# Benchmark Questions (Real Bracket)

Use these questions for both conditions.

1. What is the likely part identity and core function of this model?
2. Which regions look like mounting interfaces, and what evidence supports this?
3. Which features should be preserved during mass-reduction edits?
4. What constraints are explicit versus inferred?
5. What simulation intent is present and what is still missing for validated claims?
6. What topology-level adjacencies matter most for local design changes?
7. How does `graph/aag.json` change your confidence in adjacency reasoning?
8. Propose a structured patch plan for reducing mass while preserving mounting intent.
9. What specific validation steps are required before any safety/performance claim?
10. List unknowns that cannot be asserted from the provided inputs.
