# Verify Report: Comprehensive Documentation Update for Surface Awareness

**Result:** PASS
**Created by:** AnaVerify
**Date:** 2026-05-20
**Spec:** .ana/plans/active/docs-comprehensive-update/spec.md
**Branch:** feature/docs-comprehensive-update

## Pre-Check Results

```
=== CONTRACT COMPLIANCE ===
  Contract: /Users/rsmith/Projects/anatomia_project/anatomia/.ana/worktrees/docs-comprehensive-update/.ana/plans/active/docs-comprehensive-update/contract.yaml
  Seal: INTACT (hash sha256:ade40088f9be4b72b6b5dbe86bc232b28948e321e061fc5875078f0e15ddc448)
```

Seal: **INTACT**

- Website build: succeeds (all pages rendered)
- Tests: 51 passed (8 test files, website surface) — full workspace turbo cached all 4 tasks
- Lint: 0 errors, 3 warnings (all pre-existing: Hero.tsx unused vars, CLI warning unrelated to this build)

## Contract Compliance

No `@ana` tags expected — spec testing strategy is build-only. All assertions verified by source inspection.

| ID   | Says                                                        | Status        | Evidence |
|------|-------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|----------|
| A001 | Proof entries include the surface field in the website data pipeline | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/lib/docs-data/types.ts:45` — `surface?: string \| null` added to ProofEntry interface |
| A002 | Proof entries without a surface render null instead of undefined | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/scripts/extract-docs-data.ts:198` — `surface: entry.surface \|\| null` normalizes undefined to null |
| A003 | Proof detail pages show which surface was verified | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/components/docs/proof/ProofHero.tsx:90-92` — surface span is last item in metadata flex row, after "shipped" at line 89 |
| A004 | Proof entries without a surface do not show a surface label | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/components/docs/proof/ProofHero.tsx:90` — `{entry.surface && (...)}` guards rendering; null/undefined/empty are all falsy |
| A005 | Proof explorer rows show the surface as an inline badge | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/components/docs/proof/ProofExplorer.tsx:251-264` — surface badge rendered inside inline-flex badge container |
| A006 | Surface badges match the existing stage badge styling | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/components/docs/proof/ProofExplorer.tsx:255` — `fontSize: "10px"`, matching stage badge at line 244 |
| A007 | Proof entries without a surface do not show a surface badge | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/components/docs/proof/ProofExplorer.tsx:251` — `{e.surface && (...)}` guards rendering |
| A008 | Quickstart explains how to override detected commands in three lines | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/start.mdx:45` — contains "Override any command" |
| A009 | Quickstart links to the configurability guide for monorepo details | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/start.mdx:46` — contains "/docs/guides/configurability" |
| A010 | Quickstart warns about starting external services before the pipeline | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/start.mdx:67-70` — external services callout exists between Step 3 heading and first code block |
| A011 | External services callout mentions database and Docker | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/start.mdx:68` — "database, Redis, or Docker containers" |
| A012 | Tests-fail troubleshooting card lists database first as the most common cause | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/guides/troubleshooting.mdx:75` — item 1 is "Database or service not running" |
| A013 | Tests-fail card cross-references the monorepo card without quoting its title | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/guides/troubleshooting.mdx:79` — "See the monorepo troubleshooting card above" |
| A014 | Tests-fail card includes five ranked causes | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/guides/troubleshooting.mdx:75-79` — five numbered items (Database, Env vars, Wrong command, Prisma, Monorepo) |
| A015 | Best practices section includes guidance to start with small changes | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/guides/troubleshooting.mdx:147` — "**Start small.**" bullet with guidance |
| A016 | Best practices section includes guidance to check test commands | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/guides/troubleshooting.mdx:148` — "**Check your test command first.**" bullet |
| A017 | README documents the config delete command | ✅ SATISFIED | `README.md:164` — `ana config delete <field>` row in Scan and init commands table |
| A018 | README mentions monorepo surface detection during init | ✅ SATISFIED | `README.md:87` — "In monorepos, scan identifies each surface (package or app) and detects per-surface commands" |
| A019 | Reading-a-proof guide explains the surface label for monorepo projects | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/guides/reading-a-proof.mdx:54` — "Monorepo projects show one additional label: the surface that was verified." |
| A020 | Ana-learn guide mentions the surface flag for scoped triage | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/guides/using-ana-learn.mdx:25` — "`proof health --surface cli` and `proof audit --surface cli` scope triage to a single surface" |
| A021 | Configurability guide documents the config delete command | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/guides/configurability.mdx:35` — "Remove any field with `ana config delete <field>`" |
| A022 | Configurability guide shows per-surface command override syntax | ✅ SATISFIED | `website/content/docs/guides/configurability.mdx:25` — `surfaces.cli.commands.test` in code element |
| A023 | Pipeline, toolbelt, and context concept pages are not modified | ✅ SATISFIED | `git diff main --name-only` shows no changes to any concept page files |
| A024 | Website builds without errors after all changes | ✅ SATISFIED | `(cd website && pnpm run build)` exits 0, all pages rendered |
| A025 | All existing tests continue to pass | ✅ SATISFIED | `pnpm run test -- --run` — 51 tests pass (8 files), full turbo 4/4 tasks successful |

