# Outreach: Browser Use Team

**To**: Magnus Muller, Gregor Zunic (browser-use/browser-use maintainers)
**Emails**: gregor@browser-use.com, magnus@browser-use.com (confirm magnus@ before sending)
**GitHub**: @gregpr07, @MagMueller
**Twitter**: @gregpr07, @mamagnus00
**LinkedIn**: linkedin.com/in/gregorzunic, linkedin.com/in/magnus-mueller
**Channel**: GitHub Issue first (public credibility), then email if no response in 5 days
**Subject**: EU AI Act compliance scan results for Browser Use

---

## GitHub Issue Title

EU AI Act Technical Compliance: Scan Results and Recommendations

## Body

Hey Magnus and Gregor,

I ran Browser Use through AIR Blackbox, an open-source EU AI Act compliance scanner. Figured you'd want to see the results since the August 2026 enforcement deadline is coming up and Browser Use is one of the most widely deployed AI agent frameworks out there (79K+ stars, congrats).

**Summary**: 362 Python files scanned, 9.4% aggregate compliance score (205/2172 checks).

Per-article breakdown:

| EU AI Act Article | What It Checks | Files Passing |
|---|---|---|
| Art. 9 (Risk Management) | Error handling, fallback patterns, risk classification | 1.1% (4/362) |
| Art. 10 (Data Governance) | Input validation, PII handling, schema enforcement | 5.0% (18/362) |
| Art. 11 (Documentation) | Docstrings, type hints, system docs | 26.0% (94/362) |
| Art. 12 (Record-Keeping) | Structured logging, audit trails | 0.3% (1/362) |
| Art. 14 (Human Oversight) | Approval workflows, rate limiting | 12.2% (44/362) |
| Art. 15 (Security) | Injection defense, output validation | 12.2% (44/362) |

The biggest gaps are in record-keeping (Art. 12) and risk management (Art. 9). Browser Use has solid documentation coverage (Art. 11 at 26%), but the logging infrastructure and risk classification patterns the EU AI Act expects are mostly absent.

**To be clear**: this doesn't mean Browser Use is non-compliant. No tool can determine legal compliance. What the scanner checks is whether specific technical patterns exist in the codebase that map to requirements in Articles 9-15 of the EU AI Act. It's a linter for AI governance, not a lawyer.

The scanner is already seeing adoption (1,700+ installs this month) and is fully open source (Apache 2.0): https://github.com/air-blackbox/gateway

If you want to run it yourselves:

```bash
pip install air-blackbox
air-blackbox comply --scan . --no-llm --format table --verbose
```

We also have a drop-in trust layer for LangChain (which Browser Use builds on) that adds audit logging, input validation, and oversight hooks:

```python
import air_blackbox
air_blackbox.attach("langchain")
```

Happy to help if you want to improve coverage before August 2026. No pitch here, just one open-source maintainer to another.

Best,
Jason Shotwell
https://airblackbox.ai
