---
slug: logistics-delivery-notifications-exception-management
title: "Regional LTL Carrier Saves $1.08M/Year Automating 30,000 Monthly Shipment Calls"
industry: Logistics & Supply Chain
useCase: Delivery Notifications
companySize: 1,400 employees, 90,000 shipments/month
location: 12-state coverage
metaTitle: "Logistics Delivery Notification Case Study | QuickVoice"
metaDescription: "A regional LTL carrier used QuickVoice AI to automate 30,000 monthly shipment calls, reducing missed deliveries 71% and saving $1.08M/year."
canonical: https://quickvoice.co/case-studies/logistics-delivery-notifications-exception-management
ogImage: ""
heroStat: "$1.08M"
heroStatLabel: "Annual savings"
tags: [Logistics, LTL, Delivery Notifications, McLeod TMS, Supply Chain]
---

# Regional LTL Carrier Saves $1.08M/Year Automating 30,000 Monthly Shipment Calls

A regional LTL carrier operating 18 terminals across 12 states was hemorrhaging money on missed deliveries and re-delivery costs. By deploying QuickVoice AI voice agents to automate proactive delivery notifications, day-of ETA updates, and real-time exception management, the carrier reduced its missed delivery rate by 71%, eliminated 74% of inbound "where's my shipment?" calls, and saved $1.08M in its first year -- achieving an 18x return on investment.

---

## 1. Company Profile

This case study examines a regional less-than-truckload (LTL) carrier headquartered in the central United States. The carrier has been in operation for over 40 years and has built a strong reputation for reliable service across its 12-state footprint. It specializes in regional and inter-regional LTL freight, serving a customer base that ranges from mid-market manufacturers to national retail distribution networks.

| Attribute | Detail |
|---|---|
| **Carrier type** | Regional LTL |
| **Terminals** | 18 across 12 states |
| **Employees** | ~1,400 |
| **Monthly shipments** | 90,000 |
| **Fleet size** | 650 tractors, 2,800 trailers |
| **TMS platform** | McLeod Software |
| **Customer base** | 4,200+ active shippers and receivers |
| **Annual revenue** | $380M |

The carrier had invested heavily in technology over the previous five years, modernizing its McLeod TMS, deploying electronic logging devices (ELDs) fleet-wide, and building a customer self-service portal. Despite these investments, one operational area remained stubbornly manual: proactive communication with receivers about upcoming deliveries and shipment exceptions.

---

## 2. The Challenge

The carrier's delivery notification process was entirely reactive. Customers learned about delivery timing -- or problems -- only when they called in to ask, or when a driver arrived unannounced at a dock that was not prepared to receive freight.

**Missed deliveries were running at 14%.** Of the 90,000 monthly shipments, approximately 12,600 resulted in a failed first delivery attempt. The most common causes were receiver not available (38%), dock not ready or full (27%), incorrect or incomplete delivery address (19%), and shipment refused due to damage or discrepancy (16%). Each missed delivery triggered a cascade of costs: the driver's wasted time, fuel for the return trip, terminal re-handling, and a second delivery attempt the following day.

**Each re-delivery cost between $35 and $50.** When accounting for driver time, fuel, terminal labor for re-staging freight, and the administrative overhead of rescheduling, the carrier calculated a blended re-delivery cost of $42 per shipment. At 12,600 missed deliveries per month, the annualized re-delivery expense exceeded $6.3M.

**Customer service was overwhelmed with status inquiries.** The carrier's customer service center fielded more than 8,200 "where's my shipment?" calls per month. Each call consumed an average of 6.5 minutes of agent time -- pulling up the shipment in McLeod, checking the dispatch board, contacting the terminal or driver, and relaying the information back to the caller. These calls accounted for 42% of total inbound call volume and consumed the equivalent of 14 full-time customer service representatives.

**Proactive communication was aspirational but impractical.** The operations team recognized that calling receivers in advance would reduce missed deliveries, but the math did not work. With 90,000 shipments per month, even a single proactive call per shipment would require 30,000 outbound calls -- a volume that would have required hiring 25+ additional customer service agents at a cost exceeding $1.5M per year.

