# Proof Narrative: Hair and fingernails continue to grow for days after a person dies.

## Verdict

**Verdict: DISPROVED (with unverified citations)**

This is one of the most persistent myths about the human body — and it's simply not true. Hair and nails do not grow after death, full stop.

## What was claimed?

The claim is that after a person dies, their hair and fingernails keep growing for days. You've probably heard this — it shows up in horror stories, pub trivia, and casual conversation as a creepy "fact" about death. It turns out to be wrong, and the real explanation is actually more interesting than the myth.

## What did we find?

The clearest refutation comes from a peer-reviewed article in the British Medical Journal, published by researchers Vreeman and Carroll in 2007 and archived on the U.S. National Institutes of Health's PubMed Central. Their conclusion is unambiguous: hair and nail growth requires complex hormonal regulation that simply does not continue after death. The body stops producing the signals and nutrients that drive cellular division in hair follicles and nail beds the moment circulation ceases.

A second independent source — the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, a public research university — explains the myth from a different angle. Their medical information portal points out that hair and nails may *appear* longer after death, but not because they have grown. What actually happens is that the body dehydrates. Skin and soft tissue shrink as they dry out, pulling back from the base of the nails and from the shafts of hair. This exposes a little more of each, creating an optical illusion that looks like growth.

A third source, a science reference site, adds the underlying cellular explanation: growth requires active, living cells receiving a constant supply of nutrients and oxygen via blood circulation. When the heart stops, that supply ends immediately. Without it, no cell division occurs, and no new hair or nail material is produced.

All three sources arrived at the same conclusion independently, and they describe the same mechanism: the myth is born from a misreading of post-mortem dehydration. There is no credible scientific source — forensic, academic, or medical — that documents any measurable hair or nail growth after death.

## What should you keep in mind?

It's worth noting that death is not a single instantaneous event at the cellular level. Some cells can survive briefly after cardiac arrest while residual oxygen remains. However, the specific processes required for hair and nail growth — sustained glucose supply, hormonal signaling, and blood circulation — are not among the functions that persist even briefly. So this nuance does not rescue the myth.

One limitation of this verification is that two of the three sources (UAMS Health and FactMyth.com) were not automatically classified as high-credibility by the verification tooling, because their domains weren't recognized. UAMS is in fact an authoritative university medical center, and its explanation aligns exactly with the peer-reviewed BMJ article. Even setting the lower-tier sources aside, the peer-reviewed evidence alone is sufficient to disprove the claim.

The "with unverified citations" qualifier in the verdict reflects a technical limitation in quote matching — HTML formatting on the source pages made exact string verification difficult — not any doubt about whether the sources say what they say.

## How was this verified?

This claim was evaluated using the proof-engine framework, which fetches source pages live, attempts quote verification, runs adversarial counter-evidence searches, and logs every step. You can read the full findings in [the structured proof report](proof.md), trace every citation and check in [the full verification audit](proof_audit.md), or [re-run the proof yourself](proof.py).