## Independent Findings

**Predictions before code review:**
1. "ProofExplorer badge duplicates full style object" → **Confirmed.** Three identical 8-property style objects in the inline badge container (stage, surface, rejection). Pre-existing for two; build added the third.
2. "Extract script might use `??` instead of `||`" → **Not found.** Correctly uses `|| null` matching the `scopeSummary` pattern.
3. "Troubleshooting card might not have exactly 5 causes" → **Not found.** Exactly 5 numbered items.
4. "Quickstart callout might not match contract strings" → **Not found.** Exact matches.
5. "README changes in wrong locations" → **Not found.** Both additions correctly placed.

**Production risk predictions:**
1. "Empty string surface silently disappears" → Low risk. `|| null` in extract converts `""` to `null`. `&& (...)` in components filters falsy. Consistent behavior — empty string surfaces never appear in proof chain data.
2. "Badge captures click events" → Non-issue. Surface badge is a passive `<span>` with no onClick, no stopPropagation. Row click navigation unaffected.

**Surprise:** Nothing unexpected. This is a clean docs build — type addition, two component modifications, six content edits, two README lines. No over-building detected. No YAGNI violations. All changes are within spec scope.

**Over-building check:** Grep of new exports shows no additions. No new functions, no new files. Every change is an additive modification to an existing file. The per-surface override syntax in configurability.mdx line 25 is inside the existing card description, not a new card — follows the spec's decision to avoid a 5th grid cell.

## AC Walkthrough

- **AC1** (ProofEntry type + extract script): ✅ PASS — `surface?: string | null` at `types.ts:45`, `surface: entry.surface || null` at `extract-docs-data.ts:198`
- **AC2** (ProofHero surface label last, conditional, mono text): ✅ PASS — surface span at `ProofHero.tsx:90-92` is last item after "shipped" (line 89), guarded by `entry.surface &&`, uses same `<b>` + text pattern as other metadata items
- **AC3** (ProofExplorer 10px mono badge, conditional, no filter): ✅ PASS — badge at `ProofExplorer.tsx:251-264` matches stage badge styling exactly (10px mono, hairline border), guarded by `e.surface &&`, no interactive behavior
- **AC4** (Quickstart commands callout simplified to 3 lines): ✅ PASS — `start.mdx:43-47` — three content lines: verify detected commands, override syntax, configurability link for monorepos
- **AC5** (External services callout between Step 3 heading and first code block): ✅ PASS — `start.mdx:67-70` — callout between Step 3 heading (line 65) and the descriptive paragraph (line 72)
- **AC6** (Troubleshooting tests-fail card rewritten with 5 ranked causes): ✅ PASS — `troubleshooting.mdx:73-81` — five causes ranked: database → env vars → wrong command → Prisma → monorepo. Item 5 uses "monorepo troubleshooting card above"
- **AC7** (Two best practices bullets): ✅ PASS — `troubleshooting.mdx:147-148` — "Start small" and "Check your test command first" bullets added. "Start small" doesn't duplicate the quickstart's existing line 72 guidance — quickstart describes what to build, best practices bullet explains why
- **AC8** (README config delete): ✅ PASS — `README.md:164` — table row with description
- **AC9** (README monorepo surface detection): ✅ PASS — `README.md:87` — sentence added to scan+init section
- **AC10** (Reading-a-proof surface mention): ✅ PASS — `reading-a-proof.mdx:54` — sentence after hero grid closing div, before the explanatory paragraph
- **AC11** (Using-ana-learn --surface flag): ✅ PASS — `using-ana-learn.mdx:25` — parenthetical appended to existing paragraph with `proof health --surface cli` and `proof audit --surface cli` examples
- **AC12** (Configurability config delete + per-surface syntax): ✅ PASS — `configurability.mdx:35` has config delete sentence after grid; `configurability.mdx:25` has per-surface override syntax inside the Build/test/lint card
- **AC13** (No changes to concept pages): ✅ PASS — `git diff main --name-only` shows 0 concept page changes (pipeline, toolbelt, context not modified)
- **AC14** (Website builds): ✅ PASS — `(cd website && pnpm run build)` exits 0
- **AC15** (Tests pass): ✅ PASS — `pnpm run test -- --run` — 51 tests pass, 0 failures

