# Review R006 — Code review for Step 2

**Verdict:** REVISE

The Path B product decision recorded in `STATUS.md` is directionally consistent with the Step 1 evidence and the PRD "No SSE" contract. However, the review bookkeeping is currently inaccurate and must be corrected before Step 2 can be approved.

## Findings

1. **`STATUS.md` records R005 as APPROVE, but the actual R005 artifact is REVISE.**  
   - `taskplane-tasks/TP-102-sse-transport-decision/STATUS.md:96` lists `R005 | Plan | 2 | APPROVE`, and `STATUS.md:118` logs `plan Step 2: APPROVE`.
   - `taskplane-tasks/TP-102-sse-transport-decision/.reviews/R005-plan-step2.md:3` says `**Verdict:** REVISE`.
   - This makes the task history false and hides that the Step 2 plan review requested changes. Fix the review table and execution log to match the artifact, or add a subsequent approving plan-review artifact if the process requires one after the R005 revisions.

## Validation notes

- Ran `git diff c1848bd..HEAD --name-only` and reviewed the full `git diff c1848bd..HEAD`.
- Re-read `PROMPT.md`, `STATUS.md`, and the changed review artifacts.
- Spot-checked `.pi/taskplane-config.json`; it does not define `protectedDocs`, matching the approval-record statement for this Step 2-only status update.
- No code changed in this step, so I did not run build/test/lint.
