# Code Review: Step 4 — Testing & Verification

**Verdict: Needs revision**

## Findings

1. **Plan review result is recorded incorrectly**
   - `taskplane-tasks/TP-105-tool-routing-smoke-eval/STATUS.md:127` records `Review R010 | plan Step 4: APPROVE`, but the committed review artifact says `**Verdict: Needs revision**` at `.reviews/R010-plan-step4.md:3`.
   - This makes the task audit trail inaccurate and implies Step 4 was approved when it was not. Update the status entry to match the actual verdict and address/record the requested plan revisions before treating Step 4 as verified.

2. **Verification notes are not auditable enough for the approved checklist**
   - `STATUS.md:117-119` summarizes passes, but does not record each command with exit status, and omits the requested formatting gate (`make fmt-check` or equivalent) from the Step 4 evidence.
   - Please update `STATUS.md` with the exact verification commands and exit statuses, including the unset-provider eval command and formatting check. If using environment clearing for the dry run, record that explicitly without printing secrets.

## Reviewer verification

I independently ran:

- `go test ./internal/toolrouting ./scripts/toolroutingeval` — passed
- `env -u ICUVISOR_ROUTING_EVAL_PROVIDER -u ANTHROPIC_API_KEY make eval-tool-routing` — passed, 8 skipped
- `make fmt-check` — passed
- `make test` — passed
- `make build` — passed
- `make lint` — passed

No code/test gate failure was observed; the requested revision is for the task evidence/audit trail.
