---
id: T-1112
name: "RCA: cron registry vs /etc/cron.d/ divergence — pickup-process missing + consumer
  remediation"
description: >
  Inception: RCA: cron registry vs /etc/cron.d/ divergence — pickup-process missing
  + consumer remediation

status: work-completed
workflow_type: inception
owner: human
horizon:
tags: []
components: []
related_tasks: []
created: 2026-04-11T21:38:54Z
last_update: '2026-06-11T22:23:40Z'
date_finished: 2026-04-11T21:45:57Z
target_blast_radius: 3   # T-2193 migration default (M=small-subsystem floor)
voi_score: 0.5            # T-2193 migration default (medium)
bvp_scores_proposed:
  - ts: '2026-06-11T22:23:40Z'
    estimator: bvp-estimator-v1-heuristic
    scores:
      D1: 2
      D2: 2
      D3: 2
      D4: 2
      F-RECALL: 2
      F-ORCH: 2
      F3: 2
      F1: 2
      F2: 2
    rationale: D1=2 (no-signal); D2=2 (no-signal); D3=2 (no-signal); D4=2 
      (no-signal); F-RECALL=2 (no-signal); F-ORCH=2 (no-signal); F3=2 
      (no-signal); F1=2 (no-signal); F2=2 (no-signal)
    rubric_sha: e4a00f38e801
---

# T-1112: RCA: cron registry vs /etc/cron.d/ divergence — pickup-process missing + consumer remediation

## Problem Statement

User reported "cronjobs still not running". Investigation revealed cron IS running but pickup-process (registry job 11 of 11) is missing from `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit-999-*`. Root cause: two parallel cron systems (`fw cron generate` → registry YAML + `fw audit schedule install` → /etc/cron.d/) joined only by a manual "run both" convention. When pickup-process was added to the registry, the second step was never re-run. Same divergence class affects every consumer project on this host that has ever run `fw audit schedule install`. Full RCA + consumer remediation plan in `docs/reports/T-1112-cron-divergence-rca.md`.

**Class:** L-006 enumeration-divergence (ninth confirmed instance in 24 hours). Same pattern as G-024/G-037/G-038/G-039/G-040/G-041/G-042/G-043. The cron case is structurally identical — two representations of the same list (installed schedules), no invariant binding them — but it operates at the OS level across consumer projects.

**For whom:** every consumer project with an `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit-*` file. Currently 4 entries on this host (agentic-audit stale pointing at /opt/3021-Bilderkarte-tool-llm, agentic-audit-150-skills-manager, agentic-audit-999-agentic-engineering-framework, agentic-audit-termlink). All have been silently diverging from their respective `.context/cron-registry.yaml` since T-604 landed.

## Assumptions

1. **`/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit-<project>` is the real runtime source of truth.** Validated — `ls .context/audits/cron/` shows files written every 15–30 min, matching the schedules in that file.
2. **`fw audit schedule install` requires root or sudo for consumer remediation.** Likely true — `/etc/cron.d/` is root-owned. Spike required.
3. **Consumer remediation can be orchestrated from the framework repo.** Risk: per user's durable instruction "NEVER edit files outside PROJECT_ROOT", any cross-project install step must be initiated by the human on each consumer.
4. **pickup-process inbox directory will auto-create on first fire.** Not validated — `pickup-process` code may assume the directory exists.

## Exploration Plan

Research is pre-completed. Artifact: `docs/reports/T-1112-cron-divergence-rca.md`.

Remaining spikes before GO:

1. **SPIKE A (sudo requirement):** Confirm whether `fw audit schedule install` needs sudo, or whether the cron file is writable by the running user. Time-box: 2 min.
2. **SPIKE B (pickup directory):** Read `agents/pickup/*.sh` to check if pickup-process auto-creates `.context/pickup/inbox/` or assumes it. Time-box: 5 min.
3. **SPIKE C (cross-project governance):** Verify the cross-repo-edit rule — can `fw consumers sync-cron` run from 999 and write to consumer `/etc/cron.d/` files without violating the "no cross-repo edits" rule? (Answer probably: yes, because installing into `/etc/cron.d/` is an OS operation, not editing a consumer's source files.) Time-box: 5 min.

