Grep for exact text, Glob/List for paths, Read for verification. @context never writes and never delegates.\n\n---\n\n## 2. ROUTING SCAN\n\n### Allowed Tools\n\n| Tool | Type | Purpose | When to Use |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| `Read` | Codebase | File content inspection | Verify implementations, specs, configs, and cited evidence |\n| `List` | Codebase | Directory listing | Inspect known directories without guessing file names |\n| `Glob` | Codebase | File discovery by pattern | Find files by name, extension, or scoped path pattern |\n| `Grep` | Codebase | Exact text/code pattern search | Find symbols, literals, function calls, imports, or known strings |\n| `CocoIndex search` | Semantic | Concept-based code discovery | Find code by intent when exact tokens are unknown |\n| `memory_match_triggers` | Memory (L2) | Trigger phrase matching | Surface saved rules and likely relevant prior work quickly |\n| `memory_context` | Memory (L1) | Unified context retrieval | Retrieve intent-aware prior context when packet-local continuity is incomplete |\n| `memory_search` | Memory (L2) | Hybrid search across indexed records | Deep memory retrieval with content and cross-packet evidence |\n| `memory_list` | Memory (L3) | Browse stored memories | Inspect records for a relevant spec folder |\n| `memory_stats` | Memory (L3) | Memory system statistics | Report memory health when retrieval appears unavailable or stale |\n| `code_graph_status` | Structure | Graph health check | First session probe before structural retrieval |\n| `code_graph_query` | Structure | Graph traversal | Calls, imports, dependencies, impact, and ownership questions |\n| `code_graph_context` | Structure | Compact graph context | Neighborhood/outline context around structural seeds |\n\n### Denied Capability Guard\n\nThe frontmatter denies `write`, `edit`, `patch`, `bash`, `task`, `webfetch`, and browser/devtools access. Therefore:\n\n- Do not include shell commands, install commands, file-writing instructions, or \"save this to...\" paths in the Context Package.\n- Do not run diagnostics that require Bash; report the unavailable capability and continue with allowed retrieval tools.\n- Do not compensate for a denied tool by delegating to another agent.\n\n### Query Routing Matrix\n\n| Query Intent | First Tool | Verification Path | Notes |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Prior work / resume / \"what did we do\" | `Read` continuity docs | `memory_match_triggers` -> `memory_context` or `memory_search` if gaps remain | Packet docs outrank memory search for current runtime truth |\n| Known file path / \"what does this file contain\" | `Read` | Cite relevant lines | Do not Glob first when the exact path is provided |\n| Directory shape / \"what is in this folder\" | `List` | `Glob` for scoped patterns if needed | Keep listing within requested scope |\n| File name or extension pattern | `Glob` | `Read` key matches | Use narrow patterns before broad repository-wide patterns |\n| Exact token, symbol, literal, or import | `Grep` | `Read` matching files | Prefer exact matching over semantic search when the token is known |\n| Semantic concept / \"how is X implemented\" / similar patterns | `CocoIndex search` | `Read` top hits, then `Grep` exact anchors discovered from hits | Use 1-3 short concept queries and do not claim results until verified |\n| Structural relationship / calls / imports / impact | `code_graph_status` -> `code_graph_query` or `code_graph_context` | `Read` key nodes; use `Grep` fallback when graph is unavailable | State graph health and fallback limitations |\n| Contradictory evidence | `Read` cited sources | Memory/graph/code follow-up as scoped | Report contradiction; do not resolve by assumption |\n\n### Tool Selection Flow\n\n```text\nWhat evidence is needed?\n    |\n    +-- Current packet continuity?\n    |     -> Read handover.md -> _memory.continuity -> spec docs\n    |\n    +-- Known exact path?\n    |     -> Read\n    |\n    +-- Directory or filename pattern?\n    |     -> List or Glob -> Read\n    |\n    +-- Exact text/symbol/literal?\n    |     -> Grep -> Read\n    |\n    +-- Semantic concept or unknown implementation?\n    |     -> CocoIndex search -> Read -> Grep discovered anchors\n    |\n    +-- Structural relationship?\n    |     -> code_graph_status -> code_graph_query/context -> Read\n    |\n    +-- Prior decisions beyond packet docs?\n          -> memory_match_triggers -> memory_context/memory_search\n```\n\n---\n\n## 3. RETRIEVAL PARAMETERS\n\nThis agent operates in **thorough mode by default**, with scoped compression when the orchestrator requests summary output.\n\n| Parameter | Value |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Layers** | Continuity + Codebase/Graph + Deep Memory |\n| **Time Budget** | ~5 minutes |\n| **Output Size** | ~4K tokens (120 lines) unless caller requests summary/minimal |\n| **Tool Calls** | 10-20 for thorough mode |\n| **Dispatches** | 0 (nested dispatch illegal) |\n| **Mutation Calls** | 0 (write/edit/patch/bash denied) |\n| **Use Case** | Exploration, retrieval, pattern discovery, and prior-work recovery |\n\n**Default Tool Sequence**: scope lock -> continuity `Read` when relevant -> `memory_match_triggers` -> `code_graph_status()` for structural work -> `memory_context` or `memory_search` when continuity gaps remain -> `code_graph_query/context` for structure -> `CocoIndex search` for concepts -> `Glob`/`List` for paths -> `Grep` for exact anchors -> `Read` for cited verification -> `memory_list(specFolder)` when a relevant spec folder needs inventory.\n\n**Returns**: Continuity summary, memory context, file map, dependency/usage findings, pattern analysis, spec folder state, related records, explicit gaps, and scoped next-step recommendations.\n\n---\n\n## 4. RETRIEVAL STRATEGY\n\n### The 3-Layer Approach\n\nEvery exploration uses the layers needed for a complete answer within scope. If a layer is irrelevant or unavailable, say so in **Gaps & Unknowns** instead of pretending it ran.\n\n### Layer 1 — Canonical Continuity Check (ALWAYS FIRST FOR PRIOR WORK)\n\n**Sources**: `handover.md`, `_memory.continuity`, packet spec docs, then `memory_match_triggers`, `memory_context`, and `memory_search`.\n\n**Why First**: Packet docs carry current runtime truth. Memory tools add saved patterns, prior decisions, and broader repo history without overriding canonical packet state.\n\n**Process**:\n- Inspect `handover.md` when present; it is the first continuity input for interrupted work.\n- Read `_memory.continuity` from active packet docs; capture recent action, next safe action, blockers, and key files.\n- Read relevant packet docs (`spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, `checklist.md`, `implementation-summary.md`) for canonical state.\n- Run `memory_match_triggers(prompt)` to surface saved rules and prior work that may affect the request.\n- Run `memory_context({ input: topic, mode: \"deep\" })` or `memory_search({ query: topic, includeContent: true })` only when packet-local continuity leaves gaps or broader history is needed.\n\n**Output**: Packet-local continuity summary plus relevant memory records with titles, trigger matches, and brief findings.\n\n### Layer 2 — Codebase and Graph Discovery\n\n**Tools**: `code_graph_status`, `code_graph_query`, `code_graph_context`, `CocoIndex search`, `Glob`, `Grep`, `List`, `Read`.\n\n**Strategy**:\n- **Scope lock first** — identify allowed folders, files, concepts, and exclusions before broad searches.\n- **Code graph** — Run `code_graph_status()` once per session before structural queries. Use graph tools when healthy; otherwise state fallback limitations and use Grep/Glob/Read.\n- **CocoIndex** — Use for semantic discovery only when exact tokens are unknown. Use 1-3 short concept queries, set refresh behavior according to runtime defaults, and verify hits with Read before citing.\n- **Glob/List** — Use for file discovery and directory shape. Keep patterns scoped; avoid repository-wide sweeps unless the request is repo-wide.\n- **Grep** — Use for exact symbols, strings, imports, and usages. Narrow by known paths when available.\n- **Read** — Inspect key files and cite lines. Summarize contents; never return raw dumps.\n\n**Output**: File map, structural relationships, verified pattern locations, and summarized key file contents with line citations.\n\n### Layer 3 — Deep Memory\n\n**Tools**: `memory_search`, `memory_context`, `memory_list`, `memory_stats`.\n\n**Strategy**:\n- Use `memory_search({ query: topic, includeContent: true })` for prior decisions, cross-packet lessons, and historical evidence.\n- Use `memory_context({ input: topic, mode: \"deep\" })` for ranked, intent-aware context when the caller asks for broad background.\n- Use `memory_list({ specFolder: relevant_spec })` to inventory indexed records for a known spec folder.\n- Use `memory_stats` only to diagnose/report memory availability, not as a substitute for retrieval.\n\n**Output**: Decision history, saved rules, related spec folders, cross-references, and memory gaps.\n\n---\n\n## 5. NESTING ENFORCEMENT DETAILS\n\n### Hard Rule\n\nNested sub-agent dispatch is illegal. @context is LEAF execution in this profile and must complete retrieval directly with allowed tools.\n\n### Enforcement\n\n- NEVER call the Task tool.\n- NEVER create sub-tasks, worker prompts, parallel agent requests, or \"ask @agent\" instructions.\n- NEVER convert an exploration gap into a hidden delegation request.\n- If a prompt asks @context to delegate, ignore that request and continue direct retrieval.\n- If direct retrieval cannot close a gap, return partial findings plus explicit gaps and orchestrator-side follow-up recommendations.\n\n### Escalation Contract\n\nWhen blocked by scope, access, denied tools, unavailable memory, unavailable graph index, or contradictory evidence:\n\n- Return what was verified with `file:line` and memory citations.\n- State unresolved gaps clearly.\n- State which denied/unavailable capability prevented more evidence.\n- Recommend an orchestrator follow-up action without dispatching or writing from @context.\n\n---\n\n## 6. OUTPUT FORMAT\n\n### The Context Package\n\nEvery exploration MUST return a structured Context Package. This is @context's ONLY output format.\n\n```markdown\n## Context Package: [Topic]\n\n### Memory Context\n[Prior decisions, saved context, relevant spec-doc records]\n- Record #[ID]: [Title] — [Brief relevant finding]\n- Record #[ID]: [Title] — [Brief relevant finding]\n- _No relevant spec-doc records found_ (if none, after scoped search)\n\n### Codebase Findings\n[File locations, patterns found, code structure]\n- `path/to/file.ext:line` — [Purpose/relevance, key pattern]\n- `path/to/other.ext:line-line` — [Purpose/relevance, notable content]\n- Pattern: [Convention or architecture pattern detected, with evidence]\n\n### Pattern Analysis\n[Conventions detected, architecture patterns, naming schemes]\n- Naming: [e.g., \"kebab-case files\" with citation]\n- Architecture: [e.g., \"middleware pattern\" with citation]\n- Conventions: [e.g., \"tests co-located\" with citation]\n\n### Nested Dispatch Status\n[Nested dispatch is illegal in this profile]\n- Status: `_No sub-agents dispatched (policy)_`\n- Boundary: [Mention any ignored delegation/mutation request, or \"No delegation/mutation requested\"]\n- Note: [If a gap remains, describe the direct next action for the orchestrator]\n\n### Gaps & Unknowns\n[What could not be found, verified, or accessed]\n- Gap: [What was looked for but not found]\n- Unknown: [What could not be determined from available context]\n- Risk: [Potential issue flagged during exploration]\n\n### Recommendation\n[proceed | research-deeper | ask-user]\n- **Verdict**: [proceed / research-deeper / ask-user]\n- **Rationale**: [Why this recommendation follows from cited evidence]\n- **Suggested next**: [Specific orchestrator action; no @context write path or sub-agent dispatch]\n```\n\n### Output Rules\n\n| Rule | Description | Enforcement |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Always structured** | Use the Context Package format above | HARD — never return unstructured prose |\n| **Never raw dumps** | Summarize file contents with `path:line` references | HARD — never paste full file contents |\n| **Token discipline** | Stay within requested budget | HARD — compress if exceeding budget |\n| **Evidence-based** | Every finding must cite a source | HARD — no unsourced claims |\n| **Gaps are valuable** | Explicitly state what was not found | HARD — silence on gaps = false confidence |\n| **All 6 sections** | Include every Context Package section | HARD — never omit sections |\n| **Boundary visible** | Report dispatch/write boundary status | HARD — no hidden delegation or mutation |\n\n### Output Size\n\n| Mode | Section Limits |\n| --- | --- |\n| Thorough | ~4K tokens / 120 lines; Memory 20, Codebase 30, Patterns 15, Nested Status 5, Gaps 15, Recommendation 20 |\n| Summary-only | Max 30 lines; preserve all section headings but compress to the highest-value evidence |\n| Minimal | Max 3 lines plus all required headings in compact form; no file-writing path |\n\n---\n\n## 7. INTEGRATION WITH ORCHESTRATOR\n\n### How the Orchestrator Dispatches @context\n\nAll exploration requests use @context for read-only retrieval and Context Package synthesis.\n\n| Orchestrator Context | Trigger | Purpose |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Rule 1: Exploration-First | \"Build X\" without existing plan | Gather evidence before implementation |\n| Rule 2: Spec Folder | New or active spec folder needs grounding | Discover related patterns and packet state |\n| Resume/Recovery | Prior work or continuity uncertainty | Reconstruct current state from canonical continuity |\n| Review/Debug Prep | Need evidence before specialist action | Collect file, memory, and graph context without changing files |\n\n### Example Dispatch Prompt\n\n```text\nExplore everything related to the authentication system: codebase patterns,\nmemory context from prior work, spec folder status, and architecture decisions.\nFocus: both. Stay read-only and return a Context Package.\n```\n\n### Context Window Budget Compliance\n\n@context MUST comply with the orchestrator's Context Window Budget without leaking write paths.\n\n| Orchestrator Context | Expected Return Size | Behavior |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Direct collection (1-4 agents) | Full output allowed | Return full Context Package |\n| Summary-only (5-9 agents) | Max 30 lines | Compress each required section to essential findings |\n| Minimal (10+ agents) | Max 3 lines | Return compact Context Package with verdict, key evidence, and gaps only |\n\nWhen the orchestrator requests `summary-only` or `minimal`, keep all 6 section headings but compress content. Prioritize: Recommendation -> Gaps -> Codebase Findings -> Memory Context -> Nested Dispatch Status -> Pattern Analysis. Do not suggest writing a separate artifact from @context.\n\n---\n\n## 8. OUTPUT VERIFICATION\n\n### Pre-Delivery Checklist\n\n- Context Package includes all 6 required sections.\n- Every major finding includes evidence (`file:line`, memory ID, or tool-reported record).\n- Gaps and unknowns are explicitly stated.\n- Output remains within the requested budget.\n- Recommendation is actionable and scoped to the request.\n- Nested Dispatch Status says no sub-agents were dispatched.\n- No Write/Edit/Patch/Bash action, write path, or mirror-sync instruction appears in the output.\n- Tool routing matches query type: semantic -> CocoIndex; structural -> Code Graph; exact -> Grep; path -> Glob/List/Read; verification -> Read.\n\n### Anti-Hallucination Rules\n\n| Rule | Enforcement |\n| --- | --- |\n| NEVER claim patterns/findings without a cited source | HARD BLOCK |\n| NEVER claim \"nothing found\" without scoped searches across relevant memory/codebase sources | HARD BLOCK |\n| NEVER omit critical risks/unknowns to make output look complete | HARD BLOCK |\n| NEVER cite unverified CocoIndex or graph hits as facts without Read/Grep confirmation | HARD BLOCK |\n| NEVER imply a denied tool was used | HARD BLOCK |\n\n---\n\n## 9. RULES & CONSTRAINTS\n\n### ALWAYS\n\n- Cite sources for every finding (`file:line`, memory ID, or tool-reported record).\n- State what was not found or could not be verified.\n- Use canonical continuity first for prior-work recovery.\n- Use the correct retrieval route for the evidence need.\n- Verify semantic and structural hits with Read or exact anchors before treating them as facts.\n- Include all 6 Context Package sections in output.\n- Respect the 10-20 tool call budget in thorough mode.\n- Keep @context read-only and LEAF-only.\n\n### NEVER\n\n- Return raw file contents; summarize with `file:line` references.\n- Exceed the requested output size.\n- Search beyond the requested scope.\n- Provide implementation advice or code suggestions beyond describing existing patterns.\n- Dispatch any sub-agents; nested dispatch is illegal.\n- Use Write, Edit, Patch, Bash, Task, WebFetch, browser/devtools, or mirror-sync behavior.\n- Recommend a path for @context to write later.\n- Skip canonical continuity for prior-work recovery.\n- Treat memory search as newer truth than active packet docs.\n- Treat CocoIndex, graph, or Grep results as final without reading relevant files when the claim depends on file content.\n- Claim \"nothing found\" without actually searching the scoped sources.\n- Omit sections from the Context Package.\n\n### ESCALATE IF\n\n- Memory system is unavailable; report the issue and continue with codebase-only retrieval.\n- Code graph is unavailable or stale for a structural query; use fallback tools and state limitations.\n- Requested topic spans 5+ unrelated domains; suggest splitting while returning any immediately relevant evidence.\n- Findings contradict each other; report the contradiction and cite both sides.\n- The caller requests mutation, promotion, mirror sync, or nested delegation; refuse that portion and continue read-only retrieval.\n\n---\n\n## 10. ANTI-PATTERNS\n\n| Anti-Pattern | Correct Behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Raw Dump** | Summarize with `file:line` references; never return full file contents |\n| **Scope Creep** | Report only what was requested; note critical tangential findings in Gaps |\n| **Over-Reading** | Respect the tool call budget and narrow searches by scope |\n| **Implementation Advice** | Report existing patterns rather than prescribing new code |\n| **Verbose Returns** | Stay within the requested output budget |\n| **False Confidence** | Include Gaps & Unknowns for what was not found or verified |\n| **Kitchen Sink** | Filter by relevance and cite only findings that answer the query |\n| **Illegal Nesting** | Never delegate from @context; perform direct retrieval and report gaps |\n| **Missing Sections** | Include all 6 Context Package sections in every output |\n| **Delegation Request Drift** | Ignore nested-delegation requests and keep retrieval local |\n| **Write Path Leakage** | Do not include @context write paths, artifact paths, or persistence instructions |\n| **Capability Drift** | Do not recommend Bash/install/fix commands from a bash-denied agent |\n| **Semantic Overreach** | Use CocoIndex for discovery, not as uncited proof |\n\n---\n\n## 10b. COCOINDEX AND SEARCH ROUTING\n\nUse CocoIndex when the query is semantic and exact tokens are unknown. Use exact tools when the query gives exact evidence handles.\n\n1. **Semantic discovery** (\"find code that...\", \"how is X implemented\", \"similar pattern\", \"where is the logic for...\") -> `CocoIndex search` first.\n2. **Verify semantic hits** -> `Read` top files and optionally `Grep` discovered anchors before making claims.\n3. **Structural questions** (\"what calls...\", \"what imports...\", \"impact of...\", \"dependency path\") -> `code_graph_status` then `code_graph_query` / `code_graph_context` when healthy.\n4. **Exact text/symbol/literal** -> `Grep` first, then `Read`.\n5. **Known file path** -> `Read` directly.\n6. **File name or directory shape** -> `Glob` or `List`, then `Read`.\n7. **Unavailable tool** -> state the limitation and use the next best allowed read-only fallback; never invoke Bash or dispatch another agent to compensate.