# Verify Report: Upstream Finding Resolution

**Result:** PASS
**Created by:** AnaVerify
**Date:** 2026-05-15
**Spec:** .ana/plans/active/upstream-finding-resolution/spec.md
**Branch:** feature/upstream-finding-resolution

## Pre-Check Results

```
=== CONTRACT COMPLIANCE ===
  Contract: .ana/plans/active/upstream-finding-resolution/contract.yaml
  Seal: INTACT (hash sha256:2722c76c7160b5890874560a216a84974aadc2353d0bf0cc40488bafd32a8564)
```

Seal status: **INTACT**

Tests: 2320 passed, 2 skipped (2322 total), 104 test files. Build: ⚡️ clean. Lint: 0 errors, 1 warning (pre-existing unused eslint-disable in git-operations.ts).

## Contract Compliance

| ID | Says | Status | Evidence |
|----|------|--------|----------|
| A001 | Proof context output includes the finding ID for each finding | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/proof.test.ts:524-525`, asserts `stdout.toContain('(drizzle-C1)')` and `toContain('(drizzle-C2)')` |
| A002 | Finding ID appears between category tag and anchor text | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/proof.test.ts:527`, asserts `stdout.toContain('[code] (drizzle-C1)')` |
| A003 | Upstream findings with valid resolves arrays pass validation | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/artifact.test.ts:2813-2828`, writes upstream finding with `resolves: ["previous-slug-C2", "other-slug-C7"]`, asserts `result.errors.length === 0` |
| A004 | Findings without resolves still pass validation | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/artifact.test.ts:2830-2844`, upstream finding with no resolves field, asserts `result.errors.length === 0` |
| A005 | Non-array resolves values are rejected | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/artifact.test.ts:2846-2861`, `resolves: "previous-slug-C2"` (string not array), asserts error contains "resolves" and "must be an array" |
| A006 | Non-string elements in resolves are rejected | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/artifact.test.ts:2863-2878`, `resolves: [123]`, asserts error contains "resolves" and "elements must be strings" |
| A007 | Invalid finding ID format in resolves produces a warning | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/artifact.test.ts:2880-2897`, `resolves: ["not a valid id"]`, asserts 0 errors and warning contains "resolves" and the invalid ID string |
| A008 | Resolves on non-upstream findings produces a warning about category mismatch | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/artifact.test.ts:2899-2916`, category "code" with resolves, asserts 0 errors and warning contains "resolves" and "upstream" |
| A009 | Proof chain entries preserve the resolves field from upstream findings | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/work.test.ts:3295-3339`, writes verify_data with `resolves: ["old-slug-C3"]`, calls completeWork, reads chain, asserts `upstreamFinding.resolves` equals `['old-slug-C3']` |
| A010 | Referenced findings are not auto-closed by resolution claims | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/work.test.ts:3341-3345`, reads old entry from chain, asserts `referencedFinding.status === 'active'` |
| A011 | Work complete shows how many findings Verify claims are resolved | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/work.test.ts:3222-3247`, upstream finding with resolves, captures console.log, asserts output contains "claims", "1 finding", and "ana proof stale" |
| A012 | Summary line is omitted when no upstream findings have resolves | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/work.test.ts:3249-3271`, code finding without resolves, asserts output does NOT contain "claims" |
| A013 | Proof stale shows resolution claims for upstream findings with resolves | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:3383-3408`, chain with upstream resolves referencing active finding, asserts `result.claims.length === 1` |
| A014 | Resolution claims include the upstream finding summary and referenced ID | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:3410-3429`, asserts `claim.referenced_id === 'slug-A-C2'` |
| A015 | Resolution claims include the upstream finding that made the claim | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:3431-3450`, asserts `claim.upstream_id === 'slug-B-C3'`, `upstream_summary === 'Resolved it'`, `upstream_slug === 'slug-B'` |
| A016 | Resolution claims section is omitted when no unresolved claims exist | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:3452-3470`, no resolves on any finding, asserts `result.claims.length === 0` |
| A017 | Claims referencing non-existent finding IDs are silently skipped | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:3472-3486`, resolves `['nonexistent-C99']`, asserts `result.claims.length === 0` |
| A018 | Claims referencing already-closed findings are skipped | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:3488-3507`, referenced finding has `status: 'closed'`, asserts `result.claims.length === 0` |
| A019 | Multiple claims on the same original show only the most recent | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:3509-3536`, two entries both claim same original, asserts `result.claims.length === 1` and `upstream_id === 'entry-C-C1'` (last entry wins) |
| A020 | Old upstream findings without resolves work without errors | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:3538-3557`, chain entries with no resolves field, asserts `result.claims.length === 0` — no errors thrown |
| A021 | Template ana-verify.md includes resolves field instructions | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/proof.test.ts:2049-2054`, reads template file, asserts contains "resolves", "resolves:", and "finding ID" |
| A022 | Dogfood ana-verify.md includes resolves field instructions | ✅ SATISFIED | `packages/cli/tests/commands/proof.test.ts:2057-2063`, reads dogfood file, asserts contains "resolves", "resolves:", and "finding ID" |