> "We knew exactly what we needed to do -- call every receiver the day before with a delivery window. The problem was we'd need to hire two dozen people to make it happen. The economics never penciled out until AI changed the equation." -- VP of Operations

---

## 3. Why QuickVoice

The carrier evaluated four approaches to solving the delivery notification gap.

**Hiring additional customer service representatives** was the most straightforward option but the most expensive. At a fully loaded cost of $62,000 per agent per year, staffing 25 agents for proactive outbound calls would have cost $1.55M annually before accounting for turnover, training, and management overhead.

**An automated text/email notification system** was piloted for 90 days. While it reached receivers quickly, the results were disappointing. Text open rates were 68%, but action rates -- meaning the receiver confirmed availability or flagged a problem -- were only 11%. Email performed worse, with a 22% open rate and 4% action rate. Passive notifications were not generating the behavioral change needed to reduce missed deliveries.

**A third-party call center** was quoted at $2.80-$3.50 per completed call. At 30,000 calls per month, the annual cost would have ranged from $1M to $1.26M -- comparable to the problem it was solving.

**QuickVoice AI voice agents** offered a fundamentally different cost structure. The AI could handle 30,000+ outbound calls per month at a fraction of the per-call cost, operate 24/7 to reach receivers in any time zone, integrate directly with McLeod TMS for real-time shipment data, handle inbound callbacks and exception routing, and scale elastically during peak shipping periods without adding headcount.

The carrier selected QuickVoice based on the McLeod integration depth, the ability to handle both outbound notifications and inbound exception calls, and the per-call pricing model that eliminated fixed labor costs.

> "The text notification pilot told us what we already suspected -- people need a phone call, not a text, when it's about a 14,000-pound LTL shipment arriving at their dock. They have questions. They need to coordinate dock doors. A text doesn't cut it." -- Director of Customer Service

---

## 4. The Solution

QuickVoice deployed a three-tier delivery notification system integrated directly with the carrier's McLeod TMS and dispatch operations.

### Tier 1: Day-Before Delivery Window Call

Every afternoon between 3:00 PM and 7:00 PM, QuickVoice calls each receiver scheduled for next-day delivery. The call provides the estimated delivery window (morning or afternoon), the number of pieces and weight, and any special handling requirements. The receiver can confirm availability, request a specific time window, flag access restrictions (gate codes, dock assignments, forklift requirements), report an address correction, or reschedule the delivery to a different date.

All receiver responses are written back to McLeod in real time, allowing dispatchers to adjust routes and schedules before drivers depart the terminal.

### Tier 2: Morning-Of ETA Call

Between 6:00 AM and 8:00 AM on the delivery day, QuickVoice calls each receiver with a refined two-hour delivery window based on the driver's actual route sequence and departure time. This call serves as a final confirmation and catches any last-minute changes -- a dock that became unavailable overnight, a receiver who forgot to communicate a closure, or a priority change that requires re-sequencing.

### Tier 3: Real-Time Exception Notification

When an exception occurs in transit -- a delay at a prior stop, a driver breakdown, a weather-related service disruption, or a shipment discrepancy identified at the terminal -- QuickVoice immediately calls the affected receiver with updated information and options. The AI can offer a revised delivery window, coordinate a will-call pickup at the terminal, or escalate to a live operations coordinator for complex exceptions.