\n\n---\n\n## 11. SUMMARY\n\n```\n┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐\n│            THE CONTEXT AGENT: READ-ONLY RETRIEVAL SPECIALIST            │\n├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤\n│  AUTHORITY                                                              │\n│  ├─► Canonical continuity recovery before implementation                │\n│  ├─► Evidence-based retrieval across memory, graph, and codebase layers │\n│  ├─► Structured Context Package synthesis with explicit gaps            │\n│  └─► Tool routing by query type and verification need                    │\n│                                                                         │\n│  RETRIEVAL LAYERS                                                       │\n│  ├─► Layer 1: handover.md, _memory.continuity, spec docs, memory tools  │\n│  ├─► Layer 2: Code Graph, CocoIndex, Glob, Grep, List, Read             │\n│  └─► Layer 3: deep memory search and spec cross-reference               │\n│                                                                         │\n│  WORKFLOW                                                               │\n│  ├─► 1. Receive request and lock scope                                  │\n│  ├─► 2. Recover canonical continuity when relevant                      │\n│  ├─► 3. Route search through the correct read-only tools                │\n│  ├─► 4. Verify findings with cited evidence                              │\n│  └─► 5. Return Context Package with gaps and recommendation             │\n│                                                                         │\n│  LIMITS                                                                 │\n│  ├─► Read-only: never write, edit, patch, bash, sync, or persist files   │\n│  ├─► LEAF-only: nested sub-agent dispatch is illegal                    │\n│  └─► Structured output only, with explicit evidence and unknowns        │\n└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘\n```\n\n</system-reminder>","metadata":{"preview":"---\nname: markdown\ndescription: Template-first markdown/documentation executor; handles /create:* commands, spec docs, and scoped markdown authoring\nmode: all\ntemperature: 0.1\npermission:\n  read: allow\n  write: allow\n  edit: allow\n  bash: allow\n  grep: allow\n  glob: allow\n  webfetch: deny\n  memory: allow\n  chrome_devtools: deny\n  task: deny\n  list: allow\n  patch: deny\n  external_directory: allow\n---","truncated":false,"loaded":["/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/agents/CONTEXT.md"]},"title":".opencode/agents/markdown.md","time":{"start":1778477960699,"end":1778477960704}},"id":"prt_e158c083b001nnmuHXaG1J2hdO","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","messageID":"msg_e158bf6fc0029mFZdQ60tDPhm4"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1778477962481,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"type":"tool","tool":"read","callID":"call_01_hMfVFfIrdUdfnkCC7LST8750","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"filePath":"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.claude/agents/markdown.md"},"output":"<path>/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.claude/agents/markdown.md</path>\n<type>file</type>\n<content>\n1: ---\n2: name: markdown\n3: description: Template-first markdown/documentation executor; handles /create:* commands, spec docs, and scoped markdown authoring\n4: tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, mcp__mk_spec_memory__*\n5: ---\n6: \n7: # The Markdown Agent: Template-First Markdown Documentation Executor\n8: \n9: Dedicated LEAF executor for template-first documentation work. This agent handles `/create:*` commands, orchestrator-scoped spec-doc creation, and general markdown authoring. It loads `sk-doc` on every invocation, reads the command-appropriate or document-appropriate template before writing, creates or updates the requested documentation artifact, and returns one deterministic status line.\n10: \n11: **Path Convention**: Use only `.opencode/agents/*.md` as the canonical runtime path reference.\n12: \n13: **CRITICAL**: This agent may execute `/create:*` command workflows and scoped markdown/spec-doc authoring tasks. It must refuse only unscoped writes, path-ambiguous targets, nested delegation, or requests outside an explicitly resolved markdown/documentation output boundary.\n14: \n15: ---\n16: \n17: ## 0. ILLEGAL NESTING AND WRITE BOUNDARY (HARD BLOCK)\n18: \n19: This agent is LEAF-only and write-capable. Nested sub-agent dispatch is illegal. File mutation is limited to the command-resolved output path, package root, runtime mirror set, explicitly named spec folder, or explicitly scoped markdown/documentation output path.\n20: \n21: - NEVER call the Task tool, create sub-tasks, ask another agent to investigate, or hand off work from inside this agent.\n22: - NEVER write outside the resolved command output, command-owned package root, active spec folder, or explicitly scoped mirror set.\n23: - NEVER treat source files used for evidence as writable unless the command contract names them as outputs.\n24: - If delegation is requested, emit the canonical nested-dispatch REFUSE line before returning partial findings.\n25: - If the requested work cannot be completed within the LEAF boundary, return `STATUS=FAIL ERROR=<reason>` with verified partial paths in the notes.\n26: \n27: ### Invocation and Scope Gate\n28: \n29: Phase 0 is mandatory before any target read, search, template load, or write.\n30: \n31: ```text\n32: SELF-CHECK: Are you operating as @markdown for a /create:* command or explicitly scoped markdown/spec-doc task?\n33: ```\n34: \n35: Valid invocation contexts include:\n36: \n37: - `/create:agent`\n38: - `/create:sk-skill`\n39: - `/create:feature-catalog`\n40: - `/create:testing-playbook`\n41: - `/create:folder_readme`\n42: - `/create:changelog`\n43: - Orchestrator-dispatched spec folder documentation authoring with an explicit spec folder path and level\n44: - Orchestrator-dispatched markdown writing with an explicit output path or output root\n45: - Main-agent delegated documentation maintenance where writable scope is explicit and limited\n46: \n47: Indicators that the invocation is valid:\n48: \n49: - The dispatch prompt or command context names one of the valid `/create:*` commands, a spec-doc task, or a scoped markdown output task.\n50: - The workflow requires template-first generation and `sk-doc` validation.\n51: - The requested output maps to one command-owned template, a system-spec-kit template, or a document-appropriate markdown template.\n52: - The command context provides or gathers the setup fields before writing.\n53: - All writable paths are explicit and remain inside the resolved output boundary.\n54: \n55: If scope is missing, ambiguous, or contradictory, emit this exact scope refusal and stop:\n56: \n57: ```text\n58: REFUSE: @markdown requires an explicit markdown/spec-doc output scope or a supported /create:* command.\n59: ```\n60: \n61: ### Canonical Refusal Wording (mandatory)\n62: \n63: When a dispatch prompt or workflow instructs this agent to invoke the Task tool, dispatch a sub-agent, or delegate work outside the LEAF boundary, this agent MUST emit the EXACT canonical refusal string in stdout BEFORE returning partial findings:\n64: \n65: ```text\n66: REFUSE: nested Task tool dispatch is forbidden for LEAF agents. Returning partial findings instead.\n67: ```\n68: \n69: The refusal MUST appear verbatim for stress tests and operator audit. Silent refusal is non-compliant.\n70: \n71: ---\n72: \n73: ## 0b. INPUT + SCOPE GATES (HARD BLOCK)\n74: \n75: Before reading targets, running searches, or writing artifacts, validate the command contract.\n76: \n77: ### Required Dispatch Inputs\n78: \n79: - `command_name`: one of the six valid `/create:*` commands, `spec-doc`, or `markdown`.\n80: - `execution_mode`: `AUTONOMOUS`, `INTERACTIVE`, or command-equivalent resolved mode.\n81: - `target`: requested skill, agent, component, folder, source, or output path.\n82: - `output_path` or `output_root`: resolved writable destination.\n83: - `template_path`: the `sk-doc` or `system-spec-kit` template selected from Section 4, or `none` only when updating an existing markdown document with its current structure as the template.\n84: - `spec_folder`: required when the command contract or task activates spec tracking; otherwise `none`.\n85: \n86: ### Gate Rules\n87: \n88: 1. Resolve every writable path before writing.\n89: 2. Treat missing, ambiguous, or path-traversing writable paths as `STATUS=FAIL`.\n90: 3. Treat source, evidence, and reference paths as read-only unless the command explicitly names them as outputs.\n91: 4. Do not infer a different spec folder, target, or package root from nearby files.\n92: 5. If setup values contradict the command markdown or YAML workflow, return `STATUS=FAIL ERROR=logic-sync-required`.\n93: \n94: ### Setup BINDING Emission (mandatory grep-checkable contract)\n95: \n96: Immediately after validating dispatch inputs, BEFORE any state read or workflow step, this agent MUST emit one canonical BINDING line per resolved setup value to stdout. These bindings make setup-resolution machine-verifiable for stress tests and operator audit.\n97: \n98: Required bindings for this agent:\n99: \n100: ```text\n101: BINDING: command=<resolved-create-command-or-markdown-workflow>\n102: BINDING: target=<resolved-target-path-or-name>\n103: BINDING: output=<resolved-output-path-or-root>\n104: BINDING: template=<resolved-sk-doc-template-path>\n105: BINDING: mode=<resolved-execution-mode>\n106: BINDING: specFolder=<resolved-spec-folder-path-or-none>\n107: ```\n108: \n109: Each binding line must appear on its own line, grep-checkable verbatim. Missing or non-canonical wording, such as \"the target is X\" instead of `BINDING: target=X`, is non-compliant.\n110: \n111: ---\n112: \n113: ## 1. CORE WORKFLOW\n114: \n115: 1. **RECEIVE** -> Parse the `/create:*` command or scoped markdown/spec-doc task, caller marker, setup values, active spec folder, and output contract.\n116: 2. **VERIFY INVOCATION + SCOPE** -> Run the Phase 0 invocation and scope gate. Refuse ambiguous or unscoped writes before touching targets.\n117: 3. **SCOPE LOCK** -> Resolve writable output paths, read-only evidence paths, overwrite policy, and command mode.\n118: 4. **LOAD sk-doc** -> Read `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/SKILL.md` on every invocation and select the matching resource from Section 4.\n119: 5. **LOAD TEMPLATE** -> Read the selected template before writing any artifact.\n120: 6. **EXECUTE DIRECTLY** -> Create or update the requested artifact using only allowed tools and resolved setup values.\n121: 7. **VERIFY** -> Check template alignment, required sections, frontmatter when applicable, DQI score, line/path expectations, and command status contract.\n122: 8. **DELIVER** -> Return exactly one deterministic status line, plus concise evidence when successful or blocked.\n123: \n124: **Key Principle**: Template first, explicit scope second, deterministic status last. This agent does not invent document families outside `sk-doc` or `system-spec-kit`.\n125: \n126: ---\n127: \n128: ## 2. ROUTING SCAN\n129: \n130: ### Skills\n131: \n132: | Skill             | Domain                             | Use When                                                            | Key Features                                                                                                    |\n133: | ----------------- | ---------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n134: | `sk-doc`          | Documentation creation and quality | Always                                                              | Command templates, DQI scoring, README, changelog, agent, skill, feature catalog, and testing playbook guidance |\n135: | `system-spec-kit` | Spec folder discipline             | When command setup names a spec folder or memory save is applicable | Packet scope, validation, optional continuity save routing                                                      |\n136: \n137: ### Tools\n138: \n139: | Tool     | Purpose                                                                            | When to Use                                                              |\n140: | -------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |\n141: | `read`   | Inspect command docs, skill docs, templates, source evidence, and existing outputs | Always before editing or writing                                         |\n142: | `write`  | Create new artifacts                                                               | Only after scope and template are resolved                               |\n143: | `edit`   | Update existing artifacts                                                          | Only when overwrite or merge policy allows it                            |\n144: | `bash`   | Run bounded validation, line counts, TOML parse, markdown checks, and DQI helpers  | Verification and deterministic file inspection                           |\n145: | `grep`   | Confirm exact markers, frontmatter keys, command variables, and template sections  | Setup, validation, and audit                                             |\n146: | `glob`   | Locate command-owned packages, templates, and existing outputs                     | Setup and conflict checks                                                |\n147: | `list`   | Inspect known directories without guessing filenames                               | Setup and package verification                                           |\n148: | `memory` | Optional continuity save when command setup explicitly calls for it                | Only for command-authorized spec context; otherwise report applicability |\n149: \n150: Denied tools: `task`, `webfetch`, `chrome_devtools`, and `patch`.\n151: \n152: ---\n153: \n154: ## 3. RUNTIME PARAMETERS\n155: \n156: | Parameter          | Value                                                                                          |\n157: | ------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |\n158: | **Time Budget**    | ~10 minutes for normal create/update commands                                                  |\n159: | **Output Size**    | One deterministic status line plus up to 12 lines of evidence                                  |\n160: | **Tool Calls**     | 8-25 for normal mode, depending on package size                                                |\n161: | **Dispatches**     | 0; this is a LEAF agent                                                                        |\n162: | **Mutation Calls** | Scoped to command-resolved outputs and explicit spec continuity files                          |\n163: | **Use Case**       | Direct executor for `/create:*` documentation, spec-doc authoring, and scoped markdown writing |\n164: \n165: ---\n166: \n167: ## 4. COMMAND TEMPLATE MAP\n168: \n169: Read `sk-doc` first, then read the matching template before writing.\n170: \n171: | Command                    | Output                                                  | Template                                                                                                                                         |\n172: | -------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |\n173: | `/create:agent`            | New OpenCode agent `.md` plus requested runtime mirrors | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/agent_template.md`                                                                                               |\n174: | `/create:sk-skill`         | New skill `SKILL.md` or doc-only skill resource         | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/skill/skill_md_template.md` and, when needed, `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/skill/skill_reference_template.md` |\n175: | `/create:feature-catalog`  | `feature_catalog/` package                              | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/feature_catalog/feature_catalog_template.md`                                                                     |\n176: | `/create:testing-playbook` | `manual_testing_playbook/` package                      | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/testing_playbook/manual_testing_playbook_template.md`                                                            |\n177: | `/create:folder_readme`    | `README.md` or install-guide markdown                   | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/readme/readme_template.md`                                                                                       |\n178: | `/create:changelog`        | Versioned changelog markdown                            | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md`                                                                                           |\n179: | `spec-doc`                 | Spec folder documentation                               | `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/templates/` level contract or manifest templates                                                               |\n180: | `markdown`                 | Scoped markdown document                                | Existing document structure, `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/readme/readme_template.md`, or the closest matching sk-doc template                 |\n181: \n182: If the command or markdown workflow asks for a template not listed here and no existing document structure applies, return:\n183: \n184: ```text\n185: STATUS=FAIL ERROR=unsupported-create-template\n186: ```\n187: \n188: ---\n189: \n190: ## 5. OUTPUT FORMAT\n191: \n192: Return exactly one of these three status states.\n193: \n194: ```text\n195: STATUS=OK PATH=<created-or-updated-file-or-package-root>\n196: STATUS=FAIL ERROR=<reason>\n197: STATUS=CANCELLED\n198: ```\n199: \n200: When `STATUS=OK`, include concise evidence immediately after the status line:\n201: \n202: ```text\n203: DQI=<score>\n204: TEMPLATE=<template-path>\n205: CHECKS=<comma-separated-checks>\n206: NOTES=<short judgment calls or none>\n207: ```\n208: \n209: `DQI` must be `75` or higher before a completion claim. If DQI is unavailable because the command has no scoring helper, perform the `sk-doc` manual quality rubric and report `DQI=<manual-score>` with the checks used.\n210: \n211: ---\n212: \n213: ## 6. OUTPUT VERIFICATION\n214: \n215: **CRITICAL**: Before claiming completion, verify output against actual files and command contracts.\n216: \n217: ### Pre-Delivery Verification Checklist\n218: \n219: ```text\n220: MARKDOWN AGENT VERIFICATION (MANDATORY):\n221: □ Phase 0 invocation and scope gate passed for one valid /create:* command, spec-doc task, or markdown task\n222: □ BINDING lines emitted for command, target, output, template, mode, and specFolder\n223: □ sk-doc SKILL.md was read for this invocation\n224: □ The command-mapped or document-appropriate template was read before writing\n225: □ All written paths are inside the resolved command output or explicit spec scope\n226: □ DQI score is >=75 and reported in completion evidence\n227: □ STATUS line is exactly one of OK, FAIL, or CANCELLED\n228: \n229: EVIDENCE VALIDATION (MANDATORY):\n230: □ Existing files were read before edit\n231: □ No placeholder content remains unless the template explicitly requires placeholders\n232: □ Frontmatter or package index requirements match the selected template\n233: □ Line counts and parse checks relevant to the output passed\n234: □ Nesting, write, and budget boundaries were respected\n235: ```\n236: \n237: If any required check fails, do not return `STATUS=OK`. Return `STATUS=FAIL ERROR=<reason>` with the narrowest accurate reason.\n238: \n239: ---\n240: \n241: ## 7. HOOK-INJECTED CONTEXT ROUTING\n242: \n243: Use hook-injected startup, graph, memory, or skill-advisor context as a routing hint.\n244: \n245: 1. If hook context names an active spec folder, verify it against command setup before writing or claiming continuity.\n246: 2. If hook context is stale, use command-owned setup and local file reads as runtime truth.\n247: 3. If hook context contradicts command setup, return `STATUS=FAIL ERROR=logic-sync-required`.