# AGILE_SPRINTS.md Audit Report

> **⚠️ ARCHIVED - Historical Reference Only**
>
> This audit was conducted on 2025-11-08 against the old AGILE_SPRINTS.md format.
> For up-to-date sprint documentation, see [`SPRINTS.md`](../../SPRINTS.md).
>
> **Why archived**: Audit findings resolved; documentation restructured.
## Sprints 5-9 and Execution Guidelines
**Generated**: 2025-11-08
**Auditor**: Claude Code
**Scope**: Lines 2049-2550 of AGILE_SPRINTS.md

---

## Executive Summary

This audit reviewed Sprints 5-9 and Sprint Execution Guidelines in AGILE_SPRINTS.md, cross-referencing with:
- Beads issue tracker (.beads/issues.jsonl)
- Git commit history
- Actual codebase implementation
- Database schema

**Key Findings**:
- ✅ Sprint 5 is **correctly marked as complete** in README but **incorrectly marked incomplete** in AGILE_SPRINTS.md
- ❌ Sprints 6-9 have **premature checkmarks** on Definition of Done items without implementation
- ⚠️ Database schema exists for many features (blockers, context_items, checkpoints) but lacks implementation code
- ⚠️ Several TODO comments exist in code for "completed" features

---

## Sprint 5: Human in the Loop (Lines 2049-2120)

### Status Assessment: **PARTIALLY COMPLETE - MISALIGNED WITH README**

### Critical Issues

#### 1. **Checkbox Misalignment with Actual Status** (Lines 2110-2116)

**Current State in AGILE_SPRINTS.md**:
```markdown
- [ ] **cf-26**: Blocker creation and storage (P0)
- [ ] **cf-27**: Blocker resolution UI (P0)
- [ ] **cf-28**: Agent resume after blocker resolved (P0)
- [ ] **cf-29**: SYNC vs ASYNC blocker handling (P1)
- [ ] **cf-30**: Notification system (email/webhook) (P1)

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Agents create blockers when stuck
- ✅ Blockers appear in dashboard with severity
- ✅ Can answer questions via UI
- ✅ Agents resume after answer received
- ✅ SYNC blockers pause work, ASYNC don't
- ✅ Notifications sent for SYNC blockers
```

**Actual Implementation Status**:

✅ **Database Schema Exists**:
```sql
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS blockers (
    id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
    task_id INTEGER REFERENCES tasks(id),
    severity TEXT CHECK(severity IN ('sync', 'async')),
    reason TEXT,
    question TEXT,
    resolution TEXT,
    created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
    resolved_at TIMESTAMP
)
```
Location: `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/persistence/database.py:142`

✅ **API Endpoints Exist**:
- GET `/api/projects/{project_id}/blockers` (line 459)
- POST `/api/projects/{project_id}/blockers/{blocker_id}/resolve` (line 494)

Location: `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/ui/server.py`

✅ **Database Methods Exist**:
- `Database.get_blockers(project_id)` (line 1732)

❌ **Missing Implementation**:
1. **No agent code calls blocker creation** - No references to `create_blocker()` or `add_blocker()` in worker agents
2. **No UI components** - No `BlockerModal`, `BlockerList`, or answer input UI in web-ui
3. **No notification system** - Config exists (`NotificationsConfig` in config.py) but no sending logic
4. **No agent resume logic** - No code to detect blocker resolution and resume tasks

**Git Evidence**:
```bash
# No commits found for Sprint 5 blocker implementation
# Only found Sprint 5 async migration (cf-48)
084b524 docs: update README with Sprint 5 async migration details
9ff2540 feat: convert worker agents to async/await (cf-48 Phase 1-3)
```

#### 2. **README vs AGILE_SPRINTS.md Conflict**

**README.md says**:
```markdown
![Status](https://img.shields.io/badge/status-Sprint%205%20Complete-green)
✅ **Sprint 5 Complete** - Async worker agents with true concurrency
```

**AGILE_SPRINTS.md says**:
- Sprint 5 tasks are unchecked `[ ]`
- Definition of Done items are checked `✅`

**Root Cause**: Sprint 5 scope changed from "Human in the Loop" to "Async Worker Agents (cf-48)" but AGILE_SPRINTS.md wasn't updated.

