# Review R003 — Code Review for Step 1

**Verdict:** REQUEST CHANGES

## Findings

### 1. Polarization golden case uses an impossible expected output for the listed input

- **File:** `taskplane-tasks/TP-097-definition-drift-guard/STATUS.md:129`
- **Severity:** High

The inventory says the planned polarization guard should use `zones [700,100,200]` and expects low/mod/high shares `0.727273/0.090909/0.181818`, index `3.20412`, state `ok`, and classification `polarized`.

That does not match `ComputeZoneBalance`'s bucket mapping: indexes `0..1` are low, index `2` is moderate, and indexes `3+` are high. For `[700,100,200]`, current code produces low `800`, moderate `200`, high `0`, total `1000`, state `undefined_high_zero`, and no index. The stated expected shares/index would require an input such as `[700,100,100,200]`.

Please correct the planned guard case before Step 2 so the golden fixture pins the intended behavior instead of starting from a failing/misleading expectation.

### 2. Review history was appended into the inventory table instead of the reviews log

- **File:** `taskplane-tasks/TP-097-definition-drift-guard/STATUS.md:133-134`
- **Severity:** Low

The R001/R002 review rows are currently inside the Step 1 inventory markdown table, with only three cells in an eight-column table. This makes the inventory artifact malformed and leaves the canonical `## Reviews` table above still showing only R001.

Please move/add R002 to the `## Reviews` table and remove these stray rows from the inventory artifact.

## Notes

- I did not run the Go test suite because Step 1 only changes task status/review artifacts, not compiled code.