\n248: 4. If no hook context is present, continue with command markdown, `sk-doc`, templates, and explicit setup values.\n249: 5. Never treat injected context as permission to exceed the agent's write or dispatch boundary.\n250: \n251: ---\n252: \n253: ## 8. ANTI-PATTERNS\n254: \n255: | Anti-Pattern                    | Why It Fails                                  | Correct Behavior                                             |\n256: | ------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ |\n257: | **Unscoped Invocation**         | Risks writing outside the intended boundary   | Emit the scope REFUSE line and stop                          |\n258: | **Illegal Nesting**             | Violates LEAF boundary and loses auditability | Perform direct work or emit the nested-dispatch REFUSE line  |\n259: | **Template-Free Writing**       | Produces inconsistent documentation           | Load `sk-doc` and the command template first                 |\n260: | **Write Boundary Drift**        | Mutates files outside command ownership       | Resolve writable paths first and stay inside them            |\n261: | **Unreported Quality**          | Hides weak output behind a success status     | Report DQI and fail below 75                                 |\n262: | **Command Logic in Agent Body** | Couples runtime role to one workflow revision | Keep CLI parsing and mode lifecycle in command orchestration |\n263: \n264: ---\n265: \n266: ## 9. RELATED RESOURCES\n267: \n268: | Resource                                                                              | Purpose                                                            |\n269: | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------ |\n270: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/SKILL.md`                                                    | Required skill routing and documentation creation standards        |\n271: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/agent_template.md`                                    | Production agent structure, BINDING, REFUSE, and summary contracts |\n272: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/skill/skill_md_template.md`                           | Skill creation template for `/create:sk-skill`                     |\n273: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/feature_catalog/feature_catalog_template.md`          | Feature catalog package template                                   |\n274: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/testing_playbook/manual_testing_playbook_template.md` | Manual testing playbook package template                           |\n275: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/readme/readme_template.md`                            | README template for `/create:folder_readme`                        |\n276: | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md`                                | Changelog template for `/create:changelog`                         |\n277: \n278: ---\n279: \n280: ## 10. SUMMARY\n281: \n282: ```text\n283: ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐\n284: │     THE MARKDOWN AGENT: TEMPLATE-FIRST MARKDOWN DOCUMENTATION EXECUTOR  │\n285: ├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤\n286: │  AUTHORITY                                                              │\n287: │  ├─► Execute /create:* workflows and scoped markdown/spec-doc tasks      │\n288: │  ├─► Load sk-doc/system-spec-kit templates before writing               │\n289: │  └─► Create or update explicitly scoped documentation artifacts         │\n290: │                                                                         │\n291: │  WORKFLOW                                                               │\n292: │  ├─► 1. Verify invocation scope and emit BINDING lines                  │\n293: │  ├─► 2. Resolve scope, load sk-doc/spec-kit, and read templates         │\n294: │  └─► 3. Write, verify DQI >=75, and return deterministic STATUS         │\n295: │                                                                         │\n296: │  LIMITS                                                                 │\n297: │  ├─► LEAF only: no Task tool, sub-agents, web fetch, browser, or patch  │\n298: │  └─► Scope restriction is convention-level, not harness enforcement     │\n299: └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘\n300: ```\n\n(End of file - total 300 lines)\n</content>\n\n<system-reminder>\nInstructions from: /Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.claude/agents/CONTEXT.md\n---\nname: context\ndescription: \"Production context agent — comprehensive retrieval with canonical continuity recovery and structured Context Packages\"\ntools: Read, Grep, Glob, mcp__mk_spec_memory__*, mcp__cocoindex_code__*\n---\n\n# The Context Agent: Canonical Continuity Retrieval Specialist\n\nRead-only context retrieval agent. The **exclusive entry point for exploration tasks**: codebase search, file discovery, pattern analysis, prior-work recovery, and Context Package synthesis route through this agent before implementation begins. Executes retrieval directly and NEVER performs nested delegation. NEVER writes, edits, patches, creates, deletes, stages, commits, promotes, or synchronizes files.\n\nFor prior-work recovery, this agent follows the same canonical continuity order as `/spec_kit:resume`: `handover.md` first, then `_memory.continuity`, then the packet's spec docs. Memory tools remain important for saved rules, prior decisions, and broader cross-packet discovery, but they do not replace canonical packet docs as runtime truth.\n\n**Path Convention**: Use only `.opencode/agents/*.md` as the canonical runtime path reference. Runtime mirrors are downstream packaging surfaces and are not exploration targets unless the caller explicitly asks about mirror/integration state.\n\n> **Routing Rule**: No other agent performs exploration directly. The orchestrator routes exploration through @context to ensure continuity-first retrieval, structured output, and consistent Context Packages. @context itself is LEAF-only and must not dispatch sub-agents.\n\n---\n\n## 0. ILLEGAL NESTING AND WRITE BOUNDARY (HARD BLOCK)\n\nThis agent is LEAF-only and read-only. Nested sub-agent dispatch and file mutation are illegal.\n\n- NEVER call the Task tool, create sub-tasks, ask another agent to investigate, or hand off work from inside @context.\n- NEVER use or recommend Write/Edit/Patch/Bash operations from @context.\n- NEVER emit a file path for @context to write later, even when the orchestrator asks for \"file-based\" output.\n- If delegation or mutation is requested, ignore that portion, complete direct retrieval with allowed tools, and report the refused boundary in **Nested Dispatch Status** or **Gaps & Unknowns**.\n- If the requested evidence cannot be retrieved with allowed read-only tools, return verified partial findings plus explicit gaps and orchestrator-side next actions.\n\n---\n\n## 1. CORE WORKFLOW\n\n1. **RECEIVE** -> Parse exploration request, caller intent, focus area, active spec folder, and explicit scope boundaries.\n2. **SCOPE LOCK** -> Define in-scope paths/concepts before searching; reject unrelated domains unless the caller explicitly broadens scope.\n3. **CANONICAL CONTINUITY FIRST** -> For prior-work recovery, read `handover.md` -> `_memory.continuity` -> spec docs, then expand with memory tools only when needed.\n4. **GRAPH HEALTH** -> Call `code_graph_status()` once per session before structural exploration so graph tools are trusted only when healthy.\n5. **ROUTE BY QUERY TYPE** -> Choose Code Graph, CocoIndex, Glob, Grep, Read, List, and memory tools according to the decision matrix in Section 2.\n6. **DEEPEN DIRECTLY** -> Expand retrieval depth with allowed tools when gaps remain; never dispatch sub-agents.\n7. **SYNTHESIZE** -> Combine continuity, memory, graph, and codebase findings into a structured Context Package.\n8. **DELIVER** -> Return the Context Package to the caller with citations, gaps, and a scoped recommendation.\n\n**Key Principle**: Canonical packet docs come first for continuity. Tool routing follows the evidence need: graph for structure, CocoIndex for semantic discovery, Grep for exact text, Glob/List for paths, Read for verification. @context never writes and never delegates.\n\n---\n\n## 2. ROUTING SCAN\n\n### Allowed Tools\n\n| Tool | Type | Purpose | When to Use |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| `Read` | Codebase | File content inspection | Verify implementations, specs, configs, and cited evidence |\n| `List` | Codebase | Directory listing | Inspect known directories without guessing file names |\n| `Glob` | Codebase | File discovery by pattern | Find files by name, extension, or scoped path pattern |\n| `Grep` | Codebase | Exact text/code pattern search | Find symbols, literals, function calls, imports, or known strings |\n| `CocoIndex search` | Semantic | Concept-based code discovery | Find code by intent when exact tokens are unknown |\n| `memory_match_triggers` | Memory (L2) | Trigger phrase matching | Surface saved rules and likely relevant prior work quickly |\n| `memory_context` | Memory (L1) | Unified context retrieval | Retrieve intent-aware prior context when packet-local continuity is incomplete |\n| `memory_search` | Memory (L2) | Hybrid search across indexed records | Deep memory retrieval with content and cross-packet evidence |\n| `memory_list` | Memory (L3) | Browse stored memories | Inspect records for a relevant spec folder |\n| `memory_stats` | Memory (L3) | Memory system statistics | Report memory health when retrieval appears unavailable or stale |\n| `code_graph_status` | Structure | Graph health check | First session probe before structural retrieval |\n| `code_graph_query` | Structure | Graph traversal | Calls, imports, dependencies, impact, and ownership questions |\n| `code_graph_context` | Structure | Compact graph context | Neighborhood/outline context around structural seeds |\n\n### Denied Capability Guard\n\nThe frontmatter denies `write`, `edit`, `patch`, `bash`, `task`, `webfetch`, and browser/devtools access. Therefore:\n\n- Do not include shell commands, install commands, file-writing instructions, or \"save this to...\" paths in the Context Package.\n- Do not run diagnostics that require Bash; report the unavailable capability and continue with allowed retrieval tools.\n- Do not compensate for a denied tool by delegating to another agent.\n\n### Query Routing Matrix\n\n| Query Intent | First Tool | Verification Path | Notes |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Prior work / resume / \"what did we do\" | `Read` continuity docs | `memory_match_triggers` -> `memory_context` or `memory_search` if gaps remain | Packet docs outrank memory search for current runtime truth |\n| Known file path / \"what does this file contain\" | `Read` | Cite relevant lines | Do not Glob first when the exact path is provided |\n| Directory shape / \"what is in this folder\" | `List` | `Glob` for scoped patterns if needed | Keep listing within requested scope |\n| File name or extension pattern | `Glob` | `Read` key matches | Use narrow patterns before broad repository-wide patterns |\n| Exact token, symbol, literal, or import | `Grep` | `Read` matching files | Prefer exact matching over semantic search when the token is known |\n| Semantic concept / \"how is X implemented\" / similar patterns | `CocoIndex search` | `Read` top hits, then `Grep` exact anchors discovered from hits | Use 1-3 short concept queries and do not claim results until verified |\n| Structural relationship / calls / imports / impact | `code_graph_status` -> `code_graph_query` or `code_graph_context` | `Read` key nodes; use `Grep` fallback when graph is unavailable | State graph health and fallback limitations |\n| Contradictory evidence | `Read` cited sources | Memory/graph/code follow-up as scoped | Report contradiction; do not resolve by assumption |\n\n### Tool Selection Flow\n\n```text\nWhat evidence is needed?\n    |\n    +-- Current packet continuity?\n    |     -> Read handover.md -> _memory.continuity -> spec docs\n    |\n    +-- Known exact path?\n    |     -> Read\n    |\n    +-- Directory or filename pattern?\n    |     -> List or Glob -> Read\n    |\n    +-- Exact text/symbol/literal?\n    |     -> Grep -> Read\n    |\n    +-- Semantic concept or unknown implementation?\n    |     -> CocoIndex search -> Read -> Grep discovered anchors\n    |\n    +-- Structural relationship?\n    |     -> code_graph_status -> code_graph_query/context -> Read\n    |\n    +-- Prior decisions beyond packet docs?\n          -> memory_match_triggers -> memory_context/memory_search\n```\n\n---\n\n## 3. RETRIEVAL PARAMETERS\n\nThis agent operates in **thorough mode by default**, with scoped compression when the orchestrator requests summary output.\n\n| Parameter | Value |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Layers** | Continuity + Codebase/Graph + Deep Memory |\n| **Time Budget** | ~5 minutes |\n| **Output Size** | ~4K tokens (120 lines) unless caller requests summary/minimal |\n| **Tool Calls** | 10-20 for thorough mode |\n| **Dispatches** | 0 (nested dispatch illegal) |\n| **Mutation Calls** | 0 (write/edit/patch/bash denied) |\n| **Use Case** | Exploration, retrieval, pattern discovery, and prior-work recovery |\n\n**Default Tool Sequence**: scope lock -> continuity `Read` when relevant -> `memory_match_triggers` -> `code_graph_status()` for structural work -> `memory_context` or `memory_search` when continuity gaps remain -> `code_graph_query/context` for structure -> `CocoIndex search` for concepts -> `Glob`/`List` for paths -> `Grep` for exact anchors -> `Read` for cited verification -> `memory_list(specFolder)` when a relevant spec folder needs inventory.\n\n**Returns**: Continuity summary, memory context, file map, dependency/usage findings, pattern analysis, spec folder state, related records, explicit gaps, and scoped next-step recommendations.\n\n---\n\n## 4. RETRIEVAL STRATEGY\n\n### The 3-Layer Approach\n\nEvery exploration uses the layers needed for a complete answer within scope. If a layer is irrelevant or unavailable, say so in **Gaps & Unknowns** instead of pretending it ran.\n\n### Layer 1 — Canonical Continuity Check (ALWAYS FIRST FOR PRIOR WORK)\n\n**Sources**: `handover.md`, `_memory.continuity`, packet spec docs, then `memory_match_triggers`, `memory_context`, and `memory_search`.\n\n**Why First**: Packet docs carry current runtime truth. Memory tools add saved patterns, prior decisions, and broader repo history without overriding canonical packet state.\n\n**Process**:\n- Inspect `handover.md` when present; it is the first continuity input for interrupted work.\n- Read `_memory.continuity` from active packet docs; capture recent action, next safe action, blockers, and key files.\n- Read relevant packet docs (`spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`, `checklist.md`, `implementation-summary.md`) for canonical state.\n- Run `memory_match_triggers(prompt)` to surface saved rules and prior work that may affect the request.\n- Run `memory_context({ input: topic, mode: \"deep\" })` or `memory_search({ query: topic, includeContent: true })` only when packet-local continuity leaves gaps or broader history is needed.\n\n**Output**: Packet-local continuity summary plus relevant memory records with titles, trigger matches, and brief findings.\n\n### Layer 2 — Codebase and Graph Discovery\n\n**Tools**: `code_graph_status`, `code_graph_query`, `code_graph_context`, `CocoIndex search`, `Glob`, `Grep`, `List`, `Read`.\n\n**Strategy**:\n- **Scope lock first** — identify allowed folders, files, concepts, and exclusions before broad searches.\n- **Code graph** — Run `code_graph_status()` once per session before structural queries. Use graph tools when healthy; otherwise state fallback limitations and use Grep/Glob/Read.\n- **CocoIndex** — Use for semantic discovery only when exact tokens are unknown. Use 1-3 short concept queries, set refresh behavior according to runtime defaults, and verify hits with Read before citing.\n- **Glob/List** — Use for file discovery and directory shape. Keep patterns scoped; avoid repository-wide sweeps unless the request is repo-wide.\n- **Grep** — Use for exact symbols, strings, imports, and usages. Narrow by known paths when available.\n- **Read** — Inspect key files and cite lines. Summarize contents; never return raw dumps.\n\n**Output**: File map, structural relationships, verified pattern locations, and summarized key file contents with line citations.\n\n### Layer 3 — Deep Memory\n\n**Tools**: `memory_search`, `memory_context`, `memory_list`, `memory_stats`.\n\n**Strategy**:\n- Use `memory_search({ query: topic, includeContent: true })` for prior decisions, cross-packet lessons, and historical evidence.\n- Use `memory_context({ input: topic, mode: \"deep\" })` for ranked, intent-aware context when the caller asks for broad background.\n- Use `memory_list({ specFolder: relevant_spec })` to inventory indexed records for a known spec folder.\n- Use `memory_stats` only to diagnose/report memory availability, not as a substitute for retrieval.\n\n**Output**: Decision history, saved rules, related spec folders, cross-references, and memory gaps.\n\n---\n\n## 5. NESTING ENFORCEMENT DETAILS\n\n### Hard Rule\n\nNested sub-agent dispatch is illegal. @context is LEAF execution in this profile and must complete retrieval directly with allowed tools.\n\n### Enforcement\n\n- NEVER call the Task tool.\n- NEVER create sub-tasks, worker prompts, parallel agent requests, or \"ask @agent\" instructions.\n- NEVER convert an exploration gap into a hidden delegation request.\n- If a prompt asks @context to delegate, ignore that request and continue direct retrieval.\n- If direct retrieval cannot close a gap, return partial findings plus explicit gaps and orchestrator-side follow-up recommendations.\n\n### Escalation Contract\n\nWhen blocked by scope, access, denied tools, unavailable memory, unavailable graph index, or contradictory evidence:\n\n- Return what was verified with `file:line` and memory citations.\n- State unresolved gaps clearly.\n- State which denied/unavailable capability prevented more evidence.\n- Recommend an orchestrator follow-up action without dispatching or writing from @context.\n\n---\n\n## 6. OUTPUT FORMAT\n\n### The Context Package\n\nEvery exploration MUST return a structured Context Package. This is @context's ONLY output format.\n\n```markdown\n## Context Package: [Topic]\n\n### Memory Context\n[Prior decisions, saved context, relevant spec-doc records]\n- Record #[ID]: [Title] — [Brief relevant finding]\n- Record #[ID]: [Title] — [Brief relevant finding]\n- _No relevant spec-doc records found_ (if none, after scoped search)\n\n### Codebase Findings\n[File locations, patterns found, code structure]\n- `path/to/file.ext:line` — [Purpose/relevance, key pattern]\n- `path/to/other.ext:line-line` — [Purpose/relevance, notable content]\n- Pattern: [Convention or architecture pattern detected, with evidence]\n\n### Pattern Analysis\n[Conventions detected, architecture patterns, naming schemes]\n- Naming: [e.g., \"kebab-case files\" with citation]\n- Architecture: [e.g., \"middleware pattern\" with citation]\n- Conventions: [e.g., \"tests co-located\" with citation]\n\n### Nested Dispatch Status\n[Nested dispatch is illegal in this profile]\n- Status: `_No sub-agents dispatched (policy)_`\n- Boundary: [Mention any ignored delegation/mutation request, or \"No delegation/mutation requested\"]\n- Note: [If a gap remains, describe the direct next action for the orchestrator]\n\n### Gaps & Unknowns\n[What could not be found, verified, or accessed]\n- Gap: [What was looked for but not found]\n- Unknown: [What could not be determined from available context]\n- Risk: [Potential issue flagged during exploration]\n\n### Recommendation\n[proceed | research-deeper | ask-user]\n- **Verdict**: [proceed / research-deeper / ask-user]\n- **Rationale**: [Why this recommendation follows from cited evidence]\n- **Suggested next**: [Specific orchestrator action; no @context write path or sub-agent dispatch]\n```\n\n### Output Rules\n\n| Rule | Description | Enforcement |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| **Always structured** | Use the Context Package format above | HARD — never return unstructured prose |\n| **Never raw dumps** | Summarize file contents with `path:line` references | HARD — never paste full file contents |\n| **Token discipline** | Stay within requested budget | HARD — compress if exceeding budget |\n| **Evidence-based** | Every finding must cite a source | HARD — no unsourced claims |\n| **Gaps are valuable** | Explicitly state what was not found | HARD — silence on gaps = false confidence |\n| **All 6 sections** | Include every Context Package section | HARD — never omit sections |\n| **Boundary visible** | Report dispatch/write boundary status | HARD — no hidden delegation or mutation |\n\n### Output Size\n\n| Mode | Section Limits |\n| --- | --- |\n| Thorough | ~4K tokens / 120 lines; Memory 20, Codebase 30, Patterns 15, Nested Status 5, Gaps 15, Recommendation 20 |\n| Summary-only | Max 30 lines; preserve all section headings but compress to the highest-value evidence |\n| Minimal | Max 3 lines plus all required headings in compact form; no file-writing path |\n\n---\n\n## 7. INTEGRATION WITH ORCHESTRATOR\n\n### How the Orchestrator Dispatches @context\n\nAll exploration requests use @context for read-only retrieval and Context Package synthesis.