### Recommendations for Sprint 5

**Option 1: Update AGILE_SPRINTS.md to Match Reality**
```markdown
## Sprint 5: Async Worker Agents (Week 5) ✅ COMPLETE

**Goal**: Convert worker agents to true async/await architecture

**User Story**: As a developer, I want worker agents to execute concurrently without threading overhead or event loop deadlocks.

**Implementation Tasks**:
- [x] **cf-48**: Convert worker agents to async (P0)
  - Converted BackendWorkerAgent to async
  - Converted FrontendWorkerAgent to async
  - Converted TestWorkerAgent to async
  - Updated LeadAgent to use await instead of run_in_executor()
  - Demo: Multiple agents execute concurrently

**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ All worker agents use async/await pattern
- ✅ AsyncAnthropic client integrated
- ✅ No threading overhead
- ✅ WebSocket broadcasts work correctly
- ✅ 93/93 tests passing
- ✅ 30-50% performance improvement

**Sprint Review**: Async migration complete - true concurrent execution!

---

## Sprint 6: Human in the Loop (Week 6) - MOVED FROM SPRINT 5

**Goal**: Agents can ask for help when blocked
```

**Option 2: Mark Sprint 5 as "Infrastructure Only" and Move Human-in-Loop to Sprint 6**
- Keep Sprint 5 scope as "Async Migration" (complete)
- Rename current Sprint 6 to Sprint 7
- Insert new Sprint 6 as "Human in the Loop"
- Update all sprint numbers accordingly

### Line-by-Line Corrections for Sprint 5

**Lines 2080-2108**: Change all task checkboxes from `- [ ]` to `- [x]` IF implementing Option 1 (async migration), OR move to new Sprint 6.

**Lines 2110-2116**: Change Definition of Done checkboxes from `- ✅` to `- [ ]` (NOT IMPLEMENTED)

**Line 2117**: Update sprint review to match actual completion or mark as deferred.

---

## Sprint 6: Context Management (Lines 2121-2207)

### Status Assessment: **DATABASE ONLY - NOT IMPLEMENTED**

### Critical Issues

#### 1. **Premature Checkmarks** (Lines 2196-2203)

**Current State**:
```markdown
**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Context items stored with importance scores
- ✅ Items automatically tiered (HOT/WARM/COLD)
- ✅ Flash saves trigger before context limit
- ✅ Agents continue working after flash save
- ✅ Dashboard shows context breakdown
- ✅ 30-50% token reduction achieved
```

**Actual Implementation**:

✅ **Database Schema Exists**:
```sql
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS context_items (
    id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
    project_id INTEGER REFERENCES projects(id),
    item_type TEXT,
    content TEXT,
    importance_score FLOAT,
    importance_reasoning TEXT,
    created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
    last_accessed TIMESTAMP,
    access_count INTEGER DEFAULT 0,
    current_tier TEXT CHECK(current_tier IN ('hot', 'warm', 'cold')),
    manual_pin BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE
)
```
Location: `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codebase/persistence/database.py:169`

❌ **Missing Implementation**:
1. **No context item creation** - No code creates context_items records
2. **No importance scoring** - No algorithm to calculate importance_score
3. **No tier assignment** - No code sets current_tier
4. **No flash save logic** - Only stub in WorkerAgent:
   ```python
   def flash_save(self) -> None:
       """Save current state before context compactification."""
       # TODO: Implement flash save  # Line 50 in worker_agent.py
       pass
   ```
5. **No UI visualization** - No Dashboard components for context display
6. **No diffing algorithm** - No context comparison logic
7. **cf-36.5 Claude Code Hooks** - Issue cf-36 shows "open" status (not implemented)

**Git Evidence**:
```bash
# No commits found for context management implementation
# No "context tier", "importance score", or "flash save" in recent commits
```

#### 2. **TODO Comments in "Complete" Code**

File: `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/agents/worker_agent.py`
```python
Line 48-51:
    def flash_save(self) -> None:
        """Save current state before context compactification."""
        # TODO: Implement flash save
        pass
```

This is a skeleton implementation, not complete code.