22/22 assertions SATISFIED.

## Independent Findings

All five predictions from Step 3 investigated and not confirmed — the builder handled each gotcha from the spec correctly:

1. **Manual property copy in `getProofContext`** — `resolves` added at `proofSummary.ts:2274`, matching the `related_assertions` pattern at line 2273.
2. **Empty resolves array** — `computeResolutionClaims` guards with `f.resolves.length === 0` check, and has a dedicated test.
3. **Work complete counting** — correctly counts `f.resolves.length`, only emits when `> 0`.
4. **Two ana-verify.md files** — diffs are byte-identical.
5. **Missing finding ID in formatContextResult** — graceful fallback: `finding.id ? ` (${finding.id})` : ''`.

**Over-building check:** Grepped all new exports. `ResolutionClaim`, `ResolutionClaimsResult`, and `computeResolutionClaims` are exported from `proofSummary.ts`. All three are imported: `computeResolutionClaims` in `proof.ts`, the types implicitly via return type inference. No unused exports found.

**YAGNI check:** No new utility functions, no unrelated parameters, no feature flags. The implementation is tight — exactly the data flow the spec describes.

## AC Walkthrough

- **AC1:** `ana proof context {file}` includes finding ID — ✅ PASS. Test at proof.test.ts:517-527 verifies `(drizzle-C1)` and `[code] (drizzle-C1)` appear in output.
- **AC2:** `verify_data.yaml` accepts optional `resolves` field — ✅ PASS. Six test cases in artifact.test.ts:2813-2916 cover valid, absent, wrong-type, wrong-elements, bad-format, and wrong-category scenarios.
- **AC3:** `resolves` on non-upstream findings produces warning — ✅ PASS. Test at artifact.test.ts:2899-2916, category "code" with resolves, warning mentions "upstream".
- **AC4:** `work complete` preserves `resolves` in proof chain — ✅ PASS. Test at work.test.ts:3273-3345 writes verify_data with resolves, calls completeWork, reads chain, verifies `resolves: ['old-slug-C3']` preserved. Also verifies referenced finding NOT auto-closed (status remains 'active').
- **AC5:** `work complete` emits summary line — ✅ PASS. Test at work.test.ts:3222-3247, output contains "claims", "1 finding", "ana proof stale".
- **AC6:** `ana proof stale` shows resolution claims section — ✅ PASS. Integration test at proof.test.ts:3963-4028 creates chain with upstream resolves, runs stale command, verifies "Verify resolution claims", "entry-B-C1 claims entry-A-C1 resolved", and "Missing validation" appear.
- **AC7:** Resolution claims section omitted when no claims — ✅ PASS. Integration test at proof.test.ts:4030-4058, chain without resolves, verifies "Verify resolution claims" does NOT appear. Unit test at proofSummary.test.ts:3452-3470 confirms `claims.length === 0`.
- **AC8:** ana-verify.md updated in both template and dogfood — ✅ PASS. Content tests at proof.test.ts:2049-2063 verify both files contain "resolves", "resolves:", and "finding ID". Diff comparison confirms identical changes.
- **AC9:** Backward compatibility — ✅ PASS. Unit test at proofSummary.test.ts:3538-3557 uses old entries without resolves field, no errors, `claims.length === 0`. All existing tests pass (2320 total, same as baseline spec says 2297+ expected).
- **AC10:** All new behavior has test coverage — ✅ PASS. 23 new tests added across 4 test files covering validation (6 tests), computeResolutionClaims (8 tests), proof context display (1 test), work complete summary (3 tests), stale display (2 tests), template content (2 tests), and empty resolves edge case (1 test).
- **AC11:** Tests pass — ✅ PASS. `(cd packages/cli && pnpm vitest run)`: 2320 passed, 2 skipped, 104 test files.
- **AC12:** No build errors — ✅ PASS. `(cd packages/cli && pnpm run build)`: ⚡️ Build success.

