# Deep Research Report

## Query
Evaluate the regulatory and fiscal context influencing Brain-Computer Interfaces, taking into account geopolitical or commerce-related limitations. Consider obstacles that might arise from international relations and trade dynamics impacting the development and implementation of these technologies.

## Research Report
# Navigating the Regulatory, Fiscal, and Geopolitical Landscape of Brain-Computer Interface Development and Implementation

## Executive Summary

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) represent a transformative technological frontier with profound implications for healthcare, communication, and human augmentation. However, their development and widespread adoption are inextricably linked to a complex web of regulatory frameworks, fiscal policies, and geopolitical dynamics. This report evaluates these critical external influences, examining how international relations and trade dynamics can create both opportunities and significant obstacles for BCI innovation and global implementation. Key findings indicate a fragmented global regulatory landscape, with differing approaches to medical device approval, data privacy, and emerging neurotechnology standards. Fiscal policies, including R&D tax credits and venture capital availability, play a crucial role in fostering innovation, though their effectiveness varies. Geopolitical tensions, particularly concerning technology transfer and national strategic interests, pose a growing risk of limiting cross-border collaboration and market access. Addressing these multifaceted challenges through strategic policy development, international cooperation, and robust ethical guidelines will be paramount to realizing the full potential of BCI technology.

## 1. Introduction and Background

Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs) are sophisticated systems designed to acquire brain signals, analyze them, and translate them into commands that can control external devices, thereby replacing or restoring natural brain function. These technologies can be broadly categorized as invasive, requiring surgical implantation of electrodes, or non-invasive, utilizing external sensors such as electroencephalography (EEG) [1]. The current applications of BCIs are diverse, ranging from providing essential communication and device control for individuals with severe motor impairments to exploring potential uses in gaming, cognitive enhancement, and mental health monitoring [1].

The global BCI market is poised for substantial growth. Projections indicate an expansion from USD 2.75 billion in 2024 to USD 12.87 billion by 2034, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 16.7% [2]. More recent estimates place the 2023 market size at USD 1.97 billion, with an anticipated growth to USD 20.5 billion by 2035, reflecting a robust CAGR of 21.58% [18]. This expansion is fueled by advancements in neuroscience and artificial intelligence, the increasing prevalence of neurodegenerative disorders, and the integration of BCI technologies into sectors like gaming and smart home control [2, 3]. The development and implementation of such advanced neurotechnologies extend beyond purely technical considerations, encompassing a wide array of societal, ethical, legal, and economic factors. This report specifically focuses on the regulatory and fiscal dimensions, particularly as they intersect with international relations and trade dynamics, to understand their influence on the global trajectory of BCI technology.

## 2. Global Regulatory Frameworks for BCIs

The regulatory landscape for BCIs is characterized by significant divergence across key technological and economic regions. Major jurisdictions are establishing distinct approaches to govern these novel neurotechnologies.

**United States:** The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversees medical devices, including BCIs, by categorizing them based on risk (Class I, II, or III). The FDA encourages the use of its pre-submission program to help determine the most efficient regulatory pathway. Clinical studies supporting marketing applications typically require an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE). Humanitarian Device Exemptions (HDE) are available for devices treating rare conditions. Postmarket surveillance and reporting requirements are also in place [5].

**European Union:** The EU's Medical Device Regulation (MDR) provides a comprehensive framework for medical devices, encompassing those that incorporate software and AI, which would apply to many BCI applications [1, 2]. Notably, Annex XVI of the MDR addresses neurological devices not intended for a medical purpose, such as consumer-grade BCIs, and the upcoming General Product Safety Regulation (GPSR) also aims to regulate consumer BCIs. However, the classification of BCIs, particularly those that blur the lines between medical treatment and human enhancement, remains complex. Some consumer neurotech devices that modulate neuronal activity are classified as high-risk Class III under the MDR [1].

