---
cycle: 344-b
role: epsilon
type: cdd-iteration
---
# CDD Iteration — Cycle #344-B

## Summary

Cycle B (reference notifier + GH Actions templates) ran cleanly with no protocol-gap findings. 2 review rounds; 3 findings (F1=C, F2=B, F3=A), all resolved. No cdd-skill-gap, cdd-protocol-gap, cdd-tooling-gap, or cdd-metric-gap findings surfaced.

## Findings

No protocol-gap findings this cycle.

- F1 (C): AC description mismatch — issue AC4 named top-level README but walkthrough delivered in telegram-notifier/README.md. Root class: issue-writing gap (AC naming a specific file path that differed from what was natural to implement). This is an authoring gap, not a protocol gap; no cdd-skill-gap tag warranted.
- F2 (B): YAML `if:` operator precedence defect. Root class: implementation mechanical error. Caught correctly by β review. No protocol gap.
- F3 (A): Missing dependency documentation in README. Root class: completeness gap; caught by β. No protocol gap.

All three findings are α implementation gaps caught by β review in the normal review loop. None cross into protocol-iteration territory.

## Protocol health signal

Clean cycle. No activation/SKILL.md surface required patching. The claims.md cadence (per activation §14) was correctly produced. The §5.2 single-session configuration ran without incident on a 5-AC cycle. Branch-name adaptation (344-b instead of 344) performed correctly under §5.2 consequence 3.

## Disposition

Drop — no protocol findings requiring MCI or MCA.
