ThumbGate Verification evidence
integration | claude code feedback memory

# Claude Code Feedback Memory That Actually Enforces

Claude Code can remember more when the memory is structured, but reliability improves when thumbs-up/down feedback also becomes enforceable behavior. That is ThumbGate's angle.

👍 Thumbs up reinforces good behavior
👎 Thumbs down blocks repeated mistakes

## Why this page exists

- Claude Code users usually feel the pain as repeated mistakes across sessions.
- ThumbGate captures the thumbs-up/down signal and turns it into memory, rules, and gates.
- The page should convert Claude Code searchers into a product trial or a comparison-page reader.

## The Claude Code problem

Claude Code is strongest when the context is fresh, but teams still hit repeated mistakes, compaction drift, and re-explaining constraints. A memory file alone helps, but it does not physically stop the next bad move.

## The ThumbGate angle

- Thumbs up reinforces good behavior.
- Thumbs down becomes a prevention rule.
- Pre-action gates stop the repeated mistake before the next command executes.
- The same flow works across Cursor, Codex, Gemini, Amp, and OpenCode.

## What to show on this page

Compatibility proof, install speed, and verification evidence matter more than generic "memory" copy. The buyer should leave knowing that ThumbGate is the enforcement layer for Claude Code, not just another notebook of past context.

## FAQ

Does this only work with Claude Code?

No. Claude Code is a strong entry point, but the same thumbs-up/down feedback loop and pre-action checks work across other MCP-compatible coding agents too.

Why mention thumbs up as well as thumbs down?

Because reinforcement matters. Good behavior should become easier to repeat, not only bad behavior harder to repeat.