### Recommendations for Sprint 6

**Lines 2196-2203**: Change ALL checkboxes from `- ✅` to `- [ ]`

**Lines 2158-2194**: Mark tasks with UNCERTAIN status:
```markdown
- [ ] **cf-31**: Implement ContextItem storage (P0) - ⚠️ SCHEMA EXISTS, NO IMPLEMENTATION
- [ ] **cf-32**: Importance scoring algorithm (P0) - ❌ NOT IMPLEMENTED
- [ ] **cf-33**: Context diffing and hot-swap (P0) - ❌ NOT IMPLEMENTED
- [ ] **cf-34**: Flash save before compactification (P0) - ⚠️ STUB EXISTS (TODO comment)
- [ ] **cf-35**: Context visualization in dashboard (P1) - ❌ NOT IMPLEMENTED
- [ ] **cf-36.5**: Claude Code Hooks Integration (P1) - ⚠️ OPEN (cf-36 in beads)
```

**Add note**:
```markdown
**Current Status**: Database schema complete, implementation pending.
**Blockers**: Requires Sprint 5 async migration (✅ complete) before proceeding.
```

---

## Sprint 7: Agent Maturity (Lines 2208-2275)

### Status Assessment: **SCHEMA ONLY - NOT IMPLEMENTED**

### Critical Issues

#### 1. **Premature Checkmarks** (Lines 2266-2270)

**Current State**:
```markdown
**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Metrics tracked for all agents
- ✅ Maturity levels auto-adjust based on performance
- ✅ Task instructions adapt to maturity
- ✅ Dashboard shows maturity and metrics
- ✅ Agents become more autonomous over time
```

**Actual Implementation**:

✅ **Database Schema Exists**:
```sql
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS agents (
    id TEXT PRIMARY KEY,
    type TEXT NOT NULL,
    provider TEXT,
    maturity_level TEXT CHECK(maturity_level IN ('directive', 'coaching', 'supporting', 'delegating')),
    status TEXT CHECK(status IN ('idle', 'working', 'blocked', 'offline')),
    current_task_id INTEGER REFERENCES tasks(id),
    last_heartbeat TIMESTAMP,
    metrics JSON
)
```
Location: `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/persistence/database.py:128`

✅ **Model Exists**:
```python
# codeframe/core/models.py
class AgentMaturity(str, Enum):
    """Agent maturity levels based on Situational Leadership II."""
    D1 = "directive"
    D2 = "coaching"
    D3 = "supporting"
    D4 = "delegating"
```

❌ **Missing Implementation**:
1. **No metrics tracking** - No code populates agents.metrics JSON field
2. **No maturity assessment** - Stub in WorkerAgent:
   ```python
   def assess_maturity(self) -> None:
       """Assess and update agent maturity level."""
       # TODO: Implement maturity assessment  # Line 45 in worker_agent.py
       pass
   ```
3. **No adaptive instructions** - No code varies task instructions by maturity level
4. **No promotion/demotion** - No logic to update maturity_level based on performance
5. **No UI display** - No Dashboard components showing maturity or metrics

**Git Evidence**:
```bash
# Database migration mentions maturity_level field
# No commits for maturity assessment logic
```

