All checks complete. Findings:

- **Phase 2–3 (implementation drift):** The completed task implemented exactly the spec's §Approach. The conventions it established match verbatim — literal-path rule (`${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/flow-capture-draft-…`, `flow-interview-spec/acc/desc-…`), `spec set-plan --file` / `task set-acceptance --file` / `task set-spec --description … --acceptance …`, and the `LEAF=$(… config get tracker.perEvent.capture …)` single-fetch. No variable/API/signature diverged from spec.
- **Phase 3b.1 (glossary):** 38 terms, but every entry has an empty `avoid` list → no aliases exist to rename. No signal.
- **Phase 3b.2 (decisions):** 2 entries. The Droid decision names `flow-next-interview/SKILL.md` (a touched file), but its committed direction is *dropping* the `.factory-plugin/plugin.json` fallback — the completed task reintroduced nothing (grep clean; only hit is pre-existing SaaS/dashboard example prose that *reinforces* strategy). The tracker-sync decision's `## Consequences` names make-pr/land, not capture/interview; the capture tracker-gate change is mechanical single-fetch, not a projection→coordination shift. No contradiction to either.
- **Phase 3b.3 (strategy):** Task serves Ralph autonomous mode, Cross-platform parity, Self-improving-through-normal-work (per its own Strategy Alignment) — no contradiction; zero-dep contract preserved (skill-markdown-only). Parent spec's track names all present in current `tracks` → no rename candidates.
- **Phase 4 (downstream tasks):** .2/.3/.4 reference the *patterns* .1 established (or the same canonical sources, e.g. work `SKILL.md:184-190` for LEAF), all implemented as specified. No stale names/APIs. No glossary aliases to swap.
- **Phase 4b:** CROSS_SPEC=false → skipped.
- **Phase 5:** DRY_RUN=true → no edits. Nothing would change regardless. `## Requirement coverage` table rows for fn-81.1 (R1, R2, R7 capture-site, R13) accurately reflect what was built → no traceability update.

---

Drift detected: no

**Completed task fn-81.1** (single-emission spec writes for capture + interview) implemented the spec's approach verbatim — literal-path persistence rule, `--file <literal path>` consumption, `LEAF=` single-fetch tracker gate, and the edit-cycle Read read-back. No implementation drift against the spec.

Would update (DRY RUN): nothing.
- Downstream tasks fn-81.2, fn-81.3, fn-81.4 reference the conventions this task established (literal-path rule, `--file` consumption, LEAF single-fetch, single-entry/edit-cycle patterns) — all match what was built. No stale references.

Would update traceability: none — the `## Requirement coverage` table's fn-81.1 rows (R1, R2, R7 capture-site, R13) are accurate.

Decision overrides flagged for review: none (neither the Factory-Droid nor tracker-sync-projection decision is contradicted by the touched files).

Strategy drift flagged for review: none (task aligns with the Ralph / cross-platform / self-improving tracks; zero-dep contract intact).

No files modified.