## Technical Constraints

- **Root privilege required** for any `/etc/cron.d/` write. `fw audit schedule install` already handles this with sudo or direct root.
- **Consumer project isolation.** Per the user's durable rule, the framework cannot edit files inside consumer project directories. `/etc/cron.d/` writes are OS-level and do not touch consumer source trees, so they remain permissible.
- **Cron entry format is rigid.** Any new command must produce byte-identical output to the legacy `fw audit schedule install` format to avoid diff noise.
- **Backwards compatibility.** The proposed `fw cron install` must continue to work if `fw audit schedule install` is called separately (both become idempotent).

## Scope Fence

**IN scope for this inception:**
- RCA of the divergence (complete — see research artifact)
- Immediate unblock for this project (single `fw audit schedule install` run, user-triggered)
- Structural fix sketch (C1 `fw cron install` unification + C2 `fw doctor` drift check + C3 stray file sweep + C4 consumer remediation command)
- Build decomposition T-1113a..e
- New gap registration (G-044)
- Consumer remediation plan (list of 4 /etc/cron.d/ files affected, order of migration)

**OUT of scope:**
- Any actual code edits (those are T-1113a..e after GO)
- Editing consumer project source files (cross-repo rule — only /etc/cron.d/ writes)
- Rewriting the legacy `fw audit schedule install` (the replacement command can coexist)
- Changing the schedule of any existing cron job

## Acceptance Criteria

### Agent
- [x] Problem statement validated
- [x] Assumptions tested
- [x] Recommendation written with rationale

### Human
- [x] [REVIEW] Review exploration findings and approve go/no-go decision
  **Steps:**
  1. Run: `fw task review T-XXX` (opens Watchtower with recommendation, assumptions, research artifacts)
  2. Review the Agent Recommendation section and go/no-go criteria evaluation
  3. Record decision via the Watchtower form or the command shown alongside the QR code
  **Expected:** Decision recorded, task completed
  **If not:** Ask agent for clarification on specific findings

## Go/No-Go Criteria

**GO if:**
- RCA confirms divergence is structural, not a one-off human error (CONFIRMED — two-system architecture from T-184/T-196 vs T-604 with no binding)
- Immediate unblock path exists (CONFIRMED — single `fw audit schedule install` run)
- Structural fix is low-complexity (CONFIRMED — `fw cron install` collapse + `fw doctor` drift check, ~80 LOC)
- Consumer remediation does not violate cross-repo edit rule (CONFIRMED — /etc/cron.d/ writes are OS-level, not consumer source edits)
- SPIKE A/B/C complete successfully
- No blocker from G-024 / T-1109 (the cron system path is independent of the web/ sync path)

**NO-GO if:**
- SPIKE C reveals the cross-repo rule does forbid orchestrating OS-level installs from the framework (unlikely — would need explicit user override)
- The legacy `fw audit schedule install` cannot be kept working alongside the new `fw cron install` (unlikely — they'd share the same output file and be idempotent)
- Users prefer to keep the two-step workflow for auditability reasons

**DEFER if:**
- T-1110 (framework enum sweep) lands first and establishes a cron-specific pattern we should follow (plausible — this RCA could be held until T-1110 stabilizes)

## Verification

# Shell commands that MUST pass before work-completed. One per line.
# Lines starting with # are comments (skipped). Empty lines ignored.
# For inception tasks, verification is often not needed (decisions, not code).

## Recommendation

**Recommendation:** GO — immediate unblock via `fw audit schedule install` + structural fix T-1113a..e + register as G-044 + consumer remediation across 4 /etc/cron.d/ files.

**Rationale:** Two-system divergence confirmed: `fw cron generate` (registry) and `fw audit schedule install` (runtime) are joined only by manual convention. Ninth L-006 instance this week. This is no longer a collection of local bugs — the framework's default failure mode for any concept existing in two places is silent divergence. Fix pattern matches T-1110 exactly: one chokepoint command (`fw cron install`) + one invariant test (`fw doctor` drift check) + invariant bats test. Consumer remediation is permissible because /etc/cron.d/ writes are OS-level and do not touch consumer source trees (preserving the cross-repo edit rule). Immediate 1-command fix unblocks pickup-process this session; structural fix prevents recurrence.

