# Verify Report: Extract Proof Command Handlers

**Result:** PASS
**Created by:** AnaVerify
**Date:** 2026-05-25
**Spec:** .ana/plans/active/extract-proof-handlers/spec.md
**Branch:** feature/extract-proof-handlers

## Pre-Check Results
```
=== CONTRACT COMPLIANCE ===
  Contract: /Users/rsmith/Projects/anatomia_project/anatomia/.ana/worktrees/extract-proof-handlers/.ana/plans/active/extract-proof-handlers/contract.yaml
  Seal: INTACT (hash sha256:44803a6698e90f6645756d5fa1bdff1290bb62c23d639d28e074fdcec07f2e3a)
```

Seal status: **INTACT**

Tests: 2921 passed, 2 skipped (124 test files). Build: pass. Lint: pass (1 pre-existing warning in git-operations.ts, not introduced by this build).

## Contract Compliance
| ID | Says | Status | Evidence |
|----|------|--------|----------|
| A001 | The registration function is compact enough to read in one screen | ✅ SATISFIED | `registerProofCommand` spans lines 2331–2425 = 95 lines, under 150 |
| A002 | The list/detail handler exists as a standalone function | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:648` — `async function handleProofList(...)` |
| A003 | The context handler exists as a standalone function | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:726` — `async function handleProofContext(...)` |
| A004 | The close handler exists as a standalone function | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:766` — `async function handleProofClose(...)` |
| A005 | The promote handler exists as a standalone function | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:1015` — `async function handleProofPromote(...)` |
| A006 | The strengthen handler exists as a standalone function | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:1344` — `async function handleProofStrengthen(...)` |
| A007 | The audit handler exists as a standalone function | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:1604` — `async function handleProofAudit(...)` |
| A008 | The health handler exists as a standalone function | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:2152` — `async function handleProofHealth(...)` |
| A009 | The stale handler exists as a standalone function | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:2223` — `async function handleProofStale(...)` |
| A010 | No handler functions are exported — they stay file-private | ✅ SATISFIED | `grep "^export" proof.ts` shows only `formatHumanReadable` (line 222) and `registerProofCommand` (line 2331) — no `handleProof` exports |
| A011 | The root handler does not receive a parentJson parameter | ✅ SATISFIED | `handleProofList` signature at line 648: `(slug: string | undefined, options: { json?: boolean })` — no `parentJson` |
| A012 | Subcommand handlers receive parentJson instead of closing over proofCommand | ✅ SATISFIED | `handleProofContext` at line 726: `(..., parentJson: boolean)` |
| A013 | Subcommand handlers receive parentJson instead of closing over proofCommand | ✅ SATISFIED | `handleProofClose` at line 766: `(..., parentJson: boolean)` |
| A014 | Subcommand handlers receive parentJson instead of closing over proofCommand | ✅ SATISFIED | `handleProofAudit` at line 1604: `(..., parentJson: boolean)` |
| A015 | The existing proof list command still works correctly | ✅ SATISFIED | Live run: `node dist/index.js proof` outputs table with "Slug" column header |
| A016 | The proof context subcommand still works correctly | ✅ SATISFIED | Live run: `node dist/index.js proof context packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts` exits 0, shows findings |
| A017 | The proof health subcommand still works correctly | ✅ SATISFIED | Live run: `node dist/index.js proof health` exits 0, shows health dashboard |
| A018 | The proof audit subcommand still works correctly | ✅ SATISFIED | Live run: `node dist/index.js proof audit` exits 0, shows findings grouped by file |
| A019 | Parent --json flag still propagates to subcommands | ✅ SATISFIED | Live run: `node dist/index.js proof --json context proof.ts` outputs JSON with `"command"` key |
| A020 | The registerProofCommand export signature is unchanged | ✅ SATISFIED | Line 2331: `export function registerProofCommand(program: Command): void` |
| A021 | The formatHumanReadable export is unchanged | ✅ SATISFIED | Line 222: `export function formatHumanReadable(entry: ProofChainEntry): string` |
| A022 | All existing proof tests pass without modification | ✅ SATISFIED | 2921 passed, 2 skipped — matches spec baseline exactly |
| A023 | The build succeeds without errors | ✅ SATISFIED | `pnpm run build` exits 0, produces dist/index.js |
| A024 | The linter passes without errors | ✅ SATISFIED | `pnpm run lint` shows 0 errors (1 pre-existing warning in unrelated file) |