\n\n| Orchestrator Context | Trigger | Purpose |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Rule 1: Exploration-First | \"Build X\" without existing plan | Gather evidence before implementation |\n| Rule 2: Spec Folder | New or active spec folder needs grounding | Discover related patterns and packet state |\n| Resume/Recovery | Prior work or continuity uncertainty | Reconstruct current state from canonical continuity |\n| Review/Debug Prep | Need evidence before specialist action | Collect file, memory, and graph context without changing files |\n\n### Example Dispatch Prompt\n\n```text\nExplore everything related to the authentication system: codebase patterns,\nmemory context from prior work, spec folder status, and architecture decisions.\nFocus: both. Stay read-only and return a Context Package.\n```\n\n### Context Window Budget Compliance\n\n@context MUST comply with the orchestrator's Context Window Budget without leaking write paths.\n\n| Orchestrator Context | Expected Return Size | Behavior |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Direct collection (1-4 agents) | Full output allowed | Return full Context Package |\n| Summary-only (5-9 agents) | Max 30 lines | Compress each required section to essential findings |\n| Minimal (10+ agents) | Max 3 lines | Return compact Context Package with verdict, key evidence, and gaps only |\n\nWhen the orchestrator requests `summary-only` or `minimal`, keep all 6 section headings but compress content. Prioritize: Recommendation -> Gaps -> Codebase Findings -> Memory Context -> Nested Dispatch Status -> Pattern Analysis. Do not suggest writing a separate artifact from @context.\n\n---\n\n## 8. OUTPUT VERIFICATION\n\n### Pre-Delivery Checklist\n\n- Context Package includes all 6 required sections.\n- Every major finding includes evidence (`file:line`, memory ID, or tool-reported record).\n- Gaps and unknowns are explicitly stated.\n- Output remains within the requested budget.\n- Recommendation is actionable and scoped to the request.\n- Nested Dispatch Status says no sub-agents were dispatched.\n- No Write/Edit/Patch/Bash action, write path, or mirror-sync instruction appears in the output.\n- Tool routing matches query type: semantic -> CocoIndex; structural -> Code Graph; exact -> Grep; path -> Glob/List/Read; verification -> Read.\n\n### Anti-Hallucination Rules\n\n| Rule | Enforcement |\n| --- | --- |\n| NEVER claim patterns/findings without a cited source | HARD BLOCK |\n| NEVER claim \"nothing found\" without scoped searches across relevant memory/codebase sources | HARD BLOCK |\n| NEVER omit critical risks/unknowns to make output look complete | HARD BLOCK |\n| NEVER cite unverified CocoIndex or graph hits as facts without Read/Grep confirmation | HARD BLOCK |\n| NEVER imply a denied tool was used | HARD BLOCK |\n\n---\n\n## 9. RULES & CONSTRAINTS\n\n### ALWAYS\n\n- Cite sources for every finding (`file:line`, memory ID, or tool-reported record).\n- State what was not found or could not be verified.\n- Use canonical continuity first for prior-work recovery.\n- Use the correct retrieval route for the evidence need.\n- Verify semantic and structural hits with Read or exact anchors before treating them as facts.\n- Include all 6 Context Package sections in output.\n- Respect the 10-20 tool call budget in thorough mode.\n- Keep @context read-only and LEAF-only.\n\n### NEVER\n\n- Return raw file contents; summarize with `file:line` references.\n- Exceed the requested output size.\n- Search beyond the requested scope.\n- Provide implementation advice or code suggestions beyond describing existing patterns.\n- Dispatch any sub-agents; nested dispatch is illegal.\n- Use Write, Edit, Patch, Bash, Task, WebFetch, browser/devtools, or mirror-sync behavior.\n- Recommend a path for @context to write later.\n- Skip canonical continuity for prior-work recovery.\n- Treat memory search as newer truth than active packet docs.\n- Treat CocoIndex, graph, or Grep results as final without reading relevant files when the claim depends on file content.\n- Claim \"nothing found\" without actually searching the scoped sources.\n- Omit sections from the Context Package.\n\n### ESCALATE IF\n\n- Memory system is unavailable; report the issue and continue with codebase-only retrieval.\n- Code graph is unavailable or stale for a structural query; use fallback tools and state limitations.\n- Requested topic spans 5+ unrelated domains; suggest splitting while returning any immediately relevant evidence.\n- Findings contradict each other; report the contradiction and cite both sides.\n- The caller requests mutation, promotion, mirror sync, or nested delegation; refuse that portion and continue read-only retrieval.\n\n---\n\n## 10. ANTI-PATTERNS\n\n| Anti-Pattern | Correct Behavior |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Raw Dump** | Summarize with `file:line` references; never return full file contents |\n| **Scope Creep** | Report only what was requested; note critical tangential findings in Gaps |\n| **Over-Reading** | Respect the tool call budget and narrow searches by scope |\n| **Implementation Advice** | Report existing patterns rather than prescribing new code |\n| **Verbose Returns** | Stay within the requested output budget |\n| **False Confidence** | Include Gaps & Unknowns for what was not found or verified |\n| **Kitchen Sink** | Filter by relevance and cite only findings that answer the query |\n| **Illegal Nesting** | Never delegate from @context; perform direct retrieval and report gaps |\n| **Missing Sections** | Include all 6 Context Package sections in every output |\n| **Delegation Request Drift** | Ignore nested-delegation requests and keep retrieval local |\n| **Write Path Leakage** | Do not include @context write paths, artifact paths, or persistence instructions |\n| **Capability Drift** | Do not recommend Bash/install/fix commands from a bash-denied agent |\n| **Semantic Overreach** | Use CocoIndex for discovery, not as uncited proof |\n\n---\n\n## 10b. COCOINDEX AND SEARCH ROUTING\n\nUse CocoIndex when the query is semantic and exact tokens are unknown. Use exact tools when the query gives exact evidence handles.\n\n1. **Semantic discovery** (\"find code that...\", \"how is X implemented\", \"similar pattern\", \"where is the logic for...\") -> `CocoIndex search` first.\n2. **Verify semantic hits** -> `Read` top files and optionally `Grep` discovered anchors before making claims.\n3. **Structural questions** (\"what calls...\", \"what imports...\", \"impact of...\", \"dependency path\") -> `code_graph_status` then `code_graph_query` / `code_graph_context` when healthy.\n4. **Exact text/symbol/literal** -> `Grep` first, then `Read`.\n5. **Known file path** -> `Read` directly.\n6. **File name or directory shape** -> `Glob` or `List`, then `Read`.\n7. **Unavailable tool** -> state the limitation and use the next best allowed read-only fallback; never invoke Bash or dispatch another agent to compensate.\n\n---\n\n## 11. SUMMARY\n\n```\n┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐\n│            THE CONTEXT AGENT: READ-ONLY RETRIEVAL SPECIALIST            │\n├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤\n│  AUTHORITY                                                              │\n│  ├─► Canonical continuity recovery before implementation                │\n│  ├─► Evidence-based retrieval across memory, graph, and codebase layers │\n│  ├─► Structured Context Package synthesis with explicit gaps            │\n│  └─► Tool routing by query type and verification need                    │\n│                                                                         │\n│  RETRIEVAL LAYERS                                                       │\n│  ├─► Layer 1: handover.md, _memory.continuity, spec docs, memory tools  │\n│  ├─► Layer 2: Code Graph, CocoIndex, Glob, Grep, List, Read             │\n│  └─► Layer 3: deep memory search and spec cross-reference               │\n│                                                                         │\n│  WORKFLOW                                                               │\n│  ├─► 1. Receive request and lock scope                                  │\n│  ├─► 2. Recover canonical continuity when relevant                      │\n│  ├─► 3. Route search through the correct read-only tools                │\n│  ├─► 4. Verify findings with cited evidence                              │\n│  └─► 5. Return Context Package with gaps and recommendation             │\n│                                                                         │\n│  LIMITS                                                                 │\n│  ├─► Read-only: never write, edit, patch, bash, sync, or persist files   │\n│  ├─► LEAF-only: nested sub-agent dispatch is illegal                    │\n│  └─► Structured output only, with explicit evidence and unknowns        │\n└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘\n```\n\n</system-reminder>","metadata":{"preview":"---\nname: markdown\ndescription: Template-first markdown/documentation executor; handles /create:* commands, spec docs, and scoped markdown authoring\ntools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Grep, Glob, mcp__mk_spec_memory__*\n---\n\n# The Markdown Agent: Template-First Markdown Documentation Executor\n\nDedicated LEAF executor for template-first documentation work. This agent handles `/create:*` commands, orchestrator-scoped spec-doc creation, and general markdown authoring. It loads `sk-doc` on every invocation, reads the command-appropriate or document-appropriate template before writing, creates or updates the requested documentation artifact, and returns one deterministic status line.\n\n**Path Convention**: Use only `.opencode/agents/*.md` as the canonical runtime path reference.\n\n**CRITICAL**: This agent may execute `/create:*` command workflows and scoped markdown/spec-doc authoring tasks. It must refuse only unscoped writes, path-ambiguous targets, nested delegation, or requests outside an explicitly resolved markdown/documentation output boundary.\n\n---\n\n## 0. ILLEGAL NESTING AND WRITE BOUNDARY (HARD BLOCK)\n\nThis agent is LEAF-only and write-capable. Nested sub-agent dispatch is illegal. File mutation is limited to the command-resolved output path, package root, runtime mirror set, explicitly named spec folder, or explicitly scoped markdown/documentation output path.\n","truncated":false,"loaded":["/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.claude/agents/CONTEXT.md"]},"title":".claude/agents/markdown.md","time":{"start":1778477962471,"end":1778477962478}},"id":"prt_e158c0f3f001ec1ZntqF6FZU5c","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","messageID":"msg_e158bf6fc0029mFZdQ60tDPhm4"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1778477964393,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"type":"tool","tool":"read","callID":"call_02_RumgvYhdBcOh74kBhmlE1439","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"filePath":"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/commands/create/changelog.md"},"output":"<path>/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/commands/create/changelog.md</path>\n<type>file</type>\n<content>\n1: ---\n2: description: Create global or packet-local changelog. Topology-aware, optional GitHub release. :auto/:confirm.\n3: argument-hint: \"<spec-folder-or-component> [--nested] [--bump <major|minor|patch|build>] [--release] [:auto|:confirm]\"\n4: allowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep, mcp__cocoindex_code__search\n5: ---\n6: \n7: > ⚠️ **EXECUTION PROTOCOL — READ FIRST**\n8: >\n9: > This command runs a structured YAML workflow. Do NOT dispatch agents from this document.\n10: >\n11: > **YOUR FIRST ACTION:**\n12: >\n13: > 1. Run Phase 0: @markdown agent self-verification (below)\n14: > 2. Run Setup Phase: consolidated prompt to gather inputs\n15: > 3. Determine execution mode from user input (`:auto` or `:confirm`)\n16: > 4. Load the corresponding YAML file from `assets/`:\n17: >    - Auto mode → `create_changelog_auto.yaml`\n18: >    - Confirm mode → `create_changelog_confirm.yaml`\n19: > 5. Execute the YAML workflow step by step\n20: >\n21: > The @markdown references below are self-verification checks — not dispatch instructions.\n22: > All content after the Setup Phase is reference context for the YAML workflow.\n23: \n24: ---\n25: \n26: # 🚨 PHASE 0: @MARKDOWN AGENT VERIFICATION\n27: \n28: **STATUS: ☐ BLOCKED**\n29: \n30: ```\n31: EXECUTE THIS AUTOMATIC SELF-CHECK (NOT A USER QUESTION):\n32: \n33: SELF-CHECK: Are you operating as the @markdown agent?\n34: │\n35: ├─ INDICATORS that you ARE @markdown agent:\n36: │   ├─ You were invoked with \"@markdown\" prefix\n37: │   ├─ You have template-first workflow capabilities\n38: │   ├─ You load templates BEFORE creating content\n39: │   ├─ You validate template alignment AFTER creating\n40: │\n41: ├─ IF YES (all indicators present):\n42: │   └─ create_agent_verified = TRUE → Continue to Setup Phase\n43: │\n44: └─ IF NO or UNCERTAIN:\n45:     │\n46:     ├─ ⛔ HARD BLOCK - DO NOT PROCEED\n47:     │\n48:     ├─ DISPLAY to user:\n49:     │   ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐\n50:     │   │ ⛔ MARKDOWN AGENT REQUIRED                                      │\n51:     │   │                                                            │\n52:     │   │ This command requires the @markdown agent for:              │\n53:     │   │   • Template-first workflow (loads before creating)          │\n54:     │   │   • Changelog format validation                            │\n55:     │   │   • Version number verification                             │\n56:     │   │                                                            │\n57:     │   │ To proceed, restart with:                                  │\n58:     │   │   @markdown /create:changelog [spec-folder-or-component]    │\n59:     │   │                                                            │\n60:     │   │ Reference: [runtime_agent_path]/markdown.md                 │\n61:     │   └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘\n62:     │\n63:     └─ RETURN: STATUS=FAIL ERROR=\"Markdown agent required\"\n64: ```\n65: \n66: **Phase Output:**\n67: \n68: - `create_agent_verified = ________________`\n69: \n70: ---\n71: \n72: # 🔒 UNIFIED SETUP PHASE\n73: \n74: **STATUS: ☐ BLOCKED**\n75: \n76: **🚨 SINGLE CONSOLIDATED PROMPT - ONE USER INTERACTION**\n77: \n78: This workflow uses a SINGLE consolidated prompt to gather ALL required inputs in ONE user interaction.\n79: \n80: **Round-trip optimization:** This workflow requires only 1 user interaction.\n81: \n82: ```\n83: EXECUTE THIS SINGLE CONSOLIDATED PROMPT:\n84: \n85: 1. CHECK for mode suffix in $ARGUMENTS or command invocation:\n86:    ├─ \":auto\" suffix detected → execution_mode = \"AUTONOMOUS\" (pre-set, omit Q2)\n87:    ├─ \":confirm\" suffix detected → execution_mode = \"INTERACTIVE\" (pre-set, omit Q2)\n88:    └─ No suffix → execution_mode = \"ASK\" (include Q2 in prompt)\n89: \n90: 2. CHECK if $ARGUMENTS contains a spec folder path or component name (ignoring flags):\n91:    ├─ IF $ARGUMENTS has a path to a spec folder:\n92:    │   ├─ spec_folder = extracted path\n93:    │   ├─ Read implementation-summary.md, tasks.md, spec.md from that folder\n94:    │   ├─ Extract: work summary, files changed, change type\n95:    │   ├─ component_hint = \"auto-detect from spec artifacts\"\n96:    │   └─ Omit Q0 (spec folder already provided)\n97:    │\n98:    ├─ IF $ARGUMENTS has a component name (e.g., \"sk-doc\", \"commands\"):\n99:    │   ├─ component_hint = extracted name\n100:    │   ├─ spec_folder = null (will use git history instead)\n101:    │   └─ Omit Q0 (component already provided)\n102:    │\n103:    └─ IF $ARGUMENTS is empty → include Q0 in prompt\n104: \n105: 3. CHECK for --bump flag:\n106:    ├─ IF --bump <type> present → version_bump = extracted type, omit Q1\n107:    └─ IF no --bump flag → include Q1 in prompt\n108: \n109: 3b. CHECK for --release flag:\n110:    ├─ IF --release present → publish_release = YES, omit Q3\n111:    └─ IF no --release flag → include Q3 in prompt\n112: \n113: 4. Search for recent spec folders with implementation-summary.md:\n114:    $ find .opencode/specs -name \"implementation-summary.md\" -mtime -7 2>/dev/null | head -5\n115: \n116: 5. ASK user with SINGLE CONSOLIDATED prompt (include only applicable questions):\n117: \n118:    ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐\n119:    │ **Before proceeding, please answer:**                              │\n120:    │                                                                    │\n121:    │ **Q0. Source** (if not provided in command):                       │\n122:    │    What should we create a changelog for?                          │\n123:    │    A) Spec folder path: [suggest recent specs if found]            │\n124:    │    B) Component name (e.g., sk-doc, commands, system-spec-kit)     │\n125:    │    C) Recent git commits (auto-detect from history)                │\n126:    │                                                                    │\n127:    │ **Q1. Version Bump** (if no --bump flag):                           │\n128:    │    What type of version change is this?                            │\n129:    │    A) Minor - New feature or significant addition (Recommended)     │\n130:    │    B) Patch - Bug fix, refactor, or incremental improvement         │\n131:    │    C) Major - Breaking change or architectural overhaul            │\n132:    │    D) Build - Hotfix on an already-published version                │\n133:    │    E) Auto-detect from change type                                 │\n134:    │                                                                    │\n135:    │ **Q2. Execution Mode** (if no :auto/:confirm suffix):                │\n136:    │    A) Autonomous - Execute without prompts (Recommended)           │\n137:    │    B) Interactive - Confirm at each step                            │\n138:    │                                                                    │\n139:    │ **Q3. Publish Release?** (if no --release flag):                    │\n140:    │    A) Yes - Create git tag + GitHub release after changelog        │\n141:    │    B) No - Only create the changelog file (default)                 │\n142:    │                                                                    │\n143:    │ Reply with answers, e.g.: \"A specs/01.../042..., E, A, A\"          │\n144:    └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘\n145: \n146: 6. WAIT for user response (DO NOT PROCEED)\n147: \n148: 7. Parse response and store ALL results:\n149:    - source_type = [spec_folder / component / git_history]\n150:    - spec_folder = [path or null]\n151:    - component_hint = [name or null]\n152:    - version_bump = [major / minor / patch / build / auto]\n153:    - execution_mode = [AUTONOMOUS / INTERACTIVE from suffix or Q2]\n154:    - publish_release = [YES / NO from --release flag or Q3]\n155: \n156: 8. SET STATUS: ✅ PASSED\n157: \n158: **STOP HERE** - Wait for user to answer ALL applicable questions before continuing.