**Verdict:** APPROVED

**Round:** 1
**Fixed this round:** N/A (initial review)
**Branch CI state:** green
**Review base SHA:** dc65c7e552414991c3b201513015412c5cf1ac42 (origin/main)
**Review head SHA:** d11ca84b0dddfb0efc0b17d4a12c0d8af96d9ef3 (cycle/353)

## §2.0.0 Contract Integrity

| Check | Result | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Status truth preserved | yes | Mode clearly declared as "docs-only"; no overclaiming of scope |
| Canonical sources/paths verified | yes | All references trace to canonical sources (claude-code-dispatch proposal, tsc cycle #36) |
| Scope/non-goals consistent | yes | Scope explicitly names 3 ACs; out-of-scope items clearly enumerated |
| Constraint strata consistent | yes | AC constraints are testable with oracle queries |
| Exceptions field-specific/reasoned | yes | Worktree isolation exception noted with clear rationale |
| Path resolution base explicit | yes | File target (`cdd/operator/SKILL.md` §5.2) explicitly named |
| Proof shape adequate | yes | Oracle queries provide mechanical verification of each AC |
| Cross-surface projections updated | yes | Self-coherence reflects implementation state accurately |
| No witness theater / false closure | yes | Implementation evidence maps directly to oracle-verifiable claims |
| PR body matches branch files | yes | Issue body matches self-coherence gap/scope analysis |

## §2.0 Issue Contract

### AC Coverage
| # | AC | In diff? | Status | Notes |
|---|----|----------|--------|-------|
| 1 | §5.2.x subsection authored (≥5 prohibited, ≥3 permitted actions) | yes | ✅ COMPLETE | §5.2.1 added with 5 prohibited + 3 categories permitted |
| 2 | Failure-mode worked example present (≥2 git operations named) | yes | ✅ COMPLETE | "What goes wrong" section with `git add`, `git commit` |
| 3 | Sub-agent parallelism note (1 paragraph on shared-WT) | yes | ✅ COMPLETE | Paragraph on parallel sub-agents sharing working tree |

### Named Doc Updates
| Doc / File | In diff? | Status | Notes |
|------------|----------|--------|-------|
| cdd/operator/SKILL.md | yes | ✅ PRESENT | §5.2.1 subsection added at lines 301-323 |

### CDD Artifact Contract
| Artifact | Required? | Present? | Notes |
|----------|-----------|----------|-------|
| self-coherence.md | yes | ✅ PRESENT | Complete with gap, mode, ACs, trace, implementation evidence |
| beta-review.md | yes | ✅ IN PROGRESS | This file (incremental per review skill) |

### Active Skill Consistency
| Skill | Required by | Loaded? | Applied? | Notes |
|-------|-------------|---------|----------|-------|
| eng/write-functional | self-coherence | ✅ yes | ✅ yes | Applied to procedural prose in §5.2.1 |
| issue/SKILL.md | self-coherence | ✅ yes | ✅ yes | Applied for AC verification oracles |

## §2.1 Diff and Context Inspection

### 2.1.8 Authority-surface conflict check
- ✅ **No conflicts found.** New §5.2.1 extends existing §5.2 section without contradicting prior content
- ✅ **Canonical placement verified.** Added to `cdd/operator/SKILL.md` as specified in AC1 surface requirement

### 2.1.9 Module-truth audit for shared-WT concepts
- ✅ **Module scan complete.** Reviewed full `cdd/operator/SKILL.md` for related shared-working-tree assumptions
- ✅ **Consistent with §5.2 framing.** New subsection aligns with existing multi-session vs single-session distinction
- ✅ **No conflicting guidance.** Other sections (§5.1, §5.3) maintain clear boundaries with new §5.2.1 content

### 2.1.12 Process overhead check
- ✅ **Failure mode documented with empirical anchor.** References tsc cycle #36 corrupted commit incident
- ✅ **Clear prevention value.** Prevents fix-round cycles caused by concurrent edits (30+ min cost vs 5-10 min wait cost)
- ✅ **Target audience identified.** §5.2 operators who need concrete guidance on parent-session behavior
- ✅ **Not automatable.** Requires human operator discipline; documentation is appropriate solution

## §2.2 Architecture and Design Check

**Result:** ✅ **NOT ACTIVE** - Documentation-only change to existing skill file

**Rationale:** Change adds prose subsection to `cdd/operator/SKILL.md` without touching package boundaries, runtime surfaces, source/artifact/installed flow, or other architectural surfaces listed in activation criteria. This documents an operational invariant for existing §5.2 dispatch configuration.

## Findings

| # | Finding | Evidence | Severity | Type |
|---|---------|----------|----------|------|
| — | **No findings** | All acceptance criteria met, no incoherence detected | — | — |

## CI Status

✅ **Green:** Build workflow completed with success on review SHA d11ca84b

## Merge Instruction

`git merge cycle/353` into main with `Closes #353`