# cdd-iteration — cycle/416

**Issue:** [cnos#416](https://github.com/usurobor/cnos/issues/416)
**Date:** 2026-05-22
**Cycle:** 416 (Sub 2 of cnos#404 wave)
**Receipt status:** `protocol_gap_count: 0` — courtesy stub per backward-compatibility allowance

## Cadence

Per `cnos.cdd/skills/cdd/post-release/SKILL.md §5.6b` cadence rule: `cdd-iteration.md` is required only when `protocol_gap_count > 0`. This cycle's receipt carries `protocol_gap_count: 0`; the artifact is **optional**. This stub is written as courtesy (backward-compatibility allowance per §5.6b — empty-findings files remain valid artifacts).

## Findings

None.

- 0 `cdd-skill-gap` findings
- 0 `cdd-protocol-gap` findings
- 0 `cdd-tooling-gap` findings
- 0 `cdd-metric-gap` findings

No findings of any class. No patches landed; no MCAs filed; no `no-patch` reasons recorded.

## Why no findings

The cycle's matter was a wholesale-move package migration (644-line `cnos.cdd/skills/cdd/cross-repo/SKILL.md` → `cnos.handoff/skills/handoff/cross-repo/SKILL.md`) plus a compatibility-stub authoring + minimal HANDOFF.md package contract + consumer-cite repair across cdd and cds. The dispatch contract (δ pinning + the cnos#416 issue body's verbatim text for stub and HANDOFF.md) covered every authoring decision. The 5 substantive edits to the moved file (frontmatter triage; Authority paragraph; §2.3 STATUS-canonical-home flip; §2.3.1 / §2.3.3 self-reference adjustments; cross-package cite expansion) were all explicitly enumerated in the dispatch.

No protocol gap surfaced because:

- The dispatch contract was complete (γ scaffold + 7-axis implementation contract + 10 ACs + 3 hard operator rulings + δ-pinned every axis).
- The source file was a single self-contained canonical doctrine surface; the move did not require re-deriving any doctrine.
- The consumer-cite repair targets were pre-enumerated by `rg` in γ-scaffold; the canonical-vs-historical disposition for each citation was unambiguous per the issue body's framing.

## Cross-repo trace

None. No findings with `patch-landed` + `Cross-repo` disposition. Note: this cycle *moved* the canonical home for cross-repo doctrine, but did not itself perform any cross-repo coordination.

## Aggregator update

Appended to `.cdd/iterations/INDEX.md`: row for cycle 416 with `Findings = 0; Patches = 0; MCAs = 0; No-patch = 0`.
