# Expected Outputs

## 1. Risk Analysis
- Should identify the "Universe" non-compete scope as likely unenforceable.
- Should flag the IP assignment clause as potentially conflicting with state labor codes (e.g., CA Labor Code 2870).

## 2. Case Summary
- Must correctly identify the core dispute: ownership of the "compression algorithm".
- Must distinguish between the "Inventions Assignment" argument and the "Labor Code" argument.

## 3. Legal Memo
- Should follow the provided template structure (Question, Answer, Facts, Discussion).
- Tone should be professional, objective, and legally sound (simulated).

## 4. Litigation Dashboard (HTML)
- A clean, modern HTML file.
- Should visually represent a timeline.
- "Win Probability" should be visualized (e.g., a gauge or progress bar).
