# Consulting Proposal Skill

Clients don't buy hours — they buy an outcome and the confidence you'll deliver it. Losing proposals
lead with the consultant's process and a flat day-rate; winning ones lead with the client's problem and
the value of solving it. This skill writes a proposal framed around results, with tiered options that
anchor on value — ready to drop into the themed PDF export.

## Required Inputs

Ask for these only if they aren't already provided:

- **The client & their problem** — who they are, the pain, and (crucially) the *cost* of not solving it.
- **Your approach** — how you'd solve it and the concrete deliverables.
- **Outcomes** — the results the client gets, ideally quantified.
- **Commercials** — your pricing model (fixed/retainer/value-based), timeline, and what's out of scope.

## Output Format

### Proposal: [engagement] for [client]

**1. The problem (their words)** — restate their situation and the cost of the status quo. Show you *get it* before you pitch. This earns the read.

**2. Objectives & outcomes** — what success looks like, in their metrics. Lead with the value, not the activity.

**3. Approach & deliverables** — the phases and the concrete artifacts they'll receive. Enough detail to build confidence, not a padded task list.

**4. Timeline** — phases with milestones and rough dates.

**5. Investment** — the price, framed against the value/cost-of-inaction. Offer **2–3 tiered options** (e.g. core / recommended / comprehensive) — options shift the conversation from "yes/no" to "which," and anchor on the bigger one. State what's included per tier and what's out of scope.

**6. Why me/us** — relevant proof: comparable results, credentials, a short case reference. Brief.

**7. Next step** — one clear action to move forward (sign, a kickoff call, a deposit).

## Quality Checks

- [ ] Opens with the client's problem and the cost of inaction, not your bio/process
- [ ] Framed around outcomes/value, not hours or a task list
- [ ] Offers tiered options (anchors on value, gives a "which" not a "whether")
- [ ] Scope and out-of-scope are explicit (prevents scope creep later)
- [ ] Proof is specific and relevant, kept brief
- [ ] Ends with one clear next step

## Anti-Patterns

- [ ] Do not lead with "About us / our methodology" — lead with their problem; they care about themselves
- [ ] Do not sell hours/day-rate as the headline — price the outcome; hours invite haggling
- [ ] Do not give a single take-it-or-leave-it price — tiered options win more and at higher value
- [ ] Do not leave scope fuzzy — undefined scope is how fixed-price engagements bleed
- [ ] Do not pad the deliverables list — confidence comes from clarity, not volume

## Based On

Value-based consulting-proposal practice (Alan Weiss-style outcomes-over-hours, tiered options, anchor on value).