## Blockers

None. All 25 contract assertions satisfied. All 15 acceptance criteria pass. No test regressions. No lint errors introduced. Checked for: unused exports in modified files (none — no new exports added), unhandled error paths (none — changes are type additions and prose), sentinel test patterns (no tests to evaluate — build-only strategy), spec gaps requiring unspecified decisions (none — all content changes have explicit mockups in the spec).

## Findings

- **Code — Badge style object tripled in ProofExplorer:** `website/components/docs/proof/ProofExplorer.tsx:241-275` — The inline badge container now has three identical 8-property style objects (stage at 241, surface at 252, rejection at 266). Extracting a `badgeStyle` constant would reduce 24 lines to 3 references. Pre-existing debt for stage+rejection; this build added the third copy. Not a blocker — the duplication is local and readable.

- **Code — formatDuration still duplicated across 4 files:** `website/components/docs/proof/ProofHero.tsx:3-8` — Known finding per proof context (dynamic-pages-C7). This build didn't add a new copy or change existing ones. Still present — extracting to a shared utility is a separate scope item.

- **Test — Surface rendering untested at unit level:** `website/components/docs/proof/ProofHero.tsx:90` and `website/components/docs/proof/ProofExplorer.tsx:251` — The conditional rendering (`entry.surface && (...)`) handles null/undefined correctly, but there are no unit tests verifying this. The spec explicitly chose build-only verification ("No new tests required"), and the website test suite is a separate in-flight work item. The build succeeds with both surface-present and surface-absent entries in the proof chain data, which provides integration-level confidence. Edge case: `surface: ""` (empty string) is treated as falsy and won't render — correct behavior, but undocumented.

- **Upstream — Spec AC checkboxes not updated:** `spec.md` AC2-AC15 remain unchecked (`[ ]`). Plan writes them unchecked; Build doesn't modify the spec. This is cosmetic — the contract is the authoritative checklist, not the spec checkboxes.

## Deployer Handoff

Clean docs build — 10 files modified, no new files, no dependency changes.

The surface field addition to `ProofEntry` type and extract script means the next `extract-docs-data.ts` run will populate surface data for proof entries that have it (88 of 133 entries). Entries without a surface field render unchanged — conditional rendering handles both cases.

Content changes are prose-only across 6 MDX files and README. No runtime behavior changes. The troubleshooting card rewrite changes the order of advice (database first instead of commands first) — this is an improvement in user-facing guidance accuracy.

Lint warnings (Hero.tsx unused vars) are pre-existing and unrelated to this build.

## Verdict

**Shippable:** YES

25/25 contract assertions satisfied. 15/15 acceptance criteria pass. Website builds clean. Tests pass. No regressions. Changes are precisely scoped — every diff line traces to a spec requirement. The builder made good judgment calls: apostrophe escaping (`&apos;`) is correct, the configurability grid stays at 4 cards with config delete as prose below, and the surface badge matches existing styling exactly. Four findings documented — all debt/observation, none blocking.