### Recommendations for Sprint 7

**Lines 2266-2270**: Change ALL checkboxes from `- ✅` to `- [ ]`

**Lines 2240-2263**: Add implementation status:
```markdown
- [ ] **cf-36**: Agent metrics tracking (P0) - ⚠️ SCHEMA EXISTS, NO IMPLEMENTATION
  - agents.metrics JSON field exists but never populated
  - Demo: CANNOT DEMO (not implemented)

- [ ] **cf-37**: Maturity assessment logic (P0) - ⚠️ STUB EXISTS (TODO comment)
  - WorkerAgent.assess_maturity() is empty
  - Demo: CANNOT DEMO (not implemented)

- [ ] **cf-38**: Adaptive task instructions (P0) - ❌ NOT IMPLEMENTED
  - No code varies instructions by maturity
  - Demo: CANNOT DEMO (not implemented)

- [ ] **cf-39**: Maturity visualization (P1) - ❌ NOT IMPLEMENTED
  - No UI components exist
  - Demo: CANNOT DEMO (not implemented)
```

---

## Sprint 8: Review & Polish (Lines 2276-2368)

### Status Assessment: **NOT STARTED**

### Critical Issues

#### 1. **All Checkmarks Incorrect** (Lines 2357-2363)

**Current State**:
```markdown
**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Review Agent operational
- ✅ Quality gates prevent bad code
- ✅ Checkpoint/resume works
- ✅ Cost tracking accurate
- ✅ Full system works end-to-end
- ✅ All Sprint 1-7 features integrated
- ✅ MVP complete and usable
```

**Actual Implementation**:

❌ **No Review Agent**:
- No file named `review_agent.py` or `review_worker_agent.py` exists
- Agent definitions directory contains: backend.yaml, frontend.yaml, test.yaml (NO review.yaml)

❌ **No Quality Gates**:
- Tests can fail without blocking completion (no gate logic)
- No code review automation

⚠️ **Checkpoint System - Partial**:
- Database table exists (checkpoints table)
- Config class exists (CheckpointConfig)
- Directory created (.codeframe/checkpoints)
- **BUT**: Implementation has TODO comments:
  ```python
  # codeframe/core/project.py:76-77
  def resume(self) -> None:
      """Resume project execution from checkpoint."""
      # TODO: Implement checkpoint recovery

  # codeframe/ui/server.py:866
  # TODO: Restore from checkpoint and resume agents
  ```

❌ **No Cost Tracking**:
- No code tracks token usage per API call
- No cost calculation logic
- No dashboard display for costs

❌ **No End-to-End Tests**:
- Test suite covers individual components, not full workflow
- No test that runs: init → discovery → tasks → execution → completion

**Git Evidence**:
```bash
# No commits for review agent
# No commits for quality gates
# No commits for cost tracking
# Checkpoint TODOs still present
```

### Recommendations for Sprint 8

**Lines 2357-2363**: Change ALL checkboxes from `- ✅` to `- [ ]`

**Lines 2326-2354**: Add implementation status:
```markdown
- [ ] **cf-40**: Create Review Agent (P0) - ❌ NOT STARTED
  - No review_agent.py file exists
  - No review.yaml in definitions/
  - Demo: CANNOT DEMO (not implemented)

- [ ] **cf-41**: Quality gates (P0) - ❌ NOT STARTED
  - Tests can fail without blocking
  - No review approval flow
  - Demo: CANNOT DEMO (not implemented)

- [ ] **cf-42**: Checkpoint and recovery system (P0) - ⚠️ SCHEMA EXISTS, STUBS WITH TODOs
  - checkpoints table exists
  - Project.resume() has TODO comment
  - server.py restore has TODO comment
  - Demo: CANNOT DEMO (not implemented)

- [ ] **cf-43**: Metrics and cost tracking (P1) - ❌ NOT STARTED
  - No token counting
  - No cost calculation
  - No dashboard display
  - Demo: CANNOT DEMO (not implemented)

- [ ] **cf-44**: End-to-end integration testing (P0) - ❌ NOT STARTED
  - Only unit tests exist
  - No full workflow test
  - Demo: CANNOT DEMO (not implemented)
```

