import Link from 'next/link';
import { ArrowLeft, Calendar, Clock } from 'lucide-react';

export const metadata = {
  title: "AI Governance for API Teams: Gateway Policy, Not Just Routing",
  description: "API teams need AI governance for budgets, permissions, and Evidence Packs — not just routing. Learn where traditional API management falls short.",
  alternates: { canonical: 'https://satgate.io/blog/ai-governance-api-teams' },
  keywords: ['AI governance API teams', 'API governance AI agents', 'AI API management', 'API team governance', 'AI agent policy enforcement', 'API governance framework'],
  openGraph: {
    title: 'AI Governance for API Teams: Gateway Policy, Not Just Routing',
    description: 'API teams need AI governance for budgets, permissions, revocation, and Evidence Packs — not just gateway routing.',
    url: 'https://satgate.io/blog/ai-governance-api-teams',
    type: 'article',
    publishedTime: '2026-03-19T00:00:00Z',
  },
  twitter: {
    card: 'summary_large_image',
    title: 'AI Governance for API Teams: Gateway Policy, Not Just Routing',
    description: 'Learn how API teams can enforce AI agent budgets, permissions, audit, revocation, and request-path policy.',
  },
};

export default function AiGovernanceApiTeamsBlogPage() {
  const articleJsonLd = {
    '@context': 'https://schema.org',
    '@type': 'TechArticle',
    headline: 'AI Governance for API Teams: Why Your Gateway Needs Policy, Not Just Routing',
    description: 'API teams need AI governance for budgets, permissions, and Evidence Packs — not just routing. Learn where traditional API management falls short.',
    url: 'https://satgate.io/blog/ai-governance-api-teams',
    datePublished: '2026-03-19',
    dateModified: '2026-05-04',
    author: { '@type': 'Organization', name: 'SatGate' },
    publisher: { '@type': 'Organization', name: 'SatGate', url: 'https://satgate.io' },
    about: [
      { '@type': 'Thing', name: 'AI governance for API teams' },
      { '@type': 'Thing', name: 'AI API management' },
      { '@type': 'Thing', name: 'agent policy enforcement' },
      { '@type': 'Thing', name: 'request-path API governance' },
    ],
  };

  const faqJsonLd = {
    '@context': 'https://schema.org',
    '@type': 'FAQPage',
    mainEntity: [
      {
        '@type': 'Question',
        name: 'What does AI governance mean for API teams?',
        acceptedAnswer: {
          '@type': 'Answer',
          text: 'For API teams, AI governance means enforcing who can call an API, what each agent can spend, which tools or routes are allowed, when access should be revoked, and how every autonomous request is audited.',
        },
      },
      {
        '@type': 'Question',
        name: 'Why is routing not enough for AI API governance?',
        acceptedAnswer: {
          '@type': 'Answer',
          text: 'Routing moves traffic to the right upstream service, but it does not decide whether an autonomous agent is allowed to spend money, use a high-risk tool, exceed a workflow budget, or delegate access to a sub-agent.',
        },
      },
      {
        '@type': 'Question',
        name: 'Where should API teams enforce AI agent policy?',
        acceptedAnswer: {
          '@type': 'Answer',
          text: 'API teams should enforce AI agent policy in the request path at an economic firewall, gateway, or MCP proxy so budget, permission, revocation, and audit checks happen before upstream work executes.',
        },
      },
    ],
  };

  return (
    <div className="min-h-screen bg-black text-gray-100 font-sans">
      <script type="application/ld+json" dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: JSON.stringify(articleJsonLd) }} />
      <script type="application/ld+json" dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html: JSON.stringify(faqJsonLd) }} />
      <div className="max-w-3xl mx-auto px-6 py-16">
        <Link href="/blog" className="text-gray-500 hover:text-white flex items-center gap-2 transition mb-8">
          <ArrowLeft size={18} /> Back to Blog
        </Link>
        
        <header className="mb-12">
          <div className="flex flex-wrap gap-2 mb-4">
            <span className="px-2 py-1 rounded-full bg-purple-900/30 border border-purple-500/30 text-purple-300 text-xs font-mono">Governance</span>
            <span className="px-2 py-1 rounded-full bg-cyan-900/30 border border-cyan-500/30 text-cyan-300 text-xs font-mono">API Teams</span>
            <span className="px-2 py-1 rounded-full bg-yellow-900/30 border border-yellow-500/30 text-yellow-300 text-xs font-mono">Policy Enforcement</span>
          </div>
          
          <h1 className="text-4xl font-bold mb-4">AI Governance for API Teams: Why Your Gateway Needs Policy, Not Just Routing</h1>
          
