# Verify Report: Code Comment Cleanup

**Result:** PASS
**Created by:** AnaVerify
**Date:** 2026-05-05
**Spec:** .ana/plans/active/code-comment-cleanup/spec.md
**Branch:** feature/code-comment-cleanup

## Pre-Check Results

```
=== CONTRACT COMPLIANCE ===
  Contract: /Users/rsmith/Projects/anatomia_project/anatomia/.ana/plans/active/code-comment-cleanup/contract.yaml
  Seal: INTACT (hash sha256:a8e4e5e6175355e926367af535dee8e79a1efe2f807b3e31639888d9d748bb2b)
```

Seal: **INTACT**

Tests: 1883 passed, 2 skipped (94 files). Build: success. Lint: 0 errors (1 pre-existing warning). Typecheck: clean (exit 0).

## Contract Compliance

| ID | Says | Status | Evidence |
|----|------|--------|----------|
| A001 | The scan engine header describes the actual pipeline without referencing deleted functions | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for `analyze()` in scan-engine.ts returns 0 |
| A002 | The engine barrel file contains only clean re-exports | ✅ SATISFIED | engine/index.ts is 4 lines, no comments |
| A003 | Tree-sitter parser header has no implementation checkpoint references | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for CP0-CP3/SS-10 in treeSitter.ts returns 0 |
| A004 | No source files reference the nonexistent START_HERE.md document | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for START_HERE.md in src/ returns 0 |
| A005 | No source files reference the nonexistent ATLAS3 directory | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for ATLAS3 in src/ returns 0 |
| A006 | The confidence utility has no references to nonexistent design documents | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for ATLAS3 in confidence.ts returns 0 |
| A007 | No bare sprint identifiers remain in source files | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for S13-S24/SCAN-/SETUP-/INFRA- in src/ returns 0 |
| A008 | No bare sprint identifiers remain in test files | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for S13-S24 in tests/ returns 0 |
| A009 | No implementation plan identifiers remain in the codebase | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for STEP_/Lane 0 in src/ and tests/ returns 0 |
| A010 | No backlog or design document identifiers remain in the codebase | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for Item N/D*.N in tests/ returns only test data ("Item 1/Item 2/Item 3" in readme.test.ts — markdown parsing input, not design doc refs) |
| A011 | AI SDK detection tests use proper types instead of any casts | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for `as any` in ai-sdk-detection.test.ts returns 0 |
| A012 | Import convention tests use the ImportInfo type instead of any arrays | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for `any[]` in imports.test.ts returns 0 |
| A013 | Contract tests use proper types instead of any casts | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for `as any` in analyzer-contract.test.ts returns 0 |
| A014 | Pattern confirmation tests use the isMultiPattern type guard instead of any casts | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for `as any` in confirmation.test.ts returns 0 |
| A015 | No JSDoc examples reference the deleted analyze function | ✅ SATISFIED | @example blocks in src/engine/ reference valid functions only |
| A016 | Ruby parser explains why it exists without using sprint identifiers | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for sprint/ticket refs in ruby.ts returns 0 |
| A017 | Ruby parser still explains why the higher-level reader was removed | ✅ SATISFIED | ruby.ts:6 contains "retained" |
| A018 | PHP parser explains why it exists without using sprint identifiers | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for sprint/ticket refs in php.ts returns 0 |
| A019 | The sprint-named test file has been renamed to describe what it tests | ✅ SATISFIED | detection-overrides.test.ts exists |
| A020 | The old sprint-named test file no longer exists | ✅ SATISFIED | s11-detection.test.ts not found |
| A021 | No ticket identifiers remain in test files | ✅ SATISFIED | grep for SCAN-/SETUP-/INFRA- in tests/ returns 0 |
| A022 | All existing tests continue to pass after the cleanup | ✅ SATISFIED | 1883 passed, 2 skipped |
| A023 | The build compiles without type errors | ✅ SATISFIED | pnpm tsc --noEmit exits 0 |
| A024 | No lint errors are introduced by the cleanup | ✅ SATISFIED | lint: 0 errors |

