# Review: AD-765 — Yeo gap-doc reconciliation audit
**Verdict:** ✅ Approved
**Doc-only audit; scope is well-bounded.**

## Required (must fix before building)
*(none)*

## Recommended
1. Output filename includes a date (`yeo-gap-reconciliation-2026-05-20.md`). Acceptable — but if the audit slides by a day, the filename should NOT be retroactively edited. State the build-date convention explicitly: "filename frozen at `2026-05-20` regardless of actual landing date."
2. The four §4 spot-checks already match my own verify-first pre-flight intuition. Add `autoApproveReadOnly` to the spot-check list with a note that `proactive_scan` and `outlook_read_inbox` etc. are `requires_consensus=False` today — verify this is the same primitive the gap doc means by `autoApproveReadOnly`, or whether the doc envisions an explicit tag/policy that doesn't exist.

## Nits
- §3 child-AD draft format is good. Suggest adding "License disposition: OSS / commercial-only / pattern-absorption" as a fifth field in case any gap-doc item touches paid-license deps.
- The "do NOT file the child ADs itself — that's a follow-up wave's job" rule is the right shape for scope discipline. Keep it bold.

## Verified
- Gap doc lives in the private commercial repo (per "Notes for the auditor"). Boundary respected — no leakage into OSS prompts. ✓
- `AD-749..AD-757 + AD-758` are real wave-181 deliverables (verified via wave-plan history). ✓
- `AD-697/AD-698` (OSS-vs-commercial boundary ADs) are real. ✓
- No phantom symbols (precheck clean). ✓
- AD-763 (#709) and AD-764 (#710) referenced as "already-filed downstream gap-doc-derived ADs" — AD-763 is in this wave, AD-764 confirmed filed (issue #710 exists). ✓

## Re-review (2026-05-20)
No revisions required. Recommended items left for auditor discretion. **Ready for GATE 1.**
