# cdd-iteration — cycle/399

**Cycle:** cnos#399 — release-effector skill (Phase 4c of cnos#366).
**Date:** 2026-05-21.
**Findings:** 0 (empty-findings cycle per `epsilon/SKILL.md §1` / `activation/SKILL.md §22`).

## Disposition table

| # | Class | Finding | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|
|   | — | — | (no findings) |

## Why empty

Cycle/399 is a mechanical extraction following an explicit, δ-pinned implementation contract:
- The deliverable (release-effector/SKILL.md path) was specified by the issue body.
- The 7-axis implementation contract was pinned by δ.
- The mapping rules (what moves, what stays) were enumerated in the issue body Scope / Non-goals sections.
- α executed the mapping without protocol drift; β verified row-by-row conformance.

No protocol gaps surfaced during execution. No skill gaps surfaced (the §3.4 → release-effector relocation was a planned doctrine-driven move, not a discovery). No tooling gaps surfaced (scripts/release.sh works as-is). No metric gaps surfaced (TSC scoring per release/SKILL.md §3.8 was applied with the configuration-floor cap to γ).

## INDEX.md update

Per `CDD.md §5.3b` row 6: "The INDEX row is optional for cycles with no findings."

Per practice in `.cdd/iterations/INDEX.md` (cycles 334 and 347 both appear as 0-finding rows for traceability), γ adds an INDEX row for cycle/399 anyway — the empty-findings outcome is itself worth tracking for the Phase 4 trio's lineage.