          <p className="text-xl text-gray-400 mb-6 italic">
            Your API gateway routes traffic beautifully. But when AI agents are the consumers, routing without governance is a blank check.
          </p>
          
          <div className="flex items-center gap-4 text-sm text-gray-500">
            <span className="flex items-center gap-1"><Calendar size={14} /> March 19, 2026</span>
            <span className="flex items-center gap-1"><Clock size={14} /> 10 min read</span>
          </div>
        </header>

        <article className="prose prose-invert prose-lg max-w-none">
          
          <p className="text-gray-300 text-lg leading-relaxed">
            API teams have spent a decade perfecting their craft. Rate limiting, authentication, versioning, documentation, developer portals — the playbook is mature. Then AI agents showed up and broke all of it.
          </p>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            Not because the tools stopped working. They still route traffic, validate tokens, and enforce rate limits. The problem is subtler: <strong className="text-white">the tools were designed for human developers who read docs, respect quotas, and submit support tickets when something breaks.</strong> AI agents do none of these things.
          </p>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            An AI agent doesn't read your API documentation. It discovers endpoints through tool definitions or schema introspection. It doesn't respect implicit social contracts about "reasonable usage." It optimizes for its objective, and if that means making 10,000 API calls in a minute, it will — unless something physically stops it.
          </p>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            This is the governance gap that API teams are facing right now. And most don't realize it until the first invoice arrives.
          </p>

          <h2 className="text-2xl font-bold text-white mt-12 mb-4">What "AI Governance" Actually Means for API Teams</h2>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            Let's be specific. "AI governance" has become a catch-all term that usually means "we wrote a responsible AI policy and published it on our website." That's not what API teams need.
          </p>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            For API teams, AI governance means answering four operational questions:
          </p>

          <ol className="text-gray-300 space-y-3">
            <li><strong className="text-white">Who is calling?</strong> Not which API key — which agent, acting on behalf of which user, with what level of authority?</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">What are they allowed to spend?</strong> Not requests per second — dollars per hour, per agent, per tool.</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">What happens when they exceed limits?</strong> Not a 429 retry loop — a structured denial with budget context the agent can reason about.</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Who's accountable?</strong> Not "the AI team" — which specific workflow, agent, and user generated this cost?</li>
          </ol>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            Traditional API management tools answer question one (authentication) and partially answer question three (rate limiting). Questions two and four — the economic questions — are completely unaddressed.
          </p>

          <h2 className="text-2xl font-bold text-white mt-12 mb-4">The Zuplo Problem: Great DX, Missing Economics</h2>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            Take a modern API gateway like Zuplo. It's excellent at what it does: edge-deployed API management with TypeScript policies, OpenAPI-native design, and developer-friendly configuration. For human-to-API traffic, it's a strong choice.
          </p>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            But examine what happens when an AI agent consumes an API through Zuplo:
          </p>

          <ul className="text-gray-300 space-y-2">
            <li><strong className="text-white">Rate limiting?</strong> Yes — requests per window. But an agent making 50 requests per minute might cost $0.50 or $500, depending on the payload. Rate limits don't understand cost.</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Authentication?</strong> Yes — API keys, JWT, OAuth. But an API key grants binary access: you're in or you're out. There's no concept of "you can call this endpoint 100 more times before your budget runs out."</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Monetization?</strong> Some gateways support usage-based billing. But billing happens after the fact. The agent already consumed the resources. You're sending an invoice, not enforcing a limit.</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Attribution?</strong> You know which API key made the call. But when one key serves an orchestrator that spawns sub-agents, you can't trace costs back to the originating workflow.</li>
          </ul>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            This isn't a criticism of Zuplo specifically — it's the state of the entire API gateway category. Kong, Gravitee, Apigee, Tyk — they all share the same blind spot. They were built for a world where the API consumer is a developer writing code, not an autonomous agent making real-time economic decisions.
          </p>

          <h2 className="text-2xl font-bold text-white mt-12 mb-4">Five Governance Capabilities API Teams Need Now</h2>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            Here's what the shift to agent consumers demands from your API infrastructure:
          </p>

          <h3 className="text-xl font-bold text-white mt-8 mb-3">1. Budget-Aware Authentication</h3>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            API keys are binary: valid or invalid. AI governance requires credentials that carry economic context. When an agent authenticates, the gateway should know not just <em>who</em> they are, but <em>how much</em> they're authorized to spend.
          </p>

