# Verify Report: Health Display Polish

**Result:** PASS
**Created by:** AnaVerify
**Date:** 2026-05-01
**Spec:** .ana/plans/active/health-display-polish/spec.md
**Branch:** feature/health-display-polish

## Pre-Check Results

```
=== CONTRACT COMPLIANCE ===
  Contract: /Users/rsmith/Projects/anatomia_project/anatomia/.ana/plans/active/health-display-polish/contract.yaml
  Seal: INTACT (hash sha256:7327fdcdcc3aec26443e879163a8155dac2db751d37df7b8a1139fbffcfd5771)
```

Seal: **INTACT**

Tests: 1777 passed, 2 skipped (1779 total). Build: success. Lint: success.

Baseline was 1757 tests → 1777 tests = +20 new tests. Build expected ~10 new tests; builder added 20.

## Contract Compliance

| ID | Says | Status | Evidence |
|----|------|--------|----------|
| A001 | Health output starts with a box-drawn header showing the command name | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:1918, asserts `stdout.toContain('ana proof health')` |
| A002 | Health header shows the run count | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:1931, asserts `stdout.toContain('28 runs')` |
| A003 | Health header shows today's date | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:1942, asserts `stdout.toContain('2026-')` |
| A004 | Trajectory section shows trend before risks per run | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:1957-1959, finds trendLineIndex and asserts `trendLineIndex < risksLineIndex` |
| A005 | Trajectory condenses risks per run into a single line | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:1970, asserts `stdout.toContain('(last 5)')` and `toContain('(all)')` |
| A006 | Unclassified count appears as inline parenthetical only when > 0 | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:1998, creates entries with null-severity findings, asserts `toContain('unclassified excluded')` |
| A007 | Unclassified line is absent when count is zero | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2010, uses entries with only classified findings, asserts `not.toContain('unclassified')` |
| A008 | Hot module paths show basename instead of full path | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2022, asserts `toContain('hot.ts')` and `not.toContain('src/hot.ts')` |
| A009 | Hot module paths disambiguate when basenames collide | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2038, creates entries for `src/commands/proof.ts` and `src/engine/proof.ts`, asserts `toContain('commands/proof.ts')` |
| A010 | Observation severity is abbreviated to obs in hot modules | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2049, filters findings lines, asserts `toContain('obs')` and `not.toContain('observation')` |
| A011 | Observation severity is not abbreviated outside hot modules | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2060-2066, creates observation-severity promote candidate, asserts `toContain('[observation')` in promote lines. Intent verified — see Findings re: contract value precision |
| A012 | Promote section shows only findings with promote action | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2075, asserts `toContain('Promote')` and `toContain('promote]')` |
| A013 | Promote candidates display as one-line truncated summaries | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2095, creates finding with 120-char summary, asserts `toContain('...')` |
| A014 | Promote candidates have severity badges with promote action | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2106, asserts `toContain('promote]')` |
| A015 | Recurring section shows scope-action findings with two or more entries | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2120, creates 3 scope-action entries, asserts `toContain('Recurring')` |
| A016 | Recurring candidates show entry count suffix | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2132, asserts `toContain('entries)')` |
| A017 | Recurring candidates have severity-only badges without action | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2144, asserts `toContain('[debt]')` |
| A018 | Sections with no content are omitted entirely | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2155, asserts `not.toContain('No candidates')` and `not.toContain('No hot modules')` |
| A019 | Promote heading is absent when no promote candidates exist | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2196, uses scope-action data only, asserts `not.toContain('Promote')` |
| A020 | Zero-runs case shows box header with zero runs | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2207, empty chain, asserts `toContain('0 runs')` and `toContain('ana proof health')` |
| A021 | Zero-runs case shows No data message | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2208, asserts `toContain('No data.')` |
| A022 | Sections have horizontal line dividers | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2214, asserts `toContain('──────')` |
| A023 | Promotions effectiveness section appears when promoted findings exist | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2284, creates promoted finding across 6 entries, asserts `toContain('Promotions')` |
| A024 | Promotions effectiveness section is omitted when no promotions exist | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2298, scope-action only, asserts `not.toContain('Promotions')` |
| A025 | JSON output structure is completely unchanged | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2309, parses JSON, asserts `json.command === 'proof health'` |
| A026 | JSON output includes trajectory data unchanged | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2310, asserts `json.results.trajectory` exists along with hot_modules, promotion_candidates, promotions |
| A027 | Insufficient data trend displays with run threshold | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2229, 3 entries → insufficient_data trend, asserts `toContain('insufficient data')` |
| A028 | No classified data trend displays correctly | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2250, all null-severity findings, asserts `toContain('no classified data')` |
| A029 | Trend threshold uses imported constant instead of hardcoded value | ✅ SATISFIED | proof.test.ts:2393, reads source, asserts `toContain('MIN_ENTRIES_FOR_TREND')` and `not.toContain('need ${10}')` |

All 29 assertions SATISFIED.

## Independent Findings

**Prediction resolution:**
1. Missed zero-runs branch — **Not found.** Both "file doesn't exist" (line 1734) and the runs=0 condition in `formatHealthDisplay` (line 257) produce the box header.
2. Divider lengths wrong — **Not found.** Verified: Trajectory=10, Hot Modules=11, Promote=7, Recurring=9, Promotions=10. All match heading text lengths.
3. A011 test doesn't verify `not_contains [obs` — **Confirmed** (partially). The test verifies intent (`[observation` present) but doesn't use the literal contract matcher. However, the contract value is imprecise — see upstream finding.
4. Truncation boundary off-by-one — **Not found.** Code slices at 100 then appends `...`, giving max 103 visible chars. Consistent in both Promote and Recurring.
5. Null handling incomplete — **Not found.** Both `risks_per_run_last5` and `risks_per_run_all` have explicit null checks with fallback to `'no data'`.

**Surprise finding:** Inline `import('../types/proof.js').HealthReport` type at line 233 instead of adding to existing `import type` at line 26. Functionally fine but inconsistent.

**Over-building check:** `formatHealthDisplay` is private (not exported), used in exactly 2 call sites. No unused parameters. No unused code paths — every branch serves a contract assertion. No YAGNI violations detected.

## AC Walkthrough

- **AC1:** ✅ PASS — Box header with BOX constants, command name, run count, date. Verified live: output shows `┌───...───┐` / `│ ana proof health │` / `│ 36 runs ... 2026-05-01│` / `└───...───┘`.
- **AC2:** ✅ PASS — Dividers use `BOX.horizontal.repeat(N)` where N matches heading length. Verified in source lines 269, 305, 330, 349, 365.
- **AC3:** ✅ PASS — Trend line appears before Risks/run in live output. Test A004 verifies ordering.
- **AC4:** ✅ PASS — Live output shows `proof.ts` not `src/commands/proof.ts`. Disambiguation logic at lines 297-310.
- **AC5:** ✅ PASS — Live output shows `8 debt, 9 obs` in hot modules. Source line 316: `observation` → `obs`.
- **AC6:** ✅ PASS — Promote section filters on `suggested_action === 'promote'` (line 326), uses `[${c.severity} · promote]` badge format (line 338), truncates at 100 chars (lines 333-335).
- **AC7:** ✅ PASS — Recurring filters `scope` action + `recurrence_count >= 2` (lines 343-344), uses `[${c.severity}]` badge (line 357), appends `(${c.recurrence_count} entries)`.
- **AC8:** ✅ PASS — All sections wrapped in `if (length > 0)` guards. No "No candidates" text anywhere. Live output confirms.
- **AC9:** ✅ PASS — Zero-runs produces box header + "No data." Tested via both empty chain and missing file.
- **AC10:** ✅ PASS — Promotions section at lines 362-375 uses box/divider treatment, only appears when `report.promotions.length > 0`.
- **AC11:** ✅ PASS — JSON path unchanged (lines 1726-1732, 1750-1752). Test A025/A026 verify structure.
- **AC12:** ⚠️ PARTIAL — Not mechanically verified. The `work complete` nudge logic is untouched by this diff (no lines in the health handler reference it), but I did not run `ana work complete` to verify the fourth-line output.
- **AC13:** ✅ PASS — 1777 tests pass, 0 failures, +20 new health display tests.
- **AC14:** ✅ PASS — `(cd packages/cli && pnpm vitest run)` → 1777 passed, 2 skipped.
- **AC15:** ✅ PASS — `pnpm run build` → success.
- **AC16:** ✅ PASS — Line 28 imports `MIN_ENTRIES_FOR_TREND`, line 276 uses it in template literal. Old `${10}` pattern absent.

## Blockers

No blockers. All 29 contract assertions satisfied. All ACs pass (one PARTIAL on AC12 — untouched code path, not a regression). Checked for: unused exports in new code (none — `formatHealthDisplay` is private), unused parameters (none), error paths that swallow silently (none — the function is pure string formatting), sentinel test patterns (none found — all tests assert specific expected values).

## Findings

- **Code — Inline import type for HealthReport:** `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:233` — uses `import('../types/proof.js').HealthReport` when line 26 already has `import type { ProofChainEntry, ProofChain } from '../types/proof.js'`. Should add `HealthReport` to the existing import. Functionally identical but breaks the file's own pattern.

- **Code — Duplicated MAX_SUMMARY constant:** `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:333` and `:352` — `const MAX_SUMMARY = 100` defined identically in Promote and Recurring loops. Could be a single function-level const. Minor — not a separate function, just a const hoist.

- **Test — A029 asserts on source code content:** `packages/cli/tests/commands/proof.test.ts:2393` — reads the source file and checks `toContain('MIN_ENTRIES_FOR_TREND')`. This is the only viable way to satisfy a contract with `target: "source"`, but it's fragile and violates the testing-standards skill rule. If the constant is renamed, the test breaks — but behavior doesn't change. The contract required this approach.

- **Upstream — Contract A011 value imprecise:** Contract specifies `not_contains "[obs"` but `[observation · promote]` (which the implementation correctly produces) DOES contain `[obs` as a substring. The literal contract assertion is self-contradictory with the Promote badge format. Builder correctly tested intent (`toContain('[observation')`) rather than the broken literal check. Recommend updating the contract value to `[obs ` (with trailing space) or `[obs]` on next seal.

- **Test — A019 assertion works by test data coincidence:** `packages/cli/tests/commands/proof.test.ts:2196` — `not.toContain('Promote')` also catches the `Promotions` heading. Test passes because scope-action data doesn't trigger the Promotions section either. A more precise check would use a regex like `/^\s+Promote$/m` to match only the exact heading.

## Deployer Handoff

Clean merge to main. The build is display-only — no computation changes, no data model changes, no JSON output changes. The `MIN_ENTRIES_FOR_TREND` import fixes a known proof finding (hardcoded `10`). 20 new tests provide thorough coverage of the new display format. No environment variables, no new dependencies, no migrations needed. The inline import type at line 233 is cosmetic debt — harmless.

## Verdict

**Shippable:** YES

All 29 contract assertions satisfied. Tests pass (+20 new). Build and lint clean. Live output looks professional and matches the spec mockups. The findings are all cosmetic/upstream observations — none affect behavior or reliability. The two proof findings this build addresses (hardcoded `10`, missing truncation) are both resolved.
