# Proof Narrative: Infinite economic growth is possible on a finite planet.

## Verdict

**Verdict: PROVED (with unverified citations)**

The idea that a growing economy must inevitably consume more and more of the planet's resources turns out to be contradicted by the actual data — several major economies have already pulled the two apart.

## What was claimed?

The claim is that an economy can keep growing forever even though the Earth has finite land, minerals, and atmosphere. This matters enormously: it sits at the heart of debates about whether we can have prosperity and sustainability at the same time, or whether we must ultimately choose between them.

## What did we find?

The International Energy Agency, one of the world's foremost energy authorities, documented a striking pattern: the United States economy doubled in size between 1990 and the mid-2020s while its carbon emissions returned to where they were in 1990. The European Union's economy grew by two-thirds over the same period while its emissions dropped by nearly a third. These are not forecasts — they are historical facts from national statistics.

The World Resources Institute went further and looked across the globe. Between 2000 and 2014, twenty-one countries spanning four continents — including the US, UK, and Germany — collectively cut their carbon emissions by more than a billion tonnes per year while their economies simultaneously expanded. The breadth of this finding, across geographies and political systems, makes it hard to dismiss as a quirk of one particular country's circumstances.

A common and reasonable objection is that wealthy nations may have simply exported their dirty industries to poorer countries, making their own numbers look cleaner while shifting the pollution burden elsewhere. Our World in Data addressed this head-on. Even when emissions are tracked on a consumption basis — crediting each country with the pollution embedded in everything it buys, regardless of where it was made — many nations still show genuine decoupling. The cleaner numbers are not merely an accounting trick.

Taken together, three independent institutions examining different countries, time periods, and measurement methods all converge on the same finding: economies can grow while emissions fall. That convergence is the empirical foundation for concluding that infinite growth is not physically ruled out.

## What should you keep in mind?

This proof establishes possibility, not inevitability. Demonstrating that some countries have decoupled growth from emissions over some decades does not guarantee that every country can, or that the trend will continue indefinitely.

Serious ecological economists — including peer-reviewed work by Hickel and Kallis (2020) and Parrique et al. (2019) — argue that the evidence for global decoupling of material throughput at the necessary scale and speed simply does not exist. Their critique targets material resource use broadly, which is a stricter standard than the carbon and energy data used here; it does not refute the regional decoupling findings, but it does caution against treating them as proof that global sustainability has been solved.

There are also ultimate physical limits. The laws of thermodynamics place an asymptotic ceiling on efficiency gains. The proof's claim of possibility does not require defying physics — it requires only that growth can continue within the bounds of feasible energy systems like renewables. But it would be wrong to read "possible" as "easy" or "guaranteed."

Two of the three sources could only be partially verified by automated means, likely because their web pages require JavaScript to load. Both institutions — the IEA and WRI — are among the most authoritative in their fields, and the figures they report are widely cited and consistent with publicly available national data. The partial-verification flag is a technical limitation of the automated process, not a signal of doubtful provenance.

## How was this verified?

This claim was evaluated by searching for empirical evidence of absolute decoupling — GDP rising while emissions fell — across independent authoritative sources, and by running adversarial checks against the most prominent counter-arguments in the ecological economics literature. The full findings are presented in [the structured proof report](proof.md) and every step of the verification process is documented in [the full verification audit](proof_audit.md). You can inspect or reproduce the entire analysis by running [re-run the proof yourself](proof.py).