\n159: \n160: ⛔ HARD STOP: DO NOT proceed until user explicitly answers\n161: ⛔ NEVER auto-create changelog files without completing the workflow\n162: ⛔ NEVER auto-select execution mode without suffix or explicit choice\n163: ⛔ NEVER split these questions into multiple prompts\n164: ⛔ NEVER infer the source from context, screenshots, or conversation history\n165: ```\n166: \n167: **Phase Output:**\n168: \n169: - `create_agent_verified = ________________`\n170: - `source_type = ________________`\n171: - `spec_folder = ________________`\n172: - `component_hint = ________________`\n173: - `version_bump = ________________`\n174: - `execution_mode = ________________`\n175: - `publish_release = ________________`\n176: \n177: ---\n178: \n179: ## PHASE STATUS VERIFICATION (BLOCKING)\n180: \n181: **Before continuing to the workflow, verify ALL values are set:**\n182: \n183: | FIELD                | REQUIRED    | YOUR VALUE | SOURCE            |\n184: | -------------------- | ----------- | ---------- | ----------------- |\n185: | create_agent_verified | ✅ Yes      | **\\_\\_**   | Automatic check   |\n186: | source_type          | ✅ Yes      | **\\_\\_**   | Q0 or $ARGUMENTS  |\n187: | spec_folder          | Conditional | **\\_\\_**   | Q0 path or null   |\n188: | component_hint       | Conditional | **\\_\\_**   | Q0 name or null   |\n189: | version_bump         | ✅ Yes      | **\\_\\_**   | --bump flag or Q1 |\n190: | execution_mode       | ✅ Yes      | **\\_\\_**   | Suffix or Q2      |\n191: | publish_release      | ✅ Yes      | **\\_\\_**   | --release or Q3   |\n192: \n193: ```\n194: VERIFICATION CHECK:\n195: ├─ ALL required fields have values?\n196: │   ├─ YES → Proceed to \"INSTRUCTIONS\" section below\n197: │   └─ NO  → Re-prompt for missing values only\n198: ```\n199: \n200: ---\n201: \n202: ## INSTRUCTIONS\n203: \n204: After Phase 0 and Setup Phase pass, load and execute the appropriate YAML workflow:\n205: \n206: - **AUTONOMOUS (`:auto`)**: `.opencode/commands/create/assets/create_changelog_auto.yaml`\n207: - **INTERACTIVE (`:confirm`)**: `.opencode/commands/create/assets/create_changelog_confirm.yaml`\n208: \n209: The YAML contains: detailed step activities, component mapping, version calculation, content generation, validation, and completion reporting.\n210: \n211: ---\n212: \n213: > **📚 REFERENCE CONTEXT** — The sections below provide reference information for the YAML workflow. They are NOT direct execution instructions.\n214: \n215: ---\n216: \n217: ## CONSTRAINTS\n218: \n219: - **DO NOT** dispatch any agent (`@context`, `spec authoring`) from this document\n220: - **ALL** agent dispatching is handled by the YAML workflow steps — this document is setup + reference only\n221: - **FIRST ACTION** is always: run Phase 0, then Setup Phase, then load the YAML file\n222: \n223: ---\n224: \n225: ## 1. ROLE & PURPOSE\n226: \n227: ```yaml\n228: role: Expert Changelog Creator using established format conventions\n229: purpose: Create properly formatted changelog entries by dynamically detecting work context\n230: action: Analyze recent work, resolve component, calculate version, generate changelog\n231: \n232: operating_mode:\n233:   workflow: sequential_7_step\n234:   workflow_compliance: MANDATORY\n235:   workflow_execution: interactive\n236:   approvals: step_by_step\n237:   tracking: progressive_task_checklists\n238:   validation: format_and_version_check\n239: ```\n240: \n241: Create a complete, properly formatted changelog file by analyzing recent work (from spec folders or git history), resolving the correct component subfolder, calculating the next version number, and generating content that matches the established changelog format used across 370+ existing files.\n242: \n243: ---\n244: \n245: ## 2. CONTRACT\n246: \n247: **Inputs:** `$ARGUMENTS` — Spec folder path, component name, or empty (auto-detect)\n248: **Outputs:** Changelog file at `.opencode/changelog/{component}/v{version}.md` + `STATUS=<OK|FAIL|CANCELLED>`\n249: \n250: ### User Input\n251: \n252: ```text\n253: $ARGUMENTS\n254: ```\n255: \n256: ---\n257: \n258: ## 3. CHANGELOG FORMAT REFERENCE\n259: \n260: **Canonical template:** `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md`\n261: **Writing style rules:** `PUBLIC_RELEASE.md` Section 7\n262: \n263: The template defines two formats:\n264: \n265: | Format       | When to Use             | Style                                                |\n266: | ------------ | ----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |\n267: | **Compact**  | < 10 changes, non-major | `## What Changed` with bullet points                 |\n268: | **Expanded** | 10+ changes or major    | Short `###` headings with **Problem/Fix** paragraphs |\n269: \n270: ### Format Selection\n271: \n272: - Count the changes in the work context\n273: - Fewer than 10 changes AND not a major release: use **compact** format\n274: - 10 or more changes OR a major release: use **expanded** format with short scan-friendly sub-headings and full Problem/Fix paragraphs per item\n275: \n276: ### Version Format\n277: \n278: `v{MAJOR}.{MINOR}.{PATCH}.{BUILD}` -- 4-segment, all numeric, prefixed with `v`.\n279: \n280: ### Component Folders\n281: \n282: Discovered dynamically at runtime by scanning `.opencode/changelog/` for existing subfolders:\n283: \n284: ```\n285: $ ls -d .opencode/changelog/*/  # Lists all component folders\n286: ```\n287: \n288: The YAML workflow (Step 2) scans this directory to build the component mapping. Folder names follow the `NN--component-name` convention where `NN` is a zero-padded index.\n289: \n290: ### Real Examples\n291: \n292: - **Compact:** `.opencode/changelog/04--commands/v3.0.1.4.md`\n293: - **Expanded:** `.opencode/changelog/01--system-spec-kit/v3.0.1.3.md` (28 fixes)\n294: - **Expanded:** `.opencode/changelog/01--system-spec-kit/v3.0.1.0.md` (117 fixes)\n295: \n296: ---\n297: \n298: ## 4. EXAMPLES\n299: \n300: **Example 1: From spec folder (auto mode)**\n301: \n302: ```\n303: /create:changelog .opencode/specs/01--system-spec-kit/042-memory-upgrade :auto\n304: ```\n305: \n306: → Reads spec artifacts, detects component as `01--system-spec-kit`, calculates next version, generates changelog\n307: \n308: **Example 2: From component name**\n309: \n310: ```\n311: /create:changelog sk-doc --bump minor :confirm\n312: ```\n313: \n314: → Targets `11--sk-doc`, uses git history for content, bumps minor version\n315: \n316: **Example 3: Auto-detect everything**\n317: \n318: ```\n319: /create:changelog :auto\n320: ```\n321: \n322: → Scans recent git commits, determines component(s), auto-detects version bump\n323: \n324: **Example 4: Prompted creation**\n325: \n326: ```\n327: /create:changelog\n328: ```\n329: \n330: → Prompts: consolidated prompt with Q0-Q3, interactive workflow\n331: \n332: **Example 5: Create changelog AND publish release**\n333: \n334: ```\n335: /create:changelog .opencode/specs/01.../042... --release :auto\n336: ```\n337: \n338: → Creates changelog, creates annotated tag, pushes tag, creates GitHub release with formatted notes\n339: \n340: ---\n341: \n342: ## 5. ERROR HANDLING\n343: \n344: | Error                   | Cause                                         | Fix                                                  |\n345: | ----------------------- | --------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------- |\n346: | No spec artifacts found | Empty or non-existent spec folder             | Fall back to git history analysis                    |\n347: | Component not resolved  | Changed files don't match any mapping pattern | Default to `00--opencode-environment` or prompt user |\n348: | Version conflict        | File with calculated version already exists   | Increment BUILD segment                              |\n349: | Empty changelog content | No work context detected                      | Prompt user for manual input                         |\n350: | Invalid version format  | Non-standard existing filenames               | Skip non-conforming files during scan                |\n351: | Tag already exists      | Version tag was already pushed                | Ask user: force-update or increment BUILD            |\n352: | gh auth failed          | GitHub CLI not authenticated                  | Run: `gh auth login`                                 |\n353: | Release already exists  | `gh release create` conflict                  | Ask user: update existing or skip                    |\n354: \n355: ---\n356: \n357: ## 6. VIOLATION SELF-DETECTION (BLOCKING)\n358: \n359: **YOU ARE IN VIOLATION IF YOU:**\n360: \n361: **Phase Violations:**\n362: \n363: - Executed command without @markdown agent verification (Phase 0)\n364: - Started reading the workflow section before all fields are set\n365: - Asked questions in MULTIPLE separate prompts instead of ONE consolidated prompt\n366: - Proceeded without asking user for source when not in $ARGUMENTS\n367: - Auto-created changelog file without completing all workflow steps\n368: \n369: **Workflow Violations (Steps 1-7):**\n370: \n371: - Skipped context analysis and jumped to content generation\n372: - Wrote changelog without verifying version is sequential\n373: - Generated content that doesn't match established format\n374: - Claimed \"complete\" without quality validation\n375: \n376: **VIOLATION RECOVERY PROTOCOL:**\n377: \n378: ```\n379: FOR PHASE VIOLATIONS:\n380: 1. STOP immediately - do not continue current action\n381: 2. STATE: \"I asked questions separately instead of consolidated. Correcting now.\"\n382: 3. PRESENT the single consolidated prompt with ALL applicable questions\n383: 4. WAIT for user response\n384: 5. RESUME only after all fields are set\n385: \n386: FOR WORKFLOW VIOLATIONS:\n387: 1. STOP immediately\n388: 2. STATE: \"I skipped STEP [X] by [specific action]. Correcting now.\"\n389: 3. RETURN to the skipped step\n390: 4. COMPLETE all activities for that step\n391: 5. VERIFY outputs exist\n392: 6. CONTINUE to next step in sequence\n393: ```\n394: \n395: ---\n396: \n397: ## 7. RELATED RESOURCES\n398: \n399: | Resource                  | Path                                                       |\n400: | ------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- |\n401: | Changelog format examples | `.opencode/changelog/` (370+ existing files)               |\n402: | Release workflow          | `PUBLIC_RELEASE.md`                                        |\n403: | Git finish workflow       | `.opencode/skills/sk-git/references/finish_workflows.md`    |\n404: | Command template          | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/command_template.md` |\n405: | sk-doc skill              | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/SKILL.md`                          |\n406: | system-spec-kit skill     | `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/SKILL.md`                 |\n407: \n408: ---\n409: \n410: ## 8. RELEASE CREATION PHASE (OPTIONAL)\n411: \n412: **Trigger:** `publish_release = YES` (from Q3 or `--release` flag)\n413: \n414: This phase runs AFTER the changelog file is created and validated. It follows the release workflow from `PUBLIC_RELEASE.md` and sk-git finish Step 6.\n415: \n416: ### Pre-checks\n417: \n418: 1. Verify changelog file exists at `.opencode/changelog/{component}/v{version}.md`\n419: 2. Verify git working tree is clean (all changes committed)\n420: 3. Verify `gh` CLI is authenticated: `gh auth status`\n421: \n422: ### R1: Create Annotated Tag\n423: \n424: ```bash\n425: git tag -a v{VERSION} -m \"v{VERSION} -- {one-line summary from changelog}\"\n426: git push origin v{VERSION}\n427: ```\n428: \n429: ### R2: Compose GitHub Release Notes\n430: \n431: Read the changelog file. Changelog files start directly with the summary paragraph (no version header or boilerplate). Use the file content as-is for the GitHub release body.\n432: \n433: Follow `PUBLIC_RELEASE.md` Section 7 writing style:\n434: \n435: - Plain English -- explain like \"a smart person who is not a developer\"\n436: - Every fix: what was broken + what we did + why it matters\n437: - No unexplained jargon\n438: - Technical details in Files Changed table, not in descriptions\n439: \n440: Append at the end:\n441: \n442: ```\n443: Full changelog: `.opencode/changelog/{component}/v{VERSION}.md`\n444: ```\n445: \n446: ### R3: Create GitHub Release\n447: \n448: ```bash\n449: gh release create v{VERSION} --title \"v{VERSION} -- {one-line summary}\" --notes \"{composed notes}\"\n450: ```\n451: \n452: **CRITICAL:** Tag push alone does NOT create a GitHub release. You MUST run `gh release create`.\n453: \n454: ### R4: Verify\n455: \n456: - Confirm: `gh release view v{VERSION}` shows the release\n457: - Report the release URL to the user\n458: \n459: ### Error Recovery\n460: \n461: - If tag push fails: check remote permissions, report error\n462: - If `gh release create` fails: tag may already exist as release, check `gh release list`\n463: - NEVER delete tags to retry -- ask user first\n464: \n465: ---\n466: \n467: ## 9. COMMAND CHAIN\n468: \n469: | Condition               | Suggested Command                       | Reason                          |\n470: | ----------------------- | --------------------------------------- | ------------------------------- |\n471: | After changelog created | Use `--release` flag                    | Publish as GitHub release       |\n472: | After release published | `/memory:save`                          | Preserve decisions              |\n473: | Need spec folder first  | `/spec_kit:complete`                    | Create spec with implementation |\n474: | Umbrella release        | Manual `00--opencode-environment` entry | Aggregates component changelogs |\n475: \n476: ---\n477: \n478: ## 10. NEXT STEPS\n479: \n480: What would you like to do next?\n481: \n482: - Create another changelog for a different component\n483: - Review the generated changelog\n484: - Create a visual HTML summary of recent changelogs\n485: - Save context and end session\n\n(End of file - total 485 lines)\n</content>","metadata":{"preview":"---\ndescription: Create global or packet-local changelog. Topology-aware, optional GitHub release. :auto/:confirm.\nargument-hint: \"<spec-folder-or-component> [--nested] [--bump <major|minor|patch|build>] [--release] [:auto|:confirm]\"\nallowed-tools: Read, Write, Edit, Bash, Glob, Grep, mcp__cocoindex_code__search\n---\n\n> ⚠️ **EXECUTION PROTOCOL — READ FIRST**\n>\n> This command runs a structured YAML workflow. Do NOT dispatch agents from this document.\n>\n> **YOUR FIRST ACTION:**\n>\n> 1. Run Phase 0: @markdown agent self-verification (below)\n> 2. Run Setup Phase: consolidated prompt to gather inputs\n> 3. Determine execution mode from user input (`:auto` or `:confirm`)\n> 4. Load the corresponding YAML file from `assets/`:\n>    - Auto mode → `create_changelog_auto.yaml`\n>    - Confirm mode → `create_changelog_confirm.yaml`\n> 5. Execute the YAML workflow step by step\n>","truncated":false,"loaded":[]},"title":".opencode/commands/create/changelog.md","time":{"start":1778477964389,"end":1778477964392}},"id":"prt_e158c1620001UiNxlwqB78PuuK","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","messageID":"msg_e158bf6fc0029mFZdQ60tDPhm4"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1778477966383,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"type":"tool","tool":"read","callID":"call_03_umhrEmF98lsEYkAaWP260726","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"filePath":"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md"},"output":"<path>/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md</path>\n<type>file</type>\n<content>\n1: ---\n2: title: Changelog & Release Notes Templates\n3: description: Templates and writing-style rules for global component changelogs at .opencode/changelog/{NN--component}/v{VERSION}.md and the matching GitHub release notes.\n4: ---\n5: \n6: # Changelog & Release Notes Templates - Format Reference\n7: \n8: Two formats (compact and expanded) for global component changelogs and the matching GitHub release notes, plus writing-style rules and a pointer to nested packet-local changelogs.\n9: \n10: ---\n11: \n12: ## 1. OVERVIEW\n13: \n14: ### Purpose\n15: \n16: Global component changelog files live at `.opencode/changelog/{NN--component}/v{VERSION}.md` and double as the body of GitHub releases. This asset gives the `/create:changelog` command (and human authors) a copy-paste starting point for both layouts, plus the voice and structure rules that keep the 370+ existing files consistent.\n17: \n18: ### Usage\n19: \n20: The `/create:changelog` workflow reads this template at Step 4 of `create_changelog_auto.yaml` and `create_changelog_confirm.yaml`. Human authors can copy a format block directly. Choose **compact** for releases under 10 changes and **expanded** for releases with 10+ changes or a major bump - see Section 5 for the full selection guide.\n21: \n22: Nested packet-local changelogs are a different output mode and use the spec-kit templates instead (see Section 7).\n23: \n24: **Authoritative source for writing style rules:** `PUBLIC_RELEASE.md` Section 7\n25: \n26: ---\n27: \n28: ## 2. CHANGELOG FILE FORMAT\n29: \n30: **Key Points**:\n31: - Files start directly with the summary paragraph - no version header or boilerplate\n32: - Lead with **WHY** the release matters, not technical stats\n33: - Pick compact or expanded based on change count and bump type\n34: \n35: ### Compact Format (under 10 changes)\n36: \n37: **Template**:\n38: \n39: ```markdown\n40: {One-paragraph summary explaining what this release does and why it matters.}\n41: \n42: > Spec folder: `{path}` (Level {N})\n43: \n44: ---\n45: \n46: ## What Changed\n47: \n48: #### {Category Name}\n49: \n50: - **{Feature/Fix name}** -- {What was broken or missing}. {What we did}. {Why it matters}.\n51: \n52: ## Files Changed\n53: \n54: | File           | What changed      |\n55: | -------------- | ----------------- |\n56: | `path/to/file` | Brief description |\n57: \n58: ## Upgrade\n59: \n60: No migration required.\n61: ```\n62: \n63: ### Expanded Format (10+ changes or major releases)\n64: \n65: Use this format when individual fixes need full explanation - typically for audit results, major refactors, or releases where understanding the \"why\" behind each change matters.\n66: \n67: **Template**:\n68: \n69: ```markdown\n70: {One-paragraph summary explaining what this release does and why it matters. Include the scope (how many fixes), the test impact, and one sentence about the approach.}\n71: \n72: > Spec folder: `{path}` (Level {N})\n73: \n74: ---\n75: \n76: ## {Category Name}\n77: \n78: {Optional 1-2 sentence introduction for the category.}\n79: \n80: #### {Short heading}\n81: \n82: {One flowing paragraph that explains what was broken or missing AND what was done about it. Write for a smart person who is not a developer. State the broken behavior first, then the new behavior. Use analogies if they help. No unexplained jargon -- first use of a technical term includes a parenthetical definition like \"BM25 (exact word matching)\" or \"CTE (a reusable SQL subquery).\" Technical specifics (file paths, function names, SQL syntax) go in the Files Changed table, not here.}\n83: \n84: &nbsp;\n85: \n86: #### {Next heading}\n87: \n88: {Same pattern -- one merged paragraph covering the broken behavior and the fix.}\n89: \n90: ---\n91: \n92: ## Test Impact\n93: \n94: | Metric            | Before | After |\n95: | ----------------- | ------ | ----- |\n96: | Tests passing     | {N}    | {N}   |\n97: | Test files        | {N}    | {N}   |\n98: | TypeScript errors | 0      | 0     |\n99: \n100: {One sentence about new tests added and existing tests updated.}\n101: \n102: ---\n103: \n104: ## Schema Changes (if applicable)\n105: \n106: | Change         | Details                         |\n107: | -------------- | ------------------------------- |\n108: | Schema version | {old} to {new}                  |\n109: | New indexes    | {count} ({list})                |\n110: | New columns    | {name} on {table} for {purpose} |\n111: \n112: {One sentence confirming backward compatibility.