# Code Review R002 — Step 1

**Verdict:** Changes requested

I reviewed the diff from `338e98a26bf50bcd8812fe946c5de5d1258ad938..HEAD` and ran `go test ./internal/tools` successfully (`ok`, cached).

## Findings

1. **Step 1 audit is marked complete without the required disposition details.** `STATUS.md:27-30` checks all Step 1 outcomes, but the only discovery at `STATUS.md:83` omits the additions requested in R001: how “last 10 km” is translated into explicit distance bounds and which upstream data provides total activity distance, the description/schema mismatch, velocity-vs-pace wording, and the missing first-vs-last distance test coverage. Those points affect Step 2/3 scope, so Step 1 should not be treated as complete until they are recorded.

2. **The checked eval-scenario audit has no recorded result.** `STATUS.md:27` says existing eval scenarios were inspected, but `STATUS.md:83` only records tool/analysis/test findings and does not mention the current eval coverage or gap. Since Step 2 adds an eval specifically to close that gap, the audit should document what exists today.

3. **Review tracking is inconsistent.** `STATUS.md:72-75` leaves the Reviews table empty while `Review Counter` is now 1, and `STATUS.md:105-106` appends the R001 review note under `Notes` without a table header. Please record R001 in the Reviews table (and/or execution log) so review history remains machine/human readable.

