# Plan Review — Step 4: Docs and verification

Verdict: APPROVE

The Step 4 plan now addresses the prior review gaps and is specific enough to execute safely.

What is good:

- It names the docs/reference surfaces to inspect (`README.md`, `web/content/reference/tools.md`, `web/data/tools.json`, `docs/prd/PRD-icuvisor.md`, and `ROADMAP.md`) and frames the expected analyzer-doc outcome without assuming generated tool-reference churn.
- It includes the required `[Unreleased]` changelog update for the new reusable closed `analysis_metric` helpers and unknown-metric hints.
- It expands the quality gate into reproducible commands: `go test ./internal/analysis`, `make test`, `make build`, and `make lint`, with failures to be fixed or documented.
- It requires `STATUS.md` evidence for docs checks, changelog update, verification results, and handoff notes.
- It now states a concrete Step 4/Step 5 handoff policy: Step 5 may reuse Step 4 results only if no files changed after the recorded commands; otherwise it reruns affected gates, with a full rerun preferred for final confirmation.

Execution note: because Step 4 itself will likely update `STATUS.md` after recording command output, the worker should be explicit in the evidence about the command order and whether any post-gate changes were documentation/status-only. That will let Step 5 apply the reuse/rerun policy without guessing.