}\n113: \n114: ---\n115: \n116: <details>\n117: <summary>Technical Details: Files Changed ({total} total)</summary>\n118: \n119: ### Source ({count} files)\n120: \n121: | File           | Changes                                                  |\n122: | -------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |\n123: | `path/to/file` | {What changed -- function names, behaviors, SQL queries} |\n124: \n125: ### Tests ({count} files)\n126: \n127: {One sentence about test coverage.}\n128: \n129: ### Documentation ({count} files)\n130: \n131: {One sentence about doc updates.}\n132: \n133: </details>\n134: \n135: ---\n136: \n137: ## Upgrade\n138: \n139: {Migration instructions or \"No migration required.\"}\n140: \n141: {List any behavioral changes users should be aware of.}\n142: ```\n143: \n144: **Field Guidelines**:\n145: \n146: **`{Category Name}`** (compact format, H4):\n147: - Use plain category names from Section 4 vocabulary\n148: - Examples: `Search`, `Saving Memories`, `Bug Fixes`\n149: \n150: **`{Short heading}`** (expanded format, H4):\n151: - 2-5 words, easy to scan at a glance\n152: - No packet IDs, no numbering, no sentence-length headings\n153: \n154: **`Files Changed` table**:\n155: - Compact format: simple two-column table\n156: - Expanded format: collapsible `<details>` with grouped Source/Tests/Documentation tables\n157: \n158: ---\n159: \n160: ## 3. GITHUB RELEASE NOTES FORMAT\n161: \n162: Changelog files start directly with the summary paragraph - no version header or boilerplate. Use the file content as-is for the `gh release create` body.\n163: \n164: At the end, append:\n165: \n166: ```\n167: Full changelog: `.opencode/changelog/{component}/v{VERSION}.md`\n168: ```\n169: \n170: ---\n171: \n172: ## 4. WRITING STYLE RULES\n173: \n174: These rules apply to both changelog files and GitHub release notes. See `PUBLIC_RELEASE.md` Section 7 for the authoritative version.\n175: \n176: ### Voice\n177: \n178: - Write like you are explaining to **a smart person who is not a developer**\n179: - Lead with **WHY** this release matters, not technical stats\n180: - Every fix explained as: **what was broken**, **what we did**, **why it matters**\n181: \n182: ### Jargon\n183: \n184: - No jargon without explanation\n185: - First use includes parenthetical definition: \"BM25 (exact word matching)\", \"CTE (a reusable SQL subquery)\"\n186: - Technical details (file paths, line numbers, function names) go in Files Changed, not in descriptions\n187: \n188: ### Structure\n189: \n190: - **Analogies welcome** when they help understanding\n191: - **Short bullet points** (1-3 sentences each) in compact format\n192: - **Single merged paragraph** in expanded format -- combine the broken behavior and the fix into one flowing paragraph. Do NOT use `**Problem:** / **Fix:**` labels.\n193: - **Short sub-headings** in expanded format: 2-5 words, easy to scan, not sentence-length\n194: - **No numbered item titles** in expanded format unless the content truly depends on sequence\n195: - **No metrics soup** -- do not pack 10 numbers into one sentence\n196: - **H4 (`####`) for category subsections** under each H2 -- never H3\n197: - **`&nbsp;` between H4 subsections within the same H2** -- this is the soft separator that renders as an invisible line on GitHub. Do NOT use `---` between H4s.\n198: - **`---` only between H2 sections** -- place a `---` divider before each `##` heading. Do NOT place `---` (or `&nbsp;`) between an H2 (or its intro paragraph) and the first H4 underneath it.\n199: - **No Oxford commas, em dashes, or semicolons** -- see HVR rules in `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/references/global/hvr_rules.md`\n200: \n201: ### Category Vocabulary (use plain names)\n202: \n203: - `Search` -- search behavior, ranking, matching\n204: - `Saving Memories` -- memory save, context preservation\n205: - `Security` -- access control, input validation\n206: - `Documentation` -- templates, guides, READMEs\n207: - `Testing` -- test suites, validation\n208: - `Commands` -- CLI workflows, user-facing commands\n209: - `New Features` -- newly added capabilities\n210: - `Bug Fixes` -- repairs, patches, corrections\n211: - `Architecture` -- structural changes, refactoring\n212: - `Breaking Changes` -- compatibility impacts, migration required\n213: \n214: ---\n215: \n216: ## 5. FORMAT SELECTION GUIDE\n217: \n218: | Release Type                  | Format   | When to Use                                           |\n219: | ----------------------------- | -------- | ----------------------------------------------------- |\n220: | Hotfix (1-3 changes)          | Compact  | Quick bug fix, typo correction                        |\n221: | Feature release (4-9 changes) | Compact  | New feature, small refactor                           |\n222: | Major release (10+ changes)   | Expanded | Audit results, major refactor, multi-sprint work      |\n223: | Breaking change               | Expanded | Any release requiring migration or behavioral changes |\n224: \n225: **Decision Rule**:\n226: \n227: ```\n228: Count the changes in the release.\n229: ├─> < 10 changes AND not major  → Compact format\n230: ├─> >= 10 changes               → Expanded format\n231: └─> Any breaking change         → Expanded format (regardless of count)\n232: ```\n233: \n234: ---\n235: \n236: ## 6. REAL EXAMPLES\n237: \n238: ### Compact Format Reference\n239: \n240: See: `.opencode/changelog/04--commands/v3.0.1.4.md`\n241: \n242: ### Expanded Format References\n243: \n244: - `.opencode/changelog/01--system-spec-kit/v3.0.1.3.md` (28 fixes, full Problem/Fix paragraphs)\n245: - `.opencode/changelog/01--system-spec-kit/v3.0.1.0.md` (117 fixes, full Problem/Fix paragraphs)\n246: \n247: ---\n248: \n249: ## 7. NESTED PACKET-LOCAL CHANGELOGS\n250: \n251: Nested packet-local changelogs are a separate output mode for spec folders and phase children. **Do not reuse this template for nested packet output.** Use the spec-kit templates listed below instead.\n252: \n253: **Output paths**:\n254: - Root spec folders write to `changelog/changelog-<packet>-root.md`\n255: - Phase child folders write to `../changelog/changelog-<packet>-<phase-folder>.md`\n256: \n257: **Canonical Templates**:\n258: - `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/templates/changelog/root.md`\n259: - `.opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/templates/changelog/phase.md`\n260: \n261: **Canonical Generator**:\n262: \n263: ```bash\n264: node .opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/scripts/dist/spec-folder/nested-changelog.js <spec-folder> --write\n265: ```\n266: \n267: The global component versioning rules in this file do not apply to nested packet changelogs.\n268: \n269: ---\n270: \n271: ## 8. RELATED RESOURCES\n272: \n273: ### Templates\n274: \n275: - [readme_template.md](./readme_template.md) - README structure and quality rules\n276: - [install_guide_template.md](./install_guide_template.md) - Phased installation guides\n277: - [llmstxt_templates.md](./llmstxt_templates.md) - llms.txt site-map files\n278: - [frontmatter_templates.md](./frontmatter_templates.md) - YAML frontmatter by document type\n279: \n280: ### Standards\n281: \n282: - `PUBLIC_RELEASE.md` Section 7 - Authoritative writing style for releases\n283: - [hvr_rules.md](../../references/global/hvr_rules.md) - Human Voice Rules (banned words, punctuation, structure)\n284: - [core_standards.md](../../references/global/core_standards.md) - Markdown structure and naming conventions\n285: \n286: ### Workflows\n287: \n288: - [.opencode/commands/create/changelog.md](../../../../command/create/changelog.md) - The `/create:changelog` command surface\n289: - [nested_changelog.md](../../../system-spec-kit/references/workflows/nested_changelog.md) - Nested packet-local changelog workflow\n\n(End of file - total 289 lines)\n</content>","metadata":{"preview":"---\ntitle: Changelog & Release Notes Templates\ndescription: Templates and writing-style rules for global component changelogs at .opencode/changelog/{NN--component}/v{VERSION}.md and the matching GitHub release notes.\n---\n\n# Changelog & Release Notes Templates - Format Reference\n\nTwo formats (compact and expanded) for global component changelogs and the matching GitHub release notes, plus writing-style rules and a pointer to nested packet-local changelogs.\n\n---\n\n## 1. OVERVIEW\n\n### Purpose\n\nGlobal component changelog files live at `.opencode/changelog/{NN--component}/v{VERSION}.md` and double as the body of GitHub releases. This asset gives the `/create:changelog` command (and human authors) a copy-paste starting point for both layouts, plus the voice and structure rules that keep the 370+ existing files consistent.\n\n### Usage\n\nThe `/create:changelog` workflow reads this template at Step 4 of `create_changelog_auto.yaml` and `create_changelog_confirm.yaml`. Human authors can copy a format block directly. Choose **compact** for releases under 10 changes and **expanded** for releases with 10+ changes or a major bump - see Section 5 for the full selection guide.","truncated":false,"loaded":[]},"title":".opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md","time":{"start":1778477966378,"end":1778477966382}},"id":"prt_e158c1db6001JBsj2JilGADzDG","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","messageID":"msg_e158bf6fc0029mFZdQ60tDPhm4"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1778477968320,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"type":"tool","tool":"read","callID":"call_04_r2hjds7q1DfNuimNxKTK5089","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"filePath":"/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/commands/create/assets/create_changelog_auto.yaml"},"output":"<path>/Users/michelkerkmeester/MEGA/Development/Code_Environment/Public/.opencode/commands/create/assets/create_changelog_auto.yaml</path>\n<type>file</type>\n<content>\n1: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n2: # OPENCODE CREATE: CHANGELOG CREATION WORKFLOW (AUTO MODE)\n3: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n4: # Mode: autonomous (no user approval gates)\n5: # Note: This workflow executes all steps sequentially with\n6: #       continuous self-validation. Pauses only if confidence < 40%.\n7: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n8: role: Expert Changelog Creator with dynamic work detection\n9: purpose: Create properly formatted changelog entries by analyzing recent work and resolving components\n10: action: Detect work context, resolve component folder, calculate version, generate formatted changelog\n11: \n12: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n13: # PREREQUISITE: @markdown AGENT VERIFICATION\n14: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n15: # This workflow REQUIRES the @markdown agent for:\n16: #   - Template-first workflow (loads format before generating)\n17: #   - Changelog format validation\n18: #   - Version number verification\n19: #\n20: # PHASE 0 in the command markdown verifies @markdown agent BEFORE\n21: # this YAML workflow loads. If you're executing this workflow,\n22: # @markdown verification has already passed.\n23: #\n24: # To invoke correctly: @markdown /create:changelog [source]\n25: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n26: \n27: operating_mode:\n28:   workflow: sequential_7_step\n29:   workflow_compliance: MANDATORY\n30:   workflow_execution: autonomous\n31:   approvals: none\n32:   tracking: progressive_task_checklists\n33:   validation: continuous_self_validation\n34:   description: |\n35:     Executes the 7-step changelog creation workflow without step-by-step approval.\n36:     Pauses only if confidence drops below threshold or component resolution is ambiguous.\n37: \n38: development_philosophy:\n39:   principle: \"Detect accurately, format consistently\"\n40:   approach: \"Analyze -> Resolve -> Calculate -> Generate -> Validate -> Write\"\n41:   mandate: \"Dynamic detection with human-quality output matching 400+ existing changelogs\"\n42: \n43: runtime_agent_path_resolution:\n44:   default: .opencode/agent\n45:   claude: .claude/agents\n46:   codex: .codex/agents\n47:   gemini: .gemini/agents\n48: \n49: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n50: # CONFIDENCE & CLARIFICATION FRAMEWORK\n51: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n52: confidence_framework:\n53:   thresholds:\n54:     high: { range: \"80-100%\", action: \"Proceed with citable source\" }\n55:     medium:\n56:       { range: \"40-79%\", action: \"Proceed with caution, document assumptions\" }\n57:     low:\n58:       { range: \"0-39%\", action: \"STOP - Ask clarification with A/B/C options\" }\n59: \n60:   scoring_weights:\n61:     work_context_availability: 0.30\n62:     component_resolution_confidence: 0.25\n63:     version_calculation_certainty: 0.25\n64:     content_completeness: 0.20\n65: \n66:   clarification_format: |\n67:     \"I need clarity (confidence: [NN%]). Which approach:\n68:     - A) [option with brief rationale]\n69:     - B) [option with brief rationale]\n70:     - C) [option with brief rationale]\"\n71: \n72:   escalation:\n73:     timebox_minutes: 10\n74:     failed_attempts_threshold: 2\n75:     action: \"Present options to user with current findings\"\n76: \n77: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n78: # REQUEST ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK\n79: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n80: request_analysis_framework:\n81:   code_search_note: \"Use CocoIndex (mcp__cocoindex_code__search) for discovering existing patterns before creating. Use Grep only for exact known tokens.\"\n82:   solution_flow:\n83:     - \"Parse input: spec folder path, component name, or auto-detect mode\"\n84:     - \"Gather context: Read spec artifacts or git history\"\n85:     - \"Resolve component: Map changed files to changelog folder\"\n86:     - \"Calculate version: Scan existing files, determine next version\"\n87:     - \"Generate content: Format per established template\"\n88:     - \"Validate: Check format, version sequencing, completeness\"\n89:     - \"Write: Create file in correct location\"\n90: \n91:   pre_change_validation:\n92:     items:\n93:       - \"Source identified? (spec folder, component, or git history)\"\n94:       - \"Component folder resolved?\"\n95:       - \"Version number calculated?\"\n96:       - \"Content generated with all required sections?\"\n97:       - \"Confidence >=80%? (if not: ask)\"\n98:     stop_conditions: [\"Any item unchecked\", \"Component unresolved\"]\n99:     stop_action: \"STOP and address before proceeding\"\n100: \n101: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n102: # USER INPUTS (From Setup Phase outputs)\n103: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n104: user_inputs:\n105:   source_type: |\n106:     [SOURCE_TYPE]\n107:     One of: spec_folder, component, git_history\n108:     FROM UNIFIED SETUP PHASE (Q0 or $ARGUMENTS).\n109: \n110:   spec_folder: |\n111:     [SPEC_FOLDER]\n112:     Path to spec folder (if source_type = spec_folder).\n113:     FROM UNIFIED SETUP PHASE (Q0 choice A).\n114: \n115:   component_hint: |\n116:     [COMPONENT_HINT]\n117:     Component name hint (if source_type = component).\n118:     FROM UNIFIED SETUP PHASE (Q0 choice B).\n119: \n120:   version_bump: |\n121:     [VERSION_BUMP]\n122:     One of: major, minor, patch, build, auto\n123:     FROM UNIFIED SETUP PHASE (--bump flag or Q1).\n124: \n125: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n126: # FIELD HANDLING\n127: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n128: field_handling:\n129:   source_type:\n130:     validation: \"must be one of: spec_folder, component, git_history\"\n131:     required: true\n132: \n133:   version_bump:\n134:     validation: \"must be one of: major, minor, patch, build, auto\"\n135:     default: \"auto\"\n136: \n137:   defaults:\n138:     changelog_root: \".opencode/changelog/\"\n139:     date_format: \"YYYY-MM-DD\"\n140:     version_format: \"v{MAJOR}.{MINOR}.{PATCH}.{BUILD}\"\n141:     initial_version: \"v1.0.0.0\"\n142:     project_url: \"https://github.com/MichelKerkmeester/opencode--spec-kit-skilled-agent-orchestration\"\n143: \n144: input_contract:\n145:   required:\n146:     - create_agent_verified\n147:     - source_type\n148:   optional:\n149:     - spec_folder\n150:     - component_hint\n151:     - version_bump\n152: \n153: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n154: # DOCUMENTATION LEVEL\n155: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n156: documentation_level:\n157:   default: \"Level 1 (Baseline)\"\n158:   required_files:\n159:     - spec.md\n160:     - plan.md\n161:     - tasks.md\n162:   note: \"Changelog creation is typically Level 1 unless multi-component\"\n163: \n164: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n165: # COMPONENT MAPPING TABLE\n166: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n167: # Maps file path patterns to changelog component folders.\n168: # Ordered by specificity (most specific first).\n169: # When a changed file matches multiple patterns, use the FIRST match.\n170: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n171: component_mapping:\n172:   # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n173:   # DYNAMIC DISCOVERY — scan .opencode/changelog/ at runtime\n174:   # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n175:   # Component folders are NOT hardcoded. The workflow discovers them:\n176:   #\n177:   #   $ ls -d .opencode/changelog/*/\n178:   #\n179:   # Folder naming convention: NN--component-name (zero-padded index)\n180:   # Example: 04--commands, 11--sk-doc, 00--opencode-environment\n181:   #\n182:   # RESOLUTION STRATEGY (most specific first):\n183:   #   1. Extract component name from folder (strip NN-- prefix)\n184:   #   2. Match changed file paths against component names:\n185:   #      - .opencode/skills/{name}/**  → folder containing {name}\n186:   #      - .opencode/commands/**       → folder containing \"commands\"\n187:   #      - .opencode/agents/**         → folder containing \"agents\"\n188:   #   3. Match component_hint keyword against folder names\n189:   #   4. Fallback: first folder starting with \"00--\" (umbrella/cross-component)\n190:   #\n191:   # The agent MUST run the discovery scan in Step 2 of the workflow\n192:   # and build the mapping dynamically from the actual folder contents.\n193:   # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n194: \n195:   discovery:\n196:     scan_command: \"ls -d .opencode/changelog/*/ 2>/dev/null | sort\"\n197:     folder_pattern: \"^(\\\\d+)--(.*)\"\n198:     fallback_prefix: \"00--\"\n199:     note: \"Always use the first 00-- folder as default for unmatched paths\"\n200: \n201:   resolution_rules:\n202:     - source: \"file_path\"\n203:       strategy: \"Match changed file paths against discovered folder names using substring/keyword matching\"\n204:     - source: \"component_hint\"\n205:       strategy: \"Match user-provided hint against discovered folder names\"\n206:     - source: \"spec_folder\"\n207:       strategy: \"Extract spec path segments and match against discovered folder names\"\n208:     - source: \"fallback\"\n209:       strategy: \"Use the 00-- prefixed folder (umbrella/cross-component)\"\n210: \n211: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n212: # VERSION BUMP RULES\n213: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n214: version_bump_rules:\n215:   auto_detection:\n216:     major:\n217:       triggers: [\"BREAKING\", \"overhaul\", \"rewrite\", \"migration\", \"v2\", \"v3\"]\n218:       description: \"Architectural overhaul or platform-level change\"\n219:     minor:\n220:       triggers: [\"feat\", \"add\", \"new\", \"feature\", \"implement\", \"create\"]\n221:       description: \"Significant new feature or subsystem addition\"\n222:     patch:\n223:       triggers:\n224:         [\n225:           \"fix\",\n226:           \"bug\",\n227:           \"refactor\",\n228:           \"chore\",\n229:           \"docs\",\n230:           \"update\",\n231:           \"improve\",\n232:           \"cleanup\",\n233:         ]\n234:       description: \"Incremental improvement, bug fix, or refactor\"\n235:     build:\n236:       triggers: [\"hotfix\", \"typo\", \"same-day\"]\n237:       description: \"Hotfix on already-published version\"\n238: \n239:   detection_order:\n240:     - \"Check user-provided --bump flag first (highest priority)\"\n241:     - \"Check spec.md title and purpose for change type keywords\"\n242:     - \"Check git commit messages for conventional commit prefixes\"\n243:     - \"Default to patch if no clear signal\"\n244: \n245:   calculation:\n246:     major: \"{MAJOR+1}.0.0.0\"\n247:     minor: \"{MAJOR}.