# 2026-05-11 Effect.ts Mainline Completion Progress Summary

## Source

- Source plan reviewed: `docs/plans/2026-05-11-effect-ts-mainline-completion-progress.md`
- Skill references consulted: `.agents/skills/plan-to-beads/SKILL.md` and `.agents/skills/plan-to-beads/REFERENCE.md`
- Source character: historical progress log, not the live checklist. The file says current live status moved to `docs/plans/2026-05-14-effect-ts-mainline-live-progress.md`.

## Plan Structure

- Opens with a historical status warning and the Phase 0 worktree/branch provenance.
- Defines top-level completion guardrails as a checklist: daemon entrypoint, `Layer.succeed` bridges, persistence bridge removal, rejectable `Effect.promise`, unbounded concurrency, throwing helpers, and app-internal `Effect.run*`.
- Captures environment and baseline evidence:
  - node and pnpm versions
  - dependency setup state
  - broad baseline grep output
  - narrower check/lint/unit-test baseline
  - provider-backed and daemon-only smoke observations
- Then uses 90+ `##` sections for completed or audited slices. Most sections are phase/slice records, not hierarchical parent/child breakdowns.
- The dominant slice pattern is:
  - `Plan issue(s) found`
  - `Changes`
  - `TDD red check(s)`
  - `Verification`
  - optional review notes, blocked dependency notes, focused/broader verification, outcome, rerun notes, or decision
- Some sections are audit or gate records rather than implementation slices, especially final grep gates, runtime boundary allowlists, and bridge deletion audits.
- One section is explicitly a decision record: `Phase 6.9: Claude SDK AsyncIterable Boundary Decision`.
- Several sections include large evidence snapshots, including SQLite schema/index/constraint inventories, row counts, migration dry-runs, exact failing command output, and rerun outcomes.
- Ordering is historical append order, not clean numeric phase order. Later Phase 9 sections appear before some Phase 7 and Phase 6 sections.

## Information Types Communicated

- Completion guardrails and remaining open blockers.
- Historical environment baseline and local dependency state.
- Exact command transcripts: command, exit code, selected output, and expected failure text.
- Baseline grep inventories and later guardrail grep results.
- Behavior smoke observations, including blocked provider-backed smoke and successful daemon-only smoke.
- Per-slice plan corrections where the original plan was stale, too broad, premature, or contradicted live code.
- Per-slice implementation deltas by file or subsystem.
- TDD red evidence and expected failure messages.
- Focused, broad, integration, contract, E2E, visual, and full-suite verification evidence.
- Review findings and resolution notes, including severity-like language such as P1/P2.
- External dependency and environment blockers, especially unreachable OpenCode and local native module/tooling issues.
- Runtime boundary allowlists and intentional exceptions.
- Operational migration evidence: copied production DB inventory, migration checksum behavior, row-count preservation, and rollback procedure.
- Historical failed commands plus corrected command forms.
- Residual-risk classification, such as broad suite failures that passed when rerun narrowly.
- Deferred decisions and reopened earlier phases.

## Fit To Existing Formula Parts

| Formula part | Fit | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| `epic` | Strong | The whole Effect.ts mainline completion effort can be the epic/root. |
| `global-contract` | Partial | Guardrails and historical scope notes fit, but live-status warnings and historical provenance are evidence metadata rather than durable execution contract. |
| `architecture` | Strong | Many slice records describe ownership boundaries, bridge deletion, Effect service boundaries, and intended module ownership. |
| `policy` | Partial | TDD discipline, guardrail classification, and command policy fit, but most policy-like statements are embedded in retrospective notes. |
| `parent` | Partial | Phase numbers can be derived into parents, but the file itself mostly records leaf slices as top-level headings. |
| `child` | Partial | Most phase/slice sections are child-like vertical behaviors, but they are completed work records, not pre-execution work packets. |
| `checkpoint` | Strong | Guardrail checklist, final grep gate, focused/broader verification, and fanout-readiness audits fit checkpoint semantics. |
| `fixture` | Partial | Environment baseline, copied DB inventory, baseline grep output, and smoke setup fit fixture provenance, but the current fixture role does not clearly hold large observed inventories. |
| `pilot` | Weak | Migration dry-run on a copied production DB is pilot-like evidence, but the plan does not label pilots or use pilot decisions to spawn follow-up work. |
| `followup-template` | Weak | Deferred/reopened phase notes imply follow-up work, but they are not written as reusable templates for future child beads. |
| `work-packet` snippet | Partial | TDD red commands, expected failures, verification, and changed files map well. Required fields such as `allowedFiles`, `forbiddenFiles`, `greenScope`, and `failureConditions` are often absent or must be inferred. |
| `subagent-launch` snippet | Weak | Review notes imply spec/code-quality reviewers, but there are no launch packets, prompts, ownership boundaries, or subagent handoff fields. |
| `handoff-note` snippet | Partial | Notes, blockers, rerun instructions, and exact evidence are handoff-useful, but they are not shaped as explicit handoff notes. |

## Gaps / Schema Additions

- `evidence-run` contract snippet: command, cwd/worktree, env overrides, exit code, expected/actual classification, output summary, log path, warnings, and rerun relationship. This file is heavy with command evidence that should not be forced into `work-packet.verification`.
- `plan-delta` or `plan-correction` metadata: original plan assumption, live-code contradiction, chosen correction, and rationale. `Plan issues found` is a first-class information type throughout the file.
- `review-resolution` metadata: reviewer lens, finding severity, finding text, fix summary, and re-review outcome. Current roles have no clean place for resolved review findings.
- `inventory-snapshot` contract snippet: grep outputs, schema tables, indexes, constraints, row counts, allowed hits, source/provenance, and refresh policy. This is broader than a normal fixture input.
- `blocker-risk` metadata: external dependency, local environment failure, flaky/broad-suite failure, blocked smoke, resolution or rerun outcome, and whether the blocker is still current.
- `operational-procedure` snippet: rollback, manual recovery, dry-run procedure, and exact operational steps. The migration rollback section does not fit child/checkpoint cleanly.
- `decision-record` metadata linked to a slice: decision, alternatives rejected, deferral condition, and future trigger. Architecture/policy roles can hold decisions, but this file has phase-local decisions that need stable linkage.
- `historical-status` metadata: completed/open state, historical-vs-live status, append order, and whether a section is superseded. The current formula assumes executable readiness more than retrospective progress state.
- `corrected-command` metadata: failed historical command, reason it was invalid, and current correct command. This appears in frontend/E2E verification and should be preserved as command guidance.

## Notes For Combined Summary

- Treat this file as a retrospective evidence ledger, not as a clean source of executable Beads children.
- A converter should probably emit a separate evidence layer or attach evidence snippets to generated beads rather than making every command block part of a child work packet.
- The strongest reusable structure is the repeated slice record: plan issue, changes, red check, verification, and notes.
- Parent/child structure must be derived from phase numbers and headings; it is not explicitly nested in the markdown.
- Do not infer current project status from this file alone. It explicitly points to a later live progress file.
- The biggest schema gap is not another work role; it is evidence and correction metadata for already-executed work.