## Blockers

No blockers. All 22 contract assertions satisfied. All 12 acceptance criteria pass. No regressions (test count grew from 2297 baseline to 2320). No unused exports in new code (checked `ResolutionClaim`, `ResolutionClaimsResult`, `computeResolutionClaims` — all used). No unhandled error paths in new code (all `??` fallbacks on optional fields). No external state assumptions (pure function takes chain data, no filesystem access). No spec gaps requiring undocumented decisions.

## Findings

- **Code — Duplicated resolves counting logic in work.ts:** `packages/cli/src/commands/work.ts:1691-1697` (JSON branch) and `packages/cli/src/commands/work.ts:1720-1726` (console branch) have identical `for` loops counting resolves. A shared helper would be cleaner, but the duplication is small (6 lines) and follows the existing pattern where JSON and console branches compute independently. Not worth a separate refactor.

- **Code — Double iteration over resolves array in validation:** `packages/cli/src/commands/artifact.ts:920-928` iterates resolves once for type checking, then again for format validation. Could be combined into a single loop. Trivial performance impact — resolves arrays are typically 1-3 items.

- **Test — Redundant toBeDefined() assertion in A014 test:** `packages/cli/tests/utils/proofSummary.test.ts:3421` — `expect(result.claims[0]!.referenced_id).toBeDefined()` is followed immediately by `toBe('slug-A-C2')` on the same expression. The `toBeDefined()` is redundant since `toBe` would catch undefined. Minor style nit.

- **Code — findingIndex last-write-wins in computeResolutionClaims:** `packages/cli/src/utils/proofSummary.ts:1292` — when the same finding ID appears in multiple chain entries (e.g., after status changes), the index retains only the last entry's data. This is actually the correct behavior for status tracking (last write reflects current status), but could mask intermediate transitions if someone needs audit history. Worth monitoring if resolution claims need historical awareness later.

- **Upstream — proofSummary.ts continues to grow:** Now ~1620 lines with the `computeResolutionClaims` addition (~60 lines). Known from prior cycles. The function logically belongs here (computation layer for proof intelligence), and the spec acknowledged this. Still worth eventual extraction.

## Deployer Handoff

Clean merge expected. The build adds an optional `resolves` field to the existing proof data flow — no schema version bump, no migration needed. Old chain entries and verify_data files without `resolves` continue to work unchanged.

After merging: `ana work complete upstream-finding-resolution`. The new `ana proof stale` resolution claims section will only appear when Verify starts using the `resolves` field in verify_data.yaml, which requires the updated ana-verify.md instructions to take effect in future verification runs.

The one lint warning (unused eslint-disable in git-operations.ts) is pre-existing and unrelated to this build.

## Verdict
**Shippable:** YES

22/22 contract assertions satisfied. 12/12 acceptance criteria pass. 2320 tests pass, build clean, lint clean. The implementation follows every spec pattern precisely — `related_assertions` structural analog for validation, `computeStaleness` analog for the pure function, existing display patterns for output formatting. No over-building, no YAGNI violations, no dead code. The data flow is additive and backward-compatible.
