# Feedback Summary: APPROVE ✅

## Decision: APPROVE

All acceptance criteria met. 301 tests pass with comprehensive coverage of function parsing, definitions, calls, and return statements. Code review approved with no blocking issues.

## What Went Well

- ✅ Fixed the critical indentation tracking issue from Iteration 1 by implementing proper relative indentation level tracking
- ✅ All 301 tests pass, including 47+ new function parsing tests
- ✅ Comprehensive coverage: AC2.1 (def syntax), AC2.2 (zero-param), AC2.3 (multi-param), AC2.5 (return statements), function calls, error handling, and regression checks
- ✅ Clear test organization with 15+ indentation-specific tests
- ✅ No blocking issues identified by code review

## Non-Blocking Debt Items (for future work)

These are suggestions for improvement but do NOT block approval:

1. **Indentation Error Test Coverage**: Add 3-5 tests for malformed indentation scenarios (inconsistent indentation, mid-statement dedenting, under-indented function bodies) to validate graceful error handling.

2. **Error Message Validation**: Enhance existing error tests to validate full error messages are user-friendly, not just that errors occur. Current tests only check for ':' in error messages.

3. **Documentation**: Add inline comments explaining the indentation tracking mechanism (tracking `def_token.column` to determine function body boundaries).

4. **Property-Based Testing**: Consider using proptest for complex indentation logic to verify invariants across randomized inputs.

## Ready to Ship

Implementation is production-ready. Debt items can be tracked in a follow-up issue if desired.