**Summary:** 24/24 SATISFIED.

## Previous Findings Resolution

### Previously UNSATISFIED Assertions

| ID | Previous Issue | Current Status | Resolution |
|----|----------------|----------------|------------|
| A003 | SS-10 remained at treeSitter.ts:100 | ✅ SATISFIED | Builder changed "WASM Migration (SS-10):" to "WASM Migration:" |
| A008 | 6 sprint refs across 5 test files | ✅ SATISFIED | All removed or rewritten to plain English |
| A009 | STEP_0.1 in cross-platform.test.ts:27 | ✅ SATISFIED | Removed from test description |
| A010 | 13+ Item/D refs across 6 test files | ✅ SATISFIED | All identifiers removed from test descriptions |
| A021 | 6 ticket refs across 4 test files | ✅ SATISFIED | All SCAN-/SETUP- refs removed from test descriptions |

### Previous Findings

| Finding | Status | Notes |
|---------|--------|-------|
| SS-10 checkpoint reference in treeSitter.ts:100 | Fixed | Changed to "WASM Migration:" |
| Wave 3 incomplete across ~12 test files | Fixed | All 12 files cleaned in fix commit |
| detection-overrides.test.ts:141 still had S19/SCAN-032 | Fixed | Identifier removed, description kept |
| Pre-existing lint warning | Still present | Not introduced by this build, not a blocker |

## AC Walkthrough

- AC1: ✅ PASS — scan-engine.ts header describes 6-step pipeline, no analyze() reference
- AC2: ✅ PASS — analyze() relationship paragraph removed
- AC3: ✅ PASS — engine/index.ts is 4 clean re-export lines
- AC4: ✅ PASS — treeSitter.ts has no checkpoint list (CP0-CP3, SS-10 all removed)
- AC5: ✅ PASS — zero START_HERE.md or ATLAS3 references in src/
- AC6: ✅ PASS — ruby.ts/php.ts explain parser purpose without sprint refs
- AC7: ✅ PASS — confidence.ts design doc reference removed
- AC8: ✅ PASS — zero sprint identifiers in src/ or tests/
- AC9: ✅ PASS — zero STEP_/Lane 0/CP references
- AC10: ✅ PASS — zero Item N/D*.N design doc identifiers (readme.test.ts "Item 1/2/3" is test data, not a design doc ref)
- AC11: ✅ PASS — 14 `any` types replaced across 4 test files
- AC12: ✅ PASS — zero @example blocks reference analyze()
- AC16: ✅ PASS — test file sprint/ticket refs cleaned to same standard as src/
- AC17: ✅ PASS — s11-detection.test.ts renamed to detection-overrides.test.ts
- AC18: ✅ PASS — 1883 tests pass
- AC19: ✅ PASS — build success, typecheck clean, lint 0 errors

## Blockers

No blockers. All 24 contract assertions satisfied, all 16 ACs pass, no regressions. Checked for: unused exports in new code (none — no new exports), unhandled error paths (no behavioral changes), assumptions about external state (comment-only changes), spec gaps requiring builder judgment calls (decision rule applied consistently — identifiers removed, rationale preserved where valuable).

## Findings

- **Code — Mock fixture phrasing:** `packages/cli/tests/commands/check.test.ts:76` — "Do not modify engine types during active sprints" is a slightly odd rewrite for a mock project-context fixture. The original said "during S15" which was more specific (even if internal). The generic version works fine as test data — doesn't affect behavior or correctness.
- **Test — Compile-time sentinel assertions:** `packages/cli/tests/engine/types.test.ts:140` — Five tests use `expect(true).toBe(true)` after TypeScript type assertions. These look like sentinels but are intentionally so: the real "test" is that the block compiles, not that a runtime assertion passes. Acceptable pattern for compile-time type checking in Vitest.
- **Upstream — Pre-existing lint warning:** Line 169 of an unspecified file has an unused eslint-disable directive. Not introduced by this build. Could be cleaned in a future pass.

## Deployer Handoff

Pure comment/header/type-annotation cleanup — zero behavioral changes. The only runtime-observable difference is 14 narrower type annotations in 4 test files (which don't affect production code). Safe to merge without staging concerns.

The `readme.test.ts` matches for "Item 1/Item 2/Item 3" are markdown list items in test fixtures, not design document identifiers — they'll continue to match `Item [0-9]` greps but are correct as-is.

## Verdict
**Shippable:** YES

All 24 contract assertions satisfied. All 16 acceptance criteria pass. 1883 tests green, build and typecheck clean. The builder correctly applied the decision rule throughout — identifiers removed, design rationale preserved in plain English. No over-building, no scope creep, no behavioral changes.