**China:** China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) has been modernizing its regulatory system, aligning with international standards and streamlining approval pathways for innovative medical devices. The NMPA has introduced policies to accelerate the development and adoption of BCI technology for medical purposes, supporting devices that use brain signals to control external systems. Emphasis is placed on research into safety, efficacy, and standardization, with specific policies designed to expedite the approval of high-cost medical equipment and prioritize review of globally leading or first-of-their-kind innovative devices [6, 7]. This approach aligns with observed regional variations in regulating AI-enabled medical devices [17].

**Implications of Regulatory Divergence:** Differences in regulatory frameworks, such as the EU's MDR and the US FDA's approach, create substantial challenges for international commerce. These disparities can necessitate duplicate product testing, including clinical trials, and introduce non-value-adding administrative requirements. Such procedures can delay market access, increase costs for patients, and impact the financial sustainability of healthcare systems. Past attempts at regulatory harmonization for medical devices have yielded limited success, with existing Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and Mutual Recognition Agreements (MRAs) often having narrow scopes and failing to achieve significant market integration due to the inherent complexities of differing regulatory systems [1, 2]. This divergence mandates careful navigation for companies seeking to market BCIs globally, as compliance with one jurisdiction's standards does not guarantee acceptance in another [1, 2].

## 3. Fiscal Policies and Incentives

National fiscal policies play a pivotal role in shaping the investment and development trajectory of BCI technologies.

**R&D Tax Credits and Grants:** Countries are increasingly utilizing R&D tax credits and grants to stimulate private investment in innovation. China, for instance, has significantly increased its R&D tax support, more than tripling it between 2017 and 2022, signaling a strong national strategy to foster technological development [8]. Research indicates that tax incentives have a positive and significant impact on R&D activities, with country-level incrementality ratios demonstrating the induced R&D expenditure relative to foregone tax revenue [2]. Furthermore, claiming R&D tax credits has been associated with positive financial outcomes for companies, including reduced IPO underpricing and increased IPO proceeds [2].

**Venture Capital Funding:** Venture capital funding is a critical driver for neurotechnology, and significant global increases have been observed. In 2023, Pitchbook tracked $1.4 billion across 115 neurotech deals, a notable increase from $662.6 million across 127 deals in 2022, projecting a potential CAGR of 88% and an expectation to exceed $4 billion by 2025. Early-stage funding (Seed and Series A) has been particularly active, with a substantial portion directed towards U.S.-based companies [18]. While specific data on the return on investment for fiscal incentives in BCI startups is still emerging, the general trend in emerging technology sectors suggests that well-designed incentives can effectively attract private investment and accelerate development cycles [1, 2].

**National Investment Strategies:** Major economic powers view BCI development as a strategic imperative, leading to national investment strategies and incentives aimed at fostering domestic innovation and market dominance. This can create competitive pressures and potential trade disputes, as countries vie for leadership in this emerging field.

## 4. Intellectual Property (IP) and Data Protection

The highly sensitive nature of brain data and the novel applications of BCI technology present unique challenges for intellectual property and data protection.

**Data Privacy:** Robust data privacy and security regulations are paramount for BCIs. Divergent international standards in this area can significantly complicate global deployment and data sharing for research and development. California's amendment to the CCPA, classifying "neural data" as sensitive personal information, exemplifies the growing recognition of these unique privacy risks and the potential for varied global regulatory approaches. Colorado also explicitly includes neural data under its definition of "sensitive personal information," requiring explicit consent for its collection. The EU's GDPR provides a strong framework for personal data protection, including sensitive health data, which would apply to neurodata. However, the specific application of these laws to neurotechnology and the concept of "neural data" as a distinct category is still evolving, with ongoing efforts to establish global standards on neurotechnology ethics [9, 12]. In Chile, a landmark constitutional amendment protects "neurorights," and a Supreme Court ruling against a neurotechnology company underscored the necessity for strict product assessments prior to commercialization and robust privacy protection for neural data [9].

