# TP-133: Gym and strength best-effort support plan — Status

**Current Step:** Step 5: Documentation & Delivery
**Status:** ✅ Complete
**Last Updated:** 2026-05-29
**Review Level:** 1
**Review Counter:** 4
**Iteration:** 2
**Size:** M

> **Hydration:** Checkboxes represent meaningful outcomes, not individual code changes. Workers expand steps when runtime discoveries warrant it — aim for 2-5 outcome-level items per step, not exhaustive implementation scripts.

---

### Step 0: Preflight
**Status:** ✅ Complete

- [x] Required files and paths exist
- [x] Dependencies satisfied
- [x] Confirm no GPL/copyleft competitor source is opened or copied; use only public forum behavior signals and project docs.

---

### Step 1: Scope current support and upstream gaps
**Status:** ✅ Complete

- [x] Inspect current event/workout category handling and PRD/Roadmap strength-training mentions.
- [x] Determine what can be represented today without inventing unsupported structured strength sets.
- [x] Create or update an upstream-gap note for strength/gym support if missing.
- [x] Run targeted checks/tests as relevant.

---

### Step 2: Add best-effort prompt/docs guidance
**Status:** ✅ Complete

- [x] Update cookbook/prompt guidance to allow scheduling simple gym time blocks or notes when the user wants that, while explicitly saying detailed strength sets are future scope unless upstream support exists.
- [x] Avoid adding a new write tool in this task unless upstream API support is already documented in this repository.
- [x] Run targeted tests: `go test ./internal/prompts` if prompt fixtures change.

---

### Step 3: Capture follow-up implementation criteria
**Status:** ✅ Complete

- [x] Record in docs what evidence is needed before adding first-class strength-training tools: upstream endpoints, schema fields, response shape, and safe write behavior.
- [x] Update ROADMAP/PRD only if this clarifies existing future scope, not to expand v1 commitments.
- [x] Run docs/test validation as available. (`go test ./internal/prompts` passed)

---

### Step 4: Testing & Verification
**Status:** ✅ Complete

- [x] FULL test suite passing: `make test` (passed)
- [x] Lint passes or pre-existing linter limitations are documented: `make lint` (passed)
- [x] Build passes: `make build` (passed)
- [x] All failures fixed or clearly documented as pre-existing (no failures observed)

---

### Step 5: Documentation & Delivery
**Status:** ✅ Complete

- [x] "Must Update" docs modified (verified `docs/upstream-gaps/strength-training.md` and `CHANGELOG.md` in TP-133 commits)
- [x] "Check If Affected" docs reviewed (PRD and ROADMAP clarified existing upstream-dependent future scope without adding v1 commitments)
- [x] Discoveries logged

---

## Reviews

| # | Type | Step | Verdict | File |
|---|------|------|---------|------|

---

## Discoveries

| Discovery | Disposition | Location |
|-----------|-------------|----------|
| Current event support accepts documented categories plus custom pass-through values; `WORKOUT` requires an upstream activity `type`, and `NOTE` can carry free-text calendar annotations. PRD/Roadmap list strength only as upstream-dependent future scope/assumption. | Use docs guidance to recommend NOTE time blocks or simple supported WORKOUTs, not structured strength sets. | `internal/intervals/event_categories.go`, `internal/tools/add_or_update_event.go`, `docs/prd/PRD-icuvisor.md`, `ROADMAP.md` |
| First-class strength tools need explicit upstream read/write endpoints, schema, response-shaping, write-safety, and round-trip evidence before implementation. | Captured as implementation criteria and linked from PRD/Roadmap so future work stays scoped. | `docs/upstream-gaps/strength-training.md`, `docs/prd/PRD-icuvisor.md`, `ROADMAP.md` |

---

## Execution Log

| Timestamp | Action | Outcome |
|-----------|--------|---------|
| 2026-05-29 | Task staged | PROMPT.md and STATUS.md created |
| 2026-05-29 14:23 | Task started | Runtime V2 lane-runner execution |
| 2026-05-29 14:23 | Step 0 started | Preflight |
| 2026-05-29 14:39 | Worker iter 1 | done in 962s, tools: 65 |
| 2026-05-29 14:46 | Worker iter 2 | done in 416s, tools: 51 |
| 2026-05-29 14:46 | Task complete | .DONE created |

---

## Blockers

*None*

---

## Notes

*Reserved for execution notes*
| 2026-05-29 14:25 | Review R001 | plan Step 1: APPROVE |
| 2026-05-29 14:28 | Review R002 | plan Step 2: APPROVE |
| 2026-05-29 14:31 | Review R003 | plan Step 3: APPROVE |
| 2026-05-29 14:42 | Review R004 | plan Step 4: APPROVE |
