# Design Sprint Wednesday Artifact: [Initiative or Challenge name]

<!-- Wednesday Decide and Storyboard bundled artifact. Captures the heat map, critique, straw poll, supervote, rumble decision, and the storyboard that drives Thursday's build. -->

## Art Museum Layout

**Posting:** [Wall arrangement OR shared Figma board OR Miro frame; with link or photo reference]

**Sketches present (attribution stripped):**

| Label | Sketch source (Tuesday) | Format |
|---|---|---|
| Sketch A | [Tuesday Sketcher anonymized] | [Figma frame / PDF / photo of paper] |
| Sketch B | [...] | [...] |
| Sketch C | [...] | [...] |
| Sketch D | [...] | [...] |

[Additional sketches if team size 5-7.]

## Heat Map

**Mechanic:** 3 small dots per voter; silent; 15 minutes. Voters place dots on the PARTS of sketches that excite them (interactions, surfaces, copy, framings). Dots can stack on the same element. Total dots: [N voters x 3 = M].

| Sketch | Dot count | Hottest elements (3-5 most-dotted) |
|---|---|---|
| Sketch A | [N] | [Element 1 | Element 2 | Element 3] |
| Sketch B | [N] | [...] |
| Sketch C | [N] | [...] |
| Sketch D | [N] | [...] |

## Speed Critique Notes

[3-minute critique per sketch. Facilitator (or rotated team member) walks through the sketch and summarizes what the team sees. The sketcher is silent during their own sketch's critique. Concerns are captured as "what would worry me" notes.]

### Sketch A

**What the team sees:** [1-2 sentence summary of the design philosophy.]

**Compelling elements:** [What the heat-map dots converged on.]

**What would worry me:** [3-5 bullets capturing concerns the storyboard must address if this sketch is supervoted.]

### Sketch B

**What the team sees:** [...]

**Compelling elements:** [...]

**What would worry me:** [...]

### Sketch C

**What the team sees:** [...]

**Compelling elements:** [...]

**What would worry me:** [...]

### Sketch D

**What the team sees:** [...]

**Compelling elements:** [...]

**What would worry me:** [...]

## Straw Poll Results

**Mechanic:** 1 large dot per voter; silent; non-binding (informs Decider).

| Voter | Picked |
|---|---|
| [Name] | Sketch [A/B/C/D] |
| [Name] | Sketch [A/B/C/D] |
| [Name] | Sketch [A/B/C/D] |
| [Name] | Sketch [A/B/C/D] |

**Straw poll distribution:** [Sketch A: N votes; Sketch B: N; etc.]

## Supervote

**Decider:** [Name].

**Supervote placement:** [Decider's supervoted sketch(es). Single sketch for all-in-one; two sketches for rumble.]

**Decider's rationale:** [2-4 sentences explaining the choice; reference critique concerns the storyboard must address; reference straw poll only if relevant.]

## Rumble vs All-in-One Decision

**Decision:** [All-in-one (default) / Rumble (storyboard 2 competing prototypes)]

**Rationale:** [Why this choice. If rumble: which 2 sketches, why both are worth Thursday's build capacity, and how Friday's interviews will test both. If all-in-one: confirm the team has Thursday capacity for one prototype that does justice to the storyboard scope.]

## Storyboard

**Storyboard scope:** [Target moment from Monday] plus [N panels of setup before] plus [N panels of outcome after]. Total: [5-15] panels.

| Panel | What the customer sees | What the customer does | System response | Notes for builders |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Description] | [Action] | [Response] | [Notes] |
| 2 | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| 3 | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| 4 | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| 5 | [...] | [...] | [...] | [...] |
| ... | ... | ... | ... | ... |

**Open questions for Thursday build:** [Bulleted list of decisions the storyboard intentionally leaves to builders; typically copy, visual polish, animation timing. NOT interaction logic or surface structure; those are storyboard-locked.]

## Decider Checkpoint

**Decider sign-off required before Thursday build begins.**

- [ ] Decider confirms the supervoted sketch (or sketches, if rumble) reflects the call they intended.
- [ ] Decider confirms the storyboard is specific enough that Thursday's builders can start without re-debating design.
- [ ] Decider confirms the storyboard scope (target moment plus minimal setup plus minimal outcome) is build-feasible in one day.
- [ ] Decider acknowledges that critique concerns NOT addressed in the storyboard are accepted as known weaknesses; Friday's test may surface them.
- [ ] Decider commits to attending Friday PM 14:00-18:00 (observe interview slots 4-5 + Decider review concludes by 17:30).

**Signed:** [Decider name, role], [ISO date and local time]
