# Review R001 — Plan review for Step 2

## Verdict: approved

The Step 2 plan correctly selects the Step 2B path after the Step 1 no-exposure verdict. It stays within the task scope by documenting the upstream gap and explicitly avoids implementing `get_planning_parameters` or deriving periodization parameters client-side.

## What looks good

- The plan skips Step 2A because no athlete-level planning-parameter endpoint was found, which matches the conditional task requirements.
- The Step 2B checklist includes the required upstream-gap document at `docs/upstream-gaps/periodization-parameters.md`.
- It requires a public intervals.icu feature request and a link back from the documentation, satisfying the acceptance criterion if completed.
- It keeps the write counterpart and client-side computation out of scope.
- It calls out updating `STATUS.md` and handling the roadmap deferral, which is important given the PRD/ROADMAP mismatch already recorded in Step 1.

## Non-blocking recommendations while executing

- In the upstream-gap document, include both a user-facing rationale and a compact evidence table from Step 1: requested field, availability verdict, checked endpoints, and why near-matches such as `Wellness.rampRate`, `SummaryWithCats.rampRate`, event/workout `icu_intensity`, and folder plan metadata are insufficient.
- Cite the public discussion references from the task prompt for the relevant use cases, but avoid over-claiming if the exact posts are not accessible; link only to sources actually verified during execution.
- Do not mark the feature-request item complete unless a real public request URL is available. If public discussion/support submission requires a maintainer login or manual approval, write a ready-to-post request draft, record that blocker in `STATUS.md`, and leave the acceptance criterion incomplete rather than fabricating a link.
- Keep the ROADMAP change minimal. Since current `ROADMAP.md` does not explicitly list `get_planning_parameters`, prefer a short footnote/deferral note under the relevant v0.2 availability-gating area rather than inventing a completed roadmap item.
- Because no tool ships on this path, no README catalog or CHANGELOG update is required unless the documentation change is considered user-visible by the maintainer.

No plan changes are required before starting Step 2B.
