# Plan Review — Step 1: Define privacy claims and boundaries

**Verdict: approved to proceed.**

The revised `STATUS.md` now records the Step 1 artifacts requested by R001: a dependency disposition for TP-113, a source-backed inventory of substantiated privacy/security claims, explicit non-claims, and a page strategy that avoids overclaiming legal/GDPR compliance.

## Notes before implementation

- The constrained approach is appropriate: add a standalone `web/content/explain/privacy.md`, link it from the explain index, and avoid homepage/local-first positioning work owned by TP-113.
- The non-claims are correctly framed: no legal advice, no certification/GDPR-compliant claim, AI client/model-provider caveat, and intervals.icu upstream-service caveat.
- Keep `SECURITY.md` authoritative and link to it rather than duplicating policy text.

## Minor follow-ups

- If Step 2 mentions safety/write-delete posture, add the missing source note for delete-mode registration-time gating from `web/content/explain/safety-modes.md` / safety-mode docs.
- Clean up the stray execution-log table row that appears under `## Notes` in `STATUS.md` when convenient.

These are not blockers for Step 2.