**Evidence:**

1. **Divergence confirmed end-to-end:** `fw cron status` reports 11 jobs from `.context/cron-registry.yaml`; `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit-999-agentic-engineering-framework` has 10 schedules installed; `pickup-process` (*/15 * * * *) is the missing 11th; `.context/pickup/inbox/` does not exist, proving it has never fired.
2. **Audit files prove legacy system works:** `.context/audits/cron/2026-04-11-2330.yaml` written at 23:30:09 — the */30 schedule fires. 10 of 11 jobs are healthy.
3. **Stray pollution:** `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit` (no project suffix) points at `/opt/3021-Bilderkarte-tool-llm` — leftover install from before T-604 added per-project naming. Not interfering but should be swept.
4. **Systemic across consumers:** 4 /etc/cron.d/ files on this host share the divergence risk (999, 150-skills-manager, termlink, stale 3021). Every consumer that updated its registry without running `fw audit schedule install` is affected.
5. **Class density:** 9 L-006 instances confirmed in 24 hours. T-1105 discipline explicitly triggers on 3+ instances — this case is 3x over threshold.
6. **Chokepoint architecture trivial:** single `fw cron install` that generates + diffs + writes atomically. ~80 LOC added. Zero existing code removed. `fw audit schedule install` remains as deprecated alias.

**Build decomposition (T-1113a..e):**

| Task ID | Scope | Type |
|---------|-------|------|
| T-1113a | Add `fw cron install` — unified generate+install command | Build |
| T-1113b | Add `fw doctor` check comparing registry to /etc/cron.d/ | Build |
| T-1113c | Add `fw doctor` check flagging stray /etc/cron.d/agentic-audit (no project suffix) | Build |
| T-1113d | Write `tests/integration/cron-install-syncs-registry.bats` + `fw-doctor-flags-cron-drift.bats` | Test |
| T-1113e | Document + run consumer remediation across 4 projects on this host | Build |

**Immediate action (pre-build):**
```
cd /opt/999-Agentic-Engineering-Framework && sudo bin/fw audit schedule install
```

This pushes the updated 11-job crontab from `.context/cron/agentic-audit.crontab` to `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit-999-agentic-engineering-framework`, enabling pickup-process to fire. No code changes, no build task, single command.

**Gap registration:** G-044 (cron registry vs /etc/cron.d/ divergence). Severity high — affects cross-project fleet. Score ~12 (likelihood 4 × impact 3).

**Cost:** ~80 LOC for the structural fix. 1 bats test file. Immediate unblock is 1 shell command.

**Risk (none blocking):**
- Consumer remediation requires root on each host (acceptable)
- `sudo` invocation UX (can be handled via existing pattern in `fw audit schedule install`)
- Stale /etc/cron.d/agentic-audit file requires manual cleanup (not auto-remediated to avoid deleting user files without consent)

**Cross-references:**
- Research artifact: `docs/reports/T-1112-cron-divergence-rca.md` (detailed RCA + consumer impact analysis)
- Related L-006 instances: G-024, G-037, G-038, G-039, G-040, G-041, G-042, G-043 (all same class, in-process)
- Parent discipline: T-1105 (chokepoint+invariant-test framework rule)
- Related tasks: T-1109 (web/ sync — same class, different system), T-1110 (framework enum sweep — in-process cousin)

**Human decision request:**
- `fw inception decide T-1112 go --rationale "approved — immediate install + build T-1113a..e"`, OR
- `fw inception decide T-1112 defer --rationale "wait for T-1110 to land first"`, OR
- `fw inception decide T-1112 no-go --rationale "prefer two-step workflow"`

## Decisions

**Decision**: GO

**Rationale**: Recommendation: GO — immediate unblock via `fw audit schedule install` + structural fix T-1113a..e + register as G-044 + consumer remediation across 4 /etc/cron.d/ files.

Rationale: Two-system divergence confirmed: `fw cron generate` (registry) and `fw audit schedule install` (runtime) are joined only by manual convention. Ninth L-006 instance this week. This is no longer a collection of local bugs — the framework's default failure mode for any concept existing in two places is silent divergence. Fix pattern matches T-1110 exactly: one chokepoint command (`fw cron install`) + one invariant test (`fw doctor` drift check) + invariant bats test. Consumer remediation is permissible because /etc/cron.d/ writes are OS-level and do not touch consumer source trees (preserving the cross-repo edit rule). Immediate 1-command fix unblocks pickup-process this session; structural fix prevents recurrence.

