Provenance chain (LLM-enriched events highlighted)
- 1. [sale] 1928 sale, F. Leverton Harris et al.[section Archibald George Blomefield Russell (1879-1955)…..], London (Sotheby’s), 22 May 1928, no. 77, as Giovanni Antonio Licinio, Il Pordenone (Judgment of Daniel)
- 2. [sale] {Copy IB, Cohen 1975}, £ 20, to Dussler [Luitpold Dussler?]
- 3. [sale] 1933 {Copy Sotheby’s} from Luitpold Dussler, München, fl. 714, to Jaques Goudstikker, in or before 1933
- 4. [confiscation batch] 1940 {Goudstikker Catalog 1939, no.2247; Goudstikker, black book, 1940, no.2247, as Pordenone; Goudstikker-Miedl Archive, as 2247 Pordenone(‘Ordeel van Daniel’)} probably from his employees, fl. 2,500,000, with xx other objects, to Alois Miedl, 1940
- 5. [collection] 1940 {report restitution committee, 1.15, p.11.} the dealer J. Goudstikker/Miedl, 1940
- 6. [sale unsold] 1941 {report restitution committee, 1.15, p.11 .} anonymous sale, Cologne(Lempertz), 14 June 1941, no. 73, as as Giovanni Antonio Licinio, Il Pordenone, unsold
- 7. [widowhood] 1949 {Copy RKD.} back to Alois Miedl, 1 september 1941 {according to RKD Fiches uit Goudstikker-Miedl-archief 1940-45, as 2247 Pordenone(‘Odeel van Daniel’)} restituted to the widow Désirée Goudstikker, 1949
- 8. [sale] sale, Goudstikker, Amsterdam (Kunsthandel A. Staal), Amsterdam
- 9. [gift] 1975 Mr. L. de Ruyter before 1975, Jutphaas
- 10. [gift] 1980 {Note IB, Cohen 1975}, by whom donated to the museum, 1980
Enrichments (2 events, 4 parties)
5 of 10 resolved deterministically, 5 with LLM enrichment
The preceding context shows this is part of a sale at Sotheby's (May 22, 1928, no. 77). The price '£20' and 'to Dussler' indicates this is the purchase by Dussler at that auction.
In 1940 wartime context, 'from his employees' to Alois Miedl with a large sum (fl. 2,500,000) suggests coerced wartime acquisition. Miedl was a known Nazi art dealer who acquired Jewish collections during WWII. This appears to be forced wartime confiscation from Goudstikker's business.
[rename] The phrase 'probably from his employees' contains the preposition 'from' which indicates direction but isn't part of the party name. 'His employees' refers to Jaques Goudstikker's employees from the previous event (event 3), who likely acted on behalf of the Goudstikker business/estate during the 1940 confiscation period. This is one party (the employees as a group) acting as sender, not multiple parties. | Original: "probably from his employees" → [Goudstikker employees] [sender]
'back to Alois Miedl' indicates Miedl is receiving the artwork again (returning to his possession after the failed auction). The word 'back' and 'to' clearly indicate he is the receiver in this return transfer.
Following AAM bare-name convention, 'Mr. L. de Ruyter before 1975, Jutphaas' indicates de Ruyter held the artwork before 1975. The location and temporal qualifier establish him as the holder/owner, making him the receiver in this event.
Extracted from event text: receiver "museum" found in "to the/to [Name]" pattern. Parser's parseRest() missed this tail party.