# LinkedIn Post -- Workflow Hardening Sprint

## Long-Form Founder Post

```md
# One Workflow Safe Enough to Ship Beats Generic AI Hype

I think most teams are selling the wrong story for AI coding tools.

They are trying to sell an **AI employee**.
What buyers actually need is **one workflow that stops repeating the same mistake**.

That is a workflow hardening problem.

The failure is not just forgetting.
It is repeated mistakes across sessions, repos, and teams.

The sellable unit is not a generic agent.
It is:

- one workflow
- one owner
- one proof review

That is why our front-line offer is a **Workflow Hardening Sprint**.

What actually helps is a loop:

1. Capture what failed or worked
2. Validate whether it is specific enough to keep
3. Retrieve the right lesson on the next task
4. Turn repeated failures into prevention rules
5. Prove the result with tests and verification

That is very different from just appending another note to `MEMORY.md` or promising that the model will magically self-correct.

The buyer conversation becomes much simpler:

- What is the workflow?
- What keeps breaking?
- What proof would make wider rollout easier?

If you already have one Claude-first workflow with business value, that is usually enough to start.

If you are using **Claude Code**, **Codex**, **Cursor**, **Replit**, or **Orchids**, I am curious:

**Which workflow still is not safe enough to ship team-wide?**

That is the conversation I want to have more often.
```

## First Comment

```text
Workflow Hardening Sprint intake + proof pack:

https://thumbgate-production.up.railway.app/?utm_source=linkedin&utm_medium=organic_social&utm_campaign=claude_workflow_hardening_march_2026&utm_content=founder_post&campaign_variant=workflow_hardening_sprint&offer_code=LINKEDIN-SPRINT#workflow-sprint-intake
```

## Carousel Caption

```text
It is not a generic AI employee pitch.
It is one workflow with memory, gates, and proof.

Feedback -> retrieval -> prevention rules -> verification.

Local-first. Auditable. Built for Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and agent-heavy engineering workflows.
```

## Carousel Slide Copy

### Slide 1

- Headline: Workflow Hardening Sprint
- Body: Make one workflow safe enough to ship.
- Footer: Feedback. Retrieval. Prevention rules. Verification.

### Slide 2

- Headline: The problem is repeated mistakes
- Body: Agents repeat the same operational mistakes even when the repo docs exist.
- Footer: Persistence is not behavior change.

### Slide 3

- Headline: The loop
- Body: Capture feedback. Validate it. Retrieve the right lesson. Generate prevention rules. Verify the result.
- Footer: Build -> learn -> verify -> improve

### Slide 4

- Headline: Best first buyers
- Body: Consultancies, platform teams, AI product teams
- Footer: One workflow. One owner. One proof review.

### Slide 5

- Headline: Best first workflows
- Body: Code modernization, PR review hardening, internal ops
- Footer: Move from vibe-based agent usage to auditable reliability.

### Slide 6

- Headline: Less AI hype. More proof.
- Body: The winning offer is one workflow with memory, gates, and a proof pack.
- Footer: ThumbGate