Evidence:

1. Divergence confirmed end-to-end: `fw cron status` reports 11 jobs from `.context/cron-registry.yaml`; `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit-999-agentic-engineering-framework` has 10 schedules installed; `pickup-process` (*/15 * * * *) is the missing 11th; `.context/pickup/inbox/` does not exist, proving it has never fired.
2. Audit files prove legacy system works: `.context/audits/cron/2026-04-11-2330.yaml` written at 23:30:09 — the */30 schedule fires. 10 of 11 jobs are healthy.
3. Stray pollution: `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit` (no project suffix) points at `/opt/3021-Bilderkarte-tool-llm` — leftover install from before T-604 added per-project naming. Not interfering but should be swept.
4. Systemic across consumers: 4 /etc/cron.d/ files on this host share the divergence risk (999, 150-skills-manager, termlink, stale 3021). Every consumer that updated its registry without running `fw audit schedule install` is affected.
5. Class density: 9 L-006 instances confirmed in 24 hours. T-1105 discipline explicitly triggers on 3+ instances — this case is 3x over threshold.
6. Chokepoint architecture trivial: single `fw cron install` that generates + diffs + writes atomically. ~80 LOC added. Zero existing code removed. `fw audit schedule install` remains as deprecated alias.

Build decomposition (T-1113a..e):

| Task ID | Scope | Type |
|---------|-------|------|
| T-1113a | Add `fw cron install` — unified generate+install command | Build |
| T-1113b | Add `fw doctor` check comparing registry to /etc/cron.d/ | Build |
| T-1113c | Add `fw doctor` check flagging stray /etc/cron.d/agentic-audit (no project suffix) | Build |
| T-1113d | Write `tests/integration/cron-install-syncs-registry.bats` + `fw-doctor-flags-cron-drift.bats` | Test |
| T-1113e | Document + run consumer remediation across 4 projects on this host | Build |

Immediate action (pre-build):
```
cd /opt/999-Agentic-Engineering-Framework && sudo bin/fw audit schedule install
```

This pushes the updated 11-job crontab from `.context/cron/agentic-audit.crontab` to `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit-999-agentic-engineering-framework`, enabling pickup-process to fire. No code changes, no build task, single command.

Gap registration: G-044 (cron registry vs /etc/cron.d/ divergence). Severity high — affects cross-project fleet. Score ~12 (likelihood 4 × impact 3).

Cost: ~80 LOC for the structural fix. 1 bats test file. Immediate unblock is 1 shell command.

Risk (none blocking):
- Consumer remediation requires root on each host (acceptable)
- `sudo` invocation UX (can be handled via existing pattern in `fw audit schedule install`)
- Stale /etc/cron.d/agentic-audit file requires manual cleanup (not auto-remediated to avoid deleting user files without consent)

Cross-references:
- Research artifact: `docs/reports/T-1112-cron-divergence-rca.md` (detailed RCA + consumer impact analysis)
- Related L-006 instances: G-024, G-037, G-038, G-039, G-040, G-041, G-042, G-043 (all same class, in-process)
- Parent discipline: T-1105 (chokepoint+invariant-test framework rule)
- Related tasks: T-1109 (web/ sync — same class, different system), T-1110 (framework enum sweep — in-process cousin)

Human decision request:
- `fw inception decide T-1112 go --rationale "approved — immediate install + build T-1113a..e"`, OR
- `fw inception decide T-1112 defer --rationale "wait for T-1110 to land first"`, OR
- `fw inception decide T-1112 no-go --rationale "prefer two-step workflow"`

**Date**: 2026-04-11T21:45:57Z
## Decision

**Decision**: GO

**Rationale**: Recommendation: GO — immediate unblock via `fw audit schedule install` + structural fix T-1113a..e + register as G-044 + consumer remediation across 4 /etc/cron.d/ files.

Rationale: Two-system divergence confirmed: `fw cron generate` (registry) and `fw audit schedule install` (runtime) are joined only by manual convention. Ninth L-006 instance this week. This is no longer a collection of local bugs — the framework's default failure mode for any concept existing in two places is silent divergence. Fix pattern matches T-1110 exactly: one chokepoint command (`fw cron install`) + one invariant test (`fw doctor` drift check) + invariant bats test. Consumer remediation is permissible because /etc/cron.d/ writes are OS-level and do not touch consumer source trees (preserving the cross-repo edit rule). Immediate 1-command fix unblocks pickup-process this session; structural fix prevents recurrence.