          <pre className="bg-gray-900/70 border border-gray-800 rounded-lg p-4 overflow-x-auto text-sm my-6">
            <code className="text-green-300">{`# Traditional API key: binary access
Authorization: Bearer sk-abc123
→ Valid? Yes → Allow all requests

# Budget-aware token: economic context
Authorization: Bearer macaroon_v1_agent42_budget500
→ Valid? Yes
→ Remaining budget? 340 credits
→ This endpoint costs? 15 credits
→ Allow? Yes (325 remaining after this call)`}</code>
          </pre>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            This is the difference between a door key and a prepaid card. Both grant access. Only one controls spending.
          </p>

          <h3 className="text-xl font-bold text-white mt-8 mb-3">2. Per-Endpoint Cost Modeling</h3>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            Not all API calls are equal. A <code>/search</code> endpoint that queries a vector database costs different than a <code>/generate</code> endpoint that invokes GPT-4o. Your governance layer needs to understand the economic weight of each endpoint.
          </p>

          <pre className="bg-gray-900/70 border border-gray-800 rounded-lg p-4 overflow-x-auto text-sm my-6">
            <code className="text-green-300">{`endpoints:
  /api/search:
    cost: 2 credits
    description: "Vector similarity search"
  /api/generate:
    cost: 15 credits
    description: "LLM text generation"
  /api/generate/image:
    cost: 50 credits
    description: "Image generation"
  /api/embed:
    cost: 1 credit
    description: "Text embedding"`}</code>
          </pre>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            With cost modeling in place, an agent with 100 credits can make 50 search calls, or 6 generation calls, or 2 image generations. The agent decides how to allocate. The gateway enforces the ceiling.
          </p>

          <h3 className="text-xl font-bold text-white mt-8 mb-3">3. Hierarchical Delegation</h3>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            Modern AI architectures are multi-agent. An orchestrator delegates tasks to specialized agents, which may delegate further. Without hierarchical governance, you get one of two bad outcomes:
          </p>

          <ul className="text-gray-300 space-y-2">
            <li><strong className="text-white">Shared credentials:</strong> All agents use the same API key. No attribution, no individual limits. One rogue agent burns the entire team's budget.</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Credential sprawl:</strong> Each agent gets its own API key with separate limits. But there's no relationship between them. The orchestrator can't control how much budget flows downstream.</li>
          </ul>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            What you actually need is delegation with attenuation. The orchestrator has 10,000 credits. It mints a sub-token for each worker agent: 2,000 credits for research, 1,000 for summarization, 500 for formatting. Each sub-token is cryptographically derived from the parent — you can always trace the chain of authority. And the total can never exceed the parent's allocation.
          </p>

          <pre className="bg-gray-900/70 border border-gray-800 rounded-lg p-4 overflow-x-auto text-sm my-6">
            <code className="text-green-300">{`# Orchestrator mints delegated tokens
satgate mint --parent orchestrator_token \\
  --budget 2000 \\
  --holder "research-agent" \\
  --tools "search:2,generate:15"

satgate mint --parent orchestrator_token \\
  --budget 1000 \\
  --holder "summarizer-agent" \\
  --tools "generate:15,embed:1"

# Each sub-agent operates within its slice
# Total delegation ≤ parent budget
# Full Evidence Pack from leaf to root`}</code>
          </pre>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            This is how capability-based security works in operating systems. It's the same principle applied to API economics: authority flows downward, always diminishing, never escalating.
          </p>

          <h3 className="text-xl font-bold text-white mt-8 mb-3">4. Structured Denial (HTTP 402)</h3>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            When an agent exceeds its rate limit today, it gets HTTP 429: Too Many Requests. What does it do? It retries. And retries. And retries. Because 429 means "try again later" — there's no semantic content about <em>why</em> the request was denied or what the agent should do differently.
          </p>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            Economic governance uses HTTP 402: Payment Required. This status code has existed since HTTP/1.1 but was "reserved for future use." The future is here.
          </p>

          <pre className="bg-gray-900/70 border border-gray-800 rounded-lg p-4 overflow-x-auto text-sm my-6">
            <code className="text-green-300">{`HTTP/1.1 402 Payment Required
Content-Type: application/json

{
  "error": "budget_exhausted",
  "remaining_credits": 3,
  "required_credits": 15,
  "cheapest_alternative": {
    "endpoint": "/api/generate",
    "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
    "cost": 1
  },
  "request_more": "https://api.example.com/budget/topup"
}`}</code>
          </pre>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            Now the agent has actionable information. It can switch to a cheaper model. It can request more budget from its parent. It can gracefully inform the user. What it won't do is retry blindly — because the response tells it exactly what the problem is and what the options are.
          </p>

