verdict: READY
gaps: []

notes:
  - task_contract present with mode=standard and all required sections (requirements, surfaces, invariants, risks, verification, regression_plan).
  - Each acceptance criterion (AC-1..AC-5) has a paired verification row (VER-1..VER-5) with runnable pytest commands.
  - regression_plan.applies=true with REG-1 covering all five acceptance IDs via a focused pytest command; command is runnable.
  - contract_policy present: flow=full_spdd, sync_gate=required, verification_path=automated — meets full SPDD gate.
  - Files list (mempalace_code/mining/projects.py, tests/test_miner.py) is complete; INV-4 explicitly covers the miner.py shim re-export so no additional file needs touching. test_miner_modules.py:189 already verifies the shim and is referenced in REG-1.
  - No backlog metadata / archive files listed in plan-owned files.
  - Plan correctly diagnoses the substring bug at mempalace_code/mining/projects.py:90 (`part == c or c in part or part in c`) and the parallel `str.count()` issue at line 103.
  - Design notes ("token-sequence matching over alphanumeric tokens split by separators... contiguous subsequence") map cleanly to AC-1 (exact "views" == "views"), AC-2 (["user","views"] ⊇ ["views"], ["frontend","panel"] ⊇ ["frontend"]), and AC-3 (["interviews"] does not contain ["views"]).
  - .csproj priority is preserved (Priority 0 block unchanged) and verified by AC-5 / VER-5 against the existing TestDetectRoomCsprojMap::test_csproj_priority_over_folder_keyword.
  - No hidden TBDs, no deferred design decisions, no architectural contradictions with CLAUDE.md.