**IP and Data Ownership:** The commodification of brain signals and the processing of neural data raise significant legal and ethical questions regarding ownership and intellectual property. The evolving nature of neurotechnology creates a legal vacuum, particularly as neural data is increasingly generated and collected, leading to ambiguity about data ownership and protection [2]. The application of existing data privacy regulations like GDPR and CCPA to neural data is still being defined, and specific legal cases and disputes in this domain are likely to shape future frameworks [1, 2]. The debate surrounding the ownership of neural data is complex and multifaceted, potentially necessitating the recognition of individual ownership rights [2].

## 5. Geopolitical Influences on Technology Transfer

Geopolitical dynamics, including tensions, export controls, and trade sanctions, can significantly impact the flow of BCI technology, components, and expertise across borders.

**Technology Access and Alliances:** Geopolitical alliances and rivalries can influence which countries have access to cutting-edge BCI technology, components, or manufacturing capabilities. Export controls on dual-use technologies may become a factor. The U.S.-China tech tensions, particularly concerning AI and semiconductors, demonstrate how geopolitical factors can restrict technology transfer and collaboration, setting a precedent for BCI development [10, 11]. China's strategic focus on self-reliance in emerging technologies, driven by geopolitical competition, suggests a similar trajectory for neurotechnology, potentially leading to restrictions on collaboration and technology transfer [11].

**Precedent from Related Sectors:** The impact of geopolitical tensions on related advanced technology sectors, such as AI and semiconductors, serves as a clear indicator of potential challenges for BCIs [10, 11]. These tensions have demonstrably impacted supply chains and collaborative efforts through export controls and trade restrictions.

**Policy Considerations:** International policymakers are advised to consider BCI regulation proactively to maximize benefits and minimize risks, implying an awareness of potential geopolitical influences on the technology's development and deployment [3]. While specific geopolitical tensions directly impacting BCI technology transfer are not yet widely documented, the broader trends in international relations provide a strong indication of potential future challenges.

## 6. Commerce-Related Limitations

Trade barriers, tariffs, and non-tariff barriers can impede the import and export of BCI components and finished products, impacting global market access.

**Trade Agreements and Barriers:** An analysis of existing trade agreements and their potential impact on neurotechnology trade, including specific tariffs or non-tariff barriers, is necessary. Non-tariff barriers, such as product certification requirements, labeling, and differing technical regulations, could significantly affect BCI trade by increasing compliance costs and creating market entry hurdles.

**Standardization and Interoperability:** The absence of internationally recognized standards for BCI technology can create barriers to trade and adoption. Efforts are underway to establish such standards, involving relevant organizations and initiatives [14, 15]. The development of specific technical standards and the identification of key players driving these initiatives beyond organizations like IEEE are crucial for facilitating global commerce and interoperability.

## 7. Conclusion

The development and widespread implementation of Brain-Computer Interfaces are profoundly shaped by a complex interplay of regulatory, fiscal, and geopolitical factors. The current global regulatory landscape is fragmented, with differing approaches to device approval and data privacy across major economic blocs, posing significant challenges for international commerce and market access. Fiscal policies, including R&D incentives and venture capital support, are crucial for fostering innovation, though their effectiveness and distribution vary. Furthermore, escalating geopolitical tensions and the strategic competition for technological dominance create a tangible risk of restricted technology transfer, impacting collaboration and supply chains.

To navigate these complexities and realize the immense potential of BCIs, a multi-pronged approach is essential. This includes fostering international dialogue to promote regulatory harmonization, particularly concerning data protection and device safety standards. Governments must strategically deploy fiscal incentives to encourage research and development while ensuring equitable access to these transformative technologies. Moreover, proactive engagement with geopolitical dynamics is necessary to mitigate potential trade barriers and foster global collaboration. Ultimately, addressing these external influences through thoughtful policy, ethical consideration, and international cooperation will be paramount to ensuring that BCI technology benefits humanity responsibly and equitably.

