# Proof Narrative: 2026 is both a "happy number" and mathematically "perfect," proving the year is cosmically special.

## Verdict

**Verdict: PARTIALLY VERIFIED**

One half of this claim holds up beautifully under scrutiny — the other collapses at first contact with arithmetic.

## What was claimed?

At the turn of 2026, a claim circulated that the year carries mathematical distinction: it is supposedly both a "happy number" and a "perfect number," and therefore cosmically special. These aren't vague compliments — happy numbers and perfect numbers are precisely defined concepts in number theory, so the claim is actually testable.

## What did we find?

Start with the happy number claim. A number is "happy" if you repeatedly replace it with the sum of the squares of its digits, and that process eventually reaches 1. For 2026, the journey goes: 2026 → 44 → 32 → 13 → 10 → 1. Five steps, and you land at 1. Two independent algorithms confirm this result. So yes, 2026 is genuinely a happy number — no caveats needed.

The perfect number claim is a different story. A perfect number is one where the proper divisors — all the numbers that divide it evenly, not counting itself — add up to exactly the number itself. The classic example is 6: its proper divisors are 1, 2, and 3, and 1 + 2 + 3 = 6 exactly.

For 2026, the prime factorisation is 2 × 1013, where 1013 is prime. That sparse factorisation means 2026 has very few divisors: just 1, 2, and 1013. Add them up: 1 + 2 + 1013 = 1016. For 2026 to be perfect, that sum would need to equal 2026. It's off by 1010 — not even close.

Two independent methods, one using direct enumeration and one using an algebraic formula from number theory, both return the same answer: 1016. There's no ambiguity here. 2026 is what mathematicians call a *deficient* number — its divisors sum to less than the number itself.

The compound claim — that 2026 is *both* happy *and* perfect — therefore fails. SC1 passed; SC2 did not.

## What should you keep in mind?

Perfect numbers are extraordinarily rare. Only 51 are known as of 2024. The nearest one to 2026 is 8128; the next after that is 33,550,336. Any specific year being a perfect number would be a genuine mathematical coincidence of remarkable rarity.

The "cosmically special" framing in the original claim is rhetorical, not mathematical. There is no defined concept of "cosmically special number" in any branch of mathematics, so that part of the claim can't be confirmed or denied — it's opinion dressed in the language of proof.

It's also worth noting that the happy-number result, while true, depends on using the standard base-10 definition. A different number base would yield a different answer, though the unqualified term "happy number" always means base-10 in mathematical literature.

## How was this verified?

Each sub-claim was checked using two independent computational methods, with results compared for agreement. You can read [the structured proof report](proof.md) for the full step-by-step logic, inspect [the full verification audit](proof_audit.md) for method independence details and adversarial checks, or [re-run the proof yourself](proof.py) to reproduce every result from scratch.