# v2.6 Milestone Audit

Status: passed

## Scope Closed

- Phase `180`: Staged-L2 Review Advancement Rule
- Phase `180.1`: Public Post-Review Route Advancement
- Phase `180.2`: Fresh Post-Review Advancement Replay Proof

## Requirements Coverage

Score: `4/4` requirements satisfied

- `PRA-01` satisfied by Phase `180` through queue materialization that no
  longer leaves the topic on the static staged-L2 review summary once a later
  `continue` arrives.
- `PRA-02` satisfied by Phase `180` through the new bounded route
  `Consult the topic-local staged L2 memory and choose one bounded candidate before deeper execution.`
- `PRA-03` satisfied by Phase `180.1` through public `next` and `status`
  alignment on that post-review consultation step.
- `PRA-04` satisfied by Phase `180.2` through one isolated replay packet that
  proves the same fresh topic advances beyond staged-L2 review after a later
  benign `continue`.

## Verification Evidence

- Phase `180` queue advancement:
  - `pytest-queue-advancement.txt`: `1 passed, 86 deselected in 0.18s`
- Phase `180.1` public route advancement:
  - `receipt.md`: public `next` and `status` both advance to
    `Consult the topic-local staged L2 memory and choose one bounded candidate before deeper execution.`
- Phase `180.2` replay proof:
  - `pytest-advancement-acceptance.txt`: `1 passed, 86 deselected in 7.91s`
  - `staged-l2-advancement-acceptance.json`: public `next` and `status` both
    surface the same advanced bounded route on the same fresh topic

## Cross-Phase Integration

- Phase `180` first turned staged-L2 review from a terminal static summary into
  one bounded post-review consultation route.
- Phase `180.1` then proved that public `next` and `status` expose that same
  advanced route rather than the old staged review summary.
- Phase `180.2` closed the milestone with one durable replay packet so the
  first post-review route change is mechanically reproducible.

## Audit Notes

- This milestone stayed narrow: it closes the first advancement beyond
  staged-L2 review, not candidate selection or deeper execution.
- No unsatisfied requirement remains in the `v2.6` traceability table.
- The new baseline now reaches bounded topic-local staged-memory consultation
  without pretending that candidate choice is already closed.

## Accepted Open Gaps

- Once `consultation_followup` becomes the selected route, the loop still
  lacked an executable consultation-followup handler and could stall on a
  visible-but-non-executable next action.
- The same fresh topic had not yet been proven to record a durable consultation
  receipt, choose one bounded staged candidate, and advance `next` / `status`
  onto that candidate-specific follow-up.