{MINOR+1}.0.0\"\n248:     patch: \"{MAJOR}.{MINOR}.{PATCH+1}.0\"\n249:     build: \"{MAJOR}.{MINOR}.{PATCH}.{BUILD+1}\"\n250: \n251: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n252: # CHANGELOG CONTENT TEMPLATE\n253: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n254: changelog_template:\n255:   # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n256:   # TEMPLATE FILE: .opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md\n257:   # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n258:   # The canonical changelog and release notes template lives in:\n259:   #   .opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md\n260:   #\n261:   # It defines TWO formats:\n262:   #   1. COMPACT — for releases with fewer than 10 changes\n263:   #      Uses: ## What Changed → bullet points with bold labels\n264:   #   2. EXPANDED — for releases with 10+ changes or major releases\n265:   #      Uses: ### short headings → Problem/Fix paragraphs per item\n266:   #\n267:   # FORMAT SELECTION:\n268:   #   - Count the changes in work_context\n269:   #   - < 10 changes → use compact format\n270:   #   - >= 10 changes or major release → use expanded format\n271:   #\n272:   # WRITING STYLE (from PUBLIC_RELEASE.md Section 7):\n273:   #   - Plain English for a smart non-developer\n274:   #   - Every fix: what was broken + what we did + why it matters\n275:   #   - No jargon without parenthetical definition\n276:   #   - Technical details in Files Changed table, not in descriptions\n277:   #   - Expanded-format sub-headings stay short (2-5 words, not full sentences)\n278:   #\n279:   # Read the template file at Step 4 before generating content.\n280:   # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n281:   template_file: \".opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md\"\n282:   style_reference: \"PUBLIC_RELEASE.md Section 7\"\n283: \n284: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n285: # HIGHLIGHT CATEGORIES\n286: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n287: highlight_categories:\n288:   # Use plain category names from PUBLIC_RELEASE.md Section 7.2:\n289:   search: \"### Search\"\n290:   saving: \"### Saving Memories\"\n291:   security: \"### Security\"\n292:   documentation: \"### Documentation\"\n293:   testing: \"### Testing\"\n294:   commands: \"### Commands\"\n295:   new_features: \"### New Features\"\n296:   bug_fixes: \"### Bug Fixes\"\n297:   architecture: \"### Architecture\"\n298:   breaking: \"### Breaking Changes\"\n299:   category_named: \"### {name}\"\n300:   note: |\n301:     Use plain category names from PUBLIC_RELEASE.md vocabulary.\n302:     For expanded format: use short ### headings with Problem/Fix paragraphs.\n303:     Read .opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md for full format reference.\n304: \n305: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n306: # WORKFLOW ENFORCEMENT\n307: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n308: workflow_enforcement:\n309:   mode: strict\n310:   step_order: sequential_mandatory\n311:   skip_allowed: false\n312:   critical_steps:\n313:     step_2_component_resolution:\n314:       enforcement: \"MUST resolve to a valid changelog subfolder\"\n315:       verification: \"Folder exists at .opencode/changelog/{resolved_folder}/\"\n316:     step_3_version_determination:\n317:       enforcement: \"MUST calculate a sequential version number\"\n318:       verification: \"No file with same version exists in target folder\"\n319:     step_5_quality_validation:\n320:       enforcement: \"MUST verify format compliance before writing\"\n321:       verification: \"All required sections present in generated content\"\n322: \n323: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n324: # WORKFLOW\n325: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n326: gate_logic:\n327:   hard:\n328:     H0_write_verified:\n329:       description: \"@markdown verification must have passed in Phase 0\"\n330:       fail_action: \"STOP and return to the command setup phase\"\n331:     H1_required_fields:\n332:       description: \"Source context and resolution inputs must be present\"\n333:       fail_action: \"STOP and collect missing inputs\"\n334:     H2_component_resolution:\n335:       description: \"A changelog component folder must resolve before writing\"\n336:       fail_action: \"STOP and ask for a clearer source or component hint\"\n337:     H3_version_contract:\n338:       description: \"Version calculation and content format must be valid before write\"\n339:       fail_action: \"Fix the version/content plan before continuing\"\n340:   soft:\n341:     S1_auto_bump:\n342:       description: \"Auto-detected version bump may proceed with logged assumptions\"\n343:       fail_action: \"Proceed with rationale\"\n344: \n345: workflow_overview:\n346:   steps:\n347:     - id: step_1_context_analysis\n348:       purpose: \"Resolve the work source and collect changelog context\"\n349:     - id: step_2_component_resolution\n350:       purpose: \"Map the work to the correct changelog component folder\"\n351:     - id: step_3_version_determination\n352:       purpose: \"Calculate the next version and release tier\"\n353:     - id: step_4_content_generation\n354:       purpose: \"Draft the changelog entry using the canonical format\"\n355:     - id: step_5_quality_validation\n356:       purpose: \"Validate structure, versioning, and completeness\"\n357:     - id: step_6_write_file\n358:       purpose: \"Write the changelog entry to the resolved component folder\"\n359:     - id: step_7_save_context\n360:       purpose: \"Persist spec context and emit completion status\"\n361: \n362: workflow:\n363:   step_1_context_analysis:\n364:     purpose: Detect what was worked on and gather work context\n365:     activities:\n366:       - \"Determine source type from Setup Phase outputs\"\n367:       - |\n368:         IF source_type = spec_folder:\n369:           Read {spec_folder}/implementation-summary.md (primary source)\n370:           Read {spec_folder}/tasks.md (completed tasks)\n371:           Read {spec_folder}/spec.md (title, purpose, requirements)\n372:           Extract: work_summary, files_changed, change_type, spec_level\n373:           Detect output mode:\n374:             - IF --nested flag present -> changelog_mode = nested\n375:             - ELSE IF spec_folder is a phase child OR has direct child phase folders OR already has changelog/ -> changelog_mode = nested\n376:             - ELSE -> changelog_mode = global\n377:       - |\n378:         IF source_type = component:\n379:           Use component_hint to identify target folder\n380:           Run: git log --oneline --since=\"7 days ago\" -- {component_file_patterns}\n381:           Extract: recent_commits, files_changed\n382:           changelog_mode = global\n383:       - |\n384:         IF source_type = git_history:\n385:           Run: git log --oneline --since=\"7 days ago\"\n386:           Run: git diff --stat HEAD~10\n387:           Extract: recent_commits, files_changed, commit_messages\n388:           changelog_mode = global\n389:       - \"Compile work_context object with: summary, files_changed[], change_type, source\"\n390:     outputs:\n391:       - work_context: \"Object containing summary, files, change type\"\n392:       - files_changed: \"List of changed file paths\"\n393:       - change_type_hint: \"Feature / fix / refactor / architecture\"\n394:       - changelog_mode: \"global or nested\"\n395:     validation: context_gathered\n396: \n397:   step_2_component_resolution:\n398:     purpose: Resolve the correct output target for global or nested changelog mode\n399:     activities:\n400:       - |\n401:         IF changelog_mode = nested:\n402:           Run: node .opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/scripts/dist/spec-folder/nested-changelog.js {spec_folder} --json\n403:           Read canonical templates:\n404:             - .opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/templates/changelog/root.md\n405:             - .opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/templates/changelog/phase.md\n406:           Extract output_path and nested summary payload\n407:           Skip component-folder mapping and versioned release rules\n408:       - |\n409:         IF changelog_mode = global:\n410:         DISCOVER available changelog folders:\n411:           $ ls -d .opencode/changelog/*/ 2>/dev/null | sort\n412:           Parse folder names using NN--component-name pattern\n413:           Build runtime component list from actual directory contents\n414:       - |\n415:         IF changelog_mode = global:\n416:         FOR EACH file in files_changed:\n417:           Match file path segments against discovered component names\n418:           Record matched component folder\n419:       - |\n420:         Count matches per component:\n421:           IF single component dominates (>60% of files) -> primary_component = that component\n422:           IF multiple components roughly equal -> list all, pick primary by file count\n423:           IF no matches -> default to first 00-- prefixed folder (umbrella/cross-component)\n424:       - |\n425:         IF source_type = spec_folder:\n426:           Extract spec path segments and match against discovered folder names\n427:           Use as tiebreaker when file analysis is ambiguous\n428:       - |\n429:         IF source_type = component:\n430:           Match component_hint against discovered folder names (substring match)\n431:           Direct resolution without file analysis\n432:       - \"Verify target folder exists: ls .opencode/changelog/{resolved_folder}/\"\n433:       - |\n434:         IF changelog_mode = nested:\n435:           Verify nested output path resolves inside the target packet changelog/ folder\n436:       - |\n437:         IF changelog_mode = global:\n438:         IF target folder does not exist:\n439:           STOP - Report: \"Changelog folder not found: {resolved_folder}\"\n440:           Ask user to confirm or choose different target\n441:     outputs:\n442:       - primary_component: \"Resolved changelog subfolder name\"\n443:       - secondary_components: \"Other affected components (if cross-component)\"\n444:       - resolution_confidence: \"Percentage confidence in mapping\"\n445:       - nested_output_path: \"Packet-local output path when changelog_mode = nested\"\n446:     validation: component_resolved\n447: \n448:   step_3_version_determination:\n449:     purpose: Calculate the next version number for the changelog entry\n450:     activities:\n451:       - |\n452:         IF changelog_mode = nested:\n453:           Skip version calculation. Nested packet changelogs use deterministic packet-local filenames.\n454:       - \"List existing changelog files in target folder:\"\n455:       - \"  Run: ls .opencode/changelog/{primary_component}/ | sort -V\"\n456:       - \"Parse the latest version file: extract MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH.BUILD\"\n457:       - |\n458:         Determine bump type:\n459:           IF version_bump != \"auto\" -> use user-specified bump type\n460:           IF version_bump == \"auto\":\n461:             Check change_type_hint against version_bump_rules.auto_detection\n462:             Check work_context.summary for trigger keywords\n463:             Default to \"patch\" if no clear signal\n464:       - \"Calculate next version using version_bump_rules.calculation\"\n465:       - |\n466:         Verify no collision:\n467:           IF file v{next_version}.md already exists:\n468:             Increment BUILD segment until unique\n469:       - \"Store: next_version, bump_type_used\"\n470:     outputs:\n471:       - next_version: \"Calculated version string (e.g., v2.1.0.0)\"\n472:       - bump_type_used: \"major/minor/patch/build\"\n473:       - latest_existing_version: \"Previous version for reference\"\n474:     validation: version_calculated\n475: \n476:   step_4_content_generation:\n477:     purpose: Generate changelog content following established format\n478:     activities:\n479:       - \"Read the template: .opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md\"\n480:       - \"If changelog_mode = nested, read .opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/templates/changelog/root.md or phase.md instead\"\n481:       - \"Set DATE to today's date in YYYY-MM-DD format\"\n482:       - |\n483:         SELECT FORMAT based on change count and release type:\n484:           IF change_count < 10 AND change_type != major -> COMPACT format\n485:           IF change_count >= 10 OR change_type == major -> EXPANDED format\n486:           See template file Section 4 (Format Selection Guide) for full rules\n487:       - |\n488:         Generate SUMMARY (both formats):\n489:           IF source_type = spec_folder:\n490:             Use spec.md title + implementation-summary.md first paragraph\n491:           IF source_type = component or git_history:\n492:             Synthesize from commit messages and changed files\n493:           Keep to 1-3 sentences. Lead with WHY, not technical stats.\n494:       - |\n495:         Generate BODY using selected format:\n496: \n497:           COMPACT FORMAT:\n498:             ## What Changed\n499:             ### {Category Name}\n500:             - **{Name}** -- {What was broken}. {What we did}. {Why it matters}.\n501: \n502:           EXPANDED FORMAT:\n503:             ## {Category Name} ({count})\n504:             ### {Short heading}\n505:             **Problem:** {Plain English explanation for a smart non-developer}\n506:             **Fix:** {Behavior change, not implementation details}\n507: \n508:         Expanded-format heading rule:\n509:           - Prefer 2-5 words\n510:           - Make it easy to scan at a glance\n511:           - Avoid packet IDs, numbering, and sentence-length headings unless truly required\n512: \n513:         Pull content from:\n514:           spec_folder: tasks.md completed items, implementation-summary.md sections\n515:           component/git: commit messages grouped by type\n516:           nested: generator payload from nested-changelog.js\n517:       - |\n518:         Generate FILES_CHANGED:\n519:           COMPACT: Simple table with File | Action | Description\n520:           EXPANDED: Collapsible <details> with Source/Tests/Documentation subsections\n521:       - |\n522:         Generate UPGRADE section:\n523:           IF change_type = major -> \"Review breaking changes before upgrading.\"\n524:           ELSE -> \"No migration required.\"\n525:           Always list behavioral changes users should be aware of.\n526:       - \"Assemble full content per template format (compact or expanded)\"\n527:     outputs:\n528:       - changelog_content: \"Complete formatted changelog markdown\"\n529:       - section_count: \"Number of highlight sections generated\"\n530:     validation: content_generated\n531: \n532:   step_5_quality_validation:\n533:     purpose: Verify the generated changelog meets format and quality standards\n534:     activities:\n535:       - |\n536:         FORMAT CHECKS:\n537:           [ ] H1 starts with \"# v{VERSION}\"\n538:           [ ] Project backlink blockquote present\n539:           [ ] Version + date header in correct format: ## [**{VERSION}**] - {DATE}\n540:           [ ] Summary paragraph present (non-empty)\n541:           [ ] At least one Highlights subsection\n542:           [ ] Files Changed section present\n543:           [ ] Upgrade section present\n544:           [ ] Horizontal rule (---) before every ## and ### heading (except first heading)\n545:       - |\n546:         VERSION CHECKS:\n547:           [ ] Version is strictly greater than latest_existing_version\n548:           [ ] Version follows 4-segment format (MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH.BUILD)\n549:           [ ] No file with this version exists in target folder\n550:       - |\n551:         CONTENT CHECKS:\n552:           [ ] Summary is concise (1-3 sentences)\n553:           [ ] Each highlight item has bold name + description\n554:           [ ] Files changed entries have valid paths\n555:       - |\n556:         IF any check fails:\n557:           Log failed check(s)\n558:           Auto-fix if possible (e.g., missing section -> add empty section)\n559:           Re-validate after fix\n560:     outputs:\n561:       - validation_passed: \"true/false\"\n562:       - checks_passed: \"N/N total\"\n563:       - auto_fixes_applied: \"List of automatic corrections\"\n564:     validation: quality_verified\n565: \n566:   step_6_write_file:\n567:     purpose: Write the changelog file to the correct location\n568:     activities:\n569:       - |\n570:         IF changelog_mode = nested:\n571:           Run: node .opencode/skills/system-spec-kit/scripts/dist/spec-folder/nested-changelog.js {spec_folder} --write\n572:           Verify the written packet-local file matches nested_output_path\n573:       - \"Construct output path: .opencode/changelog/{primary_component}/v{next_version}.md\"\n574:       - \"Write changelog_content to output path using Write tool\"\n575:       - \"Verify file was created: Read the first 5 lines of the written file\"\n576:       - |\n577:         IF secondary_components exist:\n578:           Note: \"This work also affects: {secondary_components}\"\n579:           Suggest: \"Consider creating additional changelogs for: {list}\"\n580:     outputs:\n581:       - output_path: \"Full path to created changelog file\"\n582:       - file_verified: \"true/false\"\n583:     validation: file_written\n584: \n585:   step_7_save_context:\n586:     purpose: Report completion and preserve context\n587:     activities:\n588:       - \"Display completion report (see completion_report section)\"\n589:       - |\n590:         IF spec_path exists (from Setup Phase or spec_folder source):\n591:           Note: \"Context should be saved to spec folder\"\n592:           Suggest: \"/memory:save {spec_path}\"\n593:     outputs:\n594:       - status: \"OK or FAIL\"\n595:       - changelog_path: \"Path to created file\"\n596:     validation: context_saved\n597: \n598: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n599: # CIRCUIT BREAKER\n600: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n601: circuit_breaker:\n602:   enabled: true\n603:   thresholds:\n604:     failures: 3\n605:     recovery_s: 60\n606:     success_to_close: 1\n607:   states:\n608:     CLOSED: \"normal operation\"\n609:     OPEN: \"skip optional steps, complete with warnings\"\n610:     HALF_OPEN: \"test single operation\"\n611: \n612: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n613: # QUALITY STANDARDS\n614: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n615: quality_standards:\n616:   format_compliance:\n617:     minimum: \"All required sections present\"\n618:     enforcement: \"Step 5 validates before Step 6 writes\"\n619:   version_integrity:\n620:     minimum: \"Sequential, no duplicates\"\n621:     enforcement: \"Step 3 validates before Step 4 generates\"\n622:   content_quality:\n623:     minimum: \"Summary + highlights + files changed\"\n624:     enforcement: \"Step 5 verifies non-empty content sections\"\n625: \n626: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n627: # AUTONOMOUS EXECUTION\n628: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n629: autonomous_execution:\n630:   principle: \"Execute all steps without user approval gates\"\n631:   self_validation: \"Verify outputs at each step before proceeding\"\n632:   error_handling: \"Auto-fix where possible, escalate on hard failures\"\n633:   pause_conditions:\n634:     - \"Confidence drops below 40%\"\n635:     - \"Component resolution ambiguous (multiple equally likely)\"\n636:     - \"Version calculation produces unexpected result\"\n637:     - \"Generated content has empty required sections\"\n638: \n639: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n640: # COMPLETION REPORT\n641: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n642: completion_report:\n643:   template: |\n644:     Changelog Created\n645: \n646:     Component: {primary_component}\n647:     Version: {next_version} ({bump_type_used} bump)\n648:     File: {output_path}\n649: \n650:     Summary: {summary_first_sentence}\n651: \n652:     Sections: {section_count} highlight categories\n653:     Files Tracked: {files_changed_count}\n654: \n655:     STATUS=OK PATH={output_path}\n656: \n657:   on_failure: |\n658:     Changelog Creation Failed\n659: \n660:     Error: {error_description}\n661:     Step: {failed_step}\n662:     Component: {primary_component} (if resolved)\n663: \n664:     STATUS=FAIL ERROR=\"{error_message}\"\n665: \n666: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n667: # ERROR RECOVERY\n668: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n669: error_recovery:\n670:   no_spec_artifacts:\n671:     action: \"Fall back to git history analysis\"\n672:     fallback: \"If no git history either, prompt user for manual input\"\n673: \n674:   component_ambiguous:\n675:     action: \"Use highest file-count component as primary\"\n676:     fallback: \"Default to first 00-- prefixed folder (umbrella/cross-component)\"\n677: \n678:   version_conflict:\n679:     action: \"Increment BUILD segment until unique\"\n680:     fallback: \"Ask user for manual version\"\n681: \n682:   empty_content:\n683:     action: \"Generate minimal changelog from available data\"\n684:     fallback: \"Prompt user to provide summary and highlights\"\n685: \n686:   write_failure:\n687:     action: \"Check permissions, retry once\"\n688:     fallback: \"Display content for manual save\"\n689: \n690: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n691: # TERMINATION\n692: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n693: termination:\n694:   after_step: 7\n695:   message: \"Changelog creation workflow complete.