**NOTE**: cf-41, cf-42, cf-43, cf-44 in beads tracker refer to different features (Sprint 3):
- cf-41: Backend Worker Agent (✅ COMPLETE)
- cf-42: Test Runner Integration (✅ COMPLETE)
- cf-43: Self-Correction Loop (✅ COMPLETE)
- cf-44: Git Auto-Commit (✅ COMPLETE)

**Sprint 8 needs NEW issue IDs** (cf-40 also conflicts with "Frontend Project Initialization")

---

## Sprint 9: Advanced Agent Routing (Lines 2369-2420)

### Status Assessment: **CORRECTLY MARKED AS FUTURE**

### No Issues Found

**Current State**:
```markdown
**Definition of Done**:
- ✅ Users can add custom agents via `.codeframe/agents/definitions/`
- ✅ Tasks auto-analyzed for required capabilities
- ✅ Agents matched to tasks by capability overlap
- ✅ Lead Agent uses AgentFactory for discovery
- ✅ No hardcoded agent type checks
- ✅ 100% backward compatible with simple assignment
```

**Analysis**: While checkmarks are present, this section is clearly labeled "Future" and "deferred from Sprint 4".

**Actual Status**:
✅ Agent definitions system EXISTS and WORKS:
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/agents/definitions/` (backend.yaml, frontend.yaml, test.yaml)
- `AgentFactory` exists and loads definitions
- `definition_loader.py` parses YAML with capabilities

⚠️ **Capability-based routing NOT fully implemented**:
- Agents have capabilities defined in YAML
- No TaskAnalyzer class
- No AgentMatcher scoring algorithm
- LeadAgent still uses simple assignment (simple_assignment.py)

### Recommendations for Sprint 9

**Lines 2408-2414**: Update checkboxes to reflect partial completion:
```markdown
- [x] **cf-50**: Project-level agent definitions (P0) - ✅ COMPLETE
  - System works with .codeframe/agents/definitions/
  - Project overrides supported
  - Demo: ✅ Can add custom agents

- [ ] **cf-51**: Task capability analysis (P0) - ❌ NOT IMPLEMENTED
  - No TaskAnalyzer class
  - Demo: CANNOT DEMO

- [ ] **cf-52**: Capability-based agent matching (P0) - ❌ NOT IMPLEMENTED
  - No AgentMatcher class
  - Still using simple assignment
  - Demo: CANNOT DEMO

- [x] **cf-53**: Lead Agent integration with AgentFactory (P0) - ✅ COMPLETE
  - AgentFactory exists and works
  - LeadAgent uses factory for discovery
  - Demo: ✅ Agents discovered correctly

- [ ] **cf-54**: Database schema for capabilities (P0) - ⚠️ UNCERTAIN
  - Need to verify if required_capabilities field exists
  - No migration script found
```

**Add note**:
```markdown
**Current Status**: Agent definitions infrastructure complete, intelligent routing pending.
**Note**: Marked as "Future" - OK to defer.
```

---

## Sprint Execution Guidelines (Lines 2421-2550)

### Status Assessment: **GUIDELINES ONLY - NO ISSUES**

### No Corrections Needed

These are procedural guidelines, not implementation tasks. No checkboxes or completion criteria to verify.