          <h3 className="text-xl font-bold text-white mt-8 mb-3">5. Real-Time Cost Attribution</h3>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            The governance loop isn't complete without attribution. When the platform team asks "why did API costs jump 300% last week," you need precision:
          </p>

          <div className="bg-gray-900/70 border border-gray-800 rounded-lg p-6 my-6">
            <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed mb-3">
              <strong className="text-red-400">Before governance:</strong> "API usage increased. We're investigating."
            </p>
            <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed mb-0">
              <strong className="text-green-400">After governance:</strong> "Team Alpha's research-agent-v3 consumed 42,000 credits on Tuesday. It got stuck in a retry loop calling /api/generate with malformed prompts. The agent hit its daily budget cap at 2:14 PM, preventing further spend. Without the cap, projected spend was $8,400."
            </p>
          </div>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            That second answer turns a cost incident into a process improvement. You know the team, the agent, the endpoint, the failure mode, and the counterfactual. That's governance — not just knowing what happened, but having the infrastructure to prevent it and the data to fix it.
          </p>

          <h2 className="text-2xl font-bold text-white mt-12 mb-4">The Organizational Gap</h2>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            There's a human problem underneath the technical one. In most organizations, three groups are involved in AI API governance, and none of them own it:
          </p>

          <ul className="text-gray-300 space-y-3">
            <li><strong className="text-white">The AI/ML team</strong> builds agents and cares about capability. They want agents to have access to everything. Budget limits feel like friction.</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">The platform/API team</strong> manages infrastructure and cares about reliability. They set rate limits and manage API keys. But they don't understand agent economics.</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Finance</strong> cares about costs but has zero visibility into what agents are doing. They see a line item: "AI API costs: $47,000." That's all they get.</li>
          </ul>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            AI governance for API teams bridges these groups. The platform team manages the gateway policies. The AI team operates within budget allocations. Finance gets real-time attribution. Everyone has the levers they need without stepping on each other.
          </p>

          <pre className="bg-gray-900/70 border border-gray-800 rounded-lg p-4 overflow-x-auto text-sm my-6">
            <code className="text-green-300">{`# Platform team: define governance policy
policies:
  team-alpha:
    daily_budget: 5000
    agents:
      research-agent:
        budget: 2000
        tools: [search, generate, embed]
      support-agent:
        budget: 1000
        tools: [search, generate]
    alerts:
      - threshold: 80%
        notify: [platform-team, team-alpha-lead]

# Finance: query cost attribution
GET /api/governance/costs?period=2026-03-01..2026-03-19
→ team-alpha: 62,400 credits ($3,120)
→ team-beta: 28,100 credits ($1,405)
→ team-gamma: 14,300 credits ($715)`}</code>
          </pre>

          <h2 className="text-2xl font-bold text-white mt-12 mb-4">Implementation: Gateway-Layer vs Application-Layer</h2>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            API teams face a choice: implement governance in each agent's application code, or enforce it at the gateway layer. This shouldn't be a hard decision, but it's worth spelling out why.
          </p>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            <strong className="text-white">Application-layer governance</strong> means every agent team writes budget-tracking code. They check remaining budget before calls, decrement counters, handle exhaustion gracefully. This works for one agent. For fifty agents across ten teams, it's a nightmare. Every team implements it differently. Some forget. Some have bugs. The budget tracking is only as reliable as the least careful team.
          </p>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            <strong className="text-white">Gateway-layer governance</strong> means the budget enforcement happens in the infrastructure, before the request reaches the backend. Agents don't need to know about budgets. They make API calls. The gateway allows or denies based on policy. One implementation, uniformly enforced, impossible to bypass.
          </p>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            It's the same argument as TLS termination, authentication, and rate limiting — all things that moved from application code to gateway infrastructure over the past decade. Economic governance is the next capability making that move.
          </p>

          <h2 className="text-2xl font-bold text-white mt-12 mb-4">What SatGate Adds to Your API Stack</h2>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            SatGate is an economic firewall that sits alongside your existing API gateway. It doesn't replace Zuplo, Kong, or whatever you're using for routing and authentication. It adds the governance layer they're missing:
          </p>

          <ul className="text-gray-300 space-y-2">
            <li><strong className="text-white">Macaroon-based tokens</strong> that carry budget context, expire automatically, and support hierarchical delegation</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Per-endpoint cost modeling</strong> so every API call has an economic weight</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Real-time budget enforcement</strong> — pre-call checks, not post-hoc billing</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">HTTP 402 responses</strong> that give agents structured denial with actionable alternatives</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Full Evidence Packs</strong> from agent leaf to orchestrator root</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">MCP-native support</strong> for teams building with the Model Context Protocol</li>
          </ul>

