Role: implementation-shape critic.
Objective: Critique the proposed implementation direction for overengineering and shallow abstractions.
Scope: Read-only. Do not edit files. Assume global delegation is required and dynamic bespoke lanes are desirable.
Question: How can the implementation preserve global delegation while making dynamic lanes mostly natural language: skills, templates, lane cards, and progressive disclosure?
Output: <=700 words with: delete/avoid list, keep list, minimal file layout, and one blocking risk to test.
Do not reject delegation wholesale.
