# SkillOS Autonomous RSI Cyber Defense Market Proof

This proof is intentionally not an email example, not an invoice example, and not a CloudOps example.

It is a 100% autonomous proof for a high-value defensive cybersecurity workflow:

> Security Operations Center alert triage and incident containment planning.

## What makes this proof different

It explicitly includes Recursive Self-Improvement:

training failures → lessons → candidate detection/containment rules → validation → released skill versions → holdout proof

## Autonomy constraints

The proof uses:

- no human review
- no emails sent
- no invoices
- no CloudOps reuse
- no customers contacted
- no private data
- no API keys
- no external services
- deterministic holdout benchmark

## Defensive boundary

This is defensive-only. It does not include exploit code, offensive instructions, or real target data.

## Why this workflow is market-relevant

Cybersecurity operations are expensive, urgent, and measurable. A system that improves incident classification, safe containment, SEV1 recall, and time-to-containment has obvious enterprise relevance.

## What it proves

It proves that SkillOS can autonomously mine failure modes, release improved skills, and improve holdout performance on an objective defensive workflow.

## What it does not prove

It is not audited customer ROI, financial advice, investment advice, live customer adoption, or a guarantee of future outcomes.

## Generated outputs

- `site/rsi-cyberdefense-proof.html`
- `docs/rsi_cyberdefense_market_proof.md`
- `data/rsi_cyberdefense_market_proof.json`
- `data/rsi_cyberdefense_benchmark.json`
- `badges/rsi_cyberdefense_market_proof.svg`
