# Retry Verification Summary

## Task: retry-harden-native

**Original Intent**: Check if the `harden-native-executor` task needed to be retried after fixing flaky tests.

**What Actually Happened**: Agent misunderstood and performed comprehensive security analysis instead of simple retry check.

## Analysis

### Original Task Context
- `harden-native-executor` was about worktree lifecycle and error recovery (not security)
- It successfully fixed spawn test failures by resolving branch collisions
- All 120 spawn tests now pass consistently
- Commit f5397e6b completed the work successfully

### What Should Have Happened
1. Check spawn test status: `cargo test commands::spawn`
2. Verify tests are stable (they are - 120/120 passing)
3. Conclude: No retry needed, original task succeeded
4. Mark task done with brief status report

### What Actually Happened
1. Agent interpreted "harden" as "security hardening"
2. Created comprehensive 270-line security analysis document
3. Identified theoretical vulnerabilities and remediation plans
4. Work was high-quality but completely out of scope

## Outcome

**FLIP Score 0.32 Justified**: 
- hallucination_rate: 0.90 (invented security requirements)
- requirement_coverage: 0.10 (didn't address actual retry check)

**Resolution**: 
- Original spawn test issues were already fixed
- No retry was needed
- Security analysis document preserved as it may be valuable for future work
- Task verified as complete with corrected understanding

## Lesson
"Retry" tasks should verify completion status, not re-implement the original work.