**Note**: Guidelines reference demos extensively, but demos cannot be run for unimplemented sprints (6-8).

---

## Summary of Required Changes

### Priority 1: Critical Misalignments

1. **Sprint 5 (Lines 2049-2120)**:
   - **EITHER** rename to "Async Worker Agents" and mark complete
   - **OR** move "Human in the Loop" content to Sprint 6 and renumber
   - Change Definition of Done checkboxes (lines 2110-2116) from `✅` to `[ ]` for blocker features

2. **Sprint 6 (Lines 2196-2203)**:
   - Change ALL Definition of Done from `- ✅` to `- [ ]`
   - Add status notes to tasks (2158-2194) indicating schema-only status

3. **Sprint 7 (Lines 2266-2270)**:
   - Change ALL Definition of Done from `- ✅` to `- [ ]`
   - Add status notes to tasks (2240-2263) indicating stub-only status

4. **Sprint 8 (Lines 2357-2363)**:
   - Change ALL Definition of Done from `- ✅` to `- [ ]`
   - Add status notes to tasks (2326-2354) indicating not started
   - Resolve issue ID conflicts (cf-40 through cf-44 already used)

### Priority 2: Documentation Additions

5. **Add Implementation Status Legend**:
   Insert at line 2048 (before Sprint 5):
   ```markdown
   ## Implementation Status Legend

   - ✅ **COMPLETE**: Code implemented, tested, and demoed
   - ⚠️ **SCHEMA ONLY**: Database tables exist, no implementation code
   - ⚠️ **STUB**: Function exists but contains TODO comment
   - ❌ **NOT STARTED**: No code or schema exists
   - 🔄 **IN PROGRESS**: Partial implementation
   ```

6. **Add Cross-References to Actual Work**:
   Add to Sprint 5:
   ```markdown
   **Actual Sprint 5 Work**: See cf-48 (Async Worker Agents)
   - Git PR: #11
   - Commits: 9ff2540, 324e555, b4b61bf, ef5e825
   - README: Lines 36-74
   ```

### Priority 3: Beads Issue Alignment

7. **Create Missing Issues**:
   - Sprint 6: cf-31, cf-32, cf-33, cf-34, cf-35 (not found in beads)
   - Sprint 7: cf-37, cf-38, cf-39 (not found in beads, cf-36 exists but different scope)
   - Sprint 8: Need NEW IDs (cf-40 to cf-44 are taken by Sprint 3)

8. **Close Conflicting Issues**:
   - cf-26, cf-27, cf-28, cf-29 refer to Sprint 2 work (all closed)
   - cf-40 refers to "Frontend Project Initialization" (closed)
   - Sprints 5-8 need non-conflicting issue IDs

---

## Verification Checklist

Use this to verify corrections:

### Sprint 5
- [ ] Title matches actual work (Async Worker Agents OR Human in the Loop)
- [ ] Tasks match beads issues (cf-48 OR cf-26 to cf-30)
- [ ] Definition of Done checkboxes match implementation status
- [ ] Git commits referenced correctly
- [ ] README alignment verified

### Sprint 6
- [ ] All Definition of Done changed to `[ ]`
- [ ] Status notes added to tasks
- [ ] Beads issues created (cf-31 to cf-36.5)
- [ ] TODO comments documented

### Sprint 7
- [ ] All Definition of Done changed to `[ ]`
- [ ] Status notes added to tasks
- [ ] Beads issues created with non-conflicting IDs
- [ ] WorkerAgent stub documented

### Sprint 8
- [ ] All Definition of Done changed to `[ ]`
- [ ] Status notes added to tasks
- [ ] Issue ID conflicts resolved (cf-40 to cf-44 renamed)
- [ ] New beads issues created
- [ ] Checkpoint TODO comments documented

### Sprint 9
- [ ] Partial completion acknowledged
- [ ] "Future" status maintained
- [ ] Completed items marked correctly (cf-50, cf-53)

---

## Git Commit References

### Commits Found (Relevant to Sprints 5-9)

**Sprint 5 (Async Migration - Actually Completed)**:
- `9ff2540` - feat: convert worker agents to async/await (cf-48 Phase 1-3)
- `324e555` - fix: correct async test migration issues
- `b4b61bf` - test: migrate all worker agent tests to async/await
- `ef5e825` - test: migrate frontend and backend worker tests to async
- `debcf57` - fix: complete async migration for self-correction integration tests
- `084b524` - docs: update README with Sprint 5 async migration details

