---
start_date: 2025-01-28
rfc_pr: 
issue: 
---

# RFC Template

## Summary

Brief explanation of the proposed change for UI-TARS-desktop.

## Basic example

If the proposal involves API changes or new component interactions, provide a concise code/usage example. Omit if not applicable.

## Motivation

Why is this change essential for UI-TARS-desktop? What specific problems does it address? What limitations or user pain points will it resolve? Focus on objective technical reasons rather than subjective preferences.

## Detailed design

Technical specification of the proposal including:

- Architectural diagrams (if applicable)
- Modified/new APIs
- Data flow changes
- Lifecycle impacts
- Error handling strategies
- Compatibility with existing TARS patterns
- Platform considerations (Windows/macOS/Linux)

Provide sufficient detail for core maintainers to evaluate implementation feasibility.

## Drawbacks

Critical considerations including:

- Increased binary size/performance impact
- Maintenance complexity
- Security implications
- Cross-platform consistency risks
- Developer experience impacts
- Migration challenges for existing integrations

## Alternatives

What other approaches were considered? Include:

- Third-party solutions
- Partial implementations
- Alternative architectural patterns
- Status quo analysis

## Adoption strategy

How will this change be rolled out? Address:

- Phased implementation plan
- Backward compatibility measures
- Deprecation timelines (if any)
- Documentation updates
- Testing requirements (unit tests, E2E scenarios)

## How we teach this

Educational aspects covering:

- Updated API documentation strategy
- Sample project updates
- Tutorial integration points
- Workshop/onboarding implications
- Error message guidance
- Debugging patterns for new features

## Unresolved questions

Open technical discussions needing resolution:

- Unvalidated performance assumptions
- Undecided implementation details
- Third-party dependency risks
- Platform-specific edge cases
- Long-term maintenance ownership
