# Proof: Humans use only 10% of their brain at any one time.

- **Generated:** 2026-04-15
- **Verdict:** DISPROVED
- **Audit trail:** [proof_audit.md](proof_audit.md) | [proof.py](proof.py)

## Evidence Summary

| ID | Fact | Verified |
|----|------|----------|
| B1 | Scientific American — neurologist Barry Gordon rejects the 10% myth | Yes |
| B2 | MIT McGovern Institute — the 10% claim is '100 percent a myth' | Yes |
| B3 | University of Washington Neuroscience — no scientific evidence for 10% claim | Yes |
| A1 | Verified rejection source count | Computed: 3 independent sources confirmed the claim is false |

*Source: proof.py JSON summary*

## Proof Logic

This proof takes the disproof direction: the claim is shown to be false by assembling authoritative neuroscience sources that explicitly reject it.

**Neurologist Barry Gordon** of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, quoted in Scientific American, called the "10 percent myth" so wrong it is "almost laughable" (B1). He states that humans "use virtually every part of the brain" and that "the brain is active almost all the time."

**MIT's McGovern Institute for Brain Research** states directly that "the idea that we use 10 percent of our brain is 100 percent a myth" (B2). They note that the brain consumes 20 percent of the body's calories despite making up only two percent of body weight — an enormous metabolic cost that would make no evolutionary sense if 90% of the brain were idle. They further note that "even while we sleep, our entire brain remains intensely active."

**Eric Chudler's Neuroscience For Kids** at the University of Washington states: "There is no scientific evidence to suggest that we use only 10% of our brains" (B3). The page notes that functional brain imaging studies show all parts of the brain function, even during sleep.

All three sources were independently verified — their quotes were confirmed present on the cited pages via live HTTP fetch with full-quote matching (A1). The sources are from different institutions with no organizational overlap: a major science publication quoting a Johns Hopkins neurologist (B1), an MIT research institute (B2), and a University of Washington neuroscience education resource (B3).

*Source: author analysis*

## What could challenge this verdict?

Three adversarial angles were investigated:

1. **Any peer-reviewed support for the 10% claim?** An extensive search found no peer-reviewed neuroscience study supporting the claim. Every neuroscience source consulted explicitly labels it a myth. Brain imaging (fMRI, PET) consistently shows activity throughout the entire brain, even during sleep.

2. **Could the 10% refer to neurons vs. glial cells?** Roughly 10% of brain cells are neurons, but the claim refers to "using" the brain (active regions), not cell-type composition. Additionally, glial cells are functionally active — they support neuronal function and participate in signaling.

3. **Could William James's 1907 quote support the claim literally?** James wrote about human potential metaphorically ("a small part of our possible mental and physical resources"), not about brain physiology. He never stated 10%, and his work predates functional brain imaging by decades.

None of these adversarial checks produced credible support for the claim.

*Source: proof.py JSON summary*

## Conclusion

**Verdict: DISPROVED.** Three independent, authoritative neuroscience sources — Scientific American (quoting a Johns Hopkins neurologist), MIT's McGovern Institute for Brain Research, and the University of Washington — each explicitly reject the claim that humans use only 10% of their brain. All three citations were fully verified (quotes confirmed on source pages). No peer-reviewed evidence supporting the 10% claim was found. Brain imaging studies consistently demonstrate that the entire brain is active, even during rest and sleep.

*Source: proof.py JSON summary*

---

Generated by [proof-engine](https://github.com/yaniv-golan/proof-engine) v1.16.0 on 2026-04-15.
