# 2026-05-11 Fix Daemon Effect Server Bind Audit R2 Summary

## Source

- Reviewed plan file: `docs/plans/2026-05-11-fix-daemon-effect-server-bind-audit-r2.md`.
- The source audits `docs/plans/2026-05-11-fix-daemon-effect-server-bind.md`.
- The file is an audit synthesis and amendment record, not the original executable implementation plan.
- The recorded disposition is "Amend Plan required before execution."
- The audit says no source tests were run because this was a source-first planning review.

## Plan Structure

- Header metadata identifies the audited plan, audit method, completed auditor coverage, local fallback for Task 7, and overall status.
- `Amend Plan Findings` lists 13 numbered findings. Each finding describes a plan defect, usually names the affected task, often cites source evidence, and gives a required amendment.
- `Additional Plan Hygiene` adds cross-cutting corrections that are not numbered findings, including command fixes, commit strategy, test file placement, unsafe type assertions, and file-list completeness.
- `Amendments Applied` is a traceability table mapping each finding or hygiene bucket to the affected task and the amendment now applied to the underlying plan.
- `Audit Files` records the individual audit sidecar files used as inputs.
- The closing note records audit validation status: no source tests were run.

## Information Types Communicated

- Audit target identity: the source implementation plan being reviewed.
- Review provenance: requested audit flow, subagent allocation, coverage, and fallback when the thread limit was reached.
- Review disposition: execution is blocked until the plan is amended.
- Evidence-backed findings: numbered defects in the plan, tied to source file locations or current/planned code paths.
- Cross-task consistency failures: changes in one task invalidating assumptions in another task.
- Architecture corrections: daemon config ownership, TLS bind behavior, runtime config snapshots, onboarding CA material, and setup-info dependency boundaries.
- Test and fixture corrections: missing regression coverage, wrong server handle assertions, real `TlsCertLive` handoff proof, non-null CA material, and direct onboarding tests.
- Verification and command corrections: wrong routes, wrong package commands, missing TLS preflight, dynamic Tailscale IP discovery, and no-test audit status.
- Execution policy corrections: branch naming, attribution, avoiding knowingly red intermediate commits, and replacing non-existent scripts.
- Amendment instructions: concrete edits expected in the original plan.
- Amendment resolution ledger: finding-to-task mapping that records how each finding was applied.
- Audit artifact provenance: list of sidecar audit files.

## Fit To Existing Formula Parts

| Source information | Best current fit | Fit quality |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Whole audit synthesis | `epic` | Partial. It can root an audit-conversion molecule, but it is not the implementation epic itself. |
| Audited plan path, scope, disposition, and no-test note | `global-contract` | Good for shared context, especially if children are plan-amendment tasks. |
| Daemon/TLS/config/onboarding/setup-info corrections | `architecture` | Good. These are cross-cutting design constraints for any later executable work. |
| Branch, attribution, command, commit, and validation policies | `policy` | Good. These are execution rules rather than implementation tasks. |
| Original Tasks 1-7 references | `parent` | Partial. The audit references source-plan tasks but does not define full parent stages. |
| Individual amendments | `child` or child constraints | Partial. Each amendment can become a plan-edit child, but the file does not provide complete implementation work packets. |
| Regression assertions, smoke checks, and fanout blockers | `checkpoint` | Partial to good. Some items are true gates, but the audit disposition is a review decision rather than a validation-command checkpoint. |
| Test setup details and preconditions | `fixture` | Partial. Several findings describe fixture needs, but not as standalone fixture provenance records. |
| Manual smoke/preflight evidence collection | `pilot` | Weak. These are validation/preflight instructions, not an exploratory pilot that creates or rejects follow-up work. |
| Future reusable work | `followup-template` | Weak. The file does not describe generic future child templates. |
| Required amendment details | `work-packet` snippet | Partial. The file has goals, inputs, and expected assertions, but lacks required fields such as `allowedFiles`, `forbiddenFiles`, `redCommand`, `expectedFailure`, `greenScope`, and structured failure conditions. |
| Completed subagent audit method | `subagent-launch` snippet | Poor. The source records completed audit provenance, not launch instructions for new subagents. |
| Audit files and no-test note | `handoff-note` snippet | Partial. This is useful handoff context, but not enough to express finding resolution or review coverage. |

## Gaps / Schema Additions

- Add an `audit-finding` role or contract snippet for numbered review findings. Suggested fields: `findingId`, `sourceTaskRefs`, `problem`, `consequence`, `sourceEvidence`, `plannedSnippetRefs`, `amendment`, `severity`, `disposition`, and `appliedStatus`.
- Add an `amendment-ledger` role or metadata block for the `Amendments Applied` table. Current roles can store tasks or context, but not the traceability from review finding to applied plan change.
- Add a `review-provenance` role or snippet for audit method, auditor coverage, thread-limit fallback, sidecar audit files, and source-first/no-test review mode.
- Add a structured `evidence` snippet that can be attached to findings, checkpoints, or work packets. This file uses source file references and current/planned behavior comparisons as first-class information.
- Add a `plan-disposition` checkpoint subtype or metadata field for review outcomes such as "amend required before execution." Existing checkpoints assume validation and fanout mechanics, while this file records a review gate.
- Add `sourcePlanTaskRefs` metadata to connect findings to task numbers in the original plan before those tasks have been converted into generated bead logical IDs.
- Add a `validation-record` snippet for negative verification statements such as "no source tests were run" plus the reason. This should be separate from executable verification commands.

## Notes For Combined Summary

- This source is best classified as a meta-plan audit artifact: it communicates diagnostic review data and amendment traceability more than executable work.
- Existing formula parts can absorb much of the content as global contract, architecture, policy, checkpoint, and child constraints, but the conversion would need the original plan to derive complete child work packets.
- The strongest schema pressure is for review-specific concepts: findings, evidence, amendment resolution, provenance, and review disposition.
- The combined summary should distinguish implementation-plan schema from audit/amendment-record schema. This file mainly tests the latter.
- The 13 findings and hygiene bullets should become either amendments to the original plan or constraints/checkpoints for later child beads, not standalone implementation tasks without the original plan context.
