---
description: Conduct comprehensive PR review from multiple perspectives (PM, Developer, QA, Security)
category: version-control-git
argument-hint: <pr_link_or_number>
allowed-tools: Bash(gh *), Read
---

# PR Review

**PR Link/Number**: $ARGUMENTS

> **Instructions**: Execute each task in the order given to conduct a thorough code review.  Update GitHub with this review.
> **Important**: The future is now—any improvements or "future" recommendations must be addressed **immediately**.

---

## Task 1: Product Manager Review

**Objective**: Assess from a product management perspective, focusing on:
- **Business Value**: Does this PR clearly advance our core product goals and deliver immediate ROI?
- **User Experience**: Is the change intuitive and delightful for users right now? If not, make fixes immediately.
- **Strategic Alignment**: Does the PR align with current (and long-term, i.e., now) strategic objectives?

**Action**: Provide clear directives on how to ensure maximum user and business impact. All "future" suggestions must be implemented now.

---

## Task 2: Developer Review

**Objective**: Evaluate the code thoroughly from a senior lead engineer perspective:
1. **Code Quality & Maintainability**: Is the code structured for readability and easy maintenance? If not, refactor now.
2. **Performance & Scalability**: Will these changes operate efficiently at scale? If not, optimize immediately.
3. **Best Practices & Standards**: Note any deviation from coding standards and correct it now.

**Action**: Leave a concise yet complete review comment, ensuring all improvements happen immediately—no deferrals.

---

## Task 3: Quality Engineer Review

**Objective**: Verify the overall quality, testing strategy, and reliability of the solution:
1. **Test Coverage**: Are there sufficient tests (unit, integration, E2E)? If not, add them now.
2. **Potential Bugs & Edge Cases**: Have all edge cases been considered? If not, address them immediately.
3. **Regression Risk**: Confirm changes don't undermine existing functionality. If risk is identified, mitigate now with additional checks or tests.

**Action**: Provide a detailed QA assessment, insisting any "future" improvements be completed right away.

---

## Task 4: Security Engineer Review

**Objective**: Ensure robust security practices and compliance:
1. **Vulnerabilities**: