## Phase 1–5 analysis complete

**Completed task (fn-9.1):** spec = mechanical move of `src/util/{strings,dates}.py` → `src/common/{strings,dates}.py`, no content changes. Done summary: *"Moved exactly as planned; no content changes."* (commit `1091b7c`).

**Actual implementation:** `src/common/strings.py` (`slug`) and `src/common/dates.py` (`today`) exist; `src/util/` is gone. Trivial content, no API surface change. Matches the fn-9.1 spec — and the fn-9 approach — exactly. Destination `src/common/` was named in the plan, so it's not a surprise.

**Phase 3b:** husk short-circuit — `GLOSSARY_JSON.total_terms == 0`, `DECISIONS_JSON.count == 0`, `STRATEGY_CONTENT == {}`. All three husk → entire Phase 3b skipped.

**Phase 4 (fn-9.2):** fn-9.2 references `src/util/` as the import source, but that is *intentional* pre-consolidation context (description: *"written before the consolidation landed"*) and fn-9.2's whole purpose per the fn-9 approach is to rewire those imports to the new `src/common/` home. Not a drift-induced stale reference — rewriting it would strip the context that explains why fn-9.2 exists (violates "preserve intent"). No update warranted.

**Phase 4b:** CROSS_SPEC=false → skipped. **Traceability:** fn-9.md has no `## Requirement coverage` table → skipped.

---

Drift detected: no
- fn-9.1 implemented exactly as specified: `src/util/{strings,dates}.py` → `src/common/{strings,dates}.py`, mechanical move, no content or API changes. Implementation matches both the fn-9.1 spec and the fn-9 approach.

Would update (DRY RUN):
- Nothing. No downstream specs reference stale names/APIs/locations introduced by drift.

Note (not drift): fn-9.2 still names `src/util/` as its import source, but that is deliberate pre-consolidation context — fn-9.2 is the task designed to rewire app imports to the new `src/common/` location (per fn-9 approach). Left as-is intentionally.

No files modified.