Evidence:

1. Divergence confirmed end-to-end: `fw cron status` reports 11 jobs from `.context/cron-registry.yaml`; `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit-999-agentic-engineering-framework` has 10 schedules installed; `pickup-process` (*/15 * * * *) is the missing 11th; `.context/pickup/inbox/` does not exist, proving it has never fired.
2. Audit files prove legacy system works: `.context/audits/cron/2026-04-11-2330.yaml` written at 23:30:09 — the */30 schedule fires. 10 of 11 jobs are healthy.
3. Stray pollution: `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit` (no project suffix) points at `/opt/3021-Bilderkarte-tool-llm` — leftover install from before T-604 added per-project naming. Not interfering but should be swept.
4. Systemic across consumers: 4 /etc/cron.d/ files on this host share the divergence risk (999, 150-skills-manager, termlink, stale 3021). Every consumer that updated its registry without running `fw audit schedule install` is affected.
5. Class density: 9 L-006 instances confirmed in 24 hours. T-1105 discipline explicitly triggers on 3+ instances — this case is 3x over threshold.
6. Chokepoint architecture trivial: single `fw cron install` that generates + diffs + writes atomically. ~80 LOC added. Zero existing code removed. `fw audit schedule install` remains as deprecated alias.

Build decomposition (T-1113a..e):

| Task ID | Scope | Type |
|---------|-------|------|
| T-1113a | Add `fw cron install` — unified generate+install command | Build |
| T-1113b | Add `fw doctor` check comparing registry to /etc/cron.d/ | Build |
| T-1113c | Add `fw doctor` check flagging stray /etc/cron.d/agentic-audit (no project suffix) | Build |
| T-1113d | Write `tests/integration/cron-install-syncs-registry.bats` + `fw-doctor-flags-cron-drift.bats` | Test |
| T-1113e | Document + run consumer remediation across 4 projects on this host | Build |

Immediate action (pre-build):
```
cd /opt/999-Agentic-Engineering-Framework && sudo bin/fw audit schedule install
```

This pushes the updated 11-job crontab from `.context/cron/agentic-audit.crontab` to `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit-999-agentic-engineering-framework`, enabling pickup-process to fire. No code changes, no build task, single command.

Gap registration: G-044 (cron registry vs /etc/cron.d/ divergence). Severity high — affects cross-project fleet. Score ~12 (likelihood 4 × impact 3).

Cost: ~80 LOC for the structural fix. 1 bats test file. Immediate unblock is 1 shell command.

Risk (none blocking):
- Consumer remediation requires root on each host (acceptable)
- `sudo` invocation UX (can be handled via existing pattern in `fw audit schedule install`)
- Stale /etc/cron.d/agentic-audit file requires manual cleanup (not auto-remediated to avoid deleting user files without consent)

Cross-references:
- Research artifact: `docs/reports/T-1112-cron-divergence-rca.md` (detailed RCA + consumer impact analysis)
- Related L-006 instances: G-024, G-037, G-038, G-039, G-040, G-041, G-042, G-043 (all same class, in-process)
- Parent discipline: T-1105 (chokepoint+invariant-test framework rule)
- Related tasks: T-1109 (web/ sync — same class, different system), T-1110 (framework enum sweep — in-process cousin)

Human decision request:
- `fw inception decide T-1112 go --rationale "approved — immediate install + build T-1113a..e"`, OR
- `fw inception decide T-1112 defer --rationale "wait for T-1110 to land first"`, OR
- `fw inception decide T-1112 no-go --rationale "prefer two-step workflow"`

**Date**: 2026-04-11T21:45:57Z

## Updates

<!-- Auto-populated by git mining at task completion.
     Manual entries optional during execution. -->

### 2026-04-11T21:39:11Z — status-update [task-update-agent]
- **Change:** status: captured → started-work

### 2026-04-11T21:45:57Z — inception-decision [inception-workflow]
- **Action:** Recorded inception decision
- **Decision:** GO
- **Rationale:** Recommendation: GO — immediate unblock via `fw audit schedule install` + structural fix T-1113a..e + register as G-044 + consumer remediation across 4 /etc/cron.d/ files.

Rationale: Two-system divergence confirmed: `fw cron generate` (registry) and `fw audit schedule install` (runtime) are joined only by manual convention. Ninth L-006 instance this week. This is no longer a collection of local bugs — the framework's default failure mode for any concept existing in two places is silent divergence. Fix pattern matches T-1110 exactly: one chokepoint command (`fw cron install`) + one invariant test (`fw doctor` drift check) + invariant bats test. Consumer remediation is permissible because /etc/cron.d/ writes are OS-level and do not touch consumer source trees (preserving the cross-repo edit rule). Immediate 1-command fix unblocks pickup-process this session; structural fix prevents recurrence.

Evidence:

1. Divergence confirmed end-to-end: `fw cron status` reports 11 jobs from `.context/cron-registry.yaml`; `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit-999-agentic-engineering-framework` has 10 schedules installed; `pickup-process` (*/15 * * * *) is the missing 11th; `.context/pickup/inbox/` does not exist, proving it has never fired.
2. Audit files prove legacy system works: `.context/audits/cron/2026-04-11-2330.yaml` written at 23:30:09 — the */30 schedule fires. 10 of 11 jobs are healthy.
3. Stray pollution: `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit` (no project suffix) points at `/opt/3021-Bilderkarte-tool-llm` — leftover install from before T-604 added per-project naming. Not interfering but should be swept.
4. Systemic across consumers: 4 /etc/cron.d/ files on this host share the divergence risk (999, 150-skills-manager, termlink, stale 3021). Every consumer that updated its registry without running `fw audit schedule install` is affected.
5. Class density: 9 L-006 instances confirmed in 24 hours. T-1105 discipline explicitly triggers on 3+ instances — this case is 3x over threshold.
6. Chokepoint architecture trivial: single `fw cron install` that generates + diffs + writes atomically. ~80 LOC added. Zero existing code removed. `fw audit schedule install` remains as deprecated alias.

Build decomposition (T-1113a..e):

| Task ID | Scope | Type |
|---------|-------|------|
| T-1113a | Add `fw cron install` — unified generate+install command | Build |
| T-1113b | Add `fw doctor` check comparing registry to /etc/cron.d/ | Build |
| T-1113c | Add `fw doctor` check flagging stray /etc/cron.d/agentic-audit (no project suffix) | Build |
| T-1113d | Write `tests/integration/cron-install-syncs-registry.bats` + `fw-doctor-flags-cron-drift.bats` | Test |
| T-1113e | Document + run consumer remediation across 4 projects on this host | Build |

Immediate action (pre-build):
```
cd /opt/999-Agentic-Engineering-Framework && sudo bin/fw audit schedule install
```

This pushes the updated 11-job crontab from `.context/cron/agentic-audit.crontab` to `/etc/cron.d/agentic-audit-999-agentic-engineering-framework`, enabling pickup-process to fire. No code changes, no build task, single command.

Gap registration: G-044 (cron registry vs /etc/cron.d/ divergence). Severity high — affects cross-project fleet. Score ~12 (likelihood 4 × impact 3).

Cost: ~80 LOC for the structural fix. 1 bats test file. Immediate unblock is 1 shell command.

Risk (none blocking):
- Consumer remediation requires root on each host (acceptable)
- `sudo` invocation UX (can be handled via existing pattern in `fw audit schedule install`)
- Stale /etc/cron.d/agentic-audit file requires manual cleanup (not auto-remediated to avoid deleting user files without consent)

Cross-references:
- Research artifact: `docs/reports/T-1112-cron-divergence-rca.md` (detailed RCA + consumer impact analysis)
- Related L-006 instances: G-024, G-037, G-038, G-039, G-040, G-041, G-042, G-043 (all same class, in-process)
- Parent discipline: T-1105 (chokepoint+invariant-test framework rule)
- Related tasks: T-1109 (web/ sync — same class, different system), T-1110 (framework enum sweep — in-process cousin)

Human decision request:
- `fw inception decide T-1112 go --rationale "approved — immediate install + build T-1113a..e"`, OR
- `fw inception decide T-1112 defer --rationale "wait for T-1110 to land first"`, OR
- `fw inception decide T-1112 no-go --rationale "prefer two-step workflow"`

### 2026-04-11T21:45:57Z — status-update [task-update-agent]
- **Change:** status: started-work → work-completed
- **Reason:** Inception decision: GO

### 2026-04-12T09:27:16Z — status-update [task-update-agent]
- **Change:** horizon: now → next

## Reviewer Verdict (v1.5)

- **Scan ID:** R-ae9c9ac9
- **Timestamp:** 2026-06-02T14:55:15Z
- **Catalogue:** v1.3-seed
- **Overall:** PASS
- **Needs Human:** no
- **Findings:** none
