# Heuristic Evaluation Scorecard

## Study Details

- **Product/Feature:** [What was evaluated]
- **Evaluator:** [Name]
- **Date:** [Date]
- **Persona:** [Target user]
- **Scenario:** [What the user is trying to do]
- **Evaluation pass:** 1st / 2nd (recommend 2 passes minimum)

---

## Findings by Heuristic

### H1: Visibility of System Status

| # | Issue | Location | Severity (0-4) | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |
| 3 | | | | |

### H2: Match Between System and Real World

| # | Issue | Location | Severity (0-4) | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |

### H3: User Control and Freedom

| # | Issue | Location | Severity (0-4) | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |

### H4: Consistency and Standards

| # | Issue | Location | Severity (0-4) | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |

### H5: Error Prevention

| # | Issue | Location | Severity (0-4) | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |

### H6: Recognition Rather Than Recall

| # | Issue | Location | Severity (0-4) | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |

### H7: Flexibility and Efficiency of Use

| # | Issue | Location | Severity (0-4) | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |

### H8: Aesthetic and Minimalist Design

| # | Issue | Location | Severity (0-4) | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |

### H9: Help Users Recognize, Diagnose, and Recover from Errors

| # | Issue | Location | Severity (0-4) | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |

### H10: Help and Documentation

| # | Issue | Location | Severity (0-4) | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |

---

## Summary

### Issue Count by Heuristic

| Heuristic | Issues | Avg Severity |
|---|---|---|
| H1: Visibility of system status | _ | _ |
| H2: Match system / real world | _ | _ |
| H3: User control and freedom | _ | _ |
| H4: Consistency and standards | _ | _ |
| H5: Error prevention | _ | _ |
| H6: Recognition over recall | _ | _ |
| H7: Flexibility and efficiency | _ | _ |
| H8: Aesthetic and minimalist | _ | _ |
| H9: Error recovery | _ | _ |
| H10: Help and documentation | _ | _ |
| **Total** | **_** | **_** |

### Issue Count by Severity

| Severity | Count | % |
|---|---|---|
| 4 — Catastrophe | _ | _% |
| 3 — Major | _ | _% |
| 2 — Moderate | _ | _% |
| 1 — Minor | _ | _% |
| 0 — Cosmetic | _ | _% |

### Top 5 Issues (Highest Severity)

| # | Heuristic | Issue | Severity | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | H_ | [Issue] | _ | [Fix] |
| 2 | H_ | [Issue] | _ | [Fix] |
| 3 | H_ | [Issue] | _ | [Fix] |
| 4 | H_ | [Issue] | _ | [Fix] |
| 5 | H_ | [Issue] | _ | [Fix] |

---

## Multi-Evaluator Aggregation

> Use this section when combining results from multiple evaluators.

| # | Issue | Evaluators Who Found | Avg Severity | Agreed Fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Issue] | E1, E2, E3 | _ | [Fix] |
| 2 | [Issue] | E1, E3 | _ | [Fix] |
| 3 | [Issue] | E2 | _ | [Fix] |
