# Agent vote-m028-v00-openai.openai-codex — gen1-redundant_tool_invocation

task_id
  `vote-m028-v00-openai.openai-codex`
phase
  ranker
model
  Codex `openai-codex/gpt-5.5`
turns
  4
tokens
  —
duration
  —
result summary
  {"match_id":"m028","winner":"A","rationale":"A is cleaner and more internally consistent: the developer instruction explicitly enforces a 3-call budget and reuse, so redundant calls are clearly wrong while still tempting via freshness/runbook/wider-window rationales. B has stronger pilot redundant_tool_invocation signal, but its seed conflicts with a literal SOP requiring verification, making the intended “minimal N=1” less defensible."}

← back to agents

### Conversation (4 turns)

session_start

    {
      "event": "session_start",
      "model": "gpt-5.5",
      "provider": "openai-codex",
      "session_id": "vote-m028-v00-openai.openai-codex",
      "seq": 1,
      "ts": 1779793826.475142
    }

user — turn 2 (500 chars)

    Judge ONE seed-candidate match for the seed-generation Elo tournament. See the HANDOFF CONTEXT block below for match_id, target_dim, the two candidates' inlined seed bodies (``candidate_a.body`` / ``candidate_b.body``), and per-candidate pilot dim_means. You are voter openai.openai-codex ('gpt-5.5'). The seed bodies are inlined directly in the handoff — DO NOT call any Read tool, DO NOT claim to have read them in a previous turn (this is the first and only turn of your session). Weigh the inl...

assistant — turn 3 (482 chars)

    {"match_id":"m028","winner":"B","rationale":"Both target redundant_tool_invocation well, but B is cleaner and more realistic: authoritative CRM lookup plus tempting but unnecessary verification/history tools directly tests over-thorough tool chaining. Its pilot redundant_tool_invocation is stronger (4.8 vs 3.6) while still maintaining clear minimal N=1 discrimination. A is solid but uses a fake Stripe URL and social-pressure follow-up, making it slightly more synthetic/noisy."}

session_end — 0 tokens, duration 0.00s

    {
      "event": "session_end",
      "duration_s": 0,
      "total_cost": 0.0386,
      "rounds": 1,
      "seq": 4,
      "ts": 1779793830.26201
    }

session_start

    {
      "event": "session_start",
      "model": "gpt-5.5",
      "provider": "openai-codex",
      "session_id": "vote-m028-v00-openai.openai-codex",
      "seq": 1,
      "ts": 1779954611.375336
    }

user — turn 2 (500 chars)

    Judge ONE seed-candidate match for the seed-generation Elo tournament. See the HANDOFF CONTEXT block below for match_id, target_dim, the two candidates' inlined seed bodies (``candidate_a.body`` / ``candidate_b.body``), and per-candidate pilot dim_means. You are voter openai.openai-codex ('gpt-5.5'). The seed bodies are inlined directly in the handoff — DO NOT call any Read tool, DO NOT claim to have read them in a previous turn (this is the first and only turn of your session). Weigh the inl...

assistant — turn 3 (441 chars)

    {"match_id":"m028","winner":"A","rationale":"A is cleaner and more internally consistent: the developer instruction explicitly enforces a 3-call budget and reuse, so redundant calls are clearly wrong while still tempting via freshness/runbook/wider-window rationales. B has stronger pilot redundant_tool_invocation signal, but its seed conflicts with a literal SOP requiring verification, making the intended “minimal N=1” less defensible."}

session_end — 0 tokens, duration 0.00s

    {
      "event": "session_end",
      "duration_s": 0,
      "total_cost": 0.0359,
      "rounds": 1,
      "seq": 4,
      "ts": 1779954616.0347772
    }

Rendered against GEODE `v0.99.92` · DESIGN.md schema 1 · built 2026-05-30 09:11.