# Verify Report: Infrastructure Extraction (Phase 2)

**Result:** PASS
**Created by:** AnaVerify
**Date:** 2026-05-04
**Spec:** .ana/plans/active/proof-intelligence-hardening/spec-2.md
**Branch:** feature/proof-intelligence-hardening

## Pre-Check Results
```
=== CONTRACT COMPLIANCE ===
  Contract: /Users/rsmith/Projects/anatomia_project/anatomia/.ana/plans/active/proof-intelligence-hardening/contract.yaml
  Seal: INTACT (hash sha256:eddfe6b4c1b77aea14eb2346623195d15365dfc9804ad7f466fde9118af5e9d4)
```
Seal status: INTACT.

Tests: 1850 passed, 2 skipped (94 test files). Build: success. Lint: 0 errors, 15 warnings (all pre-existing).

## Contract Compliance

Phase 2 covers AC3 (A009–A012) and AC7 (A013–A015).

| ID   | Says                                                                      | Status        | Evidence |
|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|----------|
| A009 | Error handling for proof close uses a shared factory                       | ✅ SATISFIED  | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:628` — `createExitError({commandName: 'proof close', ...})`. Factory defined once at line 65. Existing close error tests pass unchanged. |
| A010 | Error handling for proof promote uses a shared factory                     | ✅ SATISFIED  | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:917` — `createExitError({commandName: 'proof promote', ...})`. All promote error tests pass. |
| A011 | Error handling for proof strengthen uses a shared factory                  | ✅ SATISFIED  | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:1280` — `createExitError({commandName: 'proof strengthen', ...})`. All strengthen error tests pass. |
| A012 | The promote error handler still shows available skills when skill required | ✅ SATISFIED  | `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:924` — hints map includes `SKILL_REQUIRED: ['  Available skills: ${availableSkills.join(', ')}', ...]` and `SKILL_NOT_FOUND: ['  Available skills: ...']`. No tagged test exists, but source inspection confirms the hint text is present and existing SKILL_REQUIRED error path tests pass. |
| A013 | Long summaries are truncated at word boundaries with ellipsis             | ✅ SATISFIED  | `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:2985` — test verifies `toContain('...')`, word boundary cut, and output length ≤ maxLength + 3. |
| A014 | Short summaries pass through unchanged                                    | ✅ SATISFIED  | `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:2971` — `truncateSummary('short text', 100)` returns original text, `result.length` asserted `toBe(10)`. |
| A015 | Custom max length parameter controls truncation point                     | ✅ SATISFIED  | `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:3003` — 72-char string with space at position 50, `truncateSummary(text, 50)` produces length 53 (50 chars + '...'). |

## Independent Findings

- **Code — `formatHint` empty-array truthy bypass:** `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:87` — The factory checks `if (dynamicHints)` but an empty array `[]` is truthy. When strengthen's `formatHint` returns `[]` for SKILL_NOT_FOUND with no skills directory, it prevents fallback to static hints. Not a behavioral regression — the old code also printed nothing in this case and strengthen has no static SKILL_NOT_FOUND hint. But the pattern is fragile: a future developer adding a static SKILL_NOT_FOUND hint to strengthen would expect it to fire when no skills exist, but the empty-array return would suppress it. Checking `dynamicHints?.length` instead of `dynamicHints` would be more defensive.

- **Code — Health display truncation behavior change:** `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:409` — The old health display used `.slice(0, 100) + '...'` (hard-cut, no word boundary). The new code uses `truncateSummary(c.summary, 100)` which cuts at word boundaries. This means health display truncation may now differ by a few characters from the old behavior. The spec explicitly authorizes this: "Unify on word-boundary (the cleaner behavior) — this may change a few truncation points by a character or two, which is acceptable." Noted as intentional.

- **Code — proofSummary.ts at ~1913 lines:** `packages/cli/src/utils/proofSummary.ts:1912` — Adding `truncateSummary` grows this file further. Known from prior cycles (proof context reports "proofSummary.ts ~1550 lines — past comfort threshold"). Now at 1912. The function is 5 lines and well-placed (display utility), but the file continues growing. Still present — see prior proof chain entries.

