# GOAP Execution Plan: Remote Repository Analysis & Workflow Adaptation

## Task Analysis

**Primary Goal**: Analyze the remote repository (d-o-hub/rust-self-learning-memory) for workflow-impacting changes and adapt findings for the local codebase.

**Constraints**:
- Time: Normal
- Resources: Swarm of specialized agents (explore, code-reviewer, feature-implementer)
- Dependencies: None (parallel analysis possible)

**Complexity Level**: Medium (2-3 agents, parallel execution)

**Quality Requirements**:
- Testing: Verify local build still works after any changes
- Standards: AGENTS.md compliance
- Documentation: Update workflow docs if needed

## Execution Strategy: SWARM

### Rationale
- Multiple similar analysis tasks (file comparison, feature gap analysis, workflow impact)
- Tasks are homogeneous (all analytical)
- Results will be aggregated for synthesis

## Phase 1: Parallel Analysis (SWARM)

### Agent 1: explore
**Task**: Fetch and analyze remote repository structure
- Fetch key files from remote: .opencode/, .claude/, scripts/, docs/
- Compare directory structures
- Identify new/changed files

### Agent 2: code-reviewer  
**Task**: Compare workflow configurations
- Compare AGENTS.md differences
- Compare skill definitions
- Compare CI/CD workflows

### Agent 3: feature-implementer
**Task**: Identify feature gaps and improvements
- Check for new features in remote
- Identify workflow optimizations
- Document adaptation requirements

## Phase 2: Synthesis (Sequential)

### GOAP Agent
**Task**: Aggregate findings and create adaptation plan
- Combine agent outputs
- Prioritize changes by impact
- Create implementation plan

## Quality Gates
- After Phase 1: All analysis complete
- After Phase 2: Adaptation plan documented

## Success Criteria
- [ ] Remote repository structure analyzed
- [ ] Workflow impacts identified
- [ ] Adaptation plan created
- [ ] Local codebase ready for changes
