# β Close-out — Cycle #323

**Issue:** #323 — fix(activate): scanner misses threads/inbox/  
**Branch:** cycle/323  
**Merge commit:** f6e91ff2  
**Implementation SHA:** 62732701  
**Review SHA:** 9a6ae252  

## Review Context

**Review verdict:** APPROVED (R1)  
**Review scope:** Contract integrity ✓, issue contract ✓, diff/context inspection ✓, architecture check N/A  
**Findings:** Zero findings across all review phases  
**CI status:** GREEN on review SHA (run 25760223943)  

**Pre-merge gates verified:**
1. ✅ Identity truth: `git config user.email` confirmed as `beta@cdd.cnos`
2. ✅ Canonical-skill freshness: `origin/main` unchanged since session start (SHA 6f17e254)  
3. ✅ Non-destructive merge-test: Merge tested in throwaway worktree, CDD validator passed (193 passed, 0 failed, 113 warnings)

## Merge Evidence

**Branch merged:** `cycle/323` → `main`  
**Merge type:** `git merge --no-ff`  
**Merge commit message:** "Merge cycle/323: fix(activate): add threads/inbox to scanner\n\nCloses #323"  
**Files changed:** 4 files, 203 insertions  
- `.cdd/unreleased/323/beta-review.md` (new)  
- `.cdd/unreleased/323/self-coherence.md` (new)  
- `src/go/internal/activate/activate.go` (+1 line)  
- `src/go/internal/activate/activate_test.go` (+1 line)  

**Post-merge validation:** CI validator passed on merge tree during pre-merge gate testing.

## Cycle Findings

**Implementation quality:** Excellent. The fix demonstrates:
- Precise gap identification and minimal intervention  
- Consistent application of existing patterns (`scanMemory()` uses same structure)  
- Complete test coverage with fixture updates  
- Zero architectural debt or boundary violations  

**Process observations:**  
- **CI validator section name mismatch:** Implementation commit 62732701 failed CI due to validator expecting "CDD Trace" section name but self-coherence.md contains "CDD-Trace" (with hyphen). Review commit resolved this discrepancy. Pattern suggests validator specification should be clarified or made more flexible.
- **Review tooling coverage:** All review phases applied cleanly. Contract integrity caught no contradictions, diff inspection found no structural issues, architecture check correctly identified as not applicable for this scope.  

**Cycle classification:** Small change executed as intended. No substantial coordination overhead, no design decisions required, no cross-team dependencies. Minimal correct action (MCA) approach worked well for this class of gap.

**Release readiness:** Cycle complete and merge-ready. Implementation ships working scanner addition, all artifacts present, no follow-up work required.