# Complexity Review Report

**Branch**: feat/183-hotspot-and-risk-scoring -> main
**Date**: 2026-05-25T18:30

## Issues in Your Changes (BLOCKING)

No blocking complexity issues found.

## Issues in Code You Touched (Should Fix)

No should-fix complexity issues found.

## Pre-existing Issues (Not Blocking)

No pre-existing complexity issues found.

## Suggestions (Lower Confidence)

- **Tuple accumulator `(f64, f64)` could be a named struct** - `scoring.rs:115` (Confidence: 65%) -- The `accum` map uses `(f64, f64)` tuples accessed via `.0` and `.1` (lines 141, 143). A small named struct (e.g., `struct Accum { weighted_total: f64, weighted_fix_total: f64 }`) would replace opaque tuple indexing with self-documenting field names. This is a readability preference rather than a defect -- the scope is small (~30 lines) and the inline comments on lines 111 and 141-143 partially compensate.

## Summary

| Category | CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW |
|----------|----------|------|--------|-----|
| Blocking | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| Should Fix | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| Pre-existing | - | - | 0 | 0 |

**Complexity Score**: 9/10
**Recommendation**: APPROVED
