# TASK-095-01-02: Tests and Docs Semantic Responsibility Policy and Code Audit

**Parent:** [TASK-095-01](./TASK-095-01_Semantic_Responsibility_Policy_and_Code_Audit.md)  
**Status:** ✅ Done  
**Priority:** 🔴 High  
**Depends On:** [TASK-095-01-01](./TASK-095-01-01_Core_Semantic_Responsibility_Code_Audit.md)

---

## Objective

Add tests and documentation updates for **Semantic Responsibility Policy and Code Audit**.

## Completion Summary

This slice is now closed.

- audit coverage tests verify that the semantic boundary document enumerates the current LaBSE call sites that matter for the repo boundary policy
- boundary tests verify that FastMCP platform/exposure files do not import semantic router components
- boundary tests verify that truth/verification-side MCP files do not import semantic matching components
- the still-deferred discovery and truth handoff work remains explicitly owned by `TASK-095-02` and `TASK-095-03`, not by this slice

---

## Repository Touchpoints

- `tests/unit/`
- `_docs/`

---

## Planned Work

### Regression Scenarios (Required)

1. allowed-role path: the audit document explicitly records allowed/disallowed LaBSE roles.
2. platform-separation path: FastMCP platform/exposure files stay free of semantic matcher imports.
3. truth-separation path: verification-side MCP files stay free of semantic matcher imports.
4. boundary regression path: audit completeness and separation violations are detected by tests.

### Metrics To Capture

- boundary violation count (target: 0)
- unaudited semantic call-site count (target: 0)
- platform/truth boundary import violations (target: 0)

### Documentation Deliverables

- update task-linked docs with a before/after summary tied to the captured metrics
- document exact test commands, fixtures, and profile/config used during validation
- record compatibility or migration notes when behavior differs between surfaces

---

## Acceptance Criteria

- all required regression scenarios are implemented and passing in CI/local test runs
- metrics are captured with baseline vs post-change values and attached to the task update
- docs include the regression matrix and explain expected behavior boundaries
- no untracked regressions are observed on related router/dispatcher/platform paths

---

## Atomic Work Items

1. Implement the required regression scenarios in focused unit/integration tests.
2. Run the target suites, collect metric outputs, and compare to baseline values.
3. Update docs with regression matrix, metric table, and migration/compatibility notes.
4. Verify adjacent surfaces for spillover regressions and document the result.