          <pre className="bg-gray-900/70 border border-gray-800 rounded-lg p-4 overflow-x-auto text-sm my-6">
            <code className="text-green-300">{`# Add economic governance to your existing API
# No changes to your agents or backend

# 1. Define your cost model
satgate init --costs "search:2,generate:15,embed:1,image:50"

# 2. Mint governance tokens for each team
satgate mint --budget 5000 --holder "team-alpha" --expires 24h

# 3. Point agents at the SatGate proxy
export API_BASE_URL=https://gateway.satgate.io/v1

# That's it. Budget enforcement is live.`}</code>
          </pre>

          <h2 className="text-2xl font-bold text-white mt-12 mb-4">The Governance Checklist for API Teams</h2>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            If your APIs are consumed by AI agents — or will be soon — here's a practical assessment:
          </p>

          <ol className="text-gray-300 space-y-3">
            <li><strong className="text-white">Can you attribute API costs to a specific agent and workflow?</strong> If not, you have a visibility gap. Start here.</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Can you set per-agent spending limits that enforce in real time?</strong> Not alerts — hard limits. If an agent hits zero, the next call returns 402, not 200.</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Can agents delegate access to sub-agents with reduced permissions?</strong> If every agent uses the same API key, you have a credential hygiene problem.</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Can you answer the CFO's question in under 5 minutes?</strong> When finance asks "why did AI API costs increase 40%," you should have team-level, agent-level, and endpoint-level breakdowns ready.</li>
            <li><strong className="text-white">Do your agents handle budget exhaustion gracefully?</strong> If they retry 429s forever, you need structured denials that agents can reason about.</li>
          </ol>

          <p className="text-gray-300 leading-relaxed">
            If you answered "no" to more than two of these, your API platform has a governance gap. The good news: it's fixable without rearchitecting your stack. Economic governance layers on top of your existing infrastructure.
          </p>

          <section className="not-prose mt-16 rounded-2xl border border-gray-800 bg-gray-950 p-8">
            <p className="mb-2 text-sm font-mono uppercase tracking-wide text-purple-300">FAQ</p>
            <h2 className="mb-6 text-2xl font-bold text-white">AI governance for API teams questions</h2>
            <div className="space-y-5">
              {[
                ['What does AI governance mean for API teams?', 'For API teams, AI governance means enforcing who can call an API, what each agent can spend, which tools or routes are allowed, when access should be revoked, and how every autonomous request is audited.'],
                ['Why is routing not enough for AI API governance?', 'Routing moves traffic to the right upstream service, but it does not decide whether an autonomous agent is allowed to spend money, use a high-risk tool, exceed a workflow budget, or delegate access to a sub-agent.'],
                ['Where should API teams enforce AI agent policy?', 'Enforce AI agent policy in the request path at an economic firewall, gateway, or MCP proxy so budget, permission, revocation, and audit checks happen before upstream work executes.'],
              ].map(([question, answer]) => (
                <div key={question} className="border-t border-gray-800 pt-5 first:border-t-0 first:pt-0">
                  <h3 className="mb-2 text-lg font-bold text-white">{question}</h3>
                  <p className="leading-relaxed text-gray-400">{answer}</p>
                </div>
              ))}
            </div>
          </section>

          <div className="mt-12 p-6 bg-gray-900/50 border border-gray-800 rounded-lg">
            <p className="text-gray-300 mb-4">
              SatGate is open-source economic governance for API teams. Add budget enforcement to your APIs in minutes:
            </p>
            <pre className="bg-gray-900/70 rounded p-3 text-sm overflow-x-auto">
              <code className="text-green-300">{`go install github.com/satgate-io/satgate/cmd/satgate-mcp@latest`}</code>
            </pre>
            <p className="text-gray-400 text-sm mt-3">
              <a href="https://github.com/SatGate-io/satgate" className="text-cyan-400 hover:text-cyan-300">GitHub →</a>
              {' · '}
              <a href="https://satgate.io/pricing" className="text-cyan-400 hover:text-cyan-300">Enterprise →</a>
            </p>
          </div>

        </article>

        <footer className="mt-16 pt-8 border-t border-gray-800 text-center">
          <Link href="/blog" className="text-gray-500 hover:text-white transition">
            ← Back to all posts
          </Link>
        </footer>
      </div>
    </div>
  );
}
