# Plan Review — Step 1

Verdict: Approved with minor clarifications.

The Step 1 plan matches the task scope: it audits the two workout-library tools, checks existing token-safety coverage, and runs the targeted `go test ./internal/tools` command before any docs/test hardening.

Clarifications to apply during execution:

- Record the audit result in `STATUS.md` (`Discoveries` or `Notes`), not only in local scratch, because Step 2 depends on knowing whether test hardening is needed.
- Be explicit that `include_full` applies to `get_workouts_in_folder`; `get_workout_library` instead has `include_top_level_workouts` and should be checked for not fetching workouts by default.
- When checking “pagination,” distinguish between implemented pagination and documented/folder-scoped workflows. Current code should not be changed in Step 1; just capture whether pagination is absent/present and whether that creates a Step 2 documentation/test need.
- If large-payload protection is assessed, verify both raw `workout_doc`/description suppression by default and the possibility of many terse rows being returned without page controls.

No blocker for proceeding.