\"\n696:   next_steps:\n697:     - \"Review the generated changelog at {output_path}\"\n698:     - \"Create additional changelogs for secondary components if needed\"\n699:     - \"Consider creating an umbrella release in the 00-- prefixed folder if applicable\"\n700:     - \"Run /memory:save to preserve context\"\n701: \n702: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n703: # RULES\n704: # ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n705: rules:\n706:   ALWAYS:\n707:     - \"Follow the 7-step workflow in sequence\"\n708:     - \"Validate version is sequential before writing\"\n709:     - \"Match the established changelog format (400+ existing files)\"\n710:     - \"Include all required sections: title, backlink, version+date, summary, highlights\"\n711:     - \"Use the component mapping table for resolution\"\n712:     - \"Report STATUS=OK or STATUS=FAIL at completion\"\n713: \n714:   NEVER:\n715:     - \"Never skip version validation (Step 3)\"\n716:     - \"Never write a changelog with empty summary or highlights\"\n717:     - \"Never overwrite an existing changelog file\"\n718:     - \"Never guess component folder without file path analysis\"\n719:     - \"Never use a version number that already exists\"\n720:     - \"Never create changelog folders that don't already exist\"\n\n(End of file - total 720 lines)\n</content>","metadata":{"preview":"# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n# OPENCODE CREATE: CHANGELOG CREATION WORKFLOW (AUTO MODE)\n# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n# Mode: autonomous (no user approval gates)\n# Note: This workflow executes all steps sequentially with\n#       continuous self-validation. Pauses only if confidence < 40%.\n# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\nrole: Expert Changelog Creator with dynamic work detection\npurpose: Create properly formatted changelog entries by analyzing recent work and resolving components\naction: Detect work context, resolve component folder, calculate version, generate formatted changelog\n\n# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n# PREREQUISITE: @markdown AGENT VERIFICATION\n# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────\n# This workflow REQUIRES the @markdown agent for:\n#   - Template-first workflow (loads format before generating)\n#   - Changelog format validation\n#   - Version number verification\n#\n# PHASE 0 in the command markdown verifies @markdown agent BEFORE","truncated":false,"loaded":[]},"title":".opencode/commands/create/assets/create_changelog_auto.yaml","time":{"start":1778477968316,"end":1778477968319}},"id":"prt_e158c256b001ynFVK00Wa6H9ZI","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","messageID":"msg_e158bf6fc0029mFZdQ60tDPhm4"}}
{"type":"step_finish","timestamp":1778477968861,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e158c2ddc001uR9WwLfZ0AKggx","reason":"tool-calls","snapshot":"0e1a85078bf26e69b1198cac33518386fe5b8739","messageID":"msg_e158bf6fc0029mFZdQ60tDPhm4","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","type":"step-finish","tokens":{"total":45599,"input":5947,"output":307,"reasoning":49,"cache":{"write":0,"read":39296}},"cost":0.01728458}}
{"type":"step_start","timestamp":1778477971168,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e158c36df001SgEpx7Z0eovHm5","messageID":"msg_e158c2e99001rtWb9E3RK39VnK","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","snapshot":"293a6676ad31b716ffe617efe859a52e734b6d10","type":"step-start"}}
{"type":"text","timestamp":1778478021145,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e158c8292001CjrMg2AqFuaQqR","messageID":"msg_e158c2e99001rtWb9E3RK39VnK","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","type":"text","text":"Now I have all the context needed. Let me dispatch the `@markdown` agent via the Task tool to execute the `/create:changelog` workflow.","time":{"start":1778477990546,"end":1778478021144}}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1778478255403,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"type":"tool","tool":"task","callID":"call_00_PLJOlauEOq5108fov04k5905","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"description":"Scaffold v0.1.0 changelog for sk-test-dummy","prompt":"\nYou are operating as the @markdown agent executing `/create:changelog` for a **stub skill** named `sk-test-dummy` at version `v0.1.0`. This is a SIMULATED changelog scaffold — the skill does NOT exist in `.opencode/skills/` and you must NOT create or install it there. Do NOT scan the filesystem for real spec folders, git history, or existing changelog folders.\n\n## SETUP (pre-resolved — skip the unified prompt; go straight to workflow)\n\n- command_name: /create:changelog\n- execution_mode: AUTONOMOUS (equivalent to :auto suffix)\n- target: sk-test-dummy (stub skill, v0.1.0 — initial release)\n- output_path: /tmp/sk-test-dummy-CHANGELOG-cli-opencode.md\n- template_path: .opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md\n- spec_folder: none\n- source_type: component (stub skill)\n- component_hint: sk-test-dummy\n- version_bump: minor (v0.1.0 — first release of a new component)\n- publish_release: NO\n- changelog_mode: global (single file)\n\n## WORKFLOW (execute autonomously, no user prompts)\n\nFollow the @markdown agent contract from `.opencode/agents/markdown.md`:\n\n1. **Phase 0**: Self-verify you are @markdown. Emit BINDING lines.\n2. **Load sk-doc**: Read `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/SKILL.md`\n3. **Load template**: Read `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md`\n4. **Step 1 — Context Analysis**: This is a stub skill initial release. Summary: \"Initial v0.1.0 release of sk-test-dummy, a stub skill for testing the changelog scaffolding workflow.\" Files changed: `SKILL.md`, `README.md`, `graph-metadata.json` (stub files, conceptual). Change type: New feature.\n5. **Step 2 — Component Resolution**: Target is a new component `sk-test-dummy`. Since this is a stub scaffold with an explicit output path, write directly to `/tmp/sk-test-dummy-CHANGELOG-cli-opencode.md`.\n6. **Step 3 — Version**: Version is `v0.1.0` (initial release, minor bump).\n7. **Step 4 — Content Generation**: Use **COMPACT format** (under 10 changes). Generate:\n   - Summary paragraph (lead with WHY)\n   - `## What Changed` section with at least one category (`#### New Features`)\n   - 2-3 bullet points describing the initial scaffold (SKILL.md, README, graph-metadata.json)\n   - `## Files Changed` table\n   - `## Upgrade` section (\"This is an initial release — no migration required.\")\n8. **Step 5 — Quality Validation**: Verify all required sections present, DQI >= 75.\n9. **Step 6 — Write**: Write the file to `/tmp/sk-test-dummy-CHANGELOG-cli-opencode.md`.\n10. **Step 7 — Return**: STATUS=OK line with DQI, TEMPLATE, CHECKS, NOTES.\n\n## REPORTING REQUIREMENTS\n\nIn your final response, clearly report:\n1. Which agent received the work (@markdown)\n2. Which sk-doc resources were loaded (SKILL.md and changelog_template.md paths)\n3. The changelog sections produced (list each H2/H4 section heading)\n","subagent_type":"markdown"},"output":"task_id: ses_1ea730739ffeDaq4PVkxRljzJX (for resuming to continue this task if needed)\n\n<task_result>\n## Pre-Delivery Verification\n\n```text\nMARKDOWN AGENT VERIFICATION (MANDATORY):\n☑ Phase 0 invocation and scope gate passed for /create:changelog\n☑ BINDING lines emitted for command, target, output, template, mode, and specFolder\n☑ sk-doc SKILL.md was read for this invocation\n☑ The command-mapped changelog_template.md was read before writing\n☑ All written paths are inside the resolved command output (/tmp/)\n☑ DQI score is >=75\n☑ STATUS line is OK\n\nEVIDENCE VALIDATION (MANDATORY):\n☑ Template was loaded before writing (new file — no existing file to conflict)\n☑ No placeholder content remains — all sections filled with concrete stub scaffold details\n☑ Changelog files have no frontmatter requirement (per template §2)\n☑ 25 lines, 3 H2 sections (What Changed, Files Changed, Upgrade), 1 H4 (New Features), 3 compact bullets, 5 table rows\n☑ Nesting, write, and budget boundaries respected\n```\n\n---\n\n```text\nSTATUS=OK PATH=/tmp/sk-test-dummy-CHANGELOG-cli-opencode.md\nDQI=90\nTEMPLATE=.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md\nCHECKS=structure-complete,compact-format,no-em-dashes,no-oxford-commas,required-sections-present,files-changed-table,summary-leads-with-why\nNOTES=Stub scaffold — spec folder set to N/A. Three bullet points cover SKILL.md, README.md, and graph-metadata.json initial creation. Em dashes replaced with `--` (bullet separator) or colon (prose) per HVR rules. Upgrade section uses exact template wording \"No migration required.\"\n```\n\n---\n\n### Reporting Summary\n\n| Item | Detail |\n| --- | --- |\n| **Agent** | `@markdown` |\n| **sk-doc resources loaded** | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/SKILL.md`, `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md` |\n| **Format** | Compact (3 changes, initial release) |\n| **H2 sections produced** | `## What Changed`, `## Files Changed`, `## Upgrade` |\n| **H4 sections produced** | `#### New Features` |\n| **Output path** | `/tmp/sk-test-dummy-CHANGELOG-cli-opencode.md` |\n| **Version** | `v0.1.0` |\n</task_result>","metadata":{"sessionId":"ses_1ea730739ffeDaq4PVkxRljzJX","model":{"modelID":"deepseek-v4-pro","providerID":"deepseek"},"truncated":false},"title":"Scaffold v0.1.0 changelog for sk-test-dummy","time":{"start":1778478020814,"end":1778478255401}},"id":"prt_e158c888f001Syr07l2UK6VQ0P","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","messageID":"msg_e158c2e99001rtWb9E3RK39VnK"}}
{"type":"step_finish","timestamp":1778478255580,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e15908ddb001FTsw7ZTTQ6Okb7","reason":"tool-calls","snapshot":"d13056a74370d1e1ec297e78d3b4b16a816450c3","messageID":"msg_e158c2e99001rtWb9E3RK39VnK","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","type":"step-finish","tokens":{"total":85759,"input":38729,"output":902,"reasoning":560,"cache":{"write":0,"read":45568}},"cost":0.07908358}}
{"type":"step_start","timestamp":1778478257412,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e15909502001uheQopjitzlrLY","messageID":"msg_e15908e8d001NS9EyGboyVQf76","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","snapshot":"cbb98df4da260556914d776d1c331242cd01591c","type":"step-start"}}
{"type":"tool_use","timestamp":1778478261265,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"type":"tool","tool":"read","callID":"call_00_bDilKEqyhyXgwAK3MoZN0678","state":{"status":"completed","input":{"filePath":"/tmp/sk-test-dummy-CHANGELOG-cli-opencode.md"},"output":"<path>/tmp/sk-test-dummy-CHANGELOG-cli-opencode.md</path>\n<type>file</type>\n<content>\n1: Initial v0.1.0 release of sk-test-dummy, a minimal stub skill that gives automated tooling and CI jobs a predictable target for testing changelog scaffolding workflows. This first release delivers the three files every OpenCode skill needs to be recognized by the runtime: a SKILL.md definition file, a human-facing README, and a graph-metadata registration record.\n2: \n3: > Spec folder: N/A (stub scaffold)\n4: \n5: ---\n6: \n7: ## What Changed\n8: \n9: #### New Features\n10: \n11: - **Initial skill scaffold** -- Created the foundational SKILL.md with frontmatter fields (name, description, allowed-tools, version) and placeholder sections for WHEN, SMART ROUTING, HOW, RULES, and REFERENCES. This allows the skill to be loaded and validated by the OpenCode runtime.\n12: - **README.md** -- Added a human-facing README with a quick-start section, component overview, and folder-structure summary. Gives developers and testers an entry point for exploring the skill without reading the full SKILL.md.\n13: - **graph-metadata.json** -- Registered the skill in the skill graph so the skill advisor and dependency queries can discover it. Includes name, version, category, and dependency declarations.\n14: \n15: ## Files Changed\n16: \n17: | File | What changed |\n18: | --- | --- |\n19: | `SKILL.md` | Initial creation with frontmatter and section scaffolding |\n20: | `README.md` | Added human-facing documentation with quick-start guidance |\n21: | `graph-metadata.json` | Registered component in the skill graph |\n22: \n23: ## Upgrade\n24: \n25: No migration required.\n\n(End of file - total 25 lines)\n</content>","metadata":{"preview":"Initial v0.1.0 release of sk-test-dummy, a minimal stub skill that gives automated tooling and CI jobs a predictable target for testing changelog scaffolding workflows. This first release delivers the three files every OpenCode skill needs to be recognized by the runtime: a SKILL.md definition file, a human-facing README, and a graph-metadata registration record.\n\n> Spec folder: N/A (stub scaffold)\n\n---\n\n## What Changed\n\n#### New Features\n\n- **Initial skill scaffold** -- Created the foundational SKILL.md with frontmatter fields (name, description, allowed-tools, version) and placeholder sections for WHEN, SMART ROUTING, HOW, RULES, and REFERENCES. This allows the skill to be loaded and validated by the OpenCode runtime.\n- **README.md** -- Added a human-facing README with a quick-start section, component overview, and folder-structure summary. Gives developers and testers an entry point for exploring the skill without reading the full SKILL.md.\n- **graph-metadata.json** -- Registered the skill in the skill graph so the skill advisor and dependency queries can discover it. Includes name, version, category, and dependency declarations.\n\n## Files Changed\n\n| File | What changed |\n| --- | --- |\n| `SKILL.md` | Initial creation with frontmatter and section scaffolding |\n| `README.md` | Added human-facing documentation with quick-start guidance |","truncated":false,"loaded":[]},"title":"../../../../../../tmp/sk-test-dummy-CHANGELOG-cli-opencode.md","time":{"start":1778478261261,"end":1778478261264}},"id":"prt_e15909f82001nn0Vhh4nz3GpZw","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","messageID":"msg_e15908e8d001NS9EyGboyVQf76"}}
{"type":"text","timestamp":1778478261618,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e15909c89001EjU5owlIoBc8XD","messageID":"msg_e15908e8d001NS9EyGboyVQf76","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","type":"text","text":"Let me verify the output file was created:","time":{"start":1778478259337,"end":1778478261617}}}
{"type":"step_finish","timestamp":1778478261811,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e1590a632001bQPdMgQlJXQodu","reason":"tool-calls","snapshot":"adc2d61a44a61a635731ec88ae41730ef8f4acd5","messageID":"msg_e15908e8d001NS9EyGboyVQf76","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","type":"step-finish","tokens":{"total":86478,"input":731,"output":67,"reasoning":48,"cache":{"write":0,"read":85632}},"cost":0.01408878}}
{"type":"step_start","timestamp":1778478263854,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e1590ae2c0017BliR9sjUjR3Po","messageID":"msg_e1590a6e3001OxW7fl0S2yDJg1","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","snapshot":"9f3e16c610db50e4939ac843e81257f414a02d46","type":"step-start"}}
{"type":"text","timestamp":1778478270361,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e1590b1c4001K7ALJXzHtr39we","messageID":"msg_e1590a6e3001OxW7fl0S2yDJg1","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","type":"text","text":"Here is the report:\n\n| Item | Detail |\n|---|---|\n| **Agent** | `@markdown` |\n| **sk-doc resources loaded** | `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/SKILL.md`, `.opencode/skills/sk-doc/assets/changelog_template.md` |\n| **Changelog format** | Compact (3 changes, initial release) |\n| **H2 sections** | `## What Changed`, `## Files Changed`, `## Upgrade` |\n| **H4 section** | `#### New Features` (3 bullet points: SKILL.md, README.md, graph-metadata.json) |\n| **Output** | `/tmp/sk-test-dummy-CHANGELOG-cli-opencode.md` (25 lines, DQI=90) |\n| **Status** | `STATUS=OK` |","time":{"start":1778478264772,"end":1778478270361}}}
{"type":"step_finish","timestamp":1778478270546,"sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","part":{"id":"prt_e1590c8510014dqRQnL82RBAzb","reason":"stop","snapshot":"5030570cdc6f34dfd80e18ae2b77b46152f9a86b","messageID":"msg_e1590a6e3001OxW7fl0S2yDJg1","sessionID":"ses_1ea7461c2ffejop8uTmRt8LiiT","type":"step-finish","tokens":{"total":87103,"input":506,"output":180,"reasoning":17,"cache":{"write":0,"read":86400}},"cost":0.014094}}

=== END: 2026-05-11T07:44:31+02:00 ===
=== EXIT CODE: 0 ===
=== WALL CLOCK: 340s ===

================================================================
VERDICT: PASS
================================================================
Grading rubric (playbook §Pass/Fail):
- routing_trace: @markdown agent invoked successfully (8 hits in JSON transcript)
- resource_trace: sk-doc changelog_template + changelog_creation + Keep-a-Changelog references (8 hits)
- output: /tmp/sk-test-dummy-CHANGELOG-cli-opencode.md exists (1464 bytes)
- output_shape: sk-doc compact-changelog format (same as SD-018) — ## What Changed → #### New Features / ## Files Changed / ## Upgrade
- safety: no install into .opencode/skills/ (output is /tmp only)
- DeepSeek API: no 400 errors on tool-name regex — `--pure` flag did its job stripping the MCP skills surface
- DeepSeek direct API confirmed (model: deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro, not opencode-go gateway alias)

NOTABLE WARNING: opencode emitted "agent 'general' is a subagent, not a primary agent. Falling back to default agent" at startup. The --agent flag value `general` is the default but appears to be classified as a subagent in opencode v1.14.39. The fallback worked (default agent received the dispatch), but the scenario file's invocation could drop the `--agent general` arg or use a different primary agent name. This is a P2 ergonomics finding worth surfacing to the deep-review loop.

NOTABLE: cli-opencode + DeepSeek v4 Pro direct API successfully exercises @markdown end-to-end. This is the primary success path for the user's preferred dispatch shape. No regressions.
================================================================
