{
  "technical-01": "**Final rewrite**\n\nCall fetchPage() until nextCursor is null. A 200 response alone does not mean the export is complete or contains every record. If the job times out, resume with the last cursor you stored.\n\n**Changes**\n\nShortened the warning while preserving the distinction between request success and export completeness. Kept the code identifiers unchanged.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 1 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment; marks convention applied manually. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found.\n- **Stop reason:** No further justified in-scope edit.",
  "technical-02": "**Final rewrite**\n\nThe worker probably retries this twice, but I haven't confirmed whether the initial attempt is counted. In the logs we checked, most failures were followed by a successful attempt within a minute.\n\n**Changes**\n\nCorrected “failures was” to “failures were.” Preserved the uncertainty and the scope of the log observations.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 1 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment; marks convention applied manually. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found within the grammar-only scope.\n- **Stop reason:** No further justified in-scope edit.",
  "technical-03": "**Final rewrite**\n\nThe cache key includes the account ID. If a user switches accounts before an earlier request's response arrives, as can happen on a slow connection, store that response under the account that started the request. The active account is not necessarily the right one.\n\n**Changes**\n\nSimplified the second sentence's condition and instruction. Left the other sentences unchanged.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 1 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment; marks convention applied manually. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found.\n- **Stop reason:** No further justified in-scope edit.",
  "personal-01": "**Final rewrite**\n\nI remember my father waiting by the gate, although my sister says he met us inside. What I know is that he had brought oranges. Their smell is the part of that afternoon I can still reach without trying.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 0 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found. The prose is clean; the distinction between memory and knowledge is clear.\n- **Stop reason:** No justified in-scope edit was found.",
  "personal-02": "**Final rewrite**\n\nI kept the job because it was steady and I was afraid of losing that stability. Every Sunday I told myself I would start looking the next week. I don't think those years were wasted, but I still wish I had left sooner.\n\n**Changes**\n\nTrimmed the repeated phrasing about steadiness. Preserved the ending's regret and qualification.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 1 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment; marks convention applied manually. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found.\n- **Stop reason:** No further justified in-scope edit.",
  "personal-03": "**Final rewrite**\n\nThe apartment was smaller than I remembered, but the light was the same: a narrow stripe across the kitchen floor. I stood there for a minute. Then I gave the keys back.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 0 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found. The punctuation is clean.\n- **Stop reason:** No justified punctuation edit was found.",
  "casual-01": "**Final rewrite**\n\nHey, I might swing by after lunch if the repair person gets here early enough. If not, maybe tomorrow? No need to wait around for me either way.\n\n**Changes**\n\nAdded a comma after “If not” to clarify the alternative. Kept the plan tentative and the casual fragments intact.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 1 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment; marks convention applied manually. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found under the casual context; the fragments suit the message.\n- **Stop reason:** No further justified in-scope edit.",
  "casual-02": "**Final rewrite**\n\nI put the spare key in the blue tin on the shelf. The lid sticks, so lift it from the back. Please leave the key there when you're done.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 0 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found. The message is clean and the instructions are clear.\n- **Stop reason:** No justified in-scope edit was found.",
  "casual-03": "**Final rewrite**\n\nI get why you liked the ending, and the acting was great, but for me the twist made the earlier scenes feel kind of pointless. Maybe I missed something in the middle. I still don't think it earned that last speech.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 0 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found. The message is clean; its disagreement and uncertainty both carry meaning.\n- **Stop reason:** No justified in-scope edit was found.",
  "product-01": "**Final rewrite**\n\nThe new search feels faster to me, though I only tried it on a small workspace. The product team says the index refreshes every minute. That would help, but the missing filters still make it harder to use than the old version for my work.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 0 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found. The prose is clean and distinguishes the writer's speed impression from the product team's refresh claim.\n- **Stop reason:** No justified in-scope edit was found.",
  "product-02": "**Final rewrite**\n\nThe headphones fit well and I liked the sound, especially for voices. But the connection dropped three times during my commute. My phone has been acting up, so it could have caused the drops; I wouldn't call this a confirmed headphone problem yet.\n\n**Changes**\n\nShortened the explanation of the possible phone issue while preserving the criticism, drop count, and uncertainty about the cause.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 1 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment; marks convention applied manually. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found.\n- **Stop reason:** No further justified in-scope edit.",
  "product-03": "**Final rewrite**\n\nFor a shared shopping list, this app does enough. Changes appear quickly, and neither of us has accidentally deleted the whole list. I would use something else for project planning; there is no useful way to track dependencies.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 0 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found. The prose is clean and limits the recommendation to a shared shopping list.\n- **Stop reason:** No justified in-scope edit was found.",
  "ec-supported-contrast-edit": "**Final rewrite**\n\nThe dashboard is a foundation for trust. It shows queue depth.\n\n**Changes**\n\nReplaced the “not just X, it is Y” frame with a direct statement, preserving the trust claim and queue-depth detail.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 1 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment using the requested blog context; marks convention applied manually. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** The source does not explain how showing queue depth makes the dashboard a foundation for trust. Retained the writer's claim without inventing support.\n- **Stop reason:** No further justified in-scope edit; the support gap remains.",
  "ec-grounded-reaction-edit": "**Final rewrite**\n\nThe most interesting part: the export has 31 rows.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 0 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment using the requested blog context. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** None found. “The most interesting part” expresses the writer's ranking and is not an empty frame here; the text is clean.\n- **Stop reason:** No justified in-scope edit was found.",
  "ec-meaningful-concession-edit": "**Final rewrite**\n\nThe platform is impressive and still has challenges. It exports CSV but cannot export PDF.\n\n**Changes**\n\nRemoved the formulaic concession frame while preserving the positive assessment, unresolved challenges, and export limitation.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 1 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment using the requested technical-blog context; marks convention applied manually. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** “Impressive” remains a general assessment without a stated basis. The PDF limitation is concrete, but the source does not establish whether it covers all the remaining challenges. Retained both claims without adding detail.\n- **Stop reason:** No further justified in-scope edit; the source's general assessments remain.",
  "ec-earned-reversal-edit": "**Final rewrite**\n\nWe planned for every failure mode except the one that happened. We tested every path except the path that failed.\n\n**Changes**\n\nFolded both repeated reversal fragments into their preceding sentences. Preserved the claimed breadth of planning and testing, including each exception.\n\n**Verification**\n\n- **Editing passes:** 1 of 2.\n- **Checks:** Model-only audit and preservation assessment using the requested blog context; marks convention applied manually. The detector, marks normalizer, and preservation validator did not run. Rendered view not checked.\n- **Residuals:** The failure mode and failed path remain unnamed. The source supplies no details to explain them.\n- **Stop reason:** No further justified in-scope edit; the explanation gaps remain."
}