# Plan Review: Step 1

Verdict: Approved

No blocking issues with the Step 1 plan. It is appropriately narrow, test-first, and focused on proving the existing direct numeric `gear_id` path is resolved through the gear-list lookup without requiring resolver changes unless the regression fails.

Notes for execution:

- Prefer using/loading the existing numeric fixtures (`activity_*_with_gear.json` and `gear_list.json`) so the regression specifically covers numeric JSON IDs (`123`), not another string-ID case.
- Cover both tool surfaces called out by the task: `get_activity_details` and `get_activities`. Assert `gear_id == "123"`, `gear_name == "Race Bike"`, and `gear_resolution == resolved`.
- Assert the fake gear client is called, so the test proves the activity output is using the full gear list rather than only activity payload fields.
- Unknown-ID fallback should assert no misleading `gear_name` is emitted and the status remains `unresolved` (distinct from `name_missing`, which is only for a matched gear item with no name).
- Minor status mismatch: `STATUS.md` marks Step 0 required paths as existing, but `internal/tools/activity_gear_resolution_test.go` is currently absent. That is fine if Step 1 creates it, but update the status/discoveries if this was an actual preflight assumption.
