# BRIEFING — 2026-06-26T22:22:00Z

## Mission
Review tests/unit/tools/common/test_memory_tools.py and verify 100% coverage on reversecore_mcp/tools/common/memory_tools.py with no integrity violations or regressions.

## 🔒 My Identity
- Archetype: reviewer and critic
- Roles: reviewer, critic
- Working directory: /Users/sjkim1127/Reversecore_MCP/.agents/reviewer_m5_2/
- Original parent: 0c44a811-b4db-47e1-891b-60482d466a84
- Milestone: Milestone 5 (memory_tools.py coverage) Review 2
- Instance: 2 of 2

## 🔒 Key Constraints
- Review-only — do NOT modify implementation code

## Current Parent
- Conversation ID: 0c44a811-b4db-47e1-891b-60482d466a84
- Updated: 2026-06-26T22:22:00Z

## Review Scope
- **Files to review**: tests/unit/tools/common/test_memory_tools.py, reversecore_mcp/tools/common/memory_tools.py
- **Interface contracts**: PROJECT.md / SCOPE.md / AGENTS.md
- **Review criteria**: correctness, style, conformance, coverage, safety

## Review Checklist
- **Items reviewed**: tests/unit/tools/common/test_memory_tools.py, reversecore_mcp/tools/common/memory_tools.py
- **Verdict**: APPROVE
- **Unverified claims**: none

## Attack Surface
- **Hypotheses tested**:
  - Mock database storage calls propagate correctly: Tested via test_db_initialization_failure.
  - Path error handling when hashing binary: Tested via test_create_memory_session_with_binary_hash_failure.
  - Memory sessions formatting works under various durations: Tested via test_list_memory_sessions.
- **Vulnerabilities found**: none
- **Untested angles**: none

## Key Decisions Made
- Confirmed test coverage of memory_tools.py is 100%.
- Verified all 1686 tests in the test suite pass with no regressions.
- Approved the work product with a positive verdict.

## Artifact Index
- None
