# R002 plan review — Step 1

Verdict: **APPROVE**

The revised Step 1 plan now records concrete wording in `STATUS.md` and scopes it to current behavior rather than assuming TP-109's future warning contract. Adding the guidance as a `Do` item in `WeeklyPlanningPrompt` is the right approach because it preserves the default guardrails in `renderSpec`.

Approved implementation constraints:

- Keep the wording tied to existing signals: `validate_workout` diagnostics, write `_meta.workout_doc_warning` when present, and readback `workout_doc_summary`/stored description.
- Do not introduce a generic new `_meta.warnings` promise from TP-109 in this step.
- Keep the parallel-write caution narrowly scoped to bulk workout/calendar writes where schema wording, warning metadata, or description/`workout_doc` preservation semantics are ambiguous.
- Update `internal/prompts/testdata/weekly_planning.md` with the rendered text and run `go test ./internal/prompts`.

One minor suggestion: consider merging or placing the new sentence next to the existing `workout_doc` write guidance so the weekly-planning prompt stays terse and coherent.
