Spectra Leaderboard

🥇

pallets/flask

Python

B+

86 / 100

53 findings 273s $2.11

🥈

tiangolo/fastapi

Python

82 / 100

19 findings 81s $0.81

🥉

leocder07/spectra

Python

B+

86 / 100

18 findings 180s $0.94

Full Dimension Breakdown

Repository	Overall	Arch	Security	Quality	Docs	Maint	Perf	Findings	Time	Cost
1 pallets/flask	B+ (86)	86 B+	81 B	87 A-	87 A-	96 A+	88 A-	53	273s	$2.11
2 tiangolo/fastapi	B (82)	87 A-	85 B+	86 B+	63 D+	85 B+	74 C+	19	81s	$0.81
3 leocder07/spectra	B+ (86)	88 A-	86 B+	84 B+	88 A-	84 B+	86 B+	60	373s	$9.24

Score Comparison

Architecture (25%)

Flask

FastAPI

Spectra

Security (25%)

Flask

FastAPI

Spectra

Quality (20%)

Flask

FastAPI

Spectra

Documentation (10%)

Flask

FastAPI

Spectra

Maintainability (10%)

Flask

FastAPI

Spectra

Performance (10%)

Flask

FastAPI

Spectra

Flask

FastAPI

Spectra

Strongest Overall

Flask leads in 4 of 6 dimensions

Mature Python framework with standout maintainability (96, A+) and strong quality (87), documentation (87), and performance (88). Only trails FastAPI in architecture and security.

Surprise Leader

FastAPI tops Architecture and Security

Despite a lower overall score, FastAPI leads both heavyweight dimensions (25% weight each) with 87 in architecture and 85 in security. Modern type hints and Pydantic validation pay off.

Biggest Gap

Documentation ranges from 63 to 87 (24-point spread)

FastAPI's D+ (63) in documentation stands out against Flask's A- (87). Spectra sits in the middle at C+ (73). This is the widest variation across any dimension.

Self-Analysis

Spectra rates itself B+ (86) with strong architecture and documentation

Spectra's self-analysis shows the most even spread across dimensions (73-80), with no standout highs or lows. Architecture (80) and maintainability (80) lead; quality (76) and docs (73) trail.