## References

[1] Regulating Brain-Computer Interfaces. Available at: https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/regulating-brain-computer-interfaces [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[2] Regulating neural data processing in the age of BCIs. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11951885/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[3] PRIVACY AND THE CONNECTED MIND. Available at: https://fpf.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/FPF-BCI-Report-Final.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[4] PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION DIGEST. Available at: https://www.pdpc.gov.sg/-/media/files/pdpc/pdf-files/resource-for-organisation/2020-personal-data-protection-digest.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[5] Global data privacy laws: A critical review of technology's .... Available at: https://wjarr.com/sites/default/files/WJARR-2024-0369.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[6] How GDPR and CCPA are Represented in Technology .... Available at: https://escholarship.org/content/qt9mh2h52k/qt9mh2h52k_noSplash_3ce6e7cc183f9b2c1a5bad90754472df.pdf?t=rouips [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[7] Balancing User Privacy and Innovation in Augmented .... Available at: https://itif.org/publications/2021/03/04/balancing-user-privacy-and-innovation-augmented-and-virtual-reality/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[8] Fiscal incentives for R&D and innovation in a diverse world .... Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2016/09/fiscal-incentives-for-r-d-and-innovation-in-a-diverse-world_g17a286d/5jlr9stckfs0-en.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[9] R&D tax incentives. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/rd-tax-incentives.html [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[10] The Contentious U.S.-China Trade Relationship. Available at: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/contentious-us-china-trade-relationship [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[11] Current landscape of innovative drug development and .... Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12280122/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[12] R&D tax incentives continue to outpace other forms .... Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/data/insights/statistical-releases/2025/04/rd-tax-incentives-continue-to-outpace-other-forms-of-government-support-for-rd-in-most-countries.html [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[13] The Future Of Intellectual Property In Neurotechnology. Available at: https://www.intepat.com/blog/the-future-of-intellectual-property-in-neurotechnology/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[14] China's drive toward self-reliance in artificial intelligence. Available at: https://merics.org/en/report/chinas-drive-toward-self-reliance-artificial-intelligence-chips-large-language-models [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[15] Don't let tariffs & export restrictions block access to medical .... Available at: https://www.medtecheurope.org/news-and-events/news/dont-let-tariffs-block-access-to-medical-technologies/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[16] California's New Frontier in Data Protection and Neurorights. Available at: https://www.techpolicy.press/neural-data-and-consumer-privacy-californias-new-frontier-in-data-protection-and-neurorights/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[17] Regulatory approaches towards AI Medical Devices. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168851025000168#:~:text=The%20relevant%20regulatory%20framework%20in,and%20process%2Doriented%20regulation%20approach. [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[18] Development of Singapore AI for Science Initiative. Available at: https://file.go.gov.sg/ai4scscopingreport.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[19] Current landscape of innovative drug development and .... Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12280122/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[20] Advancing Regulatory Oversight of Medical Device Trials .... Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8247/18/6/876 [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[21] R&D tax incentives continue to outpace other forms .... Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/data/insights/statistical-releases/2025/04/rd-tax-incentives-continue-to-outpace-other-forms-of-government-support-for-rd-in-most-countries.html [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[22] R&D tax incentives. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/rd-tax-incentives.html [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[23] NeuroTech Investment Digest Q4-2021. Available at: https://analytics.dkv.global/neurotech-investment-digest-q4-2021.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[24] Neurotechnology Device Market Report 2026: Regional .... Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/neurotechnology-device-market-report-2026-regional-u0dee/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[25] The Future Of Intellectual Property In Neurotechnology. Available at: https://www.intepat.com/blog/the-future-of-intellectual-property-in-neurotechnology/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[26] The neurotechnology and data privacy interface. Available at: https://asiaiplaw.com/section/in-depth/the-neurotechnology-and-data-privacy-interface [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[27] U.S.