# Wave 132 — Review Pass 1 Sweep Summary

**Date:** 2026-05-08
**Reviewer:** Architect (review pass-1)
**Wave size:** 1 prompt
**Tolerance:** Convention #15 (relaxed) — 1 ⚠️ allowed on highest-risk prompt; only prompt in wave is treated as highest-risk.

## Verdicts

| Prompt | Verdict | Required | Recommended | Nits | Risk | Pass-2 ready after revision? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [AD-706 v1 — BrowserTool](./ad-706-browser-tool-v1-review.md) | ⚠️ Conditional | 1 | 3 | 2 | Medium | Yes |

**Wave totals:** 1 ⚠️ / 0 ✅ / 0 ❌. At tolerance, not over.

## On track for pass-2?

**Yes — single revision cycle.**
The lone Required item (D4/D6 contradiction on `tier_3_domain_patterns`) is a small config-field addition, not architectural rework. The Recommended items (token-flow specification, action boundary-test gap, optional DRY tightening of `_DomainRateState`) are all incremental. No deeper rework is required.

## Cross-prompt concerns

**N/A — single-prompt wave.**

## Phantom-API sweep at HEAD

All cited symbols verified present in the live codebase. Six dispatch contradictions surfaced during drafting (`ToolResult.data`, AD-451 SafetyClassifier, AD-561 Intervention reuse, missing `tool_intervention_required` event, `McpAppFrame` not-a-class, `_domain_state` reuse) were absorbed into the prompt's Verified-Against block and reflected in normative content. No phantoms remain in the prompt's implementation sections.

Spot-check evidence (full table in the AD-706 review):

- `protocol.py:14–22, 29–43, 69–80, 84` — `ToolType`, `ToolPermission`, `ToolResult`, `Tool` Protocol all present and shaped as the prompt asserts.
- `registry.py:92–122` — `ToolRegistry.register(...)` signature matches every kwarg the wirer (D7) passes.
- `executor.py:69, 123, 148` — `ToolExecutor.invoke()` → `registry.check_and_invoke()` → `make_audit_hook` emits `EventType.TOOL_INVOKED`. D5's claim that `BrowserTool` does not need to double-emit is correct.
- `security/audit.py:67` — `AuditLog.append(*, category, detail)` matches.
- `agents/http_fetch.py:23, 80` — `DomainRateState` (no underscore) and `_domain_state: ClassVar[...]` confirmed; the prompt's local `_DomainRateState` is a deliberate redefinition.
- `events.py:196–197` — `TOOL_PERMISSION_DENIED`, `TOOL_INVOKED` confirmed; no pre-existing `TOOL_INTERVENTION_REQUIRED` or `BROWSER_*` (correctly introduced new in D7).
- `config.py:3000, 3014` — `validation_framework` and `mcp_app_host` insertion points confirmed.
- `finalize.py:80, 105, 963, 2296, 3214` — `_wire_creative_expression`, `_wire_classification_gate`, `_wire_mcp_app_host` (def + call site) confirmed; `runtime.audit_log` initialization confirmed.
- `runtime.py:1747` — `self.tool_registry = comm.tool_registry` confirmed.
- `cognitive/counselor.py:123` — `InterventionType` is Counselor-scoped enum, NOT a generic action-tier classifier; prompt correctly ships its own.
- `pyproject.toml:47` — `[project.optional-dependencies]` block exists with `dev`/`discord`/`slack`/`copilot`; `playwright` correctly absent. New `[browser]` group is additive.

One drift to note: D7 references the AD-697 extension dispatcher block at "line ~3828" — `_wire_mcp_app_host` call site is actually finalize.py:3214 in HEAD. Flagged as a Nit in the prompt review (line numbers shift; the relative ordering "after `_wire_mcp_app_host`" is what matters).

## Builder dispatch readiness

After the AD-706 author addresses the 1 Required item (and ideally the 3 Recommended items), the prompt is ready for review pass-2. No working-tree integrity issues observed during this review (no architect-authored source/test changes pending).

## Files written this pass

- `prompts/Reviews/ad-706-browser-tool-v1-review.md`
- `prompts/Reviews/README-wave-132-pass-1.md` (this file)

No code, tests, prompt body, `wave-plan.yaml`, `BUILDER-EXECUTION-PLAN.md`, or `DECISIONS.md` were modified.
