# Roadmap: v1.99 LibRPA QSGW Positive L0 To L2 Closure

## Result

Milestone in progress.

## Phases

- [x] **Phase 173: LibRPA QSGW Bounded Target And Trust Contract** *(Axis 1 + Axis 2)*
- [x] **Phase 173.1: LibRPA QSGW Positive Promotion To Authoritative L2** *(Axis 2 + Axis 4)*
- [x] **Phase 173.2: LibRPA QSGW Replay And Three-Lane Convergence Closure** *(Axis 4 + Axis 5)*

## Target Outcome

- one fresh public-front-door `first_principles` topic lands one bounded
  positive `LibRPA QSGW` unit in canonical `L2`
- one explicit codebase, workflow, and benchmark/convergence contract proves
  that bounded target is honest enough for promotion
- compiled `L2` and `consult-l2` expose the positive `LibRPA QSGW` landing
  with provenance intact
- the milestone closes with replay receipts and explicit convergence notes for
  the formal-theory, toy-model, and first-principles baselines

## Next Step

Run milestone lifecycle: audit, complete, and archive `v1.99`.

### Phase 173: LibRPA QSGW Bounded Target And Trust Contract

**Axis:** Axis 1 (layer capability) + Axis 2 (inter-layer connection)

**Goal:** choose one bounded positive `LibRPA QSGW` target and prove it has an
honest codebase/workflow trust contract before any authoritative-L2 promotion
claim.

**Motivation:**

- the formal and toy-model baselines are now closed, so the remaining
  user-requested lane is the first-principles / large-codebase route
- `LibRPA QSGW` is the most concrete bounded target already named by the user
- the next step must pin one positive route instead of vaguely ingesting a
  whole codebase without a promotion target

**Requirements:**

- `REQ-QSGW-01`
- `REQ-QSGW-02`

**Depends on:** `v1.98`
**Plans:** 1 plan

Plans:

- [x] `173-01` Choose one bounded `LibRPA QSGW` positive target and close its
  codebase/workflow trust contract

### Phase 173.1: LibRPA QSGW Positive Promotion To Authoritative L2

**Axis:** Axis 2 (inter-layer connection) + Axis 4 (human evidence)

**Goal:** carry the trust-gated positive `LibRPA QSGW` target from the public
front door to one authoritative canonical `L2` unit.

**Motivation:**

- bounded codebase trust without promotion still leaves the third user
  research direction short of an authoritative-L2 closure
- the formal and toy-model lanes now prove the architecture can do this in
  other scientific regimes; the first-principles lane must now prove it on
  real code/workflow material

**Requirements:**

- `REQ-QSGW-03`
- `REQ-QSGW-04`

**Depends on:** Phase `173`
**Plans:** 1 plan

Plans:

- [x] `173.1-01` Promote one bounded positive `LibRPA QSGW` unit into
  authoritative canonical `L2` and prove compiled/read-path parity

### Phase 173.2: LibRPA QSGW Replay And Three-Lane Convergence Closure

**Axis:** Axis 4 (human evidence) + Axis 5 (agent-facing roadmap clarity)

**Goal:** close the positive `LibRPA QSGW` proof with replay receipts and make
the three requested research directions explicit as a new convergence baseline
for later real-topic natural-language testing.

**Motivation:**

- the third lane should close more strongly than bootstrap-only or chat-only
  claims
- once the QSGW lane is closed, AITP has bounded positive baselines in all
  three user-requested research directions

**Requirements:**

- `REQ-QSGW-04`
- `REQ-QSGW-05`

**Depends on:** Phase `173.1`
**Plans:** 1 plan

Plans:

- [x] `173.2-01` Replay the positive `LibRPA QSGW` proof and write the
  three-lane convergence closure
