**Phases 2–5 complete.** All implementation verified against the downstream task's assumptions. Findings:

**Implementation matches spec exactly:**
- make-pr `phases.md` → 15-line stub; `SKILL.md:16` no longer force-loads it (loads `workflow.md` + `mermaid-rules.md`). Matches fn-82.5's token-table assumption `make-pr post = SKILL.md+workflow.md (phases.md un-force-loaded)`.
- capture: nine-category biz-routing table now lives inline at `workflow.md §2.6` (line 337) beside the §2.2 drafting consumer; `phases.md §Biz-context signal routing` reduced to a pointer (line 99–101). Surviving copy sits at the consumer per R8. Matches fn-82.5's token-table assumption `capture = SKILL.md+workflow.md+phases.md` (phases.md still loaded as companion).

**Phase 3b (project-anchor signals) — no husk (glossary 38 terms, 2 decisions, populated strategy), all three subsections run:**
- **3b.1 glossary renames:** every glossary entry has an empty `avoid` array → no alias-vs-canonical rename signal. Nothing to flag.
- **3b.2 decision overrides:** `factory-droid-platform-status` has no `## Consequences` section → skip per rule. `tracker-sync-is-projection-not` has Consequences, but they concern tracker-sync status projection (make-pr as In-Review rung, `land.merged`, MERGED probe); fn-82.4 was a pure text-fold of make-pr Done-when checklists — it does not touch projection behavior. No contradiction. Nothing to flag.
- **3b.3 strategy drift:** fn-82.4 aligns with the `Self-improving through normal work` track (skill optimization); adds no SaaS/deps/behavior change → contradicts no track. Parent-spec Strategy Alignment names existing tracks (`Ralph autonomous mode`, `Cross-platform parity`, `Self-improving through normal work`) → no rename candidate. Nothing to flag.

**Phase 4 (downstream fn-82.5):** every reference to fn-82.4's output holds — token-table file-sets accurate, gate-contract greps target fn-82.1's gates (fn-82.4 added no gate — it *folds*, not gates), mirror regen correctly deferred to fn-82.5 (fn-82.4 canonical-only per plan). No stale names/APIs — this is a doc/prompt refactor with no code identifiers downstream tasks depend on.

**Phase 4b (cross-spec):** CROSS_SPEC=false → skipped.

**Phase 5 / traceability:** parent spec's `## Requirement coverage` table maps R4→fn-82.4, R8→fn-82.4; both mutations kept at full eval score, coverage unchanged → no row edit warranted. DRY_RUN=true regardless.

---

## Phase 6 Summary

Drift detected: no

Completed task fn-82.4 (eval-guarded pair: make-pr phases.md fold + capture table dedupe) implemented exactly as specified — both mutations KEPT at full eval score (make-pr body 5/5, capture 15/15), canonical-only, mirror regen deferred to fn-82.5.

- **make-pr fold** landed as planned: `phases.md` reduced to stub + removed from `SKILL.md:16` force-load list. Downstream fn-82.5's token-table set (`post = SKILL.md+workflow.md`) is accurate.
- **capture dedupe** landed as planned: biz-routing table inline at `workflow.md §2.6` beside its consumer; `phases.md` copy → pointer. Proximity preserved at the consumer (R8 satisfied); token-table set (`SKILL.md+workflow.md+phases.md`) accurate.

Downstream task fn-82.5 references no stale names, APIs, or file-state assumptions from fn-82.4 — every assumption (token sets, deferred mirror regen, gate list from fn-82.1, both-kept eval outcomes) matches the actual implementation.

Phase 3b: glossary has no `avoid` aliases; neither active decision is contradicted (one lacks a Consequences section, the other concerns tracker-sync projection untouched by the text-fold); no strategy-track contradiction or rename.

Would update (DRY RUN): nothing — no downstream drift.

Decision overrides flagged for review: none.

Strategy drift flagged for review: none.

No files modified (DRY_RUN=true; and no drift to act on regardless).