# v2.3 Milestone Audit

Status: passed

## Scope Closed

- Phase `177`: Post-Registration Runtime State Coherence
- Phase `177.1`: Post-Registration Next-Action Reselection
- Phase `177.2`: Fresh First-Use Post-Registration Replay Proof

## Requirements Coverage

Score: `5/5` requirements satisfied

- `PRC-01` satisfied by Phase `177` through runtime-state refresh that writes
  back first-source presence into `topic_state` and `layer_status.L0`.
- `PRC-02` satisfied by Phase `177` through refreshed active-topic and
  current-topic projections that stay aligned with the repaired runtime state.
- `PRC-03` satisfied by Phase `177.1` through pruning stale bootstrap
  source-registration actions once a first source already exists.
- `PRC-04` satisfied by Phase `177.1` through post-registration queue
  regeneration and bounded fallback routing driven by durable runtime state.
- `PRC-05` satisfied by Phase `177.2` through one replayable fresh first-use
  lane that now proves both source-count coherence and non-stale next-action
  reselection.

## Verification Evidence

- Phase `177` runtime-state repair:
  - `pytest-runtime-state.txt`: focused post-registration state regression
  - `receipt.md`: persisted runtime-state coherence receipt
- Phase `177.1` route reselection:
  - `pytest-cli-e2e.txt`: first-use CLI E2E receipt for non-stale
    post-registration routing
  - `receipt.md`: post-registration next-action receipt
- Phase `177.2` replay closure:
  - `pytest-runtime-script.txt`: runtime-script replay receipt
  - `first-use-post-registration-replay.json`: raw replay packet
  - `receipt.md`: human-readable replay summary

## Cross-Phase Integration

- Phase `177` first removed the state contradiction where runtime surfaces still
  looked like zero-source topics after successful registration.
- Phase `177.1` then used that repaired state to regenerate the bounded next
  action instead of leaving the operator on the stale L0 handoff.
- Phase `177.2` replayed the combined route so the milestone closes on
  mechanical evidence rather than a claim assembled from unit fixes alone.

## Audit Notes

- This audit follows the same convention as `v2.1` and `v2.2`: requirements are
  checked against phase `SUMMARY.md` artifacts plus fresh replay receipts.
- No unsatisfied requirement remains in the `v2.3` traceability table.
- The milestone stayed honest: it repaired post-registration route coherence,
  not the broader first L1->L2 follow-through after that route becomes
  available.

## Accepted Open Gaps

- The first post-registration `literature_intake_stage` follow-through had not
  yet been proven to advance cleanly after it executes once.
- `v2.3` did not yet prove that the fresh-topic lane can surface staged `L2`
  review or topic-local staged consultation hits after the first
  post-registration action lands.
