# TP-105: Tool routing smoke eval — Status

**Current Step:** Step 5: Documentation & Delivery
**Status:** ✅ Complete
**Last Updated:** 2026-05-27
**Review Level:** 2
**Review Counter:** 11
**Iteration:** 1
**Size:** M

> **Hydration:** Checkboxes represent meaningful outcomes, not individual code changes. Workers may expand steps when runtime discoveries warrant it.

---

### Step 0: Preflight
**Status:** ✅ Complete

- [x] Required files and paths exist
- [x] Dependencies satisfied
- [x] Existing benchmark/eval patterns identified

---

### Step 1: Design eval fixture and expected-result format
**Status:** ✅ Complete

- [x] Fixture format defined
- [x] Initial routing cases added
- [x] Safe/full destructive-tool expectations represented where practical
- [x] Fixture loading/result comparison tests passing

---

### Step 2: Implement opt-in first-tool-call runner
**Status:** ✅ Complete

> ⚠️ Hydrate: Expand based on chosen implementation language/provider path.

- [x] Tool definitions loaded without executing handlers
- [x] Anthropic-compatible stdlib runner added under scripts/toolroutingeval
- [x] Provider call guarded by explicit environment configuration
- [x] First-tool/no-tool result captured and reported
- [x] Normal tests remain network-free
- [x] R005 lint findings fixed
- [x] R005 deterministic Anthropic temperature covered

---

### Step 3: Wire command and documentation
**Status:** ✅ Complete

- [x] `eval-tool-routing` Make target added to `.PHONY` and `make help`, invoking `go run ./scripts/toolroutingeval`
- [x] CONTRIBUTING documents live variables (`ICUVISOR_ROUTING_EVAL_PROVIDER=anthropic`, `ANTHROPIC_API_KEY`) and optional model/URL overrides
- [x] Documentation states unset-provider zero-exit validation/skips, provider-error/mismatch non-zero exits, no handler execution, and no intervals.icu calls
- [x] Changelog `[Unreleased]` developer-tooling entry added

---

### Step 4: Testing & Verification
**Status:** ✅ Complete

- [x] Targeted tests passing
- [x] FULL test suite passing: `make test`
- [x] Build passes: `make build`
- [x] Lint passes: `make lint`
- [x] Optional provider-backed eval run recorded if credentials are available
- [x] All failures fixed or documented as pre-existing unrelated failures

---

### Step 5: Documentation & Delivery
**Status:** ✅ Complete

- [x] "Must Update" docs modified
- [x] "Check If Affected" docs reviewed
- [x] Discoveries logged
- [x] Final commit includes task ID

---

## Reviews

| # | Type | Step | Verdict | File |
|---|------|------|---------|------|

---

## Discoveries

| Discovery | Disposition | Location |
|-----------|-------------|----------|
| No out-of-scope discoveries during final delivery review. | No action needed. | Step 5 |

---

## Execution Log

| Timestamp | Action | Outcome |
|-----------|--------|---------|
| 2026-05-26 | Task staged | PROMPT.md and STATUS.md created |
| 2026-05-27 10:24 | Task started | Runtime V2 lane-runner execution |
| 2026-05-27 10:24 | Step 0 started | Preflight |
| 2026-05-27 11:25 | Worker iter 1 | done in 3644s, tools: 126 |
| 2026-05-27 11:25 | Paused | User paused at iteration 1 |
| 2026-05-27 12:12 | Task started | Runtime V2 lane-runner execution |
| 2026-05-27 12:36 | Worker iter 1 | done in 1441s, tools: 75 |
| 2026-05-27 12:36 | Task complete | .DONE created |

---

## Blockers

*None*

---

## Notes

- Tracking issue: https://github.com/ricardocabral/icuvisor/issues/32
- Step 4 targeted verification: `go test ./internal/toolrouting` passed; `make eval-tool-routing` dry run passed with 8 skipped cases because provider configuration was unset.
- Provider-backed eval not run: `ICUVISOR_ROUTING_EVAL_PROVIDER` is unset in this worker environment; no model call was made.
- Step 4 quality gates passed with no failures to fix or document: `make test`, `make build`, and `make lint`.
- Step 5 affected-doc review: Makefile help includes `eval-tool-routing`; CHANGELOG has an `[Unreleased]` developer-tooling entry; `docs/kr5-benchmark.md` is benchmark-specific and did not need a routing-smoke-eval update.
- Recent task commits use `TP-105` in the subject; final delivery commit will use the same task ID convention.
| 2026-05-27 10:28 | Review R001 | plan Step 1: APPROVE |
| 2026-05-27 11:03 | Review R004 | plan Step 2: APPROVE |
| 2026-05-27 11:13 | Review R005 | code Step 2: UNKNOWN |
| 2026-05-27 11:19 | Review R006 | code Step 2: APPROVE |
| 2026-05-27 11:22 | Review R007 | plan Step 3: UNKNOWN |
| 2026-05-27 11:24 | Review R008 | plan Step 3: APPROVE |
| 2026-05-27 12:20 | Review R009 | code Step 3: APPROVE |
| 2026-05-27 12:23 | Review R010 | plan Step 4: APPROVE |
| 2026-05-27 12:34 | Review R011 | code Step 4: APPROVE |