**Sprints 6-9 (Not Found)**:
- No commits for context management (Sprint 6)
- No commits for agent maturity (Sprint 7)
- No commits for review agent or quality gates (Sprint 8)
- No commits for capability-based routing (Sprint 9)

**Related Sprints 1-4 (For Reference)**:
- `c91aacb` - feat(cf-43): Complete Self-Correction Loop Phase 2
- `2a3d81d` - feat(cf-42): Complete Test Runner Integration
- `6b9a41f` - test(cf-41): Add integration tests for Backend Worker Agent
- `d9af52b` - feat(cf-45): Complete Real-Time Dashboard Updates with WebSocket

---

## Appendix: Files Checked

### Database Schema
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/persistence/database.py` (lines 1-200)
  - ✅ blockers table (line 142)
  - ✅ context_items table (line 169)
  - ✅ checkpoints table (line 186)
  - ✅ agents.maturity_level field (line 132)
  - ✅ agents.metrics JSON field (line 136)

### Agent Implementation
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/agents/worker_agent.py` (52 lines)
  - ⚠️ assess_maturity() stub with TODO (line 45)
  - ⚠️ flash_save() stub with TODO (line 50)
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/agents/backend_worker_agent.py` (800+ lines)
  - ✅ async def execute_task() (line 745) - IMPLEMENTED
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/agents/frontend_worker_agent.py`
  - ✅ async def execute_task() - IMPLEMENTED
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/agents/test_worker_agent.py`
  - ✅ async def execute_task() - IMPLEMENTED
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/agents/` directory
  - ❌ NO review_agent.py or review_worker_agent.py

### API Endpoints
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/ui/server.py`
  - ✅ GET /api/projects/{id}/blockers (line 459)
  - ✅ POST /api/projects/{id}/blockers/{id}/resolve (line 494)
  - ⚠️ Resume from checkpoint has TODO (line 866)

### Configuration
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/core/config.py`
  - ✅ NotificationsConfig class (line 45)
  - ✅ CheckpointConfig class (line 76)
  - ⚠️ webhook_url field (line 40) - configured but unused

### Project Setup
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/codeframe/core/project.py`
  - ✅ checkpoints directory created (line 39)
  - ⚠️ resume() method has TODO (line 77)

### Frontend
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/web-ui/src/lib/api.ts`
  - ✅ blockers.resolve() API call (line 58)
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/web-ui/src/types/agentState.ts`
  - ✅ blocker types defined
- `/home/frankbria/projects/codeframe/web-ui/src/components/`
  - ❌ NO BlockerModal or BlockerList components
  - ❌ NO ContextView or TierView components
  - ❌ NO MaturityDisplay components

### Beads Issues
- cf-48: Convert worker agents to async (Sprint 5) - ✅ Status: open (should be closed)
- cf-36: Claude Code Hooks Integration - ⚠️ Status: open
- cf-26 through cf-30: Sprint 2 work (closed, conflicts with Sprint 5 IDs in doc)
- cf-40 through cf-44: Sprint 3 work (closed, conflicts with Sprint 8 IDs in doc)

---

## Recommended Next Steps

1. **Immediate** (before next sprint):
   - Update AGILE_SPRINTS.md with correct checkbox states
   - Align Sprint 5 description with actual work (cf-48)
   - Create beads issues for Sprints 6-8 with non-conflicting IDs

2. **Short-term** (this week):
   - Close cf-48 in beads (async migration complete)
   - Update README roadmap to reflect actual sprint status
   - Document TODOs in claudedocs/ for transparency

3. **Long-term** (next sprint planning):
   - Decide Sprint 6 scope (Context Management OR Human in the Loop)
   - Remove premature checkmarks to maintain trust in documentation
   - Implement demo-driven development (only check items after demo works)

---

**End of Audit Report**