- **Test — A013 word-boundary test uses weak assertion:** `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:2989` — Uses `toBeLessThanOrEqual(53)` instead of asserting the exact truncated output. The test doesn't verify *which* word boundary was chosen — it only verifies the length is within bounds. `expect(result).toBe('The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog and...')` would be a stronger assertion. The test does add secondary checks (startsWith, no trailing space), which partially mitigate.

- **Upstream — A012 has no @ana tag in tests:** The contract assertion A012 ("promote error handler still shows available skills") is verified by source inspection of `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:924` rather than a tagged test. The promote SKILL_REQUIRED error path has existing tests that pass, but none explicitly assert the "Available skills" string. This is acceptable for a refactoring phase — the behavioral contract is preserved and existing tests exercise the code path.

## AC Walkthrough

- **AC3: exitError is defined once (factory or shared function) and consumed by close, promote, and strengthen — no duplicated error-handling logic**
  ✅ PASS — `createExitError` factory defined at `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:65`. Consumed at lines 628 (close), 917 (promote), 1280 (strengthen). `grep 'function createExitError'` returns exactly 1 result. `grep 'const exitError = (code'` returns 0 — no inline definitions remain.

- **AC7: Summary truncation applies consistently in health, promote, and strengthen displays**
  ✅ PASS — `truncateSummary` used at: health promote candidates (line 409), health recurring candidates (line 422), promote single-ID output (line 1236), promote multi-ID output (line 1250), strengthen single-ID output (line 1538), strengthen multi-ID output (line 1546), context findings (line 1982). All use 100-char limit except context findings (250-char). The two promote and two strengthen output lines are NEW truncation (previously untruncated) — this fills the gap identified in the spec.

- **All existing proof command tests pass unchanged (behavior preserved)**
  ✅ PASS — 1850 tests pass, 2 skipped. No test modifications in proof.test.ts for Phase 2. All Phase 1 tests remain passing.

- **No TypeScript errors (`pnpm run build`)**
  ✅ PASS — `pnpm run build` succeeds. ESM output generated.

- **No lint errors (`pnpm run lint`)**
  ✅ PASS — 0 errors, 15 warnings (all pre-existing `@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any`).

## Blockers

No blockers. All 7 contract assertions are SATISFIED. All 5 ACs pass. Tests pass with no regressions. Checked for: unused exports from new code (truncateSummary is imported by proof.ts), unused parameters in createExitError (all 6 opts fields are used in the closure), error paths in the factory (JSON and console branches both covered by existing tests), residual inline exitError definitions (grep confirms none remain), residual MAX_SUMMARY constants (grep confirms none remain).

## Findings

- **Code — `formatHint` empty-array truthy bypass:** `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:87` — `if (dynamicHints)` treats `[]` as truthy, preventing fallback to static hints. Not a regression but fragile for future maintainers adding static hints to strengthen's SKILL_NOT_FOUND code.

- **Test — A013 word-boundary test uses weak assertion:** `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:2989` — `toBeLessThanOrEqual(53)` instead of exact output check. The test would pass even if the word-boundary logic produced a different (but shorter) truncation. Secondary checks mitigate but don't fully cover.

- **Code — proofSummary.ts at ~1913 lines:** `packages/cli/src/utils/proofSummary.ts:1912` — Continued growth of this file. Still present from prior cycles. The truncateSummary function is correctly placed here but the overall file size is technical debt.

- **Upstream — A012 no tagged test:** Contract assertion A012 verified by source inspection only. Future refactoring could silently remove the "Available skills" hint without a test catching it.

- **Code — Health display truncation minor behavior change:** `packages/cli/src/commands/proof.ts:409` — Word-boundary truncation replaces hard-cut. Authorized by spec. No test breaks.

## Deployer Handoff

Pure refactoring — no user-visible output changes except minor word-boundary differences in health display truncation (a few characters). The exitError factory is internal to proof.ts (not exported). truncateSummary is exported from proofSummary.ts and imported by proof.ts. All existing tests pass unchanged, confirming behavioral preservation. No new dependencies. No configuration changes. Safe to merge after Phase 3 verification.

## Verdict
**Shippable:** YES
All 7 contract assertions SATISFIED. All 5 acceptance criteria pass. 1850 tests pass, build and lint clean. The refactoring correctly extracts the exitError factory (3 copies → 1) and truncateSummary helper (3 inline patterns → 1 function + 4 new call sites filling truncation gaps). Findings are observational — no blockers.