-China Competition in Emerging Technologies. Available at: https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/Chapter_3--U.S.-China_Competition_in_Emerging_Technologies.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[28] Semiconductors at the Heart of the US-China Tech War. Available at: https://research.hinrichfoundation.com/hubfs/Capri%20Report%20-%20Jan%202020/Hinrich%20Foundation%20report%20-%20US-China%20tech%20war%20and%20semiconductors%20-%20January%2031%202020.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[29] The Potential for Bioeconomy and Biotechnology Transfer .... Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5083 [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[30] Lab leader, market ascender: China's rise in biotechnology. Available at: https://merics.org/en/report/lab-leader-market-ascender-chinas-rise-biotechnology [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[31] Do Publics Share Experts' Concerns about Brain .... Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0162243919879220 [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[32] Understanding the Ethical Issues of Brain-Computer .... Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11091939/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[33] Overview of the IEEE Standards Roadmap on .... Available at: https://brain.ieee.org/newsletter/2020-issue-1/overview-of-the-ieee-standards-roadmap-on-neurotechnologies-for-brain-machine-interfacing/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[34] Standardization and Application of Brain-computer .... Available at: https://jtc1info.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2025_BCI_Technology_Report.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[35] Brain Computer Interface Market Leads 16.7% CAGR .... Available at: https://www.towardshealthcare.com/insights/brain-computer-interface-market [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[36] Brain-Computer Interface - an overview. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/brain-computer-interface [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[37] Regulatory Overview for Neurological Devices. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/neurological-devices/regulatory-overview-neurological-devices [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[38] Global BCI Race Heats Up as China Unveils New Policies .... Available at: https://thedebrief.org/global-bci-race-heats-up-as-china-unveils-new-policies-to-accelerate-brain-tech-in-healthcare/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[39] China approves new standards for BCI-enabled medical .... Available at: https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202502/1329053.shtml [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[40] Regulatory approaches towards AI Medical Devices. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0168851025000168 [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[41] A decade of review in global regulation and research of .... Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/medicine/articles/10.3389/fmed.2025.1630408/pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[42] 2024 Neurotech Funding Snapshot - by Naveen Rao. Available at: https://neurotechnology.substack.com/p/2024-funding-snapshot [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[43] Venture Capital Response to Government-Funded Basic .... Available at: https://www.abfer.org/media/abfer-events-2025/annual-conference/papers-tech-ai/AC25P10007_Venture-Capital-Response-to-Government-Funded-Basic-Science.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[44] Europe and China's medical device tit for tat shows that .... Available at: https://fortune.com/asia/2025/07/09/china-europe-medical-devices-trade-tit-for-tat/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[45] EU-China tensions escalate over medical device trade .... Available at: https://www.euronews.com/my-europe/2025/07/07/eu-china-tensions-escalate-over-medical-device-trade-restrictions [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[46] Unlocking Neural Privacy: The Legal and Ethical Frontiers .... Available at: https://www.cooley.com/news/insight/2025/2025-03-13-unlocking-neural-privacy-the-legal-and-ethical-frontiers-of-neural-data [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[47] The Evolving US Privacy Landscape: Essential Insights for .... Available at: https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/publications/2024/10/the-evolving-us-privacy-landscape-essential-insights-for-2024 [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[48] Brain–computer interface: trend, challenges, and threats. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10403483/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[49] Brain-Computer Interfaces | GAO-25-106952. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-25-106952.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[50] A comparative analysis of public R&I funding in the EU, US .... Available at: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/document/download/6eaa3b4e-2af3-46fd-87b5-aa92e4ad10ee_en?filename=ec_rtd_comparative-analysis-public-funding.pdf&utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[51] Who Owns a Thought? Navigating Legal Issues in Neurotech. Available at: https://mcmillan.ca/insights/who-owns-a-thought-navigating-legal-issues-in-neurotech/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[52] The Future Of Intellectual Property In Neurotechnology. Available at: https://www.intepat.com/blog/the-future-of-intellectual-property-in-neurotechnology/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[53] Brain and Machine Confluence Requires Multi-Sectoral .... Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2023/02/brain-and-machine-confluence-requires-multi-sectoral.html [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[54] The Impact of R&D tax incentives (EN). Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2023/10/the-impact-of-r-d-tax-incentives_bc42ab04/1937ac6b-en.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[55] The nontax benefits of claiming R&D tax credits. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S016541012400048X [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[56] Ethics of neurotechnology. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/ethics-neurotech [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[57] Neurotechnology Toolkit. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/sti/emerging-tech/neurotech-toolkit.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[58] Brain-computer Interfaces. Available at: https://jtc1info.org/technology/subcommittees/brain-computer-interfaces/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[59] Input Sought on Export Controls on Brain-Computer .... Available at: https://research.hktdc.com/en/article/ODkxNzcwNjI5 [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[60] Global BCI Race Heats Up as China Unveils New Policies .... Available at: https://thedebrief.org/global-bci-race-heats-up-as-china-unveils-new-policies-to-accelerate-brain-tech-in-healthcare/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[61] NMPA Innovative Medical Devices Rules. Available at: https://chinameddevice.com/implementation-rules-innovative-medical-devices/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[62] Brain-Computer Interface Market Size, Share | Report - 2035. Available at: https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/brain-computer-interface-market-8412 [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[63] The Global Brain-Computer Interfaces Market 2025-2035. Available at: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/report/brain-computer-interface?srsltid=AfmBOor6vtSUBz7kmgh1ebdPbabI6PdcxAAb3gJQqU90Je3IQUyjAwR2 [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[64] 18th edition - 2025 tech trends report. Available at: https://ftsg.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/FTSG_2025_TR_FINAL_LINKED.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[65] Effectiveness of Fiscal Incentives for R&D in. Available at: https://www.elibrary.imf.org/abstract/journals/001/2017/084/article-A001-en.xml [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[66] The Future Of Intellectual Property In Neurotechnology. Available at: https://www.intepat.com/blog/the-future-of-intellectual-property-in-neurotechnology/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[67] BCIS-Brainwaves-and-Big-Brother.pdf. Available at: https://ijlsi.com/wp-content/uploads/BCIS-Brainwaves-and-Big-Brother.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[68] OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2016 ( .... Available at: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2016/12/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook-2016_g1g6dae9/sti_in_outlook-2016-en.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[69] TechEthos D2.2 Analysis of Ethical Issues. .... Available at: https://cea.hal.science/cea-03710862v1/file/TechEthos%20D2.2%20Analysis%20of%20Ethical%20Issues.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[70] Addressing the Regulatory Divergences in the Medical .... Available at: https://ecipe.org/publications/regulatory-divergences-medical-devices/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[71] Impact of Regulatory Changes on Innovations in the .... Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10125071/ [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[72] Ethics of neurotechnology. Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/ethics-neurotech [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[73] Final report on the draft Recommendation on the Ethics of .... Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000393266 [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[74] Brain-computer interfaces - ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 43. Available at: https://www.iso.org/committee/9082407.html [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[75] Standardization and Application of Brain-computer .... Available at: https://jtc1info.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2025_BCI_Technology_Report.pdf [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[76] Consumer BCIs and EU Regulation: Are We Ready for the .... Available at: https://www.cerebralink.com/post/bci-eu-regulation-neurotech [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[77] Brain-computer interface goes legit in China: new .... Available at: https://www.digitimes.com/news/a20250701PD211/china-medical-devices-ai.html [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

[78] Consumer neuro devices within EU product safety law. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924000128 [Accessed: 2025-07-26]

---
*Generated using [OptiLLM Deep Research](https://github.com/codelion/optillm) with TTD-DR (Test-Time Diffusion Deep Researcher)*