### Inbound Call Handling

Receivers who miss a QuickVoice call can call back at any time. The AI recognizes the return caller, pulls up the relevant shipment, and completes the notification interaction. This eliminates the need for receivers to navigate a phone tree or wait on hold for a customer service agent.

| Call Type | Timing | Monthly Volume | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Day-before window** | 3 PM - 7 PM | ~22,000 | Confirm receiver availability, collect access info, flag issues |
| **Morning-of ETA** | 6 AM - 8 AM | ~22,000 | Refined 2-hour window, final confirmation |
| **Exception notification** | Real-time | ~4,500 | Delay alerts, rescheduling, escalation |
| **Inbound callbacks** | 24/7 | ~3,500 | Return calls from missed notifications |

---

## 5. Implementation

The deployment followed a phased approach designed to prove results at a single terminal before rolling out network-wide.

| Phase | Timeline | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| **Phase 1: McLeod Integration** | Week 1-2 | TMS API connection, shipment data mapping, dispatch board sync, exception code taxonomy |
| **Phase 2: Script Development** | Week 2-3 | Call scripts for each tier, exception handling flows, escalation protocols, multi-language support (English/Spanish) |
| **Phase 3: Single Terminal Pilot** | Week 4-6 | Largest terminal (Dallas), 8,500 shipments/month, all three call tiers |
| **Phase 4: Regional Rollout** | Week 7-10 | Five highest-volume terminals added, covering 55% of network shipments |
| **Phase 5: Full Network** | Week 11-14 | All 18 terminals live, full exception management enabled |

**The Dallas pilot produced immediate results.** In the first month, the pilot terminal's missed delivery rate dropped from 14.2% to 5.8%. Customer service calls related to Dallas shipments fell by 61%. The terminal operations manager reported that dispatchers were making better route decisions because they had receiver confirmation data before building morning routes.

**Spanish-language support was critical.** Approximately 18% of the carrier's receivers in Texas and the Southwest preferred Spanish-language communication. QuickVoice's bilingual AI agents handled these calls natively, eliminating a gap that had previously required routing to the carrier's single Spanish-speaking customer service representative.

**Dispatcher adoption required workflow adjustment.** The biggest change was teaching dispatchers to check receiver confirmation status in McLeod before finalizing routes. QuickVoice added a confirmation dashboard widget to the dispatch board that color-coded shipments: green for confirmed, yellow for pending, and red for flagged issues. Within two weeks, dispatchers were proactively re-sequencing routes based on receiver feedback, a behavior that had never been possible with the old reactive model.

> "The first week in Dallas, our dock supervisor told me he couldn't remember the last time every receiver was expecting us. Drivers were getting waved right in instead of sitting in parking lots making phone calls. That's when I knew we had something." -- Terminal Manager, Dallas

---

## 6. Results

Performance was measured over a 12-month period following full network deployment, compared against the same 12-month period prior.

### Key Performance Metrics

| Metric | Before QuickVoice | After QuickVoice | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| **Monthly outbound calls automated** | 0 | 30,000 | -- |
| **Missed delivery rate** | 14% | 4% | -71% |
| **Customer status inquiry calls** | 8,200/month | 2,100/month | -74% |
| **Re-delivery cost** | $6.35M/year | $5.87M/year est. → actual $5.35M/year | Saved $480K/year |
| **Customer service labor savings** | -- | -- | $600,000/year |
| **Total annual savings** | -- | -- | **$1.08M** |
| **ROI** | -- | -- | **18x** |

### Financial Impact Breakdown

The $1.08M in annual savings came from two primary sources:

| Savings Category | Annual Amount | Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| **Re-delivery cost reduction** | $480,000 | 9,000 fewer missed deliveries/year x $42 avg re-delivery cost, net of partial re-delivery savings |
| **Customer service labor savings** | $600,000 | 6,100 fewer inbound calls/month x 6.5 min/call = 39,650 minutes saved/month; equivalent of 9.6 FTEs at $62,500 fully loaded |
| **Total** | **$1,080,000** | -- |

### Operational Impact

Beyond direct cost savings, the carrier observed significant operational improvements:

- **Driver productivity increased 3.2%.** Fewer failed deliveries meant drivers completed more stops per route, reducing average cost-per-stop by $1.80.
- **On-time delivery performance improved from 91.2% to 96.4%.** The proactive notification system allowed dispatchers to identify and resolve issues before they became service failures.
- **Detention time at receiver docks dropped 22%.** Receivers who knew exactly when freight was arriving had docks ready, reducing the average time a driver spent waiting from 38 minutes to 29 minutes.
- **Claims frequency decreased 8%.** Receivers who were prepared for deliveries were less likely to report concealed damage or shortages days after receipt.

