<!-- section:abstract_analysis -->
## Abstract Analysis

### Original Abstract

{abstract}

### Key Points

<!-- LLM: Extract the following from the abstract (1-2 sentences each):
1. Research background and motivation
2. Core method/innovation
3. Main results
4. Significance
-->

<!-- section:background -->
## Research Background & Motivation

<!-- LLM: Please analyze and write:
1. **Field status**: Current state of the art and mainstream approaches
2. **Limitations**: Key problems or bottlenecks in existing methods
3. **Motivation**: Why the authors propose a new method, what gap they address
4. **Importance**: Why this problem matters
-->

<!-- section:research_questions -->
## Research Questions

<!-- LLM: Extract the core research questions:
1. **Primary RQ**: [the main question]
2. **Sub-questions** (if any): [specific sub-problems]
3. **Hypotheses** (if any): [core hypotheses]
-->

<!-- section:method -->
## Method Overview

### Core Idea

{math_instruction_core}

### Overall Framework

{framework_images}<!-- LLM: Describe the overall architecture/pipeline:
1. What are the inputs and outputs?
2. What are the main modules/stages?
3. How do modules connect?
4. Reference framework figures if available: ![[images/fig]]
-->

### Module Details

{math_instruction_details}

<!-- section:experiments -->
## Experimental Results

### Datasets

<!-- LLM: Summarize datasets in a table:

| Dataset | Size | Characteristics | Usage |
|:--|:--|:--|:--|
| | | | |
-->

### Baselines

<!-- LLM: List all compared methods with a one-line description:
1. **[Method]**: [core idea]
2. ...
-->

### Main Results

{results_images}<!-- LLM: Present key results in a table:

| Method | Metric 1 | Metric 2 | Metric 3 |
|:--|:--|:--|:--|
| Ours | **best** | | |
| Baseline 1 | | | |

Key findings:
1. [Finding 1]
2. [Finding 2]
-->

### Ablation Study

<!-- LLM: Summarize key ablation findings:
1. **[Removed/modified component]**: Performance change and implications
2. ...
-->

<!-- section:analysis -->
## Deep Analysis

### Theoretical Contributions

<!-- LLM: Analyze the theoretical value:
1. What new concepts/frameworks/theorems are proposed?
2. How does it advance the field's theoretical framework?
3. Does it open new research directions?
-->

### Practical Applications

<!-- LLM: Analyze application value:
1. What scenarios can this be applied to?
2. Deployment difficulty and cost?
3. Implications for my research area ({domain})?
-->

### Strengths

<!-- LLM: Detailed analysis of strengths (2-3 sentences each):
1. **[Strength 1]**: [analysis]
2. **[Strength 2]**: [analysis]
-->

### Limitations

<!-- LLM: Detailed analysis of limitations (2-3 sentences each):
1. **[Limitation 1]**: [analysis and potential impact]
2. **[Limitation 2]**: [analysis and potential impact]
-->

<!-- section:comparison -->
## Comparison with Related Work

<!-- LLM: Select 2-3 most relevant papers for in-depth comparison:

### Method Comparison

| Aspect | This Paper | [Related 1] | [Related 2] |
|:--|:--|:--|:--|
| Core idea | | | |
| Architecture | | | |
| Training | | | |
| Data needs | | | |

### Performance Comparison

| Metric | This Paper | [Related 1] | [Related 2] |
|:--|:--|:--|:--|
| | | | |

### Key Differences
1. **vs [Paper 1]**: [analysis]
2. **vs [Paper 2]**: [analysis]
-->

<!-- section:roadmap -->
## Technical Roadmap

<!-- LLM: Describe where this paper sits in the technical landscape:
1. **Prior work**: What does this paper build upon?
2. **Evolution**: How has the approach evolved from earlier methods?
3. **Positioning**: Where does this paper sit in the current roadmap?
4. **Trends**: Likely future directions for this line of research
-->

<!-- section:future_work -->
## Future Work

<!-- LLM: Cover three aspects:

### Author Suggestions
[Extract from the paper's Future Work / Conclusion section]

### Extension Directions
[Analyze possible extensions based on the method]

### Improvement Suggestions
[Propose improvements based on the limitations analysis]
-->

<!-- section:evaluation -->
## Comprehensive Evaluation

| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|:--|:--|:--|
| Novelty | /10 | <!-- LLM: How novel is the approach? --> |
| Technical Quality | /10 | <!-- LLM: How rigorous is the technical design? --> |
| Experimental Rigor | /10 | <!-- LLM: How thorough are the experiments? --> |
| Writing Quality | /10 | <!-- LLM: How well is the paper written? --> |
| Practicality | /10 | <!-- LLM: How useful is this in practice? --> |

<!-- LLM: Provide a 2-3 sentence overall assessment, including reading recommendation and target audience -->

> [!tip] Key Insights
> <!-- LLM: Distill the most core insight or takeaway in 1-2 sentences -->

> [!success] Recommendation
> <!-- LLM: Give a star rating (1-5) and one-sentence reason, e.g.: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ [reason] -->
