# Skill + KDNA Output

The core problem is not phrasing. The draft has no judgment pressure.

It says AI is changing work, but it does not make a contestable claim. A reader
cannot disagree with it, remember it, or act differently because of it. The
opening also lacks a cognitive hook: it starts with familiar background rather
than a tension the reader needs resolved.

What to fix first:

- State a specific claim, for example: "Most teams do not fail at AI adoption
  because they picked the wrong tool; they fail because no one owns judgment
  standards for when AI output is good enough."
- Add one concrete example or observed failure.
- Only then polish the language.