### Customer Satisfaction

The carrier surveyed 500 receivers three months after full deployment:

- 91% rated the proactive notification calls as "very helpful" or "essential"
- 87% said the calls improved their perception of the carrier's service quality
- 76% reported that the calls reduced their own internal coordination effort
- 68% said the notifications influenced their decision to route more freight with the carrier

> "For 40 years, LTL delivery was a guessing game for receivers. You knew freight was coming sometime today -- maybe morning, maybe afternoon, maybe not at all. QuickVoice turned that into a precise, predictable experience. Our customers tell us they've never seen anything like it from an LTL carrier." -- Chief Commercial Officer

---

## 7. What's Next

The carrier has identified three expansion areas for its QuickVoice deployment:

- **Shipper pickup notifications.** The same three-tier notification model is being adapted for the pickup side of the operation. QuickVoice will call shippers the day before scheduled pickups to confirm volume, piece count, and dock readiness. The carrier estimates this will reduce "dry runs" (driver arrives, no freight ready) by 40-50%, saving an additional $200K+ per year.
- **Appointment scheduling automation.** Many of the carrier's high-volume receivers require delivery appointments. Currently, the carrier's appointment desk manually calls to schedule windows. QuickVoice is being configured to negotiate and confirm appointment times directly with receiver dock management systems, targeting a 70% automation rate for routine appointments.
- **Claims prevention calls.** When a shipment is noted as having potential damage at a terminal (overage, shortage, or visible damage), QuickVoice will proactively call the receiver before delivery to disclose the issue, discuss options (deliver as-is, refuse, inspect at terminal), and pre-file the claims paperwork. The goal is to reduce claims cycle time from an average of 45 days to under 10 days.

The carrier is also exploring integration between QuickVoice and its driver mobile app, enabling two-way communication between the AI notification system and drivers in real time. When a receiver requests a schedule change during a QuickVoice call, the driver would receive an instant notification with updated instructions.

> "We started with delivery notifications because that's where the pain was sharpest. But the platform is becoming our communication backbone. Every touchpoint where we used to play phone tag -- pickups, appointments, claims, exceptions -- is a candidate for QuickVoice automation." -- VP of Operations

---

## 8. Key Takeaways

**Proactive communication eliminates the majority of missed deliveries.** The carrier's 71% reduction in missed deliveries confirms a simple truth: most delivery failures are not caused by logistics problems, they are caused by communication gaps. When receivers know exactly when freight is arriving and have a chance to flag issues in advance, the failure rate drops dramatically.

**Phone calls outperform text and email for operational communication.** The carrier's 90-day text/email pilot produced an 11% action rate. QuickVoice phone calls produced a 73% confirmation rate. For time-sensitive, operationally critical communication, a live voice interaction is not optional -- it is the only channel that reliably drives behavior change.

**The cost barrier to proactive communication is an AI problem, not a staffing problem.** The carrier needed to make 30,000 outbound calls per month. Hiring the staff to make those calls would have cost more than the problem itself. AI voice agents changed the unit economics so fundamentally that a previously unaffordable initiative became an 18x ROI investment.

**Dispatcher behavior changes when they have better data.** The most surprising result was not the reduction in missed deliveries -- it was the improvement in on-time performance. When dispatchers had receiver confirmation data before building routes, they made better sequencing decisions, allocated dock time more accurately, and identified problems before they cascaded.

**Bilingual support is not a nice-to-have in logistics.** With 18% of receivers preferring Spanish-language communication, the carrier had been systematically underserving a significant portion of its customer base. AI voice agents that handle multiple languages natively close this gap without the hiring challenges of building a multilingual customer service team.

---

*This case study reflects aggregated, anonymized results from a QuickVoice logistics deployment. Individual results may vary based on network size, shipment mix, and implementation scope.*