Mneme HQ keeps AI assistants aligned with data platform architecture by enforcing warehouse standards, naming conventions, and pipeline constraints as structured decisions. When an assistant proposes writing directly to raw tables, bypassing reporting views, or violating regional dataset rules, Mneme HQ flags the violation before any code is written — protecting data platform integrity in AI-assisted environments. Rules files document standards. Mneme enforces them.
Reference Architecture · Simulated Scenario

# Keeping AI Assistants Aligned with Data Platform Architecture

Enforce warehouse standards, naming conventions, and pipeline constraints — before an AI assistant writes a single query that breaks your data contracts.

Install Mneme HQ View GitHub
The Problem

## AI assistants treat your warehouse like a blank slate.

Your data platform has hard-won conventions: raw tables are append-only, reporting views are the only read layer, regional datasets must never be joined cross-region, and column naming follows a strict schema. None of that is visible to an AI assistant generating a dbt model or a Spark job.

The result is pipelines that write directly to raw tables, queries that bypass the semantic layer, and naming violations that break downstream consumers — discovered only after data quality alerts fire.

Without Mneme HQ — assistant suggests:
Prompt: "Add daily active users to the analytics pipeline"
I'll write a Spark job that reads from raw.events and writes the aggregated DAU count directly to raw.user_metrics for simplicity...
With Mneme HQ — pre-flight check:
mneme check --mode strict
✗ FAIL decision/no-writes-to-raw-tables
Rule: Raw tables are append-only via ingestion pipelines only.
Context: Direct writes corrupt audit trail and break CDC.
✗ FAIL decision/use-staging-layer-for-aggregations
Rule: All aggregations must land in staging.*, not raw.*
→ Surfaced 2 violations before code generation.
Why Existing Tools Fall Short

## Data contracts and warehouse rules don't live in code.

Approach | Limitation | With Mneme HQ
--- | --- | ---
dbt tests | Catch violations after the pipeline runs; can't prevent bad schema design up front | Decisions enforced before a model is written
Data catalog | Documents what exists; doesn't prevent AI from ignoring it | Catalog knowledge encoded as enforceable decisions
Schema docs | Static; not surfaced at prompt time; AI ignores attached context | Relevant constraints retrieved and checked per prompt
Code review | Catches pipeline mistakes after they're coded; wastes data engineer time | Pre-flight check before the model exists

How Mneme HQ Solves It

## Data architecture decisions, enforced at prompt time.

1

#### Encode warehouse standards as decisions

Capture rules like layer boundaries, naming conventions, regional constraints, and anti-patterns in structured YAML.

2

#### Check before generating pipeline code

Run `mneme check` against your intended change. Mneme HQ retrieves relevant data architecture decisions and flags violations.

3

#### Generate scoped rules for data tools

Mneme HQ can output rules files for tools like Cursor or Claude Code that surface the right constraints when working in dbt, Spark, or SQL files.

4

#### Gate pipeline PRs in CI

Add `mneme check --mode strict` to your data pipeline CI. Schema violations and layer boundary breaks fail before merge.

Technical Implementation

## What data platform decisions look like.

decisions/warehouse-layer-rules.yml

    id: no-writes-to-raw-tables
    title: Raw tables are append-only via ingestion pipelines
    status: accepted
    rule: No pipeline or model may write directly to raw.* tables.
      All aggregations and transformations must land in staging.* or marts.*
    rationale: Direct writes break CDC audit trail and corrupt source-of-truth.
      Enforced after data corruption incident Q2 2024.
    enforcement: strict
    tags: [data-platform, warehouse, layers, anti-pattern]

decisions/naming-conventions.yml

    id: column-naming-snake-case
    title: All warehouse columns must use snake_case
    status: accepted
    rule: Column names must be lowercase snake_case. No camelCase, no PascalCase.
      Event timestamps must end in _at. Dimension keys must end in _id.
    rationale: Downstream BI tools and dbt macros depend on consistent naming.
    enforcement: strict
    tags: [data-platform, naming, conventions]

Terminal — checking a dbt model prompt

    $ mneme check "create a DAU model that reads from raw events" --tags data-platform

    Checking against 8 data-platform decisions...

    ✗ FAIL decision/no-writes-to-raw-tables
      Reason: Model reads from raw.* — should use staging.events source.
    ✗ FAIL decision/use-staging-layer-for-aggregations
      Reason: DAU aggregation should land in marts.*, not raw.*
    ✓ PASS decision/column-naming-snake-case
    ✓ PASS decision/regional-dataset-isolation

    Result: FAIL (2 violations, strict mode)

Simulated Outcome

## What data teams see after enforcement goes live.

100%
of layer boundary violations caught before pipeline code is written
0
raw table write incidents after decision enforcement
~3 min
to encode a new warehouse standard as an enforceable decision
These figures are based on a simulated reference scenario — not live customer data.
FAQ

## Common questions.

Does this work with dbt, Spark, and SQL-based pipelines?
Yes. Mneme HQ operates at the prompt level — it doesn't depend on your specific data tool. Whether you're generating dbt models, Spark jobs, or raw SQL, `mneme check` runs against the intent before you write any code.
Can we enforce regional data isolation rules?
Yes. Encode regional constraints as tagged decisions (e.g., `--tags gdpr,eu-region`) and check with `mneme check --tags gdpr` to scope enforcement to region-specific rules.
How do we handle schema evolution — rules that change over time?
Update the YAML and set the old decision to `status: deprecated`. The history is preserved; enforcement is disabled. New rules take effect immediately on the next check.
Can data engineers without Python experience manage decisions?
Yes. Decision files are plain YAML in version control. Any engineer comfortable opening a PR can add or update rules — no Python or programming required.
Related Use Cases
Security & Compliance Guardrails → Design System Governance → Multi-Agent Workflow Governance →