## Independent Findings

**Predictions resolved:**
1. **Confirmed:** Inconsistent indentation from original nesting levels (see Code finding below).
2. **Not found:** No extra dead code or functionality added — the diff is purely mechanical extraction.
3. **Not found:** No handler still references `proofCommand` — grep confirms all 15 references are within `registerProofCommand`.
4. **Not found:** No scope creep — the builder added JSDoc (spec-required) and nothing else.

**Production risk predictions:**
- "What would break in production this spec didn't address?" — Nothing new. The refactor is behavioral no-op. The pre-existing proof context concerns (anchor stripping regex, severity sort affecting JSON consumers) remain unchanged.

## AC Walkthrough
- ✅ AC1: `registerProofCommand` is 95 lines (under 150). Contains only command registration, option/argument declarations, and thin action wrappers.
- ✅ AC2: All 8 handler functions exist as standalone named functions (confirmed at lines 648, 726, 766, 1015, 1344, 1604, 2152, 2223).
- ✅ AC3: 7 subcommand handlers receive `parentJson: boolean`. `handleProofList` does not.
- ✅ AC4: All 2921 existing tests pass without modification (2 skipped, matching baseline).
- ✅ AC5: Two exports remain: `registerProofCommand` (line 2331) and `formatHumanReadable` (line 222). No handler exports.
- ✅ AC6: `pnpm run test -- --run` passes (all tasks successful).
- ✅ AC7: Build and lint pass.

## Blockers
No blockers. All 24 contract assertions satisfied, all 7 ACs pass, zero regressions. Checked for: unused exports in new code (none — handlers are file-private), handler bodies still referencing `proofCommand` closure (none found via grep), new imports or dependencies (none added), dead code paths introduced by extraction (none).

## Findings

- **Code — Inconsistent body indentation in extracted handlers:** `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:649,727` — `handleProofList` body uses 4-space indent, subcommand handlers use 6-space indent. Both should be 2-space (project standard). The builder moved bodies verbatim per spec instruction ("zero internal refactoring"), preserving the original nesting-level indentation. Functionally harmless; lint doesn't enforce indent width. A follow-up reformatting pass would normalize this.

- **Code — Handler bodies retain deep nesting formatting:** `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:766-2330` — All 7 subcommand handlers have body indentation at 6 spaces (original 3-level nesting: function → registerProofCommand → .action callback). At top-level, convention is 2 spaces. ~1560 lines of non-standard indentation. Low priority but creates visual noise when reading the file.

- **Upstream — Contract A001 matcher is imprecise:** Contract says `matcher: "greater", value: 0` for registerProofCommand line count. This asserts "more than 0 lines" — which any non-empty function satisfies. The intent (per `says` field) is "under 150 lines." The matcher should be `less_than` with value `150`. The assertion is technically SATISFIED (95 > 0 and 95 < 150) but the mechanical check is weaker than the intent.

## Deployer Handoff
Pure refactor — no user-facing behavior change. The 284 proof execSync tests confirm CLI output is identical. The indentation inconsistency in handler bodies is cosmetic and can be addressed in a future formatting pass if desired. Merge without concern.

## Verdict
**Shippable:** YES

All 24 assertions satisfied. All 7 ACs pass. 2921 tests green. Build and lint clean. Live testing confirms all proof subcommands work correctly including `--json` propagation. The extraction is mechanical and correct — the only rough edge is indentation preserved from the original nesting structure, which is explicitly permitted by the spec's "